Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-12400F vs Intel Core i5-11600K vs Intel Core i9-11900K

Intel Core i5-12400F

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i5-12400F is a fast six-core processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, which was introduced in January 2022. The processor has a base clock speed of 2.5 GHz and reaches a maximum clock speed of up to 4.4 GHz under load. As with its predecessor, the Intel Core i5-11400F, Alder-Lake also supports hyperthreading, which means that up to 12 threads can be processed simultaneously. The Intel Core i5-12400F is manufactured using the 10 nm process. There are many changes to the new architecture, which is essentially based on a hybrid architecture. However, the Intel Core i5-12400F does not fully benefit from this, as only P-cores are used under the heatspreader. Only with the faster Intel Core i5-12600K can you enjoy the performance of the combination of P and E cores. The Intel Core i5-12400F is a non-K CPU, which in turn means that there is no freely selectable multiplier, which means that the CPU is not suitable for overclocking.

Performance

Compared to the Intel Core i5-11400F , the IPC of the Intel Core i5-12400F has been significantly increased again. The performance difference between the two processors is between 10 and 20 percent in most cases. Due to the good single-thread performance, the Intel Core i5-12400F is definitely a sensible CPU to use as the basis in a gaming PC.

Graphics unit

The processors marked with an "F" in the nomenclature do not offer an integrated graphics unit. All other non-F processors can rely on the Intel Iris Xe.

Power consumption

The TDP is relatively low at 65 watts. This is the PL1 value. For Turbo, the Intel Core i5-12400F with PL2 offers a higher TDP of up to 117 watts. If all restrictions are deactivated in the BIOS, there is no time limit for the PL2 value. With the maximum 117 watts, a large cooling unit is not required.

Intel Core i5-11600K

► remove from comparison Intel i5-11600K

The Intel Core i5-11600K is a high-end desktop CPU based on the Rocket Lake architecture. The CPU offers 6 cores and 12 threads clocked at 3.9 - 4.9 GHz (Turbo Boost 2.0 only). Using all cores, the CPU can clock up to 4.6 GHz.  

The TDP is rated at 125 Watt (PL1, power limit sustained load) but the PL2 is set to around 250 Watt for short term boosts (up to 56 seconds). 

The Sunny Cove processor cores (known from the Ice Lake mobile CPUs) offer larger caches and an improved IPC (up to 19%). Furthermore, the chip also includes (partly) integrated WiFi 6E and Thunderbolt 4. The platform supports PCIe 4.0 and Intel DL Boost for AI acceleration.

Thanks to the faster core architecture, the 11600K can beat the old i5-10600K by around 20 percent. Therefore, the i5-11600K is a good mid range choice for gaming.

The faster Rocket Lake-S CPUs also integrate a new Intel UHD Graphics 750 that is based on the current Intel Xe architecture (e.g. mobile Tiger Lake) and offers 32 EUs. In the 11600K, the GPU is clocked from 350 - 1300 MHz.

The CPU is manufactured on the old 14nm process like the Comet Lake predecessors. The power consumption is not as high, as the Core i9-11900K, but can't come close to the power efficient Ryzen 5 5600X.

Intel Core i9-11900K

► remove from comparison Intel i9-11900K

The Intel Core i9-11900K is a high-end desktop CPU based on the Rocket Lake architecture. The CPU offers 8 cores and 16 threads clocked at 3.5 - 5.3 GHz (Turbo Boost 3.0 / TVB). With Turbo Boost 2.0, 5.1 GHz can be reached with a single thread. Using all cores, the CPU can clock up to 4.8 GHz. Adaptive Boost enables even higher multi-core frequencies (5.1 GHz all core Turbo) but uses a lot more power.

The TDP is rated at 125 Watt (PL1, power limit sustained load) but the PL2 is set to around 250 Watt for short term boosts (up to 56 seconds).

The Sunny Cove processor cores (known from the Ice Lake mobile CPUs) offer larger caches and an improved IPC (up to 19%). Furthermore, the chip also includes (partly) integrated WiFi 6E and Thunderbolt 4. The platform supports PCIe 4.0 and Intel DL Boost for AI acceleration.

The faster Rocket Lake-S CPUs also integrate a new Intel UHD Graphics 750 that is based on the current Intel Xe architecture (e.g. mobile Tiger Lake) and offers 32 EUs. In the 11900K, the GPU is clocked from 350 - 1300 MHz.

Performance

The average 11900K in our database is in the same league as the Ryzen 7 5800X3D, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. Which is an impressive result, as of mid 2022, and good enough for any task imaginable including content creation and professional gaming.

