Notebookcheck Logo

AMD A9-9410 vs Intel Core i7-8650U vs Intel Core i3-8130U

AMD A9-9410

► remove from comparison AMD A9-9410

The AMD A9-9410 is an entry-level chip from the Stoney-Ridge APU series for notebooks (7th APU generation), which was announced mid 2016. At its launch, the A9-9410 is the fastest Stoney Ridge processor (dual-core version of Bristol Ridge) and integrates two CPU cores (one Excavator module with 2 integer and on FP unit) clocked between 2.9-3.5 GHz. It also includes a Radeon R5 GPU with 192 shaders at 800 MHz as well as a single-channel DDR4-2133 memory controller, H.265 video engine and chipset with all I/O ports.

Architecture

Stoney Ridge is the successor of the Carrizo architecture and the design is almost identical. Thanks to optimized manufacturing processes and more aggressive Boost behavior, however, the clocks are a bit higher at the same power consumption. The memory controller now also supports DDR4-RAM, in this case up to 2133 MHz. Stoney Ridge is the designation for the smaller dual-core and single-core chip, while Bristol Ridge is the bigger quad-core chip with dual-channel memory controller. More technical details are available in the following articles:

Performance

Thanks to the high maximum clock of up to 3.5 GHz, the single-core performance should be pretty good. The multi-core performance on the other hand is much lower compared to the Bristol Ridge models. Compared to older Carrizo-L/Beema quad-cores, the APU should still perform pretty well. The level of performance should be similar to a Core-m3 and therefore also be sufficient for more demanding applications.

The TDP can be configured between 10-25 Watts, so there can be big performance differences under sustained workloads.

Graphics Card

The integrated Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) GPU has 192 active shader units (3 compute cores) clocked at up to 800 MHz. More details about the GPU are available in the linked articles above. 

Power Consumption

AMD specifies the TDP of the A9-9410 with 15 Watts, but it can be configured between 10-25 Watts. This means the CPU is a good choice for thin and light notebooks, but also 15-inch devices with better cooling capabilities.

Intel Core i7-8650U

► remove from comparison Intel i7-8650U

The Intel Core i7-8650U is a power efficient quad-core SoC for notebooks and Ultrabooks based on the Kaby Lake Refresh generation and was announced in August 2017. Contrary to its direct predecessor the Core i7-7600U, which were still dual-cores, the i7-8650U is equipped with four cores but at a lower base frequency of 1.9 GHz. The Turbo Boost can go up to 4,2 GHz and therefore also offer good short term single core speeds. The GPU is now named Intel UHD Graphics 620 but otherwise identical to the Intel HD Graphics 620. The integrated memory controller supports DDR4-2400 / LPDDR3-2133 and dual channel memory.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Skylake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. The manufacturer only reworked the Speed Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of voltages and clocks, and the improved 14nm process allows much higher frequencies combined with better efficiency than before.

Performance

According to Intel, the new quad core models are up to 40% faster than their dual core predecessors. Due to the reduced TDP and the same 14nm+ process, the long term performance and throttling behaviour will be interesting and depending on the laptop design. Therefore, the older 35 Watt quad-core models should be faster in applications that demand longer CPU loads. The performance however is highly depending on the TDP settings and cooling solution of the laptop. Especially, longer loads will show varying results in different laptops.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Intel Gen 9.5) is untouched from the 8th Gen Kaby Lake chips. With fast dual-channel memory it can reach the performance of a dedicated GeForce 920M.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby lake now also supports H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors announced in January should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in an improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors (14nm+), the same as the 7th Gen Kaby Lake processors. Intel still specifies the TDP with 15 Watts, which is typical for ULV chips. Depending on the usage scenario, the TDP can vary between 7.5 (cTDP Down) and 25 Watts.

Intel Core i3-8130U

► remove from comparison Intel i3-8130U

The Intel Core i3-8130U is a power efficient dual-core SoC for notebooks and Ultrabooks (most likely) based on the Kaby Lake Refresh generation (and not Coffee Lake). It was announced in February 2018. Compared to its direct predecessor, the Core i3-7130U, the 8130U offers Turbo Boost for an increased single thread performance. The GPU is now named Intel UHD Graphics 620 but otherwise identical to the Intel HD Graphics 620. The integrated memory controller supports DDR4-2400 / LPDDR3-2133 and dual channel memory.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Skylake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. The manufacturer only reworked the Speed Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of voltages and clocks, and the improved 14nm process allows much higher frequencies combined with better efficiency than before.

