Intel Core i5-13400F vs Intel Core i9-13980HX
Intel Core i5-13400F ► remove from comparison
The Intel Core i5-13400F is a mid-range desktop processor of the Raptor Lake series. It includes a hybrid architecture for the CPU cores with combined 10 cores. Six fast Golden Cove / Raptor Cove performance cores (P-cores) with HyperThreading and a clock speed of 3.5 - 5.1 GHz and four Gracemont efficiency cores without HyperThreading and a clock speed of 2.6 - 3.9 GHz. The 13400F can be based on the older Alder Lake chips (at least for early models) or the newer Raptor Lake chips. The F-series of CPUs do not integrate a iGPU.
The performance is clearly higher than the old Core i5-12400F due to the additional four E-cores. These help in multi-threaded workloads and the higher boost core of the p-cores help for single threaded workloads.
The power consumption of the 13400F is rated at 65 Watt for sustained workloads (PL1) and 148 Watt for short bursts (PL2).
Intel Core i9-13980HX ► remove from comparison
The Intel Core i9-13980HX is a fast high-end mobile processor of the Raptor Lake-HX series. Is was announced in early 2023 and is based on the desktop Core i9-13000K with combined 24 cores and 32 threads. Eight fast Raptor Cove performance cores (P-cores) with HyperThreading that clock between 2.2 GHz (base) to 5.6 GHz (single core Turbo). The sixteen Gracemont cores are smaller and slower and optimized for efficiency. They clock between 1.6 GHz (base) and 4 GHz (Turbo).
Compared to Alder Lake, Raptor Lake offers improved P-Cores (Raptor Cove micro-architecture) with bigger Caches and more E-Cores (same Gracemont micro-architecture). Furthermore, the chip supports faster DDR5 memory (up to 5600 MHz for the 13980HX).
Performance
The average 13980HX in our database is in the same league as the Core i9-13950HX and the Ryzen 9 7845HX , as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned.
Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 143 W, the Alienware m18 R1 is among the fastest systems built around the 13980HX that we know of. It can be at least 10% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.
The CPU is still produced on a further improved 10nm FinFET process (Intel 7) that allows the higher clock speeds. The power consumption is specified at 55W base power up to 157 Watt max. Turbo power.
Model Intel Core i5-13400F Intel Core i9-13980HX Series Intel Raptor Lake-S Intel Raptor Lake-HX Codename Raptor Lake-S Raptor Lake-HX Series: Raptor Lake-HX Raptor Lake-HX Clock 2500 - 4600 MHz 1600 - 5600 MHz L1 Cache 0.1 MB L2 Cache 9.5 MB 32 MB L3 Cache 20 MB 36 MB Cores / Threads 10 / 16 24 / 32 8 x 5.6 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core 16 x 4.0 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core TDP 65 Watt 55 Watt Technology 10 nm 10 nm Die Size 257 mm2 257 mm2 max. Temp. 100 °C 100 °C Socket LGA 1700 BGA1964 Features Intel SSE4.1, Intel SSE4.2, Intel AVX2 DDR4-3200/DDR5-5600 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Dir., DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Hyper-Threading, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA Architecture x86 x86 $196 U.S. Announced Manufacturer ark.intel.com ark.intel.com iGPU Intel UHD Graphics 770 ( - 1650 MHz)
Benchmarks Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-13400F
42.5 pt (59%)
...
Intel Core i5-13500
...
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-13980HX
54.5 pt (76%)
...
...
