Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-13400F vs Intel Core i5-13450HX vs Intel Core i9-13980HX

Intel Core i5-13400F

► remove from comparison Intel i5-13400F

The Intel Core i5-13400F is a mid-range desktop processor of the Raptor Lake series. It includes a hybrid architecture for the CPU cores with combined 10 cores. Six fast Golden Cove / Raptor Cove performance cores (P-cores) with HyperThreading and a clock speed of 3.5 - 5.1 GHz and four Gracemont efficiency cores without HyperThreading and a clock speed of 2.6 - 3.9 GHz. The 13400F can be based on the older Alder Lake chips (at least for early models) or the newer Raptor Lake chips. The F-series of CPUs do not integrate a iGPU.

The performance is clearly higher than the old Core i5-12400F due to the additional four E-cores. These help in multi-threaded workloads and the higher boost core of the p-cores help for single threaded workloads.

The power consumption of the 13400F is rated at 65 Watt for sustained workloads (PL1) and 148 Watt for short bursts (PL2).

Intel Core i5-13450HX

► remove from comparison Intel i5-13450HX

The Intel Core i5-13450HX is a fast mid-range mobile processor of the Raptor Lake series. Is was announced in early 2023. The CPU integrates 6 fast Raptor Cove performance cores (P-cores) with HyperThreading and 4 Gracemont efficiency cores without HyperThreading. The P-Cores clock between 2.4 GHz (base) up to 4.6 GHz (single core boost, all-core 4.5 GHz). The smaller E-Cores clock between 1.8 and 3.4 GHz. All cores can access the combined 20 MB L3 cache (compared to the 36 MB of the i9 models).

Compared to Alder Lake, Raptor Lake offers improved P-Cores (Raptor Cove micro-architecture) with bigger Caches and more E-Cores (same Gracemont micro-architecture). Furthermore, the chip supports faster DDR5 memory (up to 5600 MHz for the 13980HX, but only 4800 MHz for the i5).

Performance

While we have not tested a single system built around the 13450HX as of August 2023, we have tested several systems featuring the Core i5-12600K, a CPU with very similar specs (six P-cores mated to four E-cores, both running at insignificantly faster clock speeds than what the 13450HX has). Based on that, we expect the 13450HX to be 10% to 15% behind the Ryzen 7 7840HS and the Ryzen 9 7940HS, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned.

Your mileage may vary depending on how competent the system's cooling solution is and how high the CPU power limits are.

Power consumption

The chip's "minimum assured" power consumption sits at 45 W. Its Turbo power consumption is not supposed to go over 157 W and its "base" power consumption is supposed to be around 55 W. Most laptop makers will probably go for a value much higher than 55 W to extract as much performance out of the chip as possible.

The i5-13450HX is built with Intel's 4th generation 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for average, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i9-13980HX

► remove from comparison Intel i9-13980HX

The Intel Core i9-13980HX is a fast high-end mobile processor of the Raptor Lake-HX series. Is was announced in early 2023 and is based on the desktop Core i9-13000K with combined 24 cores and 32 threads. Eight fast Raptor Cove performance cores (P-cores) with HyperThreading that clock between 2.2 GHz (base) to 5.6 GHz (single core Turbo). The sixteen Gracemont cores are smaller and slower and optimized for efficiency. They clock between 1.6 GHz (base) and 4 GHz (Turbo).

Compared to Alder Lake, Raptor Lake offers improved P-Cores (Raptor Cove micro-architecture) with bigger Caches and more E-Cores (same Gracemont micro-architecture). Furthermore, the chip supports faster DDR5 memory (up to 5600 MHz for the 13980HX).

Performance

The average 13980HX in our database is in the same league as the Core i9-13950HX and the Ryzen 9 7845HX, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 143 W, the Alienware m18 R1 is among the fastest systems built around the 13980HX that we know of. It can be at least 10% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

The CPU is still produced on a further improved 10nm FinFET process (Intel 7) that allows the higher clock speeds. The power consumption is specified at 55W base power up to 157 Watt max. Turbo power.