Power consumption

This Core i9 has a 125 W TDP, also known as the long-term power limit. Intel lets PC manufacturers reduce that value somewhat if required, 95 W being the lower limit, which would result in lower clock speeds and lower performance. The reality is, an 11900K can be much more power hungry than either of the two numbers imply simply because of its sheer might but also because it is manufactured on an old 14 nm Intel process that makes for lower-than-average, as of mid-2022, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i5-12400FIntel Core i5-11600KIntel Core i9-11900K
Series Alder Lake-SIntel Rocket LakeIntel Rocket Lake
CodenameAlder Lake-SRocket LakeRocket Lake
Clock2500 - 4400 MHz3900 - 4900 MHz3500 - 5300 MHz
L1 Cache480 KB480 KB640 KB
L2 Cache7.5 MB3 MB4 MB
L3 Cache17.9 MB12 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 126 / 128 / 16
TDP65 Watt125 Watt125 Watt
Technology10 nm14 nm14 nm
Die Size163 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C100 °C
Socket1700LGA1200LGA1200
FeaturesTVB, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, Quick Sync, VirtualizationDDR4-3200 RAM, PCIe 4, 8 GT/s bus, DL Boost, GNA, vPro, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR4-3200 RAM, PCIe 4, 8 GT/s bus, DL Boost, GNA, vPro, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512F, FMA3, SHA
Architecturex86x86x86
$180 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerwww.intel.deark.intel.comark.intel.com
Series: Rocket Lake Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K3.5 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-11700K3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-117002.5 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11600K « 3.9 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11400F2.6 - 4.4 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11400T1.3 - 3.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i9-11900K « 3.5 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-11700K3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-117002.5 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11600K3.9 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11400F2.6 - 4.4 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11400T1.3 - 3.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) (350 - 1300 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) (350 - 1300 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-12400F
39.8 pt (55%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-11600K
39.4 pt (55%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-11900K
42.7 pt (59%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
98 Points (68%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
698 Points (13%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
12380 Points (11%)
min: 11124     avg: 11218     median: 11217.5 (10%)     max: 11311 Points
min: 13825     avg: 14669     median: 14747 (14%)     max: 15519 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1680 Points (71%)
min: 1500     avg: 1530     median: 1529.5 (65%)     max: 1559 Points
min: 1604     avg: 1640     median: 1636 (70%)     max: 1693 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
653 Points (73%)
min: 576     avg: 586     median: 585.5 (65%)     max: 595 Points
min: 619     avg: 633     median: 633 (70%)     max: 647 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
4740 Points (12%)
min: 4254     avg: 4302     median: 4301.5 (10%)     max: 4349 Points
min: 5055     avg: 5499     median: 5306 (13%)     max: 5997 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1759 Points (11%)
min: 1738     avg: 1744     median: 1744 (11%)     max: 1750 Points
min: 2238     avg: 2358     median: 2379 (15%)     max: 2436 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
244 Points (73%)
min: 234     avg: 238     median: 238 (72%)     max: 242 Points
min: 254     avg: 256.5     median: 255 (77%)     max: 262 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
20.4 Points (27%)
19.3 Points (25%)
26.8 Points (35%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3 Points (73%)
2.9 Points (71%)
3.1 Points (77%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
8389 Points (51%)
9745 Points (59%)
10545 Points (64%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
40690 Points (29%)
49408 Points (36%)
62024 Points (45%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
69819 Points (48%)
64663 Points (45%)
80613 Points (56%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
13664 Points (17%)
12957 Points (16%)
14149 Points (17%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
112.8 s (1%)
107.6 s (1%)
77.9 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
4.1 s (1%)
4.9 s (1%)
4 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
7816 Points (12%)
7850 Points (12%)
9030 Points (14%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
45043 MIPS (26%)
min: 44620     avg: 44971     median: 44971 (26%)     max: 45322 MIPS
min: 54125     avg: 59047     median: 59658.5 (34%)     max: 62746 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5476 MIPS (65%)
min: 5987     avg: 6062     median: 6061.5 (72%)     max: 6136 MIPS
min: 6174     avg: 6380     median: 6347 (76%)     max: 6652 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
101.4 fps (35%)
min: 100.5     avg: 100.8     median: 100.8 (35%)     max: 101 fps
137 fps (48%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
252.5 fps (58%)
min: 279     avg: 289     median: 289 (67%)     max: 299 fps
309.5 fps (71%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
15.2 fps (27%)
min: 14     avg: 14.4     median: 14.4 (25%)     max: 14.7 fps
