Intel Core i5-10400H vs Intel Core i7-13700H
Intel Core i5-10400H ► remove from comparison
The Intel Core i5-10400H is a fast processor for laptops with four cores based on the Comet Lake-H series (4th generation of Skylake architecture). The processor clocks at between 2.6 and 4.6 GHz (up to 4.4 with 4 cores) and can execute up to eight threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured in 14nm (14nm++) process.
The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here .
The Core i5-10400H supports the management features vPro, TXT and SIPP.
Performance
The performance should be slightly better than the old Core i7-8809G (Quad-Core 3.1 - 4.2) which was the fastest mobile quad core by Intel.
Graphics
The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a similar performance as the UHD630 in the Core i5-9300H. As a low-end solution it will probably only run current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.
Power Consumption
Intel specifies the TDP with 45 watts and therefore the i5 is only suited for big laptops with good cooling solutions. Using cTDP-down, the CPU can also be configured to 35 Watt resulting in a reduced performance.
Intel Core i7-13700H ► remove from comparison
The Intel Core i7-13700H is a high-end mobile CPU for laptops based on the Raptor Lake-H series (Alder Lake architecture). It was announced in early 2023 and offers 6 performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) and 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores support Hyper-Threading leading to 20 supported threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock rate ranges from 2.4 to 5 GHz (single core turbo, all-core 4.7 GHz) on the performance cluster and 1.8 to 3.7 GHz on the efficiency cluster. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare with the Core i7-6920HQ ). All cores can use up to 24 MB L3 cache.
Performance
The average 13700H in our database delivers multi-thread benchmark scores that are most similar to those of the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS , Core i7-12700H , Core i9-12900H . This is a very, very fast CPU, as of mid 2023, even if it does not quite manage to demolish its direct predecessor (the 12700H).
Thanks to its powerful cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 90 W, the MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK is among the fastest systems built around the i7-13700H that we know of. It can be 60% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system in our database powered by the same chip, as of August 2023.
Features
The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to DDR5-5200 (up from 4800 MHz for the 12th gen). The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficient cores for the best performance. For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC, and AV1 decode in hardware. The CPU now supports PCIe 5.0 x8 for a GPU and two PCIe 4.0 x4 for SSDs.
The integrated graphics card is based on the Xe-architecture and offers 96 EUs (Execution Units) clocked at up to 1.5 GHz.
The CPU is rated at 45 W base power (115 W PL2) but most laptops will use a PL1 of around 60 Watt. The SoC is manufactured in a 10nm process at Intel, which is known as Intel 7 (improved over the 12th Gen).
Model Intel Core i5-10400H Intel Core i7-13700H Series Intel Comet Lake Intel Raptor Lake-H Codename Comet Lake-H Raptor Lake-H Series: Raptor Lake-H Raptor Lake-H Clock 2600 - 4600 MHz 1800 - 5000 MHz L1 Cache 256 KB 1.2 MB L2 Cache 1 MB 11.5 MB L3 Cache 8 MB 24 MB Cores / Threads 4 / 8 14 / 20 TDP 45 Watt 45 Watt Technology 14 nm 10 nm max. Temp. 100 °C 100 °C Socket FCBGA1440 BGA1744 Features Dual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI DDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266/DDR5-5200/LPDDR5-6400/LPDDR5x-6400 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Dir., DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA iGPU Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1100 MHz)Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ( - 1500 MHz)Architecture x86 x86 Announced Manufacturer ark.intel.com ark.intel.com
Benchmarks Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-10400H
31.8 pt (44%)
...
...
max:
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-13700H
44.2 pt (61%)
...
...
