Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-13400F vs Intel Core i7-13700HX

Intel Core i5-13400F

► remove from comparison Intel i5-13400F

The Intel Core i5-13400F is a mid-range desktop processor of the Raptor Lake series. It includes a hybrid architecture for the CPU cores with combined 10 cores. Six fast Golden Cove / Raptor Cove performance cores (P-cores) with HyperThreading and a clock speed of 3.5 - 5.1 GHz and four Gracemont efficiency cores without HyperThreading and a clock speed of 2.6 - 3.9 GHz. The 13400F can be based on the older Alder Lake chips (at least for early models) or the newer Raptor Lake chips. The F-series of CPUs do not integrate a iGPU.

The performance is clearly higher than the old Core i5-12400F due to the additional four E-cores. These help in multi-threaded workloads and the higher boost core of the p-cores help for single threaded workloads.

The power consumption of the 13400F is rated at 65 Watt for sustained workloads (PL1) and 148 Watt for short bursts (PL2).

Intel Core i7-13700HX

► remove from comparison Intel i7-13700HX

The Intel Core i7-13700HX is a fast high-end mobile processor of the Raptor Lake series. Is was announced in early 2023 and is based on the desktop Core i7-13700K with combined 16 cores and 24 threads. Eight fast Raptor Cove performance cores (P-cores) with HyperThreading clocking between 2.1 - 5 GHz (4.5 GHz all core boost) and eight Gracemont efficiency cores without HyperThreading (1.5 - 3.7 GHz).

Compared to Alder Lake, Raptor Lake offers improved P-Cores (Raptor Cove micro-architecture) with bigger Caches and more E-Cores (same Gracemont micro-architecture). Furthermore, the chip supports faster DDR5 memory (up to 5600 MHz for the 13980HX, but only 4800 MHz for the i7).

Performance

The average 13700HX in our database is in the same league as the i7-13650HX, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned, and thus outguns the Ryzen 7 7745HX by a significant margin. This is a very fast chip, as of early 2023.

Thanks to its powerful cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 122 W, the Uniwill GM6PX7X is among the fastest laptops built around the 13700HX that we know of. It can be at least 10% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

The chip's "minimum assured" power consumption sits at 45 W. Its Turbo power consumption is not supposed to exceed 157 W; its Base power consumption is supposed to be around 55 W. Most laptop makers will probably go for a value much higher than 55 W to get better performance.

