Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-13400F vs Intel Core i9-9900T vs Intel Core i7-13700

Intel Core i5-13400F

► remove from comparison Intel i5-13400F

The Intel Core i5-13400F is a mid-range desktop processor of the Raptor Lake series. It includes a hybrid architecture for the CPU cores with combined 10 cores. Six fast Golden Cove / Raptor Cove performance cores (P-cores) with HyperThreading and a clock speed of 3.5 - 5.1 GHz and four Gracemont efficiency cores without HyperThreading and a clock speed of 2.6 - 3.9 GHz. The 13400F can be based on the older Alder Lake chips (at least for early models) or the newer Raptor Lake chips. The F-series of CPUs do not integrate a iGPU.

The performance is clearly higher than the old Core i5-12400F due to the additional four E-cores. These help in multi-threaded workloads and the higher boost core of the p-cores help for single threaded workloads.

The power consumption of the 13400F is rated at 65 Watt for sustained workloads (PL1) and 148 Watt for short bursts (PL2).

Intel Core i9-9900T

► remove from comparison Intel i9-9900T

The Intel Core i9-9900T is a high end power efficient desktop processor based on the Coffee Lake architecture. Compared to the similar named top model Core i9-9900K, the 9900T offers lower clock speeds (2.1 - 4.4 GHz versus 3.6 - 5 GHz) and a reduced TDP of 35 versus 95 Watt. It still offers all 8 cores and 16 threads and is intended for small chassis or laptops.

The performance is clearly behind the Core i9-9900K and more in the realm of the older 6-core Coffee Lake CPUs.

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 graphics card is clocked at up to 1.2 GHz and offers no advantage compared to previous generations. As it is a very low end GPU, only some low demanding games like Hearthstone can be played with it (see GPU page for benchmarks).

Intel Core i7-13700

► remove from comparison Intel i7-13700

The Intel Core i7-13700 is a fast and relatively economical desktop processor from the current Raptor Lake series. The processor was introduced in early 2023 and offers a base clock of 2.1 GHz. It reaches up to 5.2 GHz in Turbo mode. As with Alder Lake-S, Raptor Lake-S is also based on a hybrid design that combines P and E cores. Compared to the Intel Core i7-12700, the number of E-cores has been doubled to 8, meaning that the Intel Core i7-13700 offers up to 24 threads together with its 8 P-cores. The processor continues to be manufactured using the 10 nm production process called "Intel 7". There is no freely selectable multiplier for the Intel Core i7-13700 (compared to the faster i7-13700K) and the LGA 1700 socket introduced with the Alder Lake series continues to serve as the basis.

Performance

Compared to the Intel Core i7-12700, the IPC of the new Core i7-13700 has been increased slightly. At the same time, the 4 additional E-cores now provide slightly more performance for multi-threaded tasks. This puts the Intel Core i7-13700 at the level of an Intel Core i9-12900K, which also offers a total of 24 threads.

iGPU

The Intel Core i7-13700 is a processor with an integrated graphics unit. The Intel UHD Graphics 770 however is only suitable for office use and very old or low demanding games.

Power consumption

The TDP of the Intel Core i7-13700 is 65 watts in PL1. Intel defines the PL2 limit at 219 watts. If the restrictions regarding power consumption are deactivated in the BIOS, the PL2 value can be reached permanently and even exceeded with good cooling. However, a high-quality and powerful cooling unit should be used for this.

