Notebookcheck Logo

AMD A9-9410 vs Intel Core i3-8130U

AMD A9-9410

► remove from comparison AMD A9-9410

The AMD A9-9410 is an entry-level chip from the Stoney-Ridge APU series for notebooks (7th APU generation), which was announced mid 2016. At its launch, the A9-9410 is the fastest Stoney Ridge processor (dual-core version of Bristol Ridge) and integrates two CPU cores (one Excavator module with 2 integer and on FP unit) clocked between 2.9-3.5 GHz. It also includes a Radeon R5 GPU with 192 shaders at 800 MHz as well as a single-channel DDR4-2133 memory controller, H.265 video engine and chipset with all I/O ports.

Architecture

Stoney Ridge is the successor of the Carrizo architecture and the design is almost identical. Thanks to optimized manufacturing processes and more aggressive Boost behavior, however, the clocks are a bit higher at the same power consumption. The memory controller now also supports DDR4-RAM, in this case up to 2133 MHz. Stoney Ridge is the designation for the smaller dual-core and single-core chip, while Bristol Ridge is the bigger quad-core chip with dual-channel memory controller. More technical details are available in the following articles:

Performance

Thanks to the high maximum clock of up to 3.5 GHz, the single-core performance should be pretty good. The multi-core performance on the other hand is much lower compared to the Bristol Ridge models. Compared to older Carrizo-L/Beema quad-cores, the APU should still perform pretty well. The level of performance should be similar to a Core-m3 and therefore also be sufficient for more demanding applications.

The TDP can be configured between 10-25 Watts, so there can be big performance differences under sustained workloads.

Graphics Card

The integrated Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) GPU has 192 active shader units (3 compute cores) clocked at up to 800 MHz. More details about the GPU are available in the linked articles above. 

Power Consumption

AMD specifies the TDP of the A9-9410 with 15 Watts, but it can be configured between 10-25 Watts. This means the CPU is a good choice for thin and light notebooks, but also 15-inch devices with better cooling capabilities.

Intel Core i3-8130U

► remove from comparison Intel i3-8130U

The Intel Core i3-8130U is a power efficient dual-core SoC for notebooks and Ultrