Notebookcheck Logo

Apple M2 10-Core GPU vs Qualcomm Adreno 504

Apple M2 10-Core GPU

► remove from comparison Apple M2 10-Core GPU

The Apple M2 GPU is an integrated graphics card offering 10 cores designed by Apple and integrated in the Apple M2 SoC. It uses the unified memory architecture of the M2 SoC (up to 24 GB LPDDR5-6400 with 100 GB/s bandwidth) and should offer 160 execution units.

According to Apple it offers a 25% higher performance at slightly higher power consumption. The theoretical performance is rated at 3.6 Teraflops and therefore 1 TFLOP higher than the M1 8-core GPU. In our benchmarks, the GPU was able to top the M1 with up to 40%, but still stays behind the 14-core GPU in the M1 Pro. Compared to other iGPUs from AMD and Intel, the M2 benefits greatly from the unified memory architecture and the high bandwidth.

The M2 chip is manufactured in the second generation 5nm process at TSMC (most likely N5P). The power consumption is around 13.5 Watt (in our tests under load of the MBP13) and up to 15W according to Apple.

Qualcomm Adreno 504

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 504 is a mobile graphics card for lower mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 SoCs and based on the Adreno 500 architecture (like the Adreno 520 in the S820, which should be fully compatible in software).

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.1 + AE (3.2 in other sources), OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 12 (FL 12.1 according to Wikipedia, 11.1 according to Qualcomm). Furthermore, the GPU supports Universal Bandwidth Compression (UBWC) to save memory bandwidth.

According to Qualcomm, the GPU is 50% faster than the previous Adreno 308 in the Snapdragon 425.

In the Snapdragon 429, the Adreno 504 is manufactured in the modern 12nm process and should be very power efficient.

Apple M2 10-Core GPUQualcomm Adreno 504
Adreno 500 Series
M2 Max 38-Core GPU compare 38
M2 Max 30-Core GPU compare 30
M2 Pro 19-Core GPU compare 19 @ 0.44 - 1.4 GHz
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU compare 16
M2 10-Core GPU 10 @ 1.4 GHz
M2 8-Core GPU compare 8 @ 1.4 GHz
Adreno 540 compare @ 0.71 GHz
Adreno 530 compare @ 0.62 GHz
Adreno 512 compare
Adreno 510 compare
Adreno 509 compare
Adreno 508 compare @ 0.65 GHz
Adreno 506 compare @ 0.65 GHz
Adreno 505 compare @ 0.45 GHz
Adreno 504 @ 0.45 GHz
Pipelines10 - unified
Core Speed1398 (Boost) MHz450 MHz
Memory TypeLPDDR5-6400
Shared Memorynoyes
Power Consumption15 Watt
technology5 nm14 nm
Date of Announcement06.06.2022 30.06.2018
PredecessorM1 8-Core GPU
ArchitectureAdreno 500
APIDirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1)
CPU in M2 10-Core GPUGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Apple M28 x 2424 MHz, 20 W? MHz1398 MHz
CPU in Adreno 504GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4294 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear 4100+5 x ? MHz320 MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear 41004 x ? MHz320 MHz? MHz
min. - max.320 - ? MHz? - 1398 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 6895     avg: 6896     median: 6896 (1%)     max: 6897 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 428     avg: 445     median: 445 (2%)     max: 462 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 336     avg: 364.5     median: 364.5 (1%)     max: 393 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
257 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
210 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 21302     avg: 23924     median: 24236 (12%)     max: 25317 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 5328     avg: 6533     median: 6823.5 (8%)     max: 6987 Points
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom METAL *
min: 205     avg: 221     median: 221 (23%)     max: 237 Seconds
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Apple M2 10-Core GPU
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 128.65     avg: 132.8     median: 131 (8%)     max: 140.5 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Apple M2 10-Core GPU
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.5 % (100%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 35.6     avg: 43.9     median: 47.9 (19%)     max: 48.6 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 68     avg: 96     median: 102.6 (19%)     max: 110 fps
0.8 fps (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 208     avg: 267.5     median: 283.8 (21%)     max: 296 fps
min: 1.7     avg: 1.8     median: 1.8 (0%)     max: 1.8 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 136     avg: 197.6     median: 206.1 (23%)     max: 232 fps
1.8 fps (0%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 247     avg: 318.6     median: 331.5 (7%)     max: 374.6 fps
min: 3.1     avg: 3.2     median: 3.2 (0%)     max: 3.2 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 411     avg: 503     median: 509.5 (30%)     max: 557.2 fps
min: 4.7     avg: 4.8     median: 4.8 (0%)     max: 4.8 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Apple M2 10-Core GPU
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 628     avg: 824     median: 891.5 (7%)     max: 931.9 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 504
11 fps (0%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 654168     avg: 728087     median: 728086 (91%)     max: 802005 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
min: 27880     avg: 27900     median: 27900 (8%)     max: 27920 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Metal
min: 42013     avg: 44473     median: 45460 (29%)     max: 45946 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
3898 Points (4%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
860 Points (2%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 22.8     avg: 27.8     median: 26.9 (4%)     max: 34.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 27.8     avg: 32.5     median: 30.8 (7%)     max: 38.9 Watt
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 16     avg: 16.5     median: 16.7 (6%)     max: 16.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
min: 1.007     avg: 1     median: 1 (91%)     max: 1.108 fps per Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 1.116     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (92%)     max: 1.207 fps per Watt
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise + Apple M2 10-Core GPU
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
34.6 dB(A) (55%)

