Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-13400F vs Intel Core i9-9900T

Intel Core i5-13400F

► remove from comparison Intel i5-13400F

The Intel Core i5-13400F is a mid-range desktop processor of the Raptor Lake series. It includes a hybrid architecture for the CPU cores with combined 10 cores. Six fast Golden Cove / Raptor Cove performance cores (P-cores) with HyperThreading and a clock speed of 3.5 - 5.1 GHz and four Gracemont efficiency cores without HyperThreading and a clock speed of 2.6 - 3.9 GHz. The 13400F can be based on the older Alder Lake chips (at least for early models) or the newer Raptor Lake chips. The F-series of CPUs do not integrate a iGPU.

The performance is clearly higher than the old Core i5-12400F due to the additional four E-cores. These help in multi-threaded workloads and the higher boost core of the p-cores help for single threaded workloads.

The power consumption of the 13400F is rated at 65 Watt for sustained workloads (PL1) and 148 Watt for short bursts (PL2).

Intel Core i9-9900T

► remove from comparison Intel i9-9900T

The Intel Core i9-9900T is a high end power efficient desktop processor based on the Coffee Lake architecture. Compared to the similar named top model Core i9-9900K, the 9900T offers lower clock speeds (2.1 - 4.4 GHz versus 3.6 - 5 GHz) and a reduced TDP of 35 versus 95 Watt. It still offers all 8 cores and 16 threads and is intended for small chassis or laptops.

The performance is clearly behind the Core i9-9900K and more in the realm of the older 6-core Coffee Lake CPUs.

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 graphics card is clocked at up to 1.2 GHz and offers no advantage compared to previous generations. As it is a very low end GPU, only some low demanding games like Hearthstone can be played with it (see GPU page for benchmarks).

ModelIntel Core i5-13400FIntel Core i9-9900T
SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-SIntel Coffee Lake
CodenameRaptor Lake-SCoffee Lake-R
Series: Coffee Lake Coffee Lake-R
Intel Core i7-13700 compare2.1 - 5.2 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13400F « 2.5 - 4.6 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13400 compare2.5 - 4.6 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900KS compare4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900K compare3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9700K compare3.6 - 4.9 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9700 compare3 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9600K compare3.7 - 4.6 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900T « 2.1 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400F compare2.9 - 4.1 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-9100F compare3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Clock2500 - 4600 MHz2100 - 4400 MHz
L1 Cache0.1 MB512 KB
L2 Cache9.5 MB2 MB
L3 Cache20 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads10 / 168 / 16
TDP65 Watt35 Watt
Technology10 nm14++ nm
Die Size257 mm2178 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketLGA 1700FCLGA1151
FeaturesIntel SSE4.1, Intel SSE4.2, Intel AVX2Dual-Channel DDR4-2666 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX-NI, Quick Sync, Virtualization, vPro
Architecturex86x86
$196 U.S.$439 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-13400F
42.5 pt (59%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-9900T
32.7 pt (45%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
15911 Points (15%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1744 Points (74%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
672 Points (75%)
440 Points (49%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
6091 Points (15%)
2626 Points (6%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2364 Points (15%)
1112 Points (7%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
252 Points (76%)
185 Points (56%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
27.5 Points (36%)
12.4 Points (16%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.1 Points (76%)
2.1 Points (52%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
8689 Points (52%)
6758 Points (41%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
51113 Points (37%)
31357 Points (23%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
82988 Points (58%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
13947 Points (17%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
367.9 s (4%)
162.1 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.3 s (1%)
5.9 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
8602 Points (14%)
6109 Points (10%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
60048 MIPS (34%)
35084 MIPS (20%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5743 MIPS (69%)
4894 MIPS (59%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
136.9 fps (48%)
70.3 fps (25%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
314.5 fps (73%)
173.4 fps (40%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
19.2 fps (34%)
5.5 fps (10%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.1 GB/s (0%)
0.5 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2 GB/s (34%)
0.8 GB/s (14%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
12.2 GB/s (32%)
4.6 GB/s (12%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
336 Seconds (4%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
206 Seconds (1%)
422 Seconds (3%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.5 sec (10%)
1.9 sec (41%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
13989 Points (30%)
10259 Points (22%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8 s (2%)
8.8 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
17.9 s (1%)
19.6 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
420.5 s (2%)
481 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
77937 Points (68%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
23820 Points (64%)
4080 Points (11%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
77765 Points (63%)
12668 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
76636 Points (62%)
12727 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
80273 Points (68%)
13200 Points (11%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
19846 Points (50%)
3268 Points (8%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
28087 Points (50%)
13365 Points (24%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
12669 Points (53%)
5870 Points (25%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1792 Points (76%)
1206 Points (51%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
12095 Points (22%)
5888 Points (11%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1721 Points (7%)
1193 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
12009 Points (38%)
5875 Points (19%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
7684 Points (77%)
5381 Points (54%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
43856 Points (48%)
23223 Points (25%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
535 ms (1%)
878 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
254 Points (73%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
294 Points (61%)
197 Points (41%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1941 Points (74%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
214 Watt (37%)
65.2 Watt (11%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
184.2 Watt (34%)
57 Watt (10%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
76.3 Watt (50%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
19.5 Points per Watt (15%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-13400F → 100% n=40

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-9900T → 60% n=40

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 02. 14:03:53

#0 checking url part for id 14966 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12027 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719921833 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14966 +0.004s ... 0.008s

#7 got single benchmarks 14966 +0.005s ... 0.013s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12027 +0.004s ... 0.017s

#9 got single benchmarks 12027 +0.004s ... 0.021s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.021s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.041s ... 0.062s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.064s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)