Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS vs Intel Core i9-13900HK vs AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS

AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS

► remove from comparison AMD R5 8640HS

The Ryzen 5 8640HS is a mid-range, Hawk Point family processor that was unveiled in Q4 2023. The 8640HS isn't actually a new chip; instead, it's a rebadged Ryzen 5 7640U, with slightly higher wattage of the 8640HS being the only meaningful difference between the two. The 8640HS has 6 SMT-enabled cores (12 threads) running at 3.5 GHz to 4.9 GHz. Those Zen 4 architecture cores are mated to the Radeon 760M integrated graphics adapter, and the Ryzen AI technology, now in its 2nd generation, is onboard as well to make apps like DaVinci Resolve and Adobe Photoshop more powerful than ever before.

Architecture & Features

Hawk Point chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips are. That's not to say there is no difference between the three. With Hawk Point, AMD is betting big on generative AI; these processors are set to deliver an up to 40% increase in generative AI performance over 7040 series APUs.

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers, is slated to deliver a double-digit IPC improvement over the former.

Elsewhere, the 8640HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and USB 4 support (therefore, Thunderbolt is supported as well). The chip is compatible with DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-7500 RAM which is still impressive as of late 2023.

A system powered by this Ryzen 5 will have access to twenty PCIe 4 lanes; this means a speedy enough NVMe SSD will be able to deliver speeds up to 7.8 GB/s.

Systems powered by this APU are expected to run 64-bit Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10, or Linux. Like most laptop chips, the 8640HS is neither overclockable nor user-replaceable. It gets soldered to the motherboard for good (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

It's safe to expect the APU to be at least 15% faster than the Zen 3 Plus-powered Ryzen 5 6600U (6 cores, 12 threads, up to 4.5 GHz), as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is.

Graphics

The Radeon 760M has 8 CUs (512 shaders) running at up to 2,600 MHz. While not great for gaming (unless you are fine with resolutions such as 900p and low detail settings), the iGPU will let you use up to 4 monitors with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p. It also HW-decodes and HW-encodes the most widely used video codecs including AV1, HEVC, AVC without breaking a sweat.

Power consumption

The 8640HS has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 28 W that laptop makers are free to change to anything between 20 W and 30 W. Most companies will probably go for a higher value to get better performance. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for any system powered by the chip.

Last but not the least, the 8640HS is manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i9-13900HK

► remove from comparison Intel i9-13900HK

The Intel Core i9-13900HK is a high-end mobile CPU for laptops based on the Raptor Lake-H series (Alder Lake architecture). It was announced in early 2023 and offers 6 performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) and 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores support Hyper-Threading leading to 20 supported threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock rate ranges from 2.6 to 5.4 GHz (single core turbo, all-core 4.9 GHz) on the performance cluster and 1.9 to 4.1 GHz on the efficiency cluster. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare with the Core i7-6920HQ). All cores can use up to 24 MB L3 cache. As a K-variant, the CPU offers an open multiplicator and therefore the possibility to overclock the CPU cores. Compared to the similar i9-12900HK, the 13900HK offers higher clock speeds. Compared to the i9-13900H, the 13900HK only offers the "Essentials" features of vPro.

Performance

Thanks to the high core count and high clock speed, the Core i9-13900HK is the fastest 45W CPU for laptops and only bested by Raptor Lake-HX based models with more cores and improved P-cores (e.g., the i9-13980HX). Still, the CPU is very well suited for all demanding use cases like gaming, content creation, and scientific calculations.

Features

The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to DDR5-5200 (up from 4800 MHz for the 12th gen). The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficient cores for the best performance. For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC, and AV1 decode in hardware. The CPU now supports PCIe 5.0 x8 for a GPU and two PCIe 4.0 x4 for SSDs.

The integrated graphics card is based on the Xe-architecture and offers 96 EUs (Execution Units) .

The CPU is rated at 45 W base power (115 W PL2) but most laptops will use a PL1 of around 60 Watt. The SoC is manufactured in a 10nm process at Intel, which is known as Intel 7 (improved over the 12th Gen).

AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS

► remove from comparison AMD R7 8840HS

The Ryzen 7 8840HS is a powerful processor (APU) of the Hawk Point family. This isn't an entirely new laptop chip; instead, it's a rebadged Ryzen 7 7840U, the slightly higher wattage of the 8840HS being the only meaningful difference between the two. The 8840HS has eight Zen 4 cores running at 3.3 GHz to 5.1 GHz that are SMT-enabled for a total of 16 processing threads, while the great Radeon 780M is responsible for 3D processing and similar duties. The 8840HS also features the Ryzen AI technology, now in its 2nd generation.

Architecture & Features

Hawk Point family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips are. That's not to say there is no difference between the three. With Hawk Point, AMD is betting big on generative AI; these processors are set to deliver an up to 40% increase in generative AI performance over 7040 series APUs, making apps like DaVinci Resolve and Adobe Photoshop more useful than ever before.

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers, is slated to bring a double-digit IPC improvement over the former.

Elsewhere, the 8840HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and support for super-fast DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-7500 RAM. The chip is compatible with USB 4 and therefore with Thunderbolt. It comes with 20 PCIe 4 lanes, giving NVMe SSDs up to 7.8 GB/s of throughput.

