Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i3-10320 vs Intel Xeon W-10885M vs Intel Core i9-10885H

Intel Core i3-10320

► remove from comparison Intel i3-10320

The Intel Core i3-10320 is an entry level quad-core desktop processor based on the Comet Lake-S architecture (CML-S, 4th generation of Skylake). The processor clocks at between 3.8 and 4.6 GHz and can execute up to eight threads with its four cores simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. 

The processor is still manufactured in the old 14nm (14nm++) process. Thanks to the free multiplicator, the CPU can also be easily overclocked (but may not have much headroom).

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

Performance

The performance is similar to the old high end Intel Core i7-7700K due to the same architecture and similar clock speeds. 

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a similar performance as the UHD630 in the Core i7-9900K. As a  low-end solution it will only run current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 65 Watts (PL1) but under full load up to 90 Watt are consumed (PL2 for 28s).

Intel Xeon W-10885M

► remove from comparison Intel W-10885M

The Intel Xeon W-10885M is a high-end processor for workstation laptops with eight cores based on the Comet Lake architecture (CML-H, 4th generation of Skylake). The processor clocks at between 2.4 and 5.3 GHz and can execute up to sixteen threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. The processor is still manufactured in the old 14nm (14nm++) process.

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

The Intel Xeon W-10885M supports the management features vPro, TXT and SIPP and is the professional version of the Intel Core i9-10885H

Performance

The performance of the W-10885M should be slightly above the older Core i9-9980HK top model, thanks to the potential higher single core turbo. Thanks to the 8 cores and high Turbo speeds, even demanding applications should run very good on the CPU. However, long term performance is always depending on the laptop cooling system and system configuration. At the time of announcement, the Intel Xeon W-10885M is the second fastest Comet Lake-H CPU behind the Core i9-10980HK.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics P630 iGPU is supposed to offer a similar performance as the UHD630 in the Core i7-9880H. As a  low-end solution it will only run current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all. The P-variant uses professional drivers.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 45 watts and therefore the i9 is only suited for big laptops with good cooling solutions. Using cTDP-down, the CPU can also be configured to 35 Watt resulting in a reduced performance.

Intel Core i9-10885H

► remove from comparison Intel i9-10885H

The Intel Core i9-10885H is a high-end processor for laptops with eight cores based on the Comet Lake architecture (CML-H, 4th generation of Skylake). The processor clocks at between 2.4 and 5.3 GHz and can execute up to sixteen threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. The processor is still manufactured in the old 14nm (14nm++) process.

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

The Core i9-10855H supports the management features vPro, TXT and SIPP. 

Performance

The performance of the Core i9-10885H should be slightly above the older Core i9-9980HK top model, thanks to the potential higher single core turbo. Thanks to the 8 cores and high Turbo speeds, even demanding applications should run very good on the CPU. However, long term performance is always depending on the laptop cooling system and system configuration. At the time of announcement, the i9-10885H is the second fastest Comet Lake-H CPU behind the Core i9-10980HK.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a similar performance as the UHD630 in the Core i7-9880H. As a  low-end solution it will only run current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 45 watts and therefore the i9 is only suited for big laptops with good cooling solutions. Using cTDP-down, the CPU can also be configured to 35 Watt resulting in a reduced performance.

