Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-13400F vs Intel Core i9-9900KS

Intel Core i5-13400F

► remove from comparison Intel i5-13400F

The Intel Core i5-13400F is a mid-range desktop processor of the Raptor Lake series. It includes a hybrid architecture for the CPU cores with combined 10 cores. Six fast Golden Cove / Raptor Cove performance cores (P-cores) with HyperThreading and a clock speed of 3.5 - 5.1 GHz and four Gracemont efficiency cores without HyperThreading and a clock speed of 2.6 - 3.9 GHz. The 13400F can be based on the older Alder Lake chips (at least for early models) or the newer Raptor Lake chips. The F-series of CPUs do not integrate a iGPU.

The performance is clearly higher than the old Core i5-12400F due to the additional four E-cores. These help in multi-threaded workloads and the higher boost core of the p-cores help for single threaded workloads.

The power consumption of the 13400F is rated at 65 Watt for sustained workloads (PL1) and 148 Watt for short bursts (PL2).

Intel Core i9-9900KS

► remove from comparison Intel i9-9900KS

The Intel Core i9-9900KS is a high end desktop processor that includes 8 cores based on the Coffee Lake architecture. It is the fastest Coffee Lake CPU in 2019 and compared to the similar named i9-9900K, the KS offers an all core Turbo of 5 GHz. All cores can clock between 4 GHz and 5 GHz and thanks to Hyperthreading / SMT 16 threads can be executed in parallel. The CPU is still manufactured in the mature 14 nm process (14nm++). Thanks to the open multiplicator, the CPU is rather easy to overclock (if a Z390 based mainboard is used).

With good cooling, the i9-9900KS can be around 10% faster than the older Intel Core i9-9900K (thanks to the 5 GHz all core Turbo). Compare to the old Core i7-8700K, the 9900KS is even 45% faster. Especially for gaming, the 9900KS is currently the fastest option available. The fast Ryzen and Threadripper CPUs from AMD however offer a better multithreaded performance.

The integrated GPU is called Intel UHD Graphics 630 and clocks with up to 1.2 GHz. It is not suited for demanding 3D games and located in the low end.

The TDP is raised to 127 Watt for the additional performance, therefore a good CPU cooler is needed. When overclocking the CPU, more than 200 Watt can be reached unter load.

ModelIntel Core i5-13400FIntel Core i9-9900KS
SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-SIntel Coffee Lake
CodenameRaptor Lake-SCoffee Lake-R
Series: Coffee Lake Coffee Lake-R
Intel Core i7-13700 compare2.1 - 5.2 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13400F « 2.5 - 4.6 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13400 compare2.5 - 4.6 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900KS « 4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900K compare3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9700K compare3.6 - 4.9 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9700 compare3 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9600K compare3.7 - 4.6 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900T compare2.1 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400F compare2.9 - 4.1 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-9100F compare3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Clock2500 - 4600 MHz4000 - 5000 MHz
L1 Cache0.1 MB512 KB
L2 Cache9.5 MB2 MB
L3 Cache20 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads10 / 168 / 16
TDP65 Watt127 Watt
Technology10 nm14 nm
Die Size257 mm2178 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketLGA 1700FCLGA1151
FeaturesIntel SSE4.1, Intel SSE4.2, Intel AVX2Dual-Channel DDR4-2666 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX-NI, Quick Sync, Virtualization, vPro
Architecturex86x86
$196 U.S.$513 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.intel.de
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-13400F
42.5 pt (59%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-9900KS
38.4 pt (53%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
15911 Points (15%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1744 Points (74%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
672 Points (75%)
min: 509     avg: 512     median: 511.5 (57%)     max: 514 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
6091 Points (15%)
min: 4463     avg: 4820     median: 4819.5 (12%)     max: 5176 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2364 Points (15%)
min: 1962     avg: 2058     median: 2058 (13%)     max: 2154 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
252 Points (76%)
min: 215     avg: 216     median: 216 (65%)     max: 217 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
27.5 Points (36%)
min: 22.31     avg: 23.2     median: 23.1 (30%)     max: 23.98 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.1 Points (76%)
min: 2.43     avg: 2.4     median: 2.4 (61%)     max: 2.46 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
8689 Points (52%)
min: 8143     avg: 8183     median: 8183 (49%)     max: 8223 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
51113 Points (37%)
min: 50462     avg: 51779     median: 51778.5 (38%)     max: 53095 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
82988 Points (58%)
69169 Points (48%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
13947 Points (17%)
10759 Points (13%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
367.9 s (4%)
min: 82     avg: 87.9     median: 87.9 (1%)     max: 93.8 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.3 s (1%)
min: 3.232     avg: 3.6     median: 3.6 (1%)     max: 3.969 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
8602 Points (14%)
min: 8156     avg: 8353     median: 8353 (13%)     max: 8550 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
60048 MIPS (34%)
min: 55064     avg: 55735     median: 55735 (32%)     max: 56406 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5743 MIPS (69%)
min: 5674     avg: 5734     median: 5734 (69%)     max: 5794 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
136.9 fps (48%)
min: 116     avg: 122.5     median: 122.5 (43%)     max: 129 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
314.5 fps (73%)
min: 276.2     avg: 278.9     median: 278.9 (64%)     max: 281.5 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
19.2 fps (34%)
min: 15.31     avg: 16.3     median: 16.3 (29%)     max: 17.2 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.1 GB/s (0%)
1.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2 GB/s (34%)
2.1 GB/s (36%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
12.2 GB/s (32%)
min: 12.1     avg: 12.2     median: 12.2 (32%)     max: 12.2 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
336 Seconds (4%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
206 Seconds (1%)
min: 205.1     avg: 224.6     median: 224.6 (2%)     max: 244 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.5 sec (10%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
13989 Points (30%)
min: 14825     avg: 14884     median: 14883.5 (32%)     max: 14942 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8 s (2%)
min: 7.405     avg: 7.4     median: 7.4 (2%)     max: 7.436 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
17.9 s (1%)
min: 16.45     avg: 16.5     median: 16.5 (1%)     max: 16.59 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
420.5 s (2%)
min: 412.2     avg: 414.2     median: 414.2 (2%)     max: 416.1 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
77937 Points (68%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
23820 Points (64%)
min: 18531     avg: 18914     median: 18694 (51%)     max: 19517 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
77765 Points (63%)
min: 75473     avg: 75482     median: 75482 (61%)     max: 75491 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
76636 Points (62%)
min: 75946     avg: 76061     median: 76060.5 (62%)     max: 76175 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
80273 Points (68%)
min: 74085     avg: 75802     median: 75508 (64%)     max: 77813 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
19846 Points (50%)
min: 19068     avg: 19770     median: 20049 (51%)     max: 20193 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
28087 Points (50%)
min: 24327     avg: 25511     median: 26016 (46%)     max: 26191 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
12669 Points (53%)
min: 11017     avg: 11358     median: 11375 (48%)     max: 11683 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1792 Points (76%)
1372 Points (58%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
12095 Points (22%)
9100 Points (16%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1721 Points (7%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
12009 Points (38%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
7684 Points (77%)
6308 Points (63%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
43856 Points (48%)
35586 Points (39%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
6313 Points (86%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
35932 Points (88%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
535 ms (1%)
883 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
44538 Points (39%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
254 Points (73%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
294 Points (61%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1941 Points (74%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
214 Watt (37%)
259.6 Watt (45%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
184.2 Watt (34%)
min: 219.3     avg: 269.1     median: 292.7 (53%)     max: 295.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
76.3 Watt (50%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 7.29     avg: 8.1     median: 8.1 (6%)     max: 8.95 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-13400F → 100% n=38

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-9900KS → 92% n=38

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 02. 14:04:04

#0 checking url part for id 14966 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11553 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719921844 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.005s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14966 +0.004s ... 0.009s

#7 got single benchmarks 14966 +0.005s ... 0.013s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11553 +0.004s ... 0.017s

#9 got single benchmarks 11553 +0.006s ... 0.023s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.023s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.047s ... 0.07s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.072s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)