Performance

Clocked at 2.2 to 3.4 GHz, the Core i3-8130U offers a much better single core performance than the Core i3-7130U (2.7 GHz, no Turbo). Therefore, the overall performance should be comparable to the older Core i5-7260U (also 2.2 - 3.4 GHz). The Core i5-8250U offers four processor cores and therefore offers a much better multi-threaded performance.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Intel Gen 9.5) is untouched from the 8th Gen Kaby Lake chips. In the Core i3-8130U it is rather low clocked with 1 GHz compared to the 1.1 GHz in Core i7 models. With fast dual-channel memory it can reach the performance of a dedicated GeForce 920M.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby lake now also supports H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors announced in January should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is most likely manufactured in an improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors (14nm+), the same as the 7th Gen Kaby Lake processors. Intel still specifies the TDP with 15 Watts, which is typical for ULV chips. According to Intel it can be configured to 10 Watt at 800 MHz (cTDP-down).

ModelAMD A9-9410Intel Core i7-8650UIntel Core i3-8130U
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeIntel Kaby Lake RefreshIntel Kaby Lake Refresh
CodenameStoney RidgeKaby Lake RefreshKaby Lake Refresh
Series: Kaby Lake Refresh Kaby Lake Refresh
AMD A9-94253.1 - 3.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-9420e - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-94203 - 3.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-9410 « 2.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-92252.6 - 3.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-92202.5 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9220C1.8 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-92102.4 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-91202.2 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-9120C1.6 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-90102 - 2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-90001.8 - 2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9220e1.6 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core i7-8650U « 1.9 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8550U1.8 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8350U1.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8250U1.6 - 3.4 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8130U2.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4417U2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8650U1.9 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8550U1.8 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8350U1.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8250U1.6 - 3.4 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8130U « 2.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4417U2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Clock2900 - 3500 MHz1900 - 4200 MHz2200 - 3400 MHz
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 24 / 82 / 4
TDP10-25 Watt15 Watt15 Watt
Transistors1200 Million
Technology28 nm14 nm14 nm
Die Size124.5 mm2
max. Temp.90 °C
SocketBGABGA1356BGA1356
FeaturesSingle-Channel DDR4-2133, Virtualization,Dual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIDual-Channel DDR4/LPDDR3 Memory Controller, HyperThreading
iGPUAMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 800 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 620 (300 - 1150 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 620 (300 - 1000 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerproducts.amd.comark.intel.comark.intel.com
L1 Cache256 KB256 KB
L3 Cache8 MB4 MB
$409 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
348 Points (39%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
774 Points (2%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
130 Points (1%)
min: 451     avg: 589     median: 605 (4%)     max: 675 Points
min: 320     avg: 333.3     median: 338 (2%)     max: 342 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
63 Points (19%)
min: 128     avg: 165     median: 169 (51%)     max: 178 Points
min: 138     avg: 139     median: 139 (42%)     max: 140 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1.6 Points (2%)
min: 5.04     avg: 6.4     median: 6.8 (9%)     max: 7.24 Points
3.8 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
0.8 Points (20%)
min: 1.67     avg: 1.9     median: 1.9 (48%)     max: 2.04 Points
1.6 Points (41%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
2694 Points (16%)
min: 5307     avg: 6337     median: 6629 (40%)     max: 6782 Points
min: 5419     avg: 5448     median: 5447.5 (33%)     max: 5476 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
4619 Points (3%)
min: 16227     avg: 18738     median: 18635 (14%)     max: 21455 Points
min: 12142     avg: 12157     median: 12157 (9%)     max: 12172 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
21677 Points (15%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
6864 Points (8%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
751 s (9%)
min: 268.3     avg: 301.9     median: 302.8 (4%)     max: 334.6 s
485.5 s (6%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
24 s (5%)
min: 8.636     avg: 9.6     median: 9.9 (2%)     max: 10.28 s
14.3 s (3%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
413.8 s (2%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
10.3 s (5%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
879 Points (1%)
min: 4140     avg: 4423     median: 4319 (7%)     max: 4915 Points
2168 Points (3%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
10.1 fps (4%)
min: 35     avg: 39.1     median: 39.8 (14%)     max: 41.98 fps
