Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-13400F vs Intel Core i5-9600K

Intel Core i5-13400F

► remove from comparison Intel i5-13400F

The Intel Core i5-13400F is a mid-range desktop processor of the Raptor Lake series. It includes a hybrid architecture for the CPU cores with combined 10 cores. Six fast Golden Cove / Raptor Cove performance cores (P-cores) with HyperThreading and a clock speed of 3.5 - 5.1 GHz and four Gracemont efficiency cores without HyperThreading and a clock speed of 2.6 - 3.9 GHz. The 13400F can be based on the older Alder Lake chips (at least for early models) or the newer Raptor Lake chips. The F-series of CPUs do not integrate a iGPU.

The performance is clearly higher than the old Core i5-12400F due to the additional four E-cores. These help in multi-threaded workloads and the higher boost core of the p-cores help for single threaded workloads.

The power consumption of the 13400F is rated at 65 Watt for sustained workloads (PL1) and 148 Watt for short bursts (PL2).

Intel Core i5-9600K

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i5-9600K is a high end desktop processor based on the Coffee Lake architecture. It offers an open multiplicator for easy overclocking and integrates 6 cores (no Hyperthreading therefore also 6 threads) clocked at 3.7 - 4.6 GHz and it needs a new Z390 based mainboard. It is manufactured in the second iteration of the improved 14nm process (14nm++).

Compared to the older Core i5-8600K, the 9600K offers about 10 to 15% higher performance. As the CPU still offers 6 cores and threads, the improvements are mostly due to the higher clock speeds. As a fast mid range desktop CPU, the i5-9600K is suited even for very demanding applications and perfect for 3D gaming.

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 graphics card is clocked at up to 1.15 GHz and offers no advantage compared to previous generations. As it is a very low end GPU, only some low demanding games like Hearthstone can be played with it (see GPU page for benchmarks).

Intel specifies the TDP at 95 Watt, so if the CPU is used in laptops a big and chunky cooling system is needed to avoid throttling and lower clock speeds under sustained loads. When overclocking the CPU, the power consumption can easily rise up to 150 Watt and higher.

ModelIntel Core i5-13400FIntel Core i5-9600K
SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-SIntel Coffee Lake
CodenameRaptor Lake-SCoffee Lake-R
Series: Coffee Lake Coffee Lake-R
Intel Core i7-13700 compare2.1 - 5.2 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13400F « 2.5 - 4.6 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13400 compare2.5 - 4.6 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900KS compare4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900K compare3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9700K compare3.6 - 4.9 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9700 compare3 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9600K « 3.7 - 4.6 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900T compare2.1 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400F compare2.9 - 4.1 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-9100F compare3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Clock2500 - 4600 MHz3700 - 4600 MHz
L1 Cache0.1 MB512 KB
L2 Cache9.5 MB1.5 MB
L3 Cache20 MB9 MB
Cores / Threads10 / 166 / 6
TDP65 Watt95 Watt
Technology10 nm14++ nm
Die Size257 mm2178 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketLGA 1700FCLGA1151
FeaturesIntel SSE4.1, Intel SSE4.2, Intel AVX2Dual-Channel DDR4-2666 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX-NI, Quick Sync, Virtualization, vPro
Architecturex86x86
$196 U.S.$262 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1150 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-13400F
42.5 pt (59%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
15911 Points (15%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1744 Points (74%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
672 Points (75%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
6091 Points (15%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2364 Points (15%)
1094 Points (7%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
252 Points (76%)
193 Points (58%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
27.5 Points (36%)
11 Points (14%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.1 Points (76%)
2.2 Points (56%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
8689 Points (52%)
7205 Points (44%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
51113 Points (37%)
33950 Points (25%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
82988 Points (58%)
39494 Points (27%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
13947 Points (17%)
9318 Points (11%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
367.9 s (4%)
176.2 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.3 s (1%)
6 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
8602 Points (14%)
5903 Points (9%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
60048 MIPS (34%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5743 MIPS (69%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
136.9 fps (48%)
68.8 fps (24%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
314.5 fps (73%)
250 fps (58%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
19.2 fps (34%)
8 fps (14%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.1 GB/s (0%)
0.4 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2 GB/s (34%)
0.6 GB/s (11%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
12.2 GB/s (32%)
5.6 GB/s (15%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
336 Seconds (4%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
206 Seconds (1%)
444.4 Seconds (3%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.5 sec (10%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
13989 Points (30%)
10974 Points (23%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8 s (2%)
7.7 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
17.9 s (1%)
17.4 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
420.5 s (2%)
421.1 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
77937 Points (68%)
37593 Points (33%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
23820 Points (64%)
11938 Points (32%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
77765 Points (63%)
78929 Points (64%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
76636 Points (62%)
78531 Points (64%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
80273 Points (68%)
80235 Points (68%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
19846 Points (50%)
9031 Points (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
28087 Points (50%)
13701 Points (24%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
12669 Points (53%)
6071 Points (26%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1792 Points (76%)
1217 Points (51%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
12095 Points (22%)
5855 Points (10%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1721 Points (7%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
12009 Points (38%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
7684 Points (77%)
5916 Points (59%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
43856 Points (48%)
23810 Points (26%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
535 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
254 Points (73%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
294 Points (61%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1941 Points (74%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
214 Watt (37%)
145.9 Watt (25%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
184.2 Watt (34%)
134 Watt (24%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
76.3 Watt (50%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
8.2 Points per Watt (6%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-13400F → 100% n=34

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-9600K → 68% n=34

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 02. 14:20:02

#0 checking url part for id 14966 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11231 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719922802 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.003s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14966 +0.004s ... 0.008s

#7 got single benchmarks 14966 +0.005s ... 0.012s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11231 +0.001s ... 0.013s

#9 got single benchmarks 11231 +0.004s ... 0.017s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.017s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.041s ... 0.057s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.06s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)