Systems built around this Ryzen 7 series APU are designed to run 64-bit Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10, or Linux. Please note that this processor is not overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered down for good instead (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

Since this is a 7840U in disguise that we are dealing with here, it is safe to expect the 8840HS to be about as fast as the Core i7-12650H, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, and how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M has 12 CUs (768 shaders) purring away at up to 2,700 MHz. This is exactly the right iGPU for people looking for a bit more horsepower than what Intel's aging Xe options can provide. The Radeon will let you use up to 4 monitors with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p and it will also HW-decode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs (including AV1, HEVC and AVC) without breaking a sweat. In terms of gaming, the thing is good enough for 1080p and medium-to-low settings, as of late 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 28 W that laptop makers are free to tune to their liking, with values between 20 W and 30 W greenlighted by AMD. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for any system powered by this chip.

The 8840HS is built with TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 5 8640HSIntel Core i9-13900HKAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
SeriesAMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c, Ryzen 8040)Intel Raptor Lake-HAMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c, Ryzen 8040)
CodenameHawk Point-HS (Zen 4)Raptor Lake-HHawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
Series: Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c, Ryzen 8040) Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS « 3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900HK « 1.9 - 5.4 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13905H1.9 - 5.4 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900H1.9 - 5.4 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13800H1.8 - 5.2 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13705H1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700H1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13620H1.8 - 4.9 GHz10 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600H2.1 - 4.8 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13505H1.9 - 4.7 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500H1.9 - 4.7 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13420H1.5 - 4.6 GHz8 / 12 cores12 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS « 3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Clock3500 - 4900 MHz1900 - 5400 MHz3300 - 5100 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB1.2 MB512 KB
L2 Cache6 MB11.5 MB8 MB
L3 Cache16 MB24 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 12
6 x 4.9 GHz AMD Zen 4
14 / 208 / 16
8 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 4
TDP28 Watt45 Watt28 Watt
Technology4 nm10 nm4 nm
Die Size178 mm2178 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C100 °C
SocketFP7/FP7r2/FP8FCBGA1744FP7/FP7r2/FP8
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3Thread DirectorDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3
iGPUAMD Radeon 760M ( - 2600 MHz)Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ( - 1500 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.comwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 8840HS
43.2 pt (60%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
99 Points (69%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
677 Points (13%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
19704 Points (18%)
min: 12720     avg: 13230     median: 13082 (12%)     max: 13888 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1960 Points (83%)
min: 1737     avg: 1743     median: 1745 (74%)     max: 1746 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
749 Points (83%)
min: 649     avg: 670     median: 679 (75%)     max: 681 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
7542 Points (18%)
min: 4854     avg: 5087     median: 4994 (12%)     max: 5414 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2950 Points (19%)
min: 1934     avg: 2052     median: 2045 (13%)     max: 2176 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
279 Points (84%)
min: 261     avg: 266.3     median: 268 (81%)     max: 270 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
77190 MIPS (44%)
min: 54768     avg: 58828     median: 60670 (35%)     max: 61047 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5864 MIPS (70%)
min: 5912     avg: 6203     median: 6205 (74%)     max: 6493 MIPS
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
21.9 fps (38%)
min: 14.6     avg: 15.8     median: 15.7 (28%)     max: 17 fps
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
287 Seconds (4%)
min: 369     avg: 392.7     median: 404 (5%)     max: 405 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 226     avg: 234.7     median: 232 (2%)     max: 246 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.4 sec (9%)
min: 0.439     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4638 sec
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
24125 Points (65%)
min: 17511     avg: 18073     median: 18019 (49%)     max: 18690 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 16214     avg: 16437     median: 16437 (42%)     max: 16660 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
29857 Points (53%)
min: 18812     avg: 21448     median: 22488 (40%)     max: 23044 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
13169 Points (56%)
min: 7391     avg: 8233     median: 8297 (35%)     max: 9011 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 2525     avg: 2556     median: 2552 (69%)     max: 2592 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 11081     avg: 11229     median: 11279 (44%)     max: 11327 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1942 Points (82%)
min: 1894     avg: 1927     median: 1942 (82%)     max: 1946 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
14985 Points (27%)
min: 9779     avg: 9875     median: 9897 (18%)     max: 9949 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1865 Points (8%)
min: 1817     avg: 1840     median: 1840 (8%)     max: 1863 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
14628 Points (46%)
min: 9436     avg: 9651     median: 9651 (30%)     max: 9866 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
482 ms (1%)
min: 518     avg: 528     median: 528 (1%)     max: 538 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
89899 Points (79%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
279 Points (80%)
min: 246     avg: 250.3     median: 248 (71%)     max: 257 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
297 Points (62%)
min: 297     avg: 348.3     median: 308 (64%)     max: 440 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1937 Points (74%)
min: 1643     avg: 1674     median: 1681 (64%)     max: 1698 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
201 Watt (35%)
min: 39.5     avg: 44.2     median: 46.6 (8%)     max: 46.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
200 Watt (36%)
min: 22.3     avg: 36.9     median: 41.1 (8%)     max: 47.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
27.8 Watt (18%)
min: 5.32     avg: 5.7     median: 5.8 (4%)     max: 6.09 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
28 Watt (31%)
min: 5.67     avg: 6.3     median: 5.8 (6%)     max: 7.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
14.8 Points per Watt (11%)
min: 45.9     avg: 47.9     median: 47.9 (36%)     max: 49.8 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-13900HK → 0% n=

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 04. 21:43:20

#0 checking url part for id 16411 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14715 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 16413 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720122199 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.007s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 16411 +0.001s ... 0.007s

#8 got single benchmarks 16411 +0s ... 0.007s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14715 +0s ... 0.008s

#10 got single benchmarks 14715 +0s ... 0.008s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 16413 +0.004s ... 0.012s

#12 got single benchmarks 16413 +0.006s ... 0.018s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.018s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.023s ... 0.041s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.041s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)