22.2 fps (8%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
53.5 fps (12%)
min: 149     avg: 165.4     median: 169.6 (39%)     max: 173.2 fps
116.6 fps (27%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (0%)
min: 0.393     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (0%)     max: 0.444 GB/s
0.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.2 GB/s (3%)
min: 0.662     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (12%)     max: 0.733 GB/s
0.4 GB/s (6%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1 GB/s (3%)
min: 3.9     avg: 4.2     median: 4.3 (11%)     max: 4.4 GB/s
2 GB/s (5%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
2455 Points (5%)
min: 4487     avg: 6716     median: 6936 (15%)     max: 7939 Points
4720 Points (10%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
17.8 s (4%)
min: 8     avg: 8.6     median: 8.8 (2%)     max: 9 s
11.1 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
39.8 s (2%)
min: 19     avg: 19.7     median: 20 (1%)     max: 20.1 s
26.2 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
878 s (4%)
min: 501     avg: 513     median: 508 (2%)     max: 542 s
661 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 A9-9410 +
4764 Points (4%)
19125 Points (17%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
1470 Points (4%)
min: 5168     avg: 7106     median: 6863 (19%)     max: 8887 Points
min: 4075     avg: 4183     median: 4126 (11%)     max: 4349 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 A9-9410 +
17953 Points (15%)
min: 39040     avg: 42198     median: 41275 (34%)     max: 47797 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 A9-9410 +
17279 Points (14%)
min: 41011     avg: 43029     median: 41405.5 (34%)     max: 48293 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
17768 Points (15%)
min: 44090     avg: 52920     median: 56455 (48%)     max: 58675 Points
min: 47727     avg: 48886     median: 48885.5 (41%)     max: 50044 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
1318 Points (3%)
min: 4442     avg: 5935     median: 6089 (15%)     max: 7416 Points
min: 3659     avg: 3800     median: 3797 (10%)     max: 3945 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
2054 Points (4%)
min: 6823     avg: 8895     median: 9167 (16%)     max: 10541 Points
min: 5410     avg: 5509     median: 5508.5 (10%)     max: 5607 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
100%
1 A9-9410 +
732 Points (3%)
min: 2685     avg: 3010     median: 2876 (12%)     max: 3569 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3919     avg: 4001     median: 4000.5 (40%)     max: 4082 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 7470     avg: 7891     median: 7890.5 (9%)     max: 8311 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 A9-9410 +
2133 Points (29%)
min: 3796     avg: 4155     median: 4154.5 (57%)     max: 4513 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 A9-9410 +
3182 Points (8%)
min: 7123     avg: 8132     median: 8131.5 (20%)     max: 9140 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 A9-9410 +
3299 Points (6%)
min: 6935     avg: 7169     median: 7168.5 (13%)     max: 7402 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 A9-9410 +
2134 Points (42%)
min: 3107     avg: 3288     median: 3288 (64%)     max: 3469 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 A9-9410 +
3516 Points (6%)
7188 Points (11%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 A9-9410 +
2255 Points (34%)
3283 Points (49%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 A9-9410 +
3482 Points (28%)
6153 Points (50%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 A9-9410 +
3458 Points (31%)
6309 Points (57%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 A9-9410 +
4828 Points (9%)
7456 Points (15%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 A9-9410 +
4375 Points (9%)
7557 Points (15%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 A9-9410 +
4260 Points (11%)
7131 Points (19%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
2081 ms (2%)
min: 809     avg: 1126     median: 1076.5 (1%)     max: 1912 ms
min: 1084     avg: 1443     median: 1374.5 (2%)     max: 1937 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
147.7 ms (2%)
min: 63.8     avg: 74.2     median: 74.4 (1%)     max: 83.1 ms
min: 91.3     avg: 187     median: 187 (2%)     max: 282.7 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
17423 Points (15%)
min: 11491     avg: 31341     median: 33906 (30%)     max: 42822 Points
min: 25180     avg: 27861     median: 27142.5 (24%)     max: 31980 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
227 Points (47%)
153 Points (32%)

Average Benchmarks AMD A9-9410 → 100% n=25

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-8650U → 291% n=25

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-8130U → 191% n=25

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 01. 21:46:26

#0 checking url part for id 8181 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9212 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 9518 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719863186 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.009s ... 0.009s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 8181 +0.001s ... 0.01s

#8 got single benchmarks 8181 +0.005s ... 0.015s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 9212 +0.001s ... 0.016s

#10 got single benchmarks 9212 +0.015s ... 0.031s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 9518 +0s ... 0.031s

#12 got single benchmarks 9518 +0.006s ... 0.038s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.038s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.047s ... 0.084s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.084s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)