min: 16.6     avg: 18.2     median: 18.2 (32%)     max: 19.8 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.9 GB/s (0%)
0.9 GB/s (0%)
1.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.4 GB/s (24%)
1.5 GB/s (26%)
1.9 GB/s (33%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
9.3 GB/s (24%)
9.7 GB/s (25%)
13 GB/s (34%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
430 Seconds (5%)
428 Seconds (5%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
269 Seconds (2%)
min: 264.5     avg: 267.3     median: 267.3 (2%)     max: 270 Seconds
min: 190.3     avg: 210.8     median: 211.9 (1%)     max: 229 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.5 sec (10%)
min: 0.506     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (11%)     max: 0.528 sec
min: 0.4733     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (11%)     max: 0.4981 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
11892 Points (25%)
14519 Points (31%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.3 s (2%)
6.8 s (1%)
6.3 s (1%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
18.5 s (1%)
14.8 s (1%)
13.7 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
438.4 s (2%)
353.7 s (2%)
331.4 s (1%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
63413 Points (56%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
19436 Points (53%)
min: 15381     avg: 16381     median: 16381 (44%)     max: 17381 Points
min: 20149     avg: 20662     median: 20662 (56%)     max: 21175 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
81984 Points (67%)
min: 70567     avg: 75640     median: 75640 (61%)     max: 80713 Points
min: 74965     avg: 79326     median: 79325.5 (64%)     max: 83686 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
82024 Points (67%)
79747 Points (65%)
75316 Points (61%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
81270 Points (68%)
85348 Points (72%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
15317 Points (39%)
min: 14147     avg: 14403     median: 14402.5 (36%)     max: 14658 Points
min: 18242     avg: 19567     median: 20094 (51%)     max: 20364 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
24023 Points (43%)
min: 21677     avg: 22154     median: 22154 (39%)     max: 22631 Points
min: 26699     avg: 27967     median: 28121 (50%)     max: 28927 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
9745 Points (41%)
min: 8286     avg: 8884     median: 8884 (37%)     max: 9482 Points
min: 11012     avg: 12563     median: 12902.5 (54%)     max: 13433 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1742 Points (74%)
min: 1694     avg: 1723     median: 1723 (73%)     max: 1752 Points
min: 1748     avg: 1796     median: 1787.5 (75%)     max: 1885 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
9517 Points (17%)
min: 8336     avg: 8430     median: 8429.5 (15%)     max: 8523 Points
min: 9547     avg: 10328     median: 10483 (19%)     max: 11035 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1673 Points (7%)
1731 Points (8%)
1863 Points (8%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
9368 Points (30%)
8542 Points (27%)
11008 Points (35%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
7548 Points (75%)
7438 Points (74%)
7976 Points (80%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
35098 Points (39%)
33266 Points (37%)
42329 Points (46%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
573 ms (1%)
min: 587     avg: 598     median: 597.5 (1%)     max: 608 ms
min: 544     avg: 566     median: 569.5 (1%)     max: 581 ms
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
235 Points (68%)
min: 244     avg: 247     median: 247 (71%)     max: 250 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
272 Points (57%)
min: 263     avg: 271.5     median: 271.5 (57%)     max: 280 Points
min: 217     avg: 268.5     median: 283.5 (59%)     max: 290 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1762 Points (67%)
1652 Points (63%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
239 Watt (41%)
min: 187     avg: 204.7     median: 199 (34%)     max: 228 Watt
min: 197     avg: 235.6     median: 221.5 (38%)     max: 302.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
194.4 Watt (35%)
min: 177     avg: 195.3     median: 189 (34%)     max: 219.9 Watt
min: 243     avg: 274.3     median: 259.2 (47%)     max: 336 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
83.6 Watt (55%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 7.9     avg: 8.9     median: 8.9 (7%)     max: 9.89 Points per Watt
min: 7.03     avg: 8.4     median: 8.6 (6%)     max: 9.39 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-12400F → 100% n=42

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-11600K → 98% n=42

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-11900K → 114% n=42

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 01. 22:37:20

#0 checking url part for id 14994 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13163 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 13161 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719866240 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14994 +0.003s ... 0.007s

#8 got single benchmarks 14994 +0.004s ... 0.012s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 13163 +0.001s ... 0.013s

#10 got single benchmarks 13163 +0.001s ... 0.013s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 13161 +0.003s ... 0.017s

#12 got single benchmarks 13161 +0.008s ... 0.025s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.025s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.063s ... 0.088s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.088s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)