Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i3-10320 vs Intel Xeon W-10885M

Intel Core i3-10320

► remove from comparison Intel i3-10320

The Intel Core i3-10320 is an entry level quad-core desktop processor based on the Comet Lake-S architecture (CML-S, 4th generation of Skylake). The processor clocks at between 3.8 and 4.6 GHz and can execute up to eight threads with its four cores simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. 

The processor is still manufactured in the old 14nm (14nm++) process. Thanks to the free multiplicator, the CPU can also be easily overclocked (but may not have much headroom).

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

Performance

The performance is similar to the old high end Intel Core i7-7700K due to the same architecture and similar clock speeds. 

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a similar performance as the UHD630 in the Core i7-9900K. As a  low-end solution it will only run current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 65 Watts (PL1) but under full load up to 90 Watt are consumed (PL2 for 28s).

Intel Xeon W-10885M

► remove from comparison Intel W-10885M

The Intel Xeon W-10885M is a high-end processor for workstation laptops with eight cores based on the Comet Lake architecture (CML-H, 4th generation of Skylake). The processor clocks at between 2.4 and 5.3 GHz and can execute up to sixteen threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. The processor is still manufactured in the old 14nm (14nm++) process.

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

The Intel Xeon W-10885M supports the management features vPro, TXT and SIPP and is the professional version of the Intel Core i9-10885H

Performance

The performance of the W-10885M should be slightly above the older Core i9-9980HK top model, thanks to the potential higher single core turbo. Thanks to the 8 cores and high Turbo speeds, even demanding applications should run very good on the CPU. However, long term performance is always depending on the laptop cooling system and system configuration. At the time of announcement, the Intel Xeon W-10885M is the second fastest Comet Lake-H CPU behind the Core i9-10980HK.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics P630 iGPU is supposed to offer a similar performance as the UHD630 in the Core i7-9880H. As a  low-end solution it will only run current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all. The P-variant uses professional drivers.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 45 watts and therefore the i9 is only suited for big laptops with good cooling solutions. Using cTDP-down, the CPU can also be configured to 35 Watt resulting in a reduced performance.

ModelIntel Core i3-10320Intel Xeon W-10885M
SeriesIntel Comet LakeIntel Comet Lake
CodenameComet Lake-SComet Lake-H
Series: Comet Lake Comet Lake-H
Intel Core i9-10850K compare3.6 - 5.2 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10910 compare3.6 - 5 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10320 « 3.8 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores7.9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10100 compare3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10980HK compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10885M « 2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10885H compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10880H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10875H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10870H compare2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10850H compare2.7 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10855M compare2.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10750H compare2.6 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10500H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400H compare2.6 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10300H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10200H compare2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Clock3800 - 4600 MHz2400 - 5300 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB512 KB
L2 Cache1 MB2 MB
L3 Cache7.9 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 88 / 16
TDP65 Watt45 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketLGA 1200FCBGA1440
FeaturesHyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, Quick Sync, VirtualizationDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1150 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics P630 (350 - 1200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$162 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i3-10320
32.2 pt (45%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - W-10885M
36.5 pt (51%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
5986 Points (6%)
6893 Points (6%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1185 Points (50%)
1300 Points (55%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
458 Points (51%)
min: 488     avg: 495.3     median: 495.5 (55%)     max: 502 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
2320 Points (6%)
min: 2727     avg: 3639     median: 3882.5 (9%)     max: 4065 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
949 Points (6%)
min: 1089     avg: 1509     median: 1640 (10%)     max: 1666 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
188 Points (57%)
min: 208     avg: 209.8     median: 210 (63%)     max: 211 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
10.5 Points (14%)
18.3 Points (24%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.1 Points (52%)
2.4 Points (58%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
7164 Points (43%)
7865 Points (48%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
28383 Points (21%)
44583 Points (32%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
105.8 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.6 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
7180 Points (11%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
25864 MIPS (15%)
min: 36204     avg: 43315     median: 45696 (26%)     max: 48044 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4899 MIPS (59%)
min: 5495     avg: 5568     median: 5507 (66%)     max: 5703 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
58.8 fps (21%)
100.1 fps (35%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
218 fps (50%)
236.9 fps (55%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
8.2 fps (14%)
min: 8.89     avg: 11.9     median: 13.1 (23%)     max: 13.6 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.5 GB/s (0%)
1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.9 GB/s (16%)
1.8 GB/s (31%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
5.3 GB/s (14%)
10.3 GB/s (27%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
469 Seconds (3%)
min: 281     avg: 326.3     median: 286 (2%)     max: 412 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.6 sec (14%)
min: 0.551     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (12%)     max: 0.57 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
9911 Points (21%)
13490 Points (29%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
9.7 s (2%)
7.7 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
17.1 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
516 s (2%)
429.3 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
10518 Points (28%)
min: 13072     avg: 16593     median: 18302 (49%)     max: 18404 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
63063 Points (51%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
9675 Points (24%)
min: 10772     avg: 13951     median: 14922 (38%)     max: 16159 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
13564 Points (24%)
min: 15118     avg: 19215     median: 20247 (36%)     max: 22279 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
4368 Points (18%)
min: 6457     avg: 8161     median: 8812 (37%)     max: 9214 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1217 Points (51%)
min: 1331     avg: 1339     median: 1340 (57%)     max: 1347 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
4846 Points (9%)
min: 6948     avg: 7939     median: 8378 (15%)     max: 8491 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1310     avg: 1332     median: 1323 (6%)     max: 1362 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 7542     avg: 8126     median: 8295 (26%)     max: 8541 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 5880     avg: 5899     median: 5892 (59%)     max: 5924 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 30737     avg: 32163     median: 32814 (36%)     max: 32939 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
784 ms (1%)
min: 728     avg: 736     median: 733 (1%)     max: 746 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
160 ms (2%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
224 Points (47%)
min: 228     avg: 229.3     median: 229 (48%)     max: 231 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1254 Points (48%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
115 Watt (20%)
150 Watt (26%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
96.3 Watt (18%)
152.9 Watt (28%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
9.9 Points per Watt (7%)
10.8 Points per Watt (8%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-10320 → 100% n=31

Average Benchmarks Intel Xeon W-10885M → 140% n=31

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 02. 17:51:59

#0 checking url part for id 14009 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12205 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719935519 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14009 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#7 got single benchmarks 14009 +0.005s ... 0.015s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12205 +0.004s ... 0.019s

#9 got single benchmarks 12205 +0.006s ... 0.025s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.025s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.037s ... 0.061s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.064s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)