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
15911 Points (15%)
min: 28301 avg: 30428 median: 30273 (28%) max: 33052 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 80 W TDP 125 W TDP 130 W TDP 143 W TDP 157 W TDP 170 W 94% 68% 89% 92% 93% 100% 89% 97%
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1744 Points (74%)
min: 1825 avg: 2081 median: 2110 (90%) max: 2169 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 80 W TDP 125 W TDP 130 W TDP 143 W TDP 170 W 98% 89% 85% 99% 99% 98% 100%
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
672 Points (75%)
min: 717 avg: 790 median: 807 (90%) max: 825 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 80 W TDP 125 W TDP 130 W TDP 143 W TDP 157 W TDP 170 W 98% 89% 87% 88% 99% 98% 94% 100%
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
6091 Points (15%)
min: 10353 avg: 11583 median: 11510 (28%) max: 12437 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 80 W TDP 125 W TDP 130 W TDP 143 W TDP 157 W TDP 170 W 95% 66% 91% 90% 94% 100% 90% 97%
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2364 Points (15%)
min: 4358 avg: 4724 median: 4717 (30%) max: 5172 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 80 W TDP 125 W TDP 130 W TDP 143 W TDP 157 W TDP 170 W 98% 67% 94% 92% 94% 100% 91% 96%
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
252 Points (76%)
min: 289 avg: 303.6 median: 304.5 (92%) max: 312 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 80 W TDP 125 W TDP 130 W TDP 143 W TDP 157 W TDP 170 W 98% 90% 93% 97% 97% 97% 94% 100%
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
27.5 Points (36%)
55.8 Points (73%)
CPU TDP 65 W TDP 170 W 49% 100%
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.1 Points (76%)
3.7 Points (93%)
CPU TDP 65 W TDP 170 W 82% 100%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
8689 Points (52%)
11940 Points (72%)
CPU TDP 65 W TDP 170 W 73% 100%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
51113 Points (37%)
85088 Points (62%)
CPU TDP 65 W TDP 170 W 60% 100%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
82988 Points (58%)
125983 Points (87%)
CPU TDP 65 W TDP 170 W 66% 100%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
13947 Points (17%)
17400 Points (21%)
CPU TDP 65 W TDP 170 W 80% 100%
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
367.9 s (4%)
183.5 s (2%)
CPU TDP 65 W TDP 170 W 100% 102%
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.3 s (1%)
3 s (1%)
CPU TDP 65 W TDP 170 W 100% 100%
8602 Points (14%)
11438 Points (18%)
CPU TDP 65 W TDP 170 W 75% 100%
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
60048 MIPS (34%)
min: 104616 avg: 118958 median: 119244 (68%) max: 129804 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 80 W TDP 125 W TDP 130 W TDP 143 W TDP 157 W TDP 170 W 94% 68% 81% 91% 90% 100% 86% 95%
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5743 MIPS (69%)
min: 6889 avg: 6991 median: 6972 (83%) max: 7163 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 80 W TDP 125 W TDP 130 W TDP 143 W TDP 157 W TDP 170 W 98% 90% 98% 98% 99% 97% 88% 100%
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
136.9 fps (48%)
198.1 fps (69%)
CPU TDP 65 W TDP 170 W 69% 100%
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
314.5 fps (73%)
374 fps (86%)
CPU TDP 65 W TDP 170 W 84% 100%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
19.2 fps (34%)
min: 27 avg: 31.1 median: 31.6 (56%) max: 33.4 fps
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 80 W TDP 125 W TDP 130 W TDP 143 W TDP 170 W 97% 73% 81% 95% 90% 99% 100%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.1 GB/s (0%)
2.5 GB/s (0%)
CPU TDP 65 W TDP 170 W 44% 100%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2 GB/s (34%)
4.9 GB/s (84%)
CPU TDP 65 W TDP 170 W 41% 100%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
12.2 GB/s (32%)
18.4 GB/s (48%)
CPU TDP 65 W TDP 170 W 66% 100%
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
336 Seconds (4%)
min: 170 avg: 194.7 median: 190 (2%) max: 249 Seconds
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 80 W TDP 125 W TDP 130 W TDP 143 W TDP 170 W 101% 100% 100% 101% 101% 101% 101%
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
206 Seconds (1%)
min: 97 avg: 108.4 median: 106 (1%) max: 136 Seconds
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 80 W TDP 125 W TDP 130 W TDP 143 W TDP 157 W TDP 170 W 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.5 sec (10%)
min: 0.3793 avg: 0.4 median: 0.4 (8%) max: 0.4041 sec
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 80 W TDP 125 W TDP 130 W TDP 143 W TDP 157 W TDP 170 W 101% 100% 101% 102% 101% 101% 100% 102%
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
13989 Points (30%)
19734 Points (42%)
CPU TDP 65 W TDP 170 W 71% 100%
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8 s (2%)
7.4 s (2%)
CPU TDP 65 W TDP 170 W 100% 100%
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
17.9 s (1%)
15.5 s (1%)
CPU TDP 65 W TDP 170 W 100% 100%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
420.5 s (2%)
345.8 s (2%)
CPU TDP 65 W TDP 170 W 100% 100%
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
77937 Points (68%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
23820 Points (64%)
min: 12665 avg: 23608 median: 25051 (68%) max: 27094 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 80 W TDP 125 W TDP 130 W TDP 143 W TDP 170 W 89% 86% 47% 88% 95% 100% 98%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
77765 Points (63%)