ModelIntel Core i5-13400FIntel Core i9-9900TIntel Core i7-13700
SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-SIntel Coffee LakeIntel Raptor Lake-S
CodenameRaptor Lake-SCoffee Lake-RRaptor Lake-S
Series: Raptor Lake-S Raptor Lake-S
Intel Core i7-137002.1 - 5.2 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13400F « 2.5 - 4.6 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i5-134002.5 - 4.6 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900KS4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900K3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9700K3.6 - 4.9 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-97003 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9600K3.7 - 4.6 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900T « 2.1 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400F2.9 - 4.1 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-9100F3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700 « 2.1 - 5.2 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13400F2.5 - 4.6 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i5-134002.5 - 4.6 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Clock2500 - 4600 MHz2100 - 4400 MHz2100 - 5200 MHz
L1 Cache0.1 MB512 KB
L2 Cache9.5 MB2 MB24 MB
L3 Cache20 MB16 MB30 MB
Cores / Threads10 / 168 / 1616 / 24
8 x 5.2 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
8 x 4.1 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
TDP65 Watt35 Watt65 Watt
Technology10 nm14++ nm10 nm
Die Size257 mm2178 mm2257 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C100 °C
SocketLGA 1700FCLGA1151LGA 1700
FeaturesIntel SSE4.1, Intel SSE4.2, Intel AVX2Dual-Channel DDR4-2666 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX-NI, Quick Sync, Virtualization, vProIntel SSE4.1, Intel SSE4.2, Intel AVX2
Architecturex86x86x86
$196 U.S.$439 U.S.$384 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.comwww.intel.de
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1600 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-13400F
42.5 pt (59%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-9900T
32.7 pt (45%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-13700
49.5 pt (69%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
15911 Points (15%)
min: 21013     avg: 25369     median: 25369 (24%)     max: 29725 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1744 Points (74%)
min: 1997     avg: 2009     median: 2008.5 (85%)     max: 2020 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
672 Points (75%)
440 Points (49%)
min: 703     avg: 740     median: 739.5 (82%)     max: 776 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
6091 Points (15%)
2626 Points (6%)
min: 7027     avg: 9194     median: 9194 (22%)     max: 11361 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2364 Points (15%)
1112 Points (7%)
min: 2986     avg: 3692     median: 3692 (23%)     max: 4398 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
252 Points (76%)
185 Points (56%)
min: 279     avg: 285     median: 285 (86%)     max: 291 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
27.5 Points (36%)
12.4 Points (16%)
50.4 Points (66%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.1 Points (76%)
2.1 Points (52%)
3.5 Points (87%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
8689 Points (52%)
6758 Points (41%)
10840 Points (65%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
51113 Points (37%)
31357 Points (23%)
82724 Points (60%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
82988 Points (58%)
125536 Points (87%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
13947 Points (17%)
16324 Points (20%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
367.9 s (4%)
162.1 s (2%)
161.5 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.3 s (1%)
5.9 s (1%)
2.5 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
8602 Points (14%)
6109 Points (10%)
12289 Points (19%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
60048 MIPS (34%)
35084 MIPS (20%)
min: 74475     avg: 91604     median: 91604 (53%)     max: 108733 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5743 MIPS (69%)
4894 MIPS (59%)
min: 6466     avg: 6643     median: 6642.5 (79%)     max: 6819 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
136.9 fps (48%)
70.3 fps (25%)
224 fps (78%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
314.5 fps (73%)
173.4 fps (40%)
393 fps (91%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
19.2 fps (34%)
5.5 fps (10%)
min: 21.4     avg: 27.3     median: 27.3 (48%)     max: 33.1 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.1 GB/s (0%)
0.5 GB/s (0%)
2.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2 GB/s (34%)
0.8 GB/s (14%)
3.8 GB/s (66%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
12.2 GB/s (32%)
4.6 GB/s (12%)
22 GB/s (57%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
336 Seconds (4%)
min: 181     avg: 250.5     median: 250.5 (3%)     max: 320 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
206 Seconds (1%)
422 Seconds (3%)
min: 111     avg: 144.5     median: 144.5 (1%)     max: 178 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.5 sec (10%)
1.9 sec (41%)
min: 0.4075     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.423 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
13989 Points (30%)
10259 Points (22%)
17194 Points (37%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8 s (2%)
8.8 s (2%)
6.4 s (1%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
17.9 s (1%)
19.6 s (1%)
13.9 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
420.5 s (2%)
481 s (2%)
329.2 s (1%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
77937 Points (68%)
82438 Points (72%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
23820 Points (64%)
4080 Points (11%)
min: 23197     avg: 26874     median: 26874 (73%)     max: 30551 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
77765 Points (63%)
12668 Points (10%)
96793 Points (79%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
76636 Points (62%)
12727 Points (10%)
96083 Points (78%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
80273 Points (68%)
13200 Points (11%)
97199 Points (82%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
19846 Points (50%)
3268 Points (8%)
26999 Points (68%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
28087 Points (50%)
13365 Points (24%)
min: 31032     avg: 37512     median: 37512 (67%)     max: 43992 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
12669 Points (53%)
5870 Points (25%)
min: 14079     avg: 16213     median: 16212.5 (68%)     max: 18346 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
2761 Points (74%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
15882 Points (63%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1792 Points (76%)
1206 Points (51%)
min: 1958     avg: 1984     median: 1983.5 (84%)     max: 2009 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
12095 Points (22%)
5888 Points (11%)
min: 15525     avg: 17564     median: 17563.5 (31%)     max: 19602 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1721 Points (7%)
1193 Points (5%)
1925 Points (8%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
12009 Points (38%)
5875 Points (19%)
18964 Points (60%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
7684 Points (77%)
5381 Points (54%)
8714 Points (87%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
43856 Points (48%)
23223 Points (25%)
67866 Points (74%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
535 ms (1%)
878 ms (1%)
min: 468     avg: 470     median: 470 (1%)     max: 472 ms
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
254 Points (73%)
min: 289     avg: 289.5     median: 289.5 (83%)     max: 290 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
294 Points (61%)
197 Points (41%)
min: 332     avg: 338     median: 338 (70%)     max: 344 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1941 Points (74%)
min: 2017     avg: 2169     median: 2168.5 (83%)     max: 2320 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
214 Watt (37%)
65.2 Watt (11%)
min: 109.8     avg: 247.9     median: 247.9 (43%)     max: 386 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
184.2 Watt (34%)
57 Watt (10%)
min: 149.6     avg: 257.3     median: 257.3 (47%)     max: 365 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
76.3 Watt (50%)
min: 8.49     avg: 46.1     median: 46.1 (30%)     max: 83.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
19.5 Points per Watt (15%)
20 Points per Watt (15%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-13400F → 100% n=40

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-9900T → 60% n=40

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-13700 → 131% n=40

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 04. 17:25:24

#0 checking url part for id 14966 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12027 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14997 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720106724 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.007s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14966 +0.004s ... 0.01s

#8 got single benchmarks 14966 +0.005s ... 0.015s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 12027 +0.004s ... 0.019s

#10 got single benchmarks 12027 +0.003s ... 0.022s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 14997 +0.004s ... 0.026s

#12 got single benchmarks 14997 +0.005s ... 0.031s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.031s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.072s ... 0.103s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.103s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)