max:
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
111 Points (77%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
818 Points (15%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 5890 avg: 15266 median: 15541.5 (14%) max: 20034 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 15 W TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 44 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 53 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 80 W TDP 85 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W 68% 29% 58% 75% 72% 72% 80% 87% 85% 72% 70% 79% 94% 86% 91% 91% 86% 100%
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1323 avg: 1797 median: 1863 (79%) max: 1914 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 15 W TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 44 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 53 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 80 W TDP 85 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W 99% 77% 69% 98% 100% 94% 98% 99% 99% 94% 99% 98% 81% 85% 89% 100% 97% 97%
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
471 Points (52%)
min: 508 avg: 693 median: 719 (80%) max: 741 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 15 W TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 44 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 53 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 80 W TDP 85 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W 99% 77% 69% 99% 99% 88% 99% 100% 99% 95% 98% 99% 81% 88% 91% 100% 98% 98%
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
1924 Points (5%)
min: 2322 avg: 5945 median: 6018.5 (15%) max: 7674 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 15 W TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 44 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 53 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 80 W TDP 85 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W 70% 30% 58% 75% 76% 63% 80% 86% 85% 85% 69% 79% 92% 86% 94% 91% 86% 100%
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
796 Points (5%)
min: 905 avg: 2455 median: 2505.5 (16%) max: 2982 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 15 W TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 44 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 53 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 80 W TDP 85 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W 76% 31% 78% 86% 77% 67% 90% 90% 95% 90% 81% 90% 100% 95% 99% 95% 96% 99%
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
192 Points (58%)
min: 213 avg: 260.4 median: 269 (81%) max: 278 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 15 W TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 44 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 53 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 80 W TDP 85 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W 98% 78% 77% 97% 94% 88% 97% 98% 98% 93% 94% 98% 80% 87% 90% 100% 97% 98%
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
9.6 Points (13%)
33.8 Points (44%)
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 115 W 28% 100%
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.2 Points (54%)
3.3 Points (82%)
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 115 W 66% 100%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
7403 Points (45%)
10487 Points (63%)
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 115 W 71% 100%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
25731 Points (19%)
65623 Points (48%)
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 115 W 39% 100%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100409 Points (70%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
15266 Points (19%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
801 s (9%)
208.8 s (2%)
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 115 W 100% 108%
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
24.9 s (5%)
2.9 s (1%)
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 115 W 100% 105%
4115 Points (7%)
7559 Points (12%)
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 115 W 54% 100%
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
23136 MIPS (13%)
min: 27322 avg: 61025 median: 61381.5 (35%) max: 76344 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 15 W TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 44 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 53 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 80 W TDP 85 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W 74% 36% 65% 75% 72% 68% 83% 92% 93% 88% 72% 79% 93% 92% 98% 69% 89% 100%
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4766 MIPS (57%)
min: 4825 avg: 5858 median: 6034 (72%) max: 6238 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 15 W TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 44 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 53 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 80 W TDP 85 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W 100% 86% 78% 99% 98% 92% 97% 97% 99% 94% 100% 99% 80% 87% 89% 99% 97% 99%
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
49.1 fps (17%)
167.5 fps (58%)
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 115 W 29% 100%
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
191.4 fps (44%)
340.5 fps (79%)
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 115 W 56% 100%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
6.1 fps (11%)
min: 6.72 avg: 16.7 median: 16.9 (30%) max: 21.2 fps
CPU TDP ? TDP 15 W TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 44 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 53 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 80 W TDP 85 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W 74% 32% 62% 68% 83% 66% 79% 89% 90% 87% 74% 81% 94% 85% 100% 85% 93% 93%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.6 GB/s (0%)
1.5 GB/s (0%)
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 115 W 37% 100%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.9 GB/s (16%)
2.9 GB/s (50%)
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 115 W 33% 100%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
5.3 GB/s (14%)
16.1 GB/s (42%)
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 115 W 33% 100%
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 295 avg: 404.1 median: 385 (5%) max: 907 Seconds
CPU TDP ? TDP 15 W TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 44 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 53 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 80 W TDP 85 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W 107% 100% 106% 106% 107% 107% 108% 108% 108% 108% 107% 107% 108% 108% 109% 109% 108% 109%
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
565 Seconds (4%)
min: 169 avg: 229.4 median: 217 (2%) max: 555 Seconds
CPU TDP ? TDP 15 W TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 44 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 53 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 80 W TDP 85 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W 102% 100% 102% 102% 102% 102% 102% 103% 103% 103% 102% 102% 103% 103% 103% 103% 103% 103%
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.6 sec (14%)
min: 0.4308 avg: 0.5 median: 0.4 (10%) max: 0.607 sec
CPU TDP ? TDP 15 W TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 44 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 53 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 80 W TDP 85 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W 104% 102% 100% 104% 104% 103% 104% 104% 104% 104% 104% 104% 102% 103% 103% 104% 104% 104%
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
9578 Points (20%)
min: 13025 avg: 15916 median: 15415 (33%) max: 19810 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 60 W TDP 70 W 57% 100% 78% 78%
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.1 s (2%)
6.8 s (1%)
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 115 W 100% 100%
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
14.8 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
484.5 s (2%)
371.9 s (2%)
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 115 W 100% 101%
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
79797 Points (70%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
8007 Points (22%)
min: 7388 avg: 19959 median: 20503.5 (55%) max: 25179 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 15 W TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 44 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 53 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 80 W TDP 85 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W 83% 29% 71% 72% 65% 66% 82% 93% 94% 88% 67% 84% 92% 79% 98% 65% 87% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 81147 avg: 91751 median: 92897 (75%) max: 100286 Points
