Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-13400F vs Intel Core i5-9600K vs Intel Core i7-13700

Intel Core i5-13400F

► remove from comparison Intel i5-13400F

The Intel Core i5-13400F is a mid-range desktop processor of the Raptor Lake series. It includes a hybrid architecture for the CPU cores with combined 10 cores. Six fast Golden Cove / Raptor Cove performance cores (P-cores) with HyperThreading and a clock speed of 3.5 - 5.1 GHz and four Gracemont efficiency cores without HyperThreading and a clock speed of 2.6 - 3.9 GHz. The 13400F can be based on the older Alder Lake chips (at least for early models) or the newer Raptor Lake chips. The F-series of CPUs do not integrate a iGPU.

The performance is clearly higher than the old Core i5-12400F due to the additional four E-cores. These help in multi-threaded workloads and the higher boost core of the p-cores help for single threaded workloads.

The power consumption of the 13400F is rated at 65 Watt for sustained workloads (PL1) and 148 Watt for short bursts (PL2).

Intel Core i5-9600K

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i5-9600K is a high end desktop processor based on the Coffee Lake architecture. It offers an open multiplicator for easy overclocking and integrates 6 cores (no Hyperthreading therefore also 6 threads) clocked at 3.7 - 4.6 GHz and it needs a new Z390 based mainboard. It is manufactured in the second iteration of the improved 14nm process (14nm++).

Compared to the older Core i5-8600K, the 9600K offers about 10 to 15% higher performance. As the CPU still offers 6 cores and threads, the improvements are mostly due to the higher clock speeds. As a fast mid range desktop CPU, the i5-9600K is suited even for very demanding applications and perfect for 3D gaming.

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 graphics card is clocked at up to 1.15 GHz and offers no advantage compared to previous generations. As it is a very low end GPU, only some low demanding games like Hearthstone can be played with it (see GPU page for benchmarks).

Intel specifies the TDP at 95 Watt, so if the CPU is used in laptops a big and chunky cooling system is needed to avoid throttling and lower clock speeds under sustained loads. When overclocking the CPU, the power consumption can easily rise up to 150 Watt and higher.

Intel Core i7-13700

► remove from comparison Intel i7-13700

The Intel Core i7-13700 is a fast and relatively economical desktop processor from the current Raptor Lake series. The processor was introduced in early 2023 and offers a base clock of 2.1 GHz. It reaches up to 5.2 GHz in Turbo mode. As with Alder Lake-S, Raptor Lake-S is also based on a hybrid design that combines P and E cores. Compared to the Intel Core i7-12700, the number of E-cores has been doubled to 8, meaning that the Intel Core i7-13700 offers up to 24 threads together with its 8 P-cores. The processor continues to be manufactured using the 10 nm production process called "Intel 7". There is no freely selectable multiplier for the Intel Core i7-13700 (compared to the faster i7-13700K) and the LGA 1700 socket introduced with the Alder Lake series continues to serve as the basis.

Performance

Compared to the Intel Core i7-12700, the IPC of the new Core i7-13700 has been increased slightly. At the same time, the 4 additional E-cores now provide slightly more performance for multi-threaded tasks. This puts the Intel Core i7-13700 at the level of an Intel Core i9-12900K, which also offers a total of 24 threads.

iGPU

The Intel Core i7-13700 is a processor with an integrated graphics unit. The Intel UHD Graphics 770 however is only suitable for office use and very old or low demanding games.

Power consumption

The TDP of the Intel Core i7-13700 is 65 watts in PL1. Intel defines the PL2 limit at 219 watts. If the restrictions regarding power consumption are deactivated in the BIOS, the PL2 value can be reached permanently and even exceeded with good cooling. However, a high-quality and powerful cooling unit should be used for this.

