Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS vs AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS

AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS

► remove from comparison AMD R5 8640HS

The Ryzen 5 8640HS is a mid-range, Hawk Point family processor that was unveiled in Q4 2023. The 8640HS isn't actually a new chip; instead, it's a rebadged Ryzen 5 7640U, with slightly higher wattage of the 8640HS being the only meaningful difference between the two. The 8640HS has 6 SMT-enabled cores (12 threads) running at 3.5 GHz to 4.9 GHz. Those Zen 4 architecture cores are mated to the Radeon 760M integrated graphics adapter, and the Ryzen AI technology, now in its 2nd generation, is onboard as well to make apps like DaVinci Resolve and Adobe Photoshop more powerful than ever before.

Architecture & Features

Hawk Point chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips are. That's not to say there is no difference between the three. With Hawk Point, AMD is betting big on generative AI; these processors are set to deliver an up to 40% increase in generative AI performance over 7040 series APUs.

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers, is slated to deliver a double-digit IPC improvement over the former.

Elsewhere, the 8640HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and USB 4 support (therefore, Thunderbolt is supported as well). The chip is compatible with DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-7500 RAM which is still impressive as of late 2023.

A system powered by this Ryzen 5 will have access to twenty PCIe 4 lanes; this means a speedy enough NVMe SSD will be able to deliver speeds up to 7.8 GB/s.

Systems powered by this APU are expected to run 64-bit Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10, or Linux. Like most laptop chips, the 8640HS is neither overclockable nor user-replaceable. It gets soldered to the motherboard for good (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

It's safe to expect the APU to be at least 15% faster than the Zen 3 Plus-powered Ryzen 5 6600U (6 cores, 12 threads, up to 4.5 GHz), as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is.

Graphics

The Radeon 760M has 8 CUs (512 shaders) running at up to 2,600 MHz. While not great for gaming (unless you are fine with resolutions such as 900p and low detail settings), the iGPU will let you use up to 4 monitors with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p. It also HW-decodes and HW-encodes the most widely used video codecs including AV1, HEVC, AVC without breaking a sweat.

Power consumption

The 8640HS has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 28 W that laptop makers are free to change to anything between 20 W and 30 W. Most companies will probably go for a higher value to get better performance. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for any system powered by the chip.

Last but not the least, the 8640HS is manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS

► remove from comparison AMD R7 8840HS

The Ryzen 7 8840HS is a powerful processor (APU) of the Hawk Point family. This isn't an entirely new laptop chip; instead, it's a rebadged Ryzen 7 7840U, the slightly higher wattage of the 8840HS being the only meaningful difference between the two. The 8840HS has eight Zen 4 cores running at 3.3 GHz to 5.1 GHz that are SMT-enabled for a total of 16 processing threads, while the great Radeon 780M is responsible for 3D processing and similar duties. The 8840HS also features the Ryzen AI technology, now in its 2nd generation.

Architecture & Features

Hawk Point family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips are. That's not to say there is no difference between the three. With Hawk Point, AMD is betting big on generative AI; these processors are set to deliver an up to 40% increase in generative AI performance over 7040 series APUs, making apps like DaVinci Resolve and Adobe Photoshop more useful than ever before.

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers, is slated to bring a double-digit IPC improvement over the former.

Elsewhere, the 8840HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and support for super-fast DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-7500 RAM. The chip is compatible with USB 4 and therefore with Thunderbolt. It comes with 20 PCIe 4 lanes, giving NVMe SSDs up to 7.8 GB/s of throughput.

Systems built around this Ryzen 7 series APU are designed to run 64-bit Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10, or Linux. Please note that this processor is not overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered down for good instead (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

Since this is a 7840U in disguise that we are dealing with here, it is safe to expect the 8840HS to be about as fast as the Core i7-12650H, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, and how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M has 12 CUs (768 shaders) purring away at up to 2,700 MHz. This is exactly the right iGPU for people looking for a bit more horsepower than what Intel's aging Xe options can provide. The Radeon will let you use up to 4 monitors with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p and it will also HW-decode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs (including AV1, HEVC and AVC) without breaking a sweat. In terms of gaming, the thing is good enough for 1080p and medium-to-low settings, as of late 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 28 W that laptop makers are free to tune to their liking, with values between 20 W and 30 W greenlighted by AMD. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for any system powered by this chip.

The 8840HS is built with TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 5 8640HSAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
SeriesAMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c, Ryzen 8040)AMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c, Ryzen 8040)
CodenameHawk Point-HS (Zen 4)Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
Series: Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c, Ryzen 8040) Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS « 3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS « 3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Clock3500 - 4900 MHz3300 - 5100 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB512 KB
L2 Cache6 MB8 MB
L3 Cache16 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 12
6 x 4.9 GHz AMD Zen 4
8 / 16
8 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 4
TDP28 Watt28 Watt
Technology4 nm4 nm
Die Size178 mm2178 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketFP7/FP7r2/FP8FP7/FP7r2/FP8
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3DDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3
iGPUAMD Radeon 760M ( - 2600 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 8840HS
43.2 pt (60%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
99 Points (69%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
677 Points (13%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 12720     avg: 13230     median: 13082 (12%)     max: 13888 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1737     avg: 1743     median: 1745 (74%)     max: 1746 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 649     avg: 670     median: 679 (75%)     max: 681 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 4854     avg: 5087     median: 4994 (12%)     max: 5414 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1934     avg: 2052     median: 2045 (13%)     max: 2176 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 261     avg: 266.3     median: 268 (81%)     max: 270 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 54768     avg: 58828     median: 60670 (35%)     max: 61047 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5912     avg: 6203     median: 6205 (74%)     max: 6493 MIPS
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 14.6     avg: 15.8     median: 15.7 (28%)     max: 17 fps
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 369     avg: 392.7     median: 404 (5%)     max: 405 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 226     avg: 234.7     median: 232 (2%)     max: 246 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.439     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4638 sec
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 17511     avg: 18073     median: 18019 (49%)     max: 18690 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 16214     avg: 16437     median: 16437 (42%)     max: 16660 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 18812     avg: 21448     median: 22488 (40%)     max: 23044 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 7391     avg: 8233     median: 8297 (35%)     max: 9011 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 2525     avg: 2556     median: 2552 (69%)     max: 2592 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 11081     avg: 11229     median: 11279 (44%)     max: 11327 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1894     avg: 1927     median: 1942 (82%)     max: 1946 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 9779     avg: 9875     median: 9897 (18%)     max: 9949 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1817     avg: 1840     median: 1840 (8%)     max: 1863 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 9436     avg: 9651     median: 9651 (30%)     max: 9866 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 518     avg: 528     median: 528 (1%)     max: 538 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
89899 Points (79%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 246     avg: 250.3     median: 248 (71%)     max: 257 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 297     avg: 348.3     median: 308 (64%)     max: 440 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1643     avg: 1674     median: 1681 (64%)     max: 1698 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 39.5     avg: 44.2     median: 46.6 (8%)     max: 46.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 22.3     avg: 36.9     median: 41.1 (8%)     max: 47.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 5.32     avg: 5.7     median: 5.8 (4%)     max: 6.09 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 5.67     avg: 6.3     median: 5.8 (6%)     max: 7.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 45.9     avg: 47.9     median: 47.9 (36%)     max: 49.8 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 02. 17:19:46

#0 checking url part for id 16411 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 16413 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719933586 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 16411 +0.001s ... 0.006s

#7 got single benchmarks 16411 +0s ... 0.006s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 16413 +0.004s ... 0.01s

#9 got single benchmarks 16413 +0.006s ... 0.016s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.016s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.016s ... 0.032s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.034s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)