CPU TDP 40 W TDP 45 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 115 W 93% 96% 88% 81% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 88650 avg: 97627 median: 99436 (81%) max: 104795 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 60 W TDP 115 W 100% 85% 95%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 89385 avg: 96005 median: 98040 (83%) max: 100591 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 60 W TDP 115 W 100% 89% 97%
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 7531 avg: 17293 median: 17753 (45%) max: 22289 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 15 W TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 80 W TDP 85 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W 91% 34% 58% 74% 78% 72% 86% 63% 79% 87% 69% 100% 85% 84% 91%
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 4242 avg: 24628 median: 26188 (47%) max: 30010 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 15 W TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 44 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 53 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 80 W TDP 85 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W 70% 36% 69% 79% 86% 84% 88% 96% 90% 93% 68% 92% 94% 73% 98% 100% 92% 98%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 4312 avg: 10479 median: 11075 (47%) max: 13904 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 15 W TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 44 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 53 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 80 W TDP 85 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W 71% 31% 57% 61% 66% 72% 83% 95% 91% 96% 72% 83% 100% 72% 100% 67% 92% 87%
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 2316 avg: 2551 median: 2605 (70%) max: 2639 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 44 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 60 W TDP 70 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 100% 99% 95% 100% 94% 100% 88% 97%
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 8415 avg: 11887 median: 11872.5 (47%) max: 13832 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 44 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 60 W TDP 70 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 85% 77% 81% 100% 95% 100% 96% 62%
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1245 Points (53%)
min: 1362 avg: 1792 median: 1828.5 (77%) max: 1919 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 15 W TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 44 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 53 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 80 W TDP 85 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W 98% 88% 72% 98% 97% 88% 98% 99% 96% 93% 98% 100% 80% 90% 90% 94% 96% 96%
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
4332 Points (8%)
min: 6165 avg: 11777 median: 12127 (22%) max: 14215 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 15 W TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 44 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 53 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 80 W TDP 85 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W 83% 45% 73% 82% 75% 70% 92% 96% 100% 93% 86% 94% 95% 94% 96% 65% 93% 96%
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1761 avg: 1810 median: 1815 (8%) max: 1854 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 115 W 100% 95% 98%
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 12854 avg: 13227 median: 13200 (42%) max: 13628 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 115 W 94% 100% 97%
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
8083 Points (81%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
50819 Points (56%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
787 ms (1%)
min: 490 avg: 513 median: 499.5 (1%) max: 570 ms
CPU TDP ? TDP 40 W TDP 44 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 53 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 80 W TDP 85 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 115 W 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 78885 avg: 90890 median: 92987 (82%) max: 96738 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 40 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 53 W TDP 60 W TDP 70 W TDP 80 W TDP 85 W 100% 97% 94% 98% 100% 86% 93% 82% 95%
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 208 avg: 262.7 median: 270 (78%) max: 325 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 40 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 53 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 80 W TDP 85 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 115 W 100% 92% 84% 93% 92% 93% 89% 93% 95% 78% 83% 81% 94% 92%
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 215 avg: 289.3 median: 297 (62%) max: 321 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 40 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 53 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 80 W TDP 85 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 115 W 98% 96% 88% 99% 98% 100% 89% 97% 100% 69% 89% 84% 95% 95%
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1205 avg: 1757 median: 1768 (68%) max: 2073 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 44 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 53 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 80 W TDP 85 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 115 W 86% 63% 99% 90% 90% 97% 94% 93% 95% 98% 100% 86% 91% 100% 90% 94%
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
67.4 Watt (12%)
min: 37.8 avg: 89.4 median: 83.3 (14%) max: 148 Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 40 W TDP 44 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 53 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 80 W TDP 85 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 115 W 117% 117% 115% 119% 116% 112% 110% 112% 121% 114% 101% 113% 102% 108% 100%
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
75.9 Watt (14%)
min: 67.7 avg: 114.5 median: 116.2 (21%) max: 166 Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 40 W TDP 44 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 53 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 80 W TDP 85 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 115 W 122% 120% 111% 123% 112% 114% 109% 119% 124% 101% 108% 102% 105% 100%
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 4.1 avg: 13.3 median: 14.9 (10%) max: 24.4 Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 40 W TDP 44 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 53 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 80 W TDP 85 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 115 W 111% 108% 114% 111% 112% 113% 106% 104% 116% 100% 105% 105% 105% 104% 104%
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 5.21 avg: 11.6 median: 11.9 (13%) max: 20.1 Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 40 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 53 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 80 W TDP 85 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 115 W 107% 110% 108% 107% 108% 100% 104% 115% 106% 104% 106% 110% 103% 102%
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
10.5 Points per Watt (8%)
min: 17.9 avg: 23.5 median: 23.3 (17%) max: 29.6 Points per Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 40 W TDP 44 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 53 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 85 W TDP 95 W 93% 100% 60% 64% 71% 79% 70% 80% 68% 64%
Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-10400H → 100% n=28 Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-13700H → 201% n=28
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
v1.28
log 01. 21:06:37
#0 checking url part for id 11958 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 14721 +0s ... 0s
#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719860797 +0s ... 0s
#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s
#4 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.005s
#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s
#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 11958 +0.002s ... 0.007s
#7 got single benchmarks 11958 +0s ... 0.007s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14721 +0.004s ... 0.011s
#9 got single benchmarks 14721 +0.044s ... 0.055s
#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.055s
#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.052s ... 0.107s
#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.11s
Please share our article, every link counts!
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)
Deutsch
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
Magyar
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card