ModelIntel Core i5-13400FIntel Core i5-9600KIntel Core i7-13700
SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-SIntel Coffee LakeIntel Raptor Lake-S
CodenameRaptor Lake-SCoffee Lake-RRaptor Lake-S
Series: Raptor Lake-S Raptor Lake-S
Intel Core i7-137002.1 - 5.2 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13400F « 2.5 - 4.6 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i5-134002.5 - 4.6 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900KS4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900K3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9700K3.6 - 4.9 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-97003 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9600K « 3.7 - 4.6 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900T2.1 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400F2.9 - 4.1 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-9100F3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700 « 2.1 - 5.2 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13400F2.5 - 4.6 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i5-134002.5 - 4.6 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Clock2500 - 4600 MHz3700 - 4600 MHz2100 - 5200 MHz
L1 Cache0.1 MB512 KB
L2 Cache9.5 MB1.5 MB24 MB
L3 Cache20 MB9 MB30 MB
Cores / Threads10 / 166 / 616 / 24
8 x 5.2 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
8 x 4.1 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
TDP65 Watt95 Watt65 Watt
Technology10 nm14++ nm10 nm
Die Size257 mm2178 mm2257 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C100 °C
SocketLGA 1700FCLGA1151LGA 1700
FeaturesIntel SSE4.1, Intel SSE4.2, Intel AVX2Dual-Channel DDR4-2666 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX-NI, Quick Sync, Virtualization, vProIntel SSE4.1, Intel SSE4.2, Intel AVX2
Architecturex86x86x86
$196 U.S.$262 U.S.$384 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.comwww.intel.de
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1150 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1600 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-13400F
42.5 pt (59%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-13700
49.5 pt (69%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
15911 Points (15%)
min: 21013     avg: 25369     median: 25369 (24%)     max: 29725 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1744 Points (74%)
min: 1997     avg: 2009     median: 2008.5 (85%)     max: 2020 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
672 Points (75%)
min: 703     avg: 740     median: 739.5 (82%)     max: 776 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
6091 Points (15%)
min: 7027     avg: 9194     median: 9194 (22%)     max: 11361 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2364 Points (15%)
1094 Points (7%)
min: 2986     avg: 3692     median: 3692 (23%)     max: 4398 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
252 Points (76%)
193 Points (58%)
min: 279     avg: 285     median: 285 (86%)     max: 291 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
27.5 Points (36%)
11 Points (14%)
50.4 Points (66%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.1 Points (76%)
2.2 Points (56%)
3.5 Points (87%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
8689 Points (52%)
7205 Points (44%)
10840 Points (65%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
51113 Points (37%)
33950 Points (25%)
82724 Points (60%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
82988 Points (58%)
39494 Points (27%)
125536 Points (87%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
13947 Points (17%)
9318 Points (11%)
16324 Points (20%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
367.9 s (4%)
176.2 s (2%)
161.5 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.3 s (1%)
6 s (1%)
2.5 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
8602 Points (14%)
5903 Points (9%)
12289 Points (19%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
60048 MIPS (34%)
min: 74475     avg: 91604     median: 91604 (53%)     max: 108733 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5743 MIPS (69%)
min: 6466     avg: 6643     median: 6642.5 (79%)     max: 6819 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
136.9 fps (48%)
68.8 fps (24%)
224 fps (78%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
314.5 fps (73%)
250 fps (58%)
393 fps (91%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
19.2 fps (34%)
8 fps (14%)
min: 21.4     avg: 27.3     median: 27.3 (48%)     max: 33.1 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.1 GB/s (0%)
0.4 GB/s (0%)
2.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2 GB/s (34%)
0.6 GB/s (11%)
3.8 GB/s (66%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
12.2 GB/s (32%)
5.6 GB/s (15%)
22 GB/s (57%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
336 Seconds (4%)
min: 181     avg: 250.5     median: 250.5 (3%)     max: 320 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
206 Seconds (1%)
444.4 Seconds (3%)
min: 111     avg: 144.5     median: 144.5 (1%)     max: 178 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.5 sec (10%)
min: 0.4075     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.423 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
13989 Points (30%)
10974 Points (23%)
17194 Points (37%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8 s (2%)
7.7 s (2%)
6.4 s (1%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
17.9 s (1%)
17.4 s (1%)
13.9 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
420.5 s (2%)
421.1 s (2%)
329.2 s (1%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
77937 Points (68%)
37593 Points (33%)
82438 Points (72%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
23820 Points (64%)
11938 Points (32%)
min: 23197     avg: 26874     median: 26874 (73%)     max: 30551 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
77765 Points (63%)
78929 Points (64%)
96793 Points (79%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
76636 Points (62%)
78531 Points (64%)
96083 Points (78%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
80273 Points (68%)
80235 Points (68%)
97199 Points (82%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
19846 Points (50%)
9031 Points (23%)
26999 Points (68%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
28087 Points (50%)
13701 Points (24%)
min: 31032     avg: 37512     median: 37512 (67%)     max: 43992 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
12669 Points (53%)
6071 Points (26%)
min: 14079     avg: 16213     median: 16212.5 (68%)     max: 18346 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
2761 Points (74%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
15882 Points (63%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1792 Points (76%)
1217 Points (51%)
min: 1958     avg: 1984     median: 1983.5 (84%)     max: 2009 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
12095 Points (22%)
5855 Points (10%)
min: 15525     avg: 17564     median: 17563.5 (31%)     max: 19602 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1721 Points (7%)
1925 Points (8%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
12009 Points (38%)
18964 Points (60%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
7684 Points (77%)
5916 Points (59%)
8714 Points (87%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
43856 Points (48%)
23810 Points (26%)
67866 Points (74%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
535 ms (1%)
min: 468     avg: 470     median: 470 (1%)     max: 472 ms
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
254 Points (73%)
min: 289     avg: 289.5     median: 289.5 (83%)     max: 290 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
294 Points (61%)
min: 332     avg: 338     median: 338 (70%)     max: 344 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1941 Points (74%)
min: 2017     avg: 2169     median: 2168.5 (83%)     max: 2320 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
214 Watt (37%)
145.9 Watt (25%)
min: 109.8     avg: 247.9     median: 247.9 (43%)     max: 386 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
184.2 Watt (34%)
134 Watt (24%)
min: 149.6     avg: 257.3     median: 257.3 (47%)     max: 365 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
76.3 Watt (50%)
min: 8.49     avg: 46.1     median: 46.1 (30%)     max: 83.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
8.2 Points per Watt (6%)
20 Points per Watt (15%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-13400F → 100% n=34

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-9600K → 68% n=34

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-13700 → 132% n=34

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 04. 17:10:22

#0 checking url part for id 14966 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11231 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14997 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720105822 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14966 +0.004s ... 0.009s

#8 got single benchmarks 14966 +0.005s ... 0.014s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11231 +0.001s ... 0.015s

#10 got single benchmarks 11231 +0.004s ... 0.018s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 14997 +0.003s ... 0.022s

#12 got single benchmarks 14997 +0.005s ... 0.026s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.026s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.062s ... 0.088s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.088s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)