min: 91195 avg: 94076 median: 94075.5 (76%) max: 96956 Points
CPU TDP 65 W TDP 130 W TDP 170 W 80% 100% 94%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
76636 Points (62%)
91414 Points (74%)
CPU TDP 65 W TDP 170 W 84% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
80273 Points (68%)
94552 Points (80%)
CPU TDP 65 W TDP 170 W 85% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
19846 Points (50%)
min: 15674 avg: 20652 median: 21142 (53%) max: 24650 Points
CPU TDP 65 W TDP 80 W TDP 130 W TDP 170 W 77% 64% 100% 98%
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
28087 Points (50%)
min: 19708 avg: 37344 median: 40175 (72%) max: 41644 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 80 W TDP 125 W TDP 130 W TDP 143 W TDP 170 W 93% 77% 47% 93% 98% 100% 99%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
12669 Points (53%)
min: 14503 avg: 16587 median: 17026 (72%) max: 18234 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 80 W TDP 125 W TDP 130 W TDP 143 W TDP 170 W 100% 77% 84% 100% 95% 99% 90%
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 2802 avg: 2882 median: 2881.5 (78%) max: 2961 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 125 W 95% 100%
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 17472 avg: 17564 median: 17564 (69%) max: 17656 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 125 W 100% 99%
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1792 Points (76%)
min: 1986 avg: 2079 median: 2099 (89%) max: 2139 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 80 W TDP 125 W TDP 130 W TDP 143 W TDP 157 W TDP 170 W 97% 91% 94% 100% 98% 97% 84% 98%
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
12095 Points (22%)
min: 18475 avg: 20205 median: 20329 (36%) max: 22200 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 80 W TDP 125 W TDP 130 W TDP 143 W TDP 157 W TDP 170 W 93% 70% 83% 93% 89% 100% 86% 94%
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1721 Points (7%)
1987 Points (9%)
CPU TDP 65 W TDP 143 W 87% 100%
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
12009 Points (38%)
22107 Points (70%)
CPU TDP 65 W TDP 143 W 54% 100%
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
7684 Points (77%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
43856 Points (48%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
535 ms (1%)
min: 446 avg: 459.9 median: 451 (1%) max: 515 ms
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 80 W TDP 125 W TDP 130 W TDP 143 W TDP 170 W 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 96184 avg: 102620 median: 102620 (90%) max: 109055 Points
CPU TDP 80 W TDP 130 W 88% 100%
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
254 Points (73%)
min: 254 avg: 298.6 median: 306 (88%) max: 318 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 80 W TDP 125 W TDP 130 W TDP 143 W TDP 170 W 94% 80% 80% 96% 96% 96% 100%
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
294 Points (61%)
min: 277 avg: 330.2 median: 337 (70%) max: 349 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 80 W TDP 125 W TDP 130 W TDP 143 W TDP 170 W 94% 91% 79% 100% 97% 97% 97%
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1941 Points (74%)
min: 1935 avg: 2079 median: 2080 (80%) max: 2182 Points
CPU TDP 65 W TDP 80 W TDP 125 W TDP 130 W TDP 143 W TDP 170 W 91% 94% 89% 99% 100% 96%
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
214 Watt (37%)
min: 157.3 avg: 197.5 median: 191.9 (33%) max: 262 Watt
CPU TDP 65 W TDP 80 W TDP 125 W TDP 130 W TDP 143 W 119% 129% 116% 127% 100%
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
184.2 Watt (34%)
min: 172.2 avg: 222.5 median: 225 (41%) max: 291 Watt
CPU TDP 65 W TDP 80 W TDP 125 W TDP 130 W TDP 143 W TDP 170 W 144% 132% 116% 135% 100% 122%
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
230 Watt (100%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
76.3 Watt (50%)
min: 19.8 avg: 25.3 median: 23.2 (15%) max: 32.3 Watt
CPU TDP 65 W TDP 80 W TDP 125 W TDP 130 W TDP 143 W TDP 170 W 100% 133% 120% 132% 130% 121%
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 15.2 avg: 25.2 median: 24.9 (28%) max: 37.8 Watt
CPU TDP 65 W TDP 80 W TDP 125 W TDP 130 W TDP 143 W TDP 170 W 121% 143% 101% 139% 125% 100%
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 18.3 avg: 21.1 median: 20.4 (15%) max: 25.3 Points per Watt
CPU TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 130 W TDP 170 W 100% 72% 81% 80%
Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-13400F → 100% n=45 Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-13980HX → 137% n=45
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
v1.28
log 02. 16:23:18
#0 checking url part for id 14966 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 14665 +0s ... 0s
#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719930197 +0s ... 0s
#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s
#4 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s
#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s
#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14966 +0.004s ... 0.01s
#7 got single benchmarks 14966 +0.004s ... 0.014s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14665 +0.004s ... 0.018s
#9 got single benchmarks 14665 +0.016s ... 0.034s
#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.034s
#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.062s ... 0.096s
#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.099s
Please share our article, every link counts!
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)