ModelIntel Core i5-13400FIntel Core i5-13450HXIntel Core i9-13980HX
SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-SIntel Raptor Lake-HXIntel Raptor Lake-HX
CodenameRaptor Lake-SRaptor Lake-HXRaptor Lake-HX
Series: Raptor Lake-HX Raptor Lake-HX
Intel Core i7-137002.1 - 5.2 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13400F « 2.5 - 4.6 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i5-134002.5 - 4.6 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13980HX1.6 - 5.6 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13950HX1.6 - 5.5 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900HX1.6 - 5.4 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13850HX1.5 - 5.3 GHz20 / 28 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700HX1.5 - 5 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13650HX1.9 - 4.9 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600HX1.9 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500HX1.8 - 4.7 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13450HX « 1.8 - 4.6 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13980HX « 1.6 - 5.6 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13950HX1.6 - 5.5 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900HX1.6 - 5.4 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13850HX1.5 - 5.3 GHz20 / 28 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700HX1.5 - 5 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13650HX1.9 - 4.9 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600HX1.9 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500HX1.8 - 4.7 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13450HX1.8 - 4.6 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Clock2500 - 4600 MHz1800 - 4600 MHz1600 - 5600 MHz
L1 Cache0.1 MB
L2 Cache9.5 MB32 MB
L3 Cache20 MB20 MB36 MB
Cores / Threads10 / 1610 / 16
6 x 4.5 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
4 x 3.4 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
24 / 32
8 x 5.6 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
16 x 4.0 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
TDP65 Watt55 Watt55 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm10 nm
Die Size257 mm2257 mm2257 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C100 °C
SocketLGA 1700BGA1964BGA1964
FeaturesIntel SSE4.1, Intel SSE4.2, Intel AVX2DDR4-3200/DDR5-4800 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR4-3200/DDR5-5600 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Dir., DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Hyper-Threading, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
Architecturex86x86x86
$196 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.comark.intel.com
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) ( - 1450 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 770 ( - 1650 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-13400F
42.5 pt (59%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-13450HX
42.6 pt (59%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-13980HX
54.5 pt (76%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
15911 Points (15%)
16575 Points (15%)
min: 28301     avg: 30428     median: 30273 (28%)     max: 33052 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1744 Points (74%)
1766 Points (75%)
min: 1825     avg: 2081     median: 2110 (90%)     max: 2169 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
672 Points (75%)
680 Points (76%)
min: 717     avg: 790     median: 807 (90%)     max: 825 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
6091 Points (15%)
6489 Points (16%)
min: 10353     avg: 11583     median: 11510 (28%)     max: 12437 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2364 Points (15%)
2427 Points (15%)
min: 4358     avg: 4724     median: 4717 (30%)     max: 5172 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
252 Points (76%)
251 Points (76%)
min: 289     avg: 303.6     median: 304.5 (92%)     max: 312 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
27.5 Points (36%)
29.2 Points (38%)
55.8 Points (73%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.1 Points (76%)
3.1 Points (76%)
3.7 Points (93%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
8689 Points (52%)
9840 Points (59%)
11940 Points (72%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
51113 Points (37%)
58749 Points (43%)
85088 Points (62%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
82988 Points (58%)
125983 Points (87%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
13947 Points (17%)
17400 Points (21%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
367.9 s (4%)
183.5 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.3 s (1%)
3 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
8602 Points (14%)
6830 Points (11%)
11438 Points (18%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
60048 MIPS (34%)
61811 MIPS (35%)
min: 104616     avg: 118958     median: 119244 (68%)     max: 129804 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5743 MIPS (69%)
5571 MIPS (67%)
min: 6889     avg: 6991     median: 6972 (83%)     max: 7163 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
136.9 fps (48%)
141.7 fps (49%)
198.1 fps (69%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
314.5 fps (73%)
324.6 fps (75%)
374 fps (86%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
19.2 fps (34%)
16.9 fps (30%)
min: 27     avg: 31.1     median: 31.6 (56%)     max: 33.4 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.1 GB/s (0%)
1 GB/s (0%)
2.5 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2 GB/s (34%)
1.6 GB/s (28%)
4.9 GB/s (84%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