Average Benchmarks Apple M2 10-Core GPU → 100% n=6

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 504 → 1% n=6

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
ultra Ultra
100%
M2 10-Core GPU:
59.3  fps
Call of Duty Mobile

Call of Duty Mobile

2020
low
100%
M2 10-Core GPU:
118.8  fps
ultra
100%
M2 10-Core GPU:
58.5  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
ultra
100%
M2 10-Core GPU:
65  fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
100%
M2 10-Core GPU:
118.4  fps
low 1280x720
100%
M2 10-Core GPU:
53.1 66.8 73 ~ 64 fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
M2 10-Core GPU:
34 34.2 36 ~ 35 fps
high 1920x1080
100%
M2 10-Core GPU:
22 23.8 28 ~ 25 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
M2 10-Core GPU:
15 16.4 17.6 ~ 16 fps
low 1280x720
100%
M2 10-Core GPU:
88.6 89 136 138 ~ 113 fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
M2 10-Core GPU:
39 45.3 46.3 47 ~ 44 fps
high 1920x1080
100%
M2 10-Core GPU:
22 26.3 29 29.5 ~ 27 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
M2 10-Core GPU:
15.9 16 21 21.3 ~ 19 fps
low 1280x720
100%
M2 10-Core GPU:
60 76 102 ~ 79 fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
M2 10-Core GPU:
28 31 39 40 ~ 35 fps
high 1920x1080
100%
M2 10-Core GPU:
25 27 36 36 ~ 31 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
M2 10-Core GPU:
21 23 31 32 ~ 27 fps
QHD 2560x1440
100%
M2 10-Core GPU:
20  fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
Adreno 504:
23  fps
high
100%
M2 10-Core GPU:
39.8  fps
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
Adreno 504:
32  fps
ultra
Adreno 504:
31  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
M2 10-Core GPU:
34  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
M2 10-Core GPU:
28  fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
high
100%
M2 10-Core GPU:
67.7  fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
Adreno 504:
7  fps
high
100%
M2 10-Core GPU:
44.2  fps
16%
Adreno 504:
7  fps

Average Gaming Apple M2 10-Core GPU → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 504 → 16%

Apple M2 10-Core GPUlowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal59.3
Call of Duty Mobile118.858.5
Genshin Impact65
Armajet118.4
Borderlands 364352516
Total War: Three Kingdoms113442719
Shadow of the Tomb Raider7935312720
PUBG Mobile39.8
The Witcher 33428
Asphalt 8: Airborne67.7
Asphalt 9: Legends44.2
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


4

3

2
4
2
4
2
1
1





Qualcomm Adreno 504lowmed.highultraQHD4K
PUBG Mobile23
Arena of Valor3231
Asphalt 9: Legends77
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
2
1




1



1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 02. 03:18:28

#0 checking url part for id 11368 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9890 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719883108 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:16:07 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.027s ... 0.027s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.027s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.027s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11368 +0.018s ... 0.045s

#8 got single benchmarks 11368 +0.008s ... 0.053s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 9890 +0s ... 0.053s

#10 got single benchmarks 9890 +0.004s ... 0.057s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.057s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.015s ... 0.072s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.072s

#14 Got 59 rows for game benchmarks. +0.007s ... 0.079s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.079s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.08s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.004s ... 0.083s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.083s

#19 return log +0.002s ... 0.085s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)