Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-12400F vs Intel Core i5-11600K

Intel Core i5-12400F

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i5-12400F is a fast six-core processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, which was introduced in January 2022. The processor has a base clock speed of 2.5 GHz and reaches a maximum clock speed of up to 4.4 GHz under load. As with its predecessor, the Intel Core i5-11400F, Alder-Lake also supports hyperthreading, which means that up to 12 threads can be processed simultaneously. The Intel Core i5-12400F is manufactured using the 10 nm process. There are many changes to the new architecture, which is essentially based on a hybrid architecture. However, the Intel Core i5-12400F does not fully benefit from this, as only P-cores are used under the heatspreader. Only with the faster Intel Core i5-12600K can you enjoy the performance of the combination of P and E cores. The Intel Core i5-12400F is a non-K CPU, which in turn means that there is no freely selectable multiplier, which means that the CPU is not suitable for overclocking.

Performance

Compared to the Intel Core i5-11400F , the IPC of the Intel Core i5-12400F has been significantly increased again. The performance difference between the two processors is between 10 and 20 percent in most cases. Due to the good single-thread performance, the Intel Core i5-12400F is definitely a sensible CPU to use as the basis in a gaming PC.

Graphics unit

The processors marked with an "F" in the nomenclature do not offer an integrated graphics unit. All other non-F processors can rely on the Intel Iris Xe.

Power consumption

The TDP is relatively low at 65 watts. This is the PL1 value. For Turbo, the Intel Core i5-12400F with PL2 offers a higher TDP of up to 117 watts. If all restrictions are deactivated in the BIOS, there is no time limit for the PL2 value. With the maximum 117 watts, a large cooling unit is not required.

Intel Core i5-11600K

► remove from comparison Intel i5-11600K

The Intel Core i5-11600K is a high-end desktop CPU based on the Rocket Lake architecture. The CPU offers 6 cores and 12 threads clocked at 3.9 - 4.9 GHz (Turbo Boost 2.0 only). Using all cores, the CPU can clock up to 4.6 GHz.  

The TDP is rated at 125 Watt (PL1, power limit sustained load) but the PL2 is set to around 250 Watt for short term boosts (up to 56 seconds). 

The Sunny Cove processor cores (known from the Ice Lake mobile CPUs) offer larger caches and an improved IPC (up to 19%). Furthermore, the chip also includes (partly) integrated WiFi 6E and Thunderbolt 4. The platform supports PCIe 4.0 and Intel DL Boost for AI acceleration.

Thanks to the faster core architecture, the 11600K can beat the old i5-10600K by around 20 percent. Therefore, the i5-11600K is a good mid range choice for gaming.

The faster Rocket Lake-S CPUs also integrate a new Intel UHD Graphics 750 that is based on the current Intel Xe architecture (e.g. mobile Tiger Lake) and offers 32 EUs. In the 11600K, the GPU is clocked from 350 - 1300 MHz.

The CPU is manufactured on the old 14nm process like the Comet Lake predecessors. The power consumption is not as high, as the Core i9-11900K, but can't come close to the power efficient Ryzen 5 5600X.

ModelIntel Core i5-12400FIntel Core i5-11600K
Series Alder Lake-SIntel Rocket Lake
CodenameAlder Lake-SRocket Lake
Clock2500 - 4400 MHz3900 - 4900 MHz
L1 Cache480 KB480 KB
L2 Cache7.5 MB3 MB
L3 Cache17.9 MB12 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 126 / 12
TDP65 Watt125 Watt
Technology10 nm14 nm
Die Size163 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
Socket1700LGA1200
FeaturesTVB, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, Quick Sync, VirtualizationDDR4-3200 RAM, PCIe 4, 8 GT/s bus, DL Boost, GNA, vPro, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
Architecturex86x86
$180 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerwww.intel.deark.intel.com
Series: Rocket Lake Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K compare3.5 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-11700K compare3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-11700 compare2.5 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11600K « 3.9 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11400F compare2.6 - 4.4 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11400T compare1.3 - 3.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) (350 - 1300 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-12400F
39.8 pt (55%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-11600K
39.4 pt (55%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
12380 Points (11%)
min: 11124     avg: 11218     median: 11217.5 (10%)     max: 11311 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1680 Points (71%)
min: 1500     avg: 1530     median: 1529.5 (65%)     max: 1559 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
653 Points (73%)
min: 576     avg: 586     median: 585.5 (65%)     max: 595 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
4740 Points (12%)
min: 4254     avg: 4302     median: 4301.5 (10%)     max: 4349 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1759 Points (11%)
min: 1738     avg: 1744     median: 1744 (11%)     max: 1750 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
244 Points (73%)
min: 234     avg: 238     median: 238 (72%)     max: 242 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
20.4 Points (27%)
19.3 Points (25%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3 Points (73%)
2.9 Points (71%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
8389 Points (51%)
9745 Points (59%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
40690 Points (29%)
49408 Points (36%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
69819 Points (48%)
64663 Points (45%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
13664 Points (17%)
12957 Points (16%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
112.8 s (1%)
107.6 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
4.1 s (1%)
4.9 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
7816 Points (12%)
7850 Points (12%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
45043 MIPS (26%)
min: 44620     avg: 44971     median: 44971 (26%)     max: 45322 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5476 MIPS (65%)
min: 5987     avg: 6062     median: 6061.5 (72%)     max: 6136 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
101.4 fps (35%)
min: 100.5     avg: 100.8     median: 100.8 (35%)     max: 101 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
252.5 fps (58%)
min: 279     avg: 289     median: 289 (67%)     max: 299 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
15.2 fps (27%)
min: 14     avg: 14.4     median: 14.4 (25%)     max: 14.7 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.9 GB/s (0%)
0.9 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.4 GB/s (24%)
1.5 GB/s (26%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
9.3 GB/s (24%)
9.7 GB/s (25%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
430 Seconds (5%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
269 Seconds (2%)
min: 264.5     avg: 267.3     median: 267.3 (2%)     max: 270 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.5 sec (10%)
min: 0.506     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (11%)     max: 0.528 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
11892 Points (25%)
14519 Points (31%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.3 s (2%)
6.8 s (1%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
18.5 s (1%)
14.8 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
438.4 s (2%)
353.7 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
63413 Points (56%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
19436 Points (53%)
min: 15381     avg: 16381     median: 16381 (44%)     max: 17381 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
81984 Points (67%)
min: 70567     avg: 75640     median: 75640 (61%)     max: 80713 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
82024 Points (67%)
79747 Points (65%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
81270 Points (68%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
15317 Points (39%)
min: 14147     avg: 14403     median: 14402.5 (36%)     max: 14658 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
24023 Points (43%)
min: 21677     avg: 22154     median: 22154 (39%)     max: 22631 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
9745 Points (41%)
min: 8286     avg: 8884     median: 8884 (37%)     max: 9482 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1742 Points (74%)
min: 1694     avg: 1723     median: 1723 (73%)     max: 1752 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
9517 Points (17%)
min: 8336     avg: 8430     median: 8429.5 (15%)     max: 8523 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1673 Points (7%)
1731 Points (8%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
9368 Points (30%)
8542 Points (27%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
7548 Points (75%)
7438 Points (74%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
35098 Points (39%)
33266 Points (37%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
573 ms (1%)
min: 587     avg: 598     median: 597.5 (1%)     max: 608 ms
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
235 Points (68%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
272 Points (57%)
min: 263     avg: 271.5     median: 271.5 (57%)     max: 280 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1762 Points (67%)
1652 Points (63%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
239 Watt (41%)
min: 187     avg: 204.7     median: 199 (34%)     max: 228 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
194.4 Watt (35%)
min: 177     avg: 195.3     median: 189 (34%)     max: 219.9 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
83.6 Watt (55%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 7.9     avg: 8.9     median: 8.9 (7%)     max: 9.89 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-12400F → 100% n=44

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-11600K → 99% n=44

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 29. 19:08:33

#0 checking url part for id 14994 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13163 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719680912 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.003s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14994 +0.004s ... 0.008s

#7 got single benchmarks 14994 +0.005s ... 0.012s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 13163 +0.003s ... 0.016s

#9 got single benchmarks 13163 +0.005s ... 0.02s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.02s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.048s ... 0.068s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.07s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)