Notebookcheck Logo

UNISOC Tangula T770 vs HiSilicon Kirin 960s

UNISOC Tangula T770

► remove from comparison  Tangula T770

The Unisoc T770 Tanggula (former Spreadtrum) is a mid range SoC for Android based smartphones and tablets. It integrates an octa-core CPU with three clusters. One fast ARM Cortex-A76 clocked at up to 2.5 GHz, three more A76 performance cores clocked at up to 2.2 GHz and a power efficiency cluster of four ARM-Cortex-A55 cores with up to 2 GHz. The integrated memory controller supports LPDDR4/4X with up to 2133 MHz (2x 16 Bit). The integrated ISP supports two main cameras and two subsidiary cameras (up to 108 MPix). The integrated graphics card is an ARM Mali-G57 MC4 (4 cores) at up to 780 MHz. Unisoc also specifies that the T770 offers hardware AI acceleration.

The chip is manufactured in the modern 6nm process.

HiSilicon Kirin 960s

► remove from comparison

The HiSilicon Kirin 960S is an ARM based mid-range octa-core SoC for smartphones and tablets, which was introduced with the 2018 10.5-inch Huawei MediaPad M5. Compared to the normal Kirin 960, the 960S offers an additional NPU for AI calculations from the Kirin 970. Looks like to be slower clocked than the older Kirin 960.

Besides 8 CPU cores (4x Cortex-A73, 4x Cortex-A53), the SoC is also equipped with a modern Mali-G71 MP8 graphics adapter, a dual-channel LPDDR4 memory controller as well as an LTE Cat. 12/13 modem. It is one of the fastest ARM SoCs in the end of 2016. The Kirin 960 is manufactured in a modern 16-nm process at TSMC.

ModelUNISOC Tangula T770HiSilicon Kirin 960s
Series
CodenameCortex-A76 / A55Cortex-A73/-A53
Series: Cortex-A73/-A53
MediaTek Dimensity 820 compare2 - 2.6 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 810 compare2 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 800 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 800U compare2 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ compare2 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 6080 compare2 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 6020 compare2 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
UNISOC T820 compare2.1 - 2.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T770 « 2 - 2.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T760 compare2 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores3 MB L3 Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 700 compare2 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
UNISOC T765 compare2.1 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 720 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
UNISOC T750 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores3 MB L3 Cortex-A76 / A55
HiSilicon Kirin 970 compare2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 960 compare2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 960s « 2.1 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 710 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 710A compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
Clock2000 - 2500 MHz2100 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology6 nm16 nm
FeaturesISP (2 main + 2 subsidiary, 108M 4-in-1, 64M ZSL)ARM Mali-G71 MP8 GPU, 4x Cortex-A73 (2.4 GHz) + 4x Cortex-A53 (1.8 GHz, big.LITTLE), 2x 32 Bit LPDDR4 Memory Controller
iGPUARM Mali-G57 MP4 ( - 780 MHz)ARM Mali-G71 MP8 ( - 900 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
14698 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
2323 Points (27%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
2101 Points (24%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
622 Points (26%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
2226 Points (4%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
2763 Points (28%)
1634 Points (16%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
8087 Points (9%)
5809 Points (6%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1706 Points (23%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
5609 Points (14%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
5734 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
1756 Points (26%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
2165 Points (17%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
3780 Points (34%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
10498 Points (21%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
5303 Points (11%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
6502 Points (17%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
5947 ms (7%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
6802 Points (6%)
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
147305 Points (50%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
8364 Points (26%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
28103 Points (34%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
33870 Points (11%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
43350 Points (27%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
113687 Points (20%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
419246 Points (25%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
133629 Points (37%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
5114 Points (33%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
5040 Points (25%)

Average Benchmarks UNISOC Tangula T770 → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 960s → 65% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 26. 22:22:21

#0 checking url part for id 14025 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9952 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719433340 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 05:15:18 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.056s ... 0.056s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.056s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14025 +0.001s ... 0.057s

#7 got single benchmarks 14025 +0.003s ... 0.06s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 9952 +0.001s ... 0.06s

#9 got single benchmarks 9952 +0.003s ... 0.064s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.064s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.012s ... 0.076s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.078s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)