ModelIntel Core i3-10320Intel Xeon W-10885MIntel Core i9-10885H
SeriesIntel Comet LakeIntel Comet LakeIntel Comet Lake
CodenameComet Lake-SComet Lake-HComet Lake-H
Series: Comet Lake Comet Lake-H
Intel Core i9-10850K3.6 - 5.2 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i9-109103.6 - 5 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10320 « 3.8 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores7.9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-101003.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10980HK2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10885M « 2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10885H2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10880H2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10875H2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10870H2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10850H2.7 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10855M2.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10750H2.6 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10500H2.5 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400H2.6 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10300H2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10200H2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10980HK2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10885M2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10885H « 2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10880H2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10875H2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10870H2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10850H2.7 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10855M2.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10750H2.6 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10500H2.5 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400H2.6 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10300H2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10200H2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Clock3800 - 4600 MHz2400 - 5300 MHz2400 - 5300 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB512 KB512 KB
L2 Cache1 MB2 MB2 MB
L3 Cache7.9 MB16 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 88 / 168 / 16
TDP65 Watt45 Watt45 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketLGA 1200FCBGA1440FCBGA1440
FeaturesHyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, Quick Sync, VirtualizationDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1150 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics P630 (350 - 1200 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
$162 U.S.$556 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i3-10320
32.2 pt (45%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - W-10885M
36.5 pt (51%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-10885H
36.2 pt (50%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
5986 Points (6%)
6893 Points (6%)
min: 8802     avg: 9438     median: 9438 (9%)     max: 10074 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1185 Points (50%)
1300 Points (55%)
min: 1284     avg: 1290     median: 1289.5 (55%)     max: 1295 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
458 Points (51%)
min: 488     avg: 495.3     median: 495.5 (55%)     max: 502 Points
min: 460     avg: 487.3     median: 489 (54%)     max: 513 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
2320 Points (6%)
min: 2727     avg: 3639     median: 3882.5 (9%)     max: 4065 Points
min: 2798     avg: 3400     median: 3639 (9%)     max: 3762 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
949 Points (6%)
min: 1089     avg: 1509     median: 1640 (10%)     max: 1666 Points
min: 1264     avg: 1502     median: 1517 (10%)     max: 1726 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
188 Points (57%)
min: 208     avg: 209.8     median: 210 (63%)     max: 211 Points
min: 197     avg: 206.7     median: 211 (64%)     max: 212 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
10.5 Points (14%)
18.3 Points (24%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.1 Points (52%)
2.4 Points (58%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
7164 Points (43%)
7865 Points (48%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
28383 Points (21%)
44583 Points (32%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
105.8 s (1%)
131.2 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.6 s (1%)
3.9 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
7180 Points (11%)
6420 Points (10%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
25864 MIPS (15%)
min: 36204     avg: 43315     median: 45696 (26%)     max: 48044 MIPS
min: 36740     avg: 40519     median: 41823 (24%)     max: 42993 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4899 MIPS (59%)
min: 5495     avg: 5568     median: 5507 (66%)     max: 5703 MIPS
min: 5397     avg: 5551     median: 5589 (67%)     max: 5668 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
58.8 fps (21%)
100.1 fps (35%)
80.5 fps (28%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
218 fps (50%)
236.9 fps (55%)
217.8 fps (50%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
8.2 fps (14%)
min: 8.89     avg: 11.9     median: 13.1 (23%)     max: 13.6 fps
min: 10.6     avg: 11.5     median: 11.3 (20%)     max: 12.5 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.5 GB/s (0%)
1 GB/s (0%)
1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.9 GB/s (16%)
1.8 GB/s (31%)
1.8 GB/s (31%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
5.3 GB/s (14%)
10.3 GB/s (27%)
9.9 GB/s (26%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
469 Seconds (3%)
min: 281     avg: 326.3     median: 286 (2%)     max: 412 Seconds
min: 283     avg: 311     median: 302 (2%)     max: 348 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.6 sec (14%)
min: 0.551     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (12%)     max: 0.57 sec
min: 0.564     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (12%)     max: 0.572 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
9911 Points (21%)
13490 Points (29%)
12101 Points (26%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
9.7 s (2%)
7.7 s (2%)
7.3 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
17.1 s (1%)
16.3 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
516 s (2%)
429.3 s (2%)
433.9 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
10518 Points (28%)
min: 13072     avg: 16593     median: 18302 (49%)     max: 18404 Points
min: 12279     avg: 14604     median: 14291 (39%)     max: 17242 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
63063 Points (51%)
31296 Points (25%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
30997 Points (25%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
9675 Points (24%)
min: 10772     avg: 13951     median: 14922 (38%)     max: 16159 Points
min: 11176     avg: 12814     median: 12814 (32%)     max: 14452 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
13564 Points (24%)
min: 15118     avg: 19215     median: 20247 (36%)     max: 22279 Points
min: 17249     avg: 19483     median: 20594 (37%)     max: 20606 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
4368 Points (18%)
min: 6457     avg: 8161     median: 8812 (37%)     max: 9214 Points
min: 6510     avg: 7798     median: 8203 (35%)     max: 8682 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1217 Points (51%)
min: 1331     avg: 1339     median: 1340 (57%)     max: 1347 Points
min: 1216     avg: 1303     median: 1317 (56%)     max: 1376 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
4846 Points (9%)
min: 6948     avg: 7939     median: 8378 (15%)     max: 8491 Points
min: 6529     avg: 7045     median: 6914 (12%)     max: 7693 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1310     avg: 1332     median: 1323 (6%)     max: 1362 Points
min: 1234     avg: 1281     median: 1280.5 (6%)     max: 1327 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 7542     avg: 8126     median: 8295 (26%)     max: 8541 Points
min: 6598     avg: 7172     median: 7172 (23%)     max: 7746 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 5880     avg: 5899     median: 5892 (59%)     max: 5924 Points
min: 5672     avg: 5676     median: 5675.5 (57%)     max: 5679 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 30737     avg: 32163     median: 32814 (36%)     max: 32939 Points
min: 26114     avg: 29009     median: 29009 (32%)     max: 31904 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
784 ms (1%)
min: 728     avg: 736     median: 733 (1%)     max: 746 ms
min: 730     avg: 738     median: 734 (1%)     max: 749 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
160 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
58398 Points (51%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
224 Points (47%)
min: 228     avg: 229.3     median: 229 (48%)     max: 231 Points
min: 233     avg: 234.3     median: 234 (49%)     max: 236 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1254 Points (48%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
115 Watt (20%)
150 Watt (26%)
min: 78.1     avg: 103.7     median: 116.4 (20%)     max: 116.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
96.3 Watt (18%)
152.9 Watt (28%)
min: 125.2     avg: 131.2     median: 126 (23%)     max: 142.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
9.9 Points per Watt (7%)
10.8 Points per Watt (8%)
min: 10.1     avg: 11.5     median: 10.7 (8%)     max: 13.7 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-10320 → 100% n=27

Average Benchmarks Intel Xeon W-10885M → 141% n=27

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-10885H → 134% n=27

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 04. 19:56:29

#0 checking url part for id 14009 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12205 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11962 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720115789 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14009 +0.002s ... 0.006s

#8 got single benchmarks 14009 +0s ... 0.007s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 12205 +0.004s ... 0.01s

#10 got single benchmarks 12205 +0.007s ... 0.017s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11962 +0.003s ... 0.021s

#12 got single benchmarks 11962 +0.008s ... 0.028s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.028s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.055s ... 0.083s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.083s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)