12.2 GB/s (32%)
13.5 GB/s (35%)
18.4 GB/s (48%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
336 Seconds (4%)
387 Seconds (5%)
min: 170     avg: 194.7     median: 190 (2%)     max: 249 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
206 Seconds (1%)
196 Seconds (1%)
min: 97     avg: 108.4     median: 106 (1%)     max: 136 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.5 sec (10%)
0.5 sec (10%)
min: 0.3793     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (8%)     max: 0.4041 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
13989 Points (30%)
14017 Points (30%)
19734 Points (42%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8 s (2%)
7.2 s (2%)
7.4 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
17.9 s (1%)
15.9 s (1%)
15.5 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
420.5 s (2%)
402 s (2%)
345.8 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
77937 Points (68%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
23820 Points (64%)
21982 Points (59%)
min: 12665     avg: 23608     median: 25051 (68%)     max: 27094 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
77765 Points (63%)
82893 Points (67%)
min: 91195     avg: 94076     median: 94075.5 (76%)     max: 96956 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
76636 Points (62%)
91414 Points (74%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
80273 Points (68%)
94552 Points (80%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
19846 Points (50%)
19916 Points (50%)
min: 15674     avg: 20652     median: 21142 (53%)     max: 24650 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
28087 Points (50%)
27595 Points (49%)
min: 19708     avg: 37344     median: 40175 (72%)     max: 41644 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
12669 Points (53%)
12644 Points (53%)
min: 14503     avg: 16587     median: 17026 (72%)     max: 18234 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
2448 Points (66%)
min: 2802     avg: 2882     median: 2881.5 (78%)     max: 2961 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
12619 Points (50%)
min: 17472     avg: 17564     median: 17564 (69%)     max: 17656 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1792 Points (76%)
1763 Points (74%)
min: 1986     avg: 2079     median: 2099 (89%)     max: 2139 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
12095 Points (22%)
12022 Points (22%)
min: 18475     avg: 20205     median: 20329 (36%)     max: 22200 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1721 Points (7%)
1987 Points (9%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
12009 Points (38%)
22107 Points (70%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
7684 Points (77%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
43856 Points (48%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
7348 Points (100%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
41034 Points (100%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
535 ms (1%)
531 ms (1%)
min: 446     avg: 459.9     median: 451 (1%)     max: 515 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 96184     avg: 102620     median: 102620 (90%)     max: 109055 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
254 Points (73%)
min: 254     avg: 298.6     median: 306 (88%)     max: 318 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
294 Points (61%)
281 Points (59%)
min: 277     avg: 330.2     median: 337 (70%)     max: 349 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1941 Points (74%)
min: 1935     avg: 2079     median: 2080 (80%)     max: 2182 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
214 Watt (37%)
min: 108.7     avg: 134.8     median: 134.8 (23%)     max: 160.8 Watt
min: 157.3     avg: 197.5     median: 191.9 (33%)     max: 262 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
184.2 Watt (34%)
min: 172.2     avg: 222.5     median: 225 (41%)     max: 291 Watt
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
230 Watt (100%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
76.3 Watt (50%)
min: 19.2     avg: 25.4     median: 25.4 (17%)     max: 31.6 Watt
min: 19.8     avg: 25.3     median: 23.2 (15%)     max: 32.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 11.5     avg: 14.8     median: 14.8 (16%)     max: 18.1 Watt
min: 15.2     avg: 25.2     median: 24.9 (28%)     max: 37.8 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 18.3     avg: 21.1     median: 20.4 (15%)     max: 25.3 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-13400F → 100% n=35

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-13450HX → 100% n=35

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-13980HX → 141% n=35

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 30. 19:41:30

#0 checking url part for id 14966 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14673 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14665 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719769289 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.008s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14966 +0.005s ... 0.013s

#8 got single benchmarks 14966 +0.005s ... 0.017s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14673 +0.003s ... 0.021s

#10 got single benchmarks 14673 +0.006s ... 0.026s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 14665 +0.004s ... 0.031s

#12 got single benchmarks 14665 +0.019s ... 0.05s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.05s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.08s ... 0.13s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.13s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)