This Raptor Lake family processor is built with Intel's 4th generation 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for average, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i5-13400FIntel Core i7-13700HX
SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-SIntel Raptor Lake-HX
CodenameRaptor Lake-SRaptor Lake-HX
Series: Raptor Lake-HX Raptor Lake-HX
Intel Core i7-13700 compare2.1 - 5.2 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13400F « 2.5 - 4.6 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13400 compare2.5 - 4.6 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13980HX compare1.6 - 5.6 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13950HX compare1.6 - 5.5 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900HX compare1.6 - 5.4 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13850HX compare1.5 - 5.3 GHz20 / 28 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700HX « 1.5 - 5 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13650HX compare1.9 - 4.9 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600HX compare1.9 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500HX compare1.8 - 4.7 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13450HX compare1.8 - 4.6 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Clock2500 - 4600 MHz1500 - 5000 MHz
L1 Cache0.1 MB
L2 Cache9.5 MB24 MB
L3 Cache20 MB30 MB
Cores / Threads10 / 1616 / 24
8 x 5.0 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
8 x 3.7 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
TDP65 Watt55 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm
Die Size257 mm2257 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketLGA 1700BGA1964
FeaturesIntel SSE4.1, Intel SSE4.2, Intel AVX2DDR4-3200/DDR5-4800 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
Architecturex86x86
$196 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 770 ( - 1550 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-13400F
42.5 pt (59%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-13700HX
46.8 pt (65%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
112 Points (78%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
971 Points (18%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
15911 Points (15%)
min: 19987     avg: 21150     median: 20997.5 (19%)     max: 22598 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1744 Points (74%)
min: 1666     avg: 1842     median: 1882 (80%)     max: 1933 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
672 Points (75%)
min: 644     avg: 711     median: 724.5 (81%)     max: 740 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
6091 Points (15%)
min: 6889     avg: 7981     median: 7966 (19%)     max: 8610 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2364 Points (15%)
min: 3008     avg: 3288     median: 3324 (21%)     max: 3482 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
252 Points (76%)
min: 243     avg: 269     median: 272.5 (82%)     max: 279 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
27.5 Points (36%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.1 Points (76%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
8689 Points (52%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
51113 Points (37%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
82988 Points (58%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
13947 Points (17%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
367.9 s (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.3 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
8602 Points (14%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
60048 MIPS (34%)
min: 72220     avg: 79565     median: 78488 (45%)     max: 89294 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5743 MIPS (69%)
min: 5552     avg: 6125     median: 6201.5 (74%)     max: 6409 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
136.9 fps (48%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
314.5 fps (73%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
19.2 fps (34%)
min: 19.7     avg: 22.6     median: 22.3 (39%)     max: 25.5 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2 GB/s (34%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
12.2 GB/s (32%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
336 Seconds (4%)
min: 240     avg: 278.9     median: 270.5 (3%)     max: 345 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
206 Seconds (1%)
min: 138     avg: 161.4     median: 159 (1%)     max: 198 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.5 sec (10%)
min: 0.4274     avg: 0.5     median: 0.4 (10%)     max: 0.493 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
13989 Points (30%)
min: 15688     avg: 17169     median: 17038 (36%)     max: 18780 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
17.9 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
420.5 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
77937 Points (68%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
23820 Points (64%)
min: 21590     avg: 23818     median: 23995.5 (65%)     max: 25859 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
77765 Points (63%)
103646 Points (84%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
76636 Points (62%)
103932 Points (84%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
80273 Points (68%)
103341 Points (87%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
19846 Points (50%)
min: 17714     avg: 20672     median: 20745.5 (52%)     max: 22722 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
28087 Points (50%)
min: 30988     avg: 34044     median: 33720 (60%)     max: 36417 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
12669 Points (53%)
min: 12569     avg: 14765     median: 14971.5 (63%)     max: 16441 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 2541     avg: 2591     median: 2593 (70%)     max: 2638 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 11793     avg: 13739     median: 14402 (57%)     max: 15022 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1792 Points (76%)
min: 1666     avg: 1834     median: 1852.5 (78%)     max: 1899 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
12095 Points (22%)
min: 12389     avg: 14660     median: 14695 (26%)     max: 15850 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1721 Points (7%)
min: 1712     avg: 1786     median: 1788.5 (8%)     max: 1855 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
12009 Points (38%)
min: 13815     avg: 14802     median: 15008.5 (47%)     max: 15376 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
7684 Points (77%)
8059 Points (81%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
43856 Points (48%)
57031 Points (63%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
535 ms (1%)
min: 489     avg: 508     median: 503.5 (1%)     max: 538 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 86875     avg: 92028     median: 92283 (81%)     max: 96670 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
254 Points (73%)
min: 247     avg: 267.4     median: 270.5 (78%)     max: 283 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
294 Points (61%)
min: 238     avg: 304.1     median: 316 (66%)     max: 336 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1941 Points (74%)
min: 1663     avg: 1875     median: 1831 (70%)     max: 2105 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
214 Watt (37%)
min: 100.4     avg: 157.7     median: 166.5 (29%)     max: 189.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
184.2 Watt (34%)
min: 166.3     avg: 187.3     median: 183.9 (34%)     max: 221 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
76.3 Watt (50%)
min: 12.9     avg: 22     median: 22.1 (15%)     max: 28.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 12.1     avg: 16.8     median: 15.2 (17%)     max: 25.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 16.9     avg: 18.3     median: 17.7 (13%)     max: 20.9 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-13400F → 100% n=30

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-13700HX → 115% n=30

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 02. 16:48:35

#0 checking url part for id 14966 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14661 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719931715 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.005s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14966 +0.004s ... 0.009s

#7 got single benchmarks 14966 +0.005s ... 0.013s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14661 +0.004s ... 0.017s

#9 got single benchmarks 14661 +0.017s ... 0.034s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.034s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.047s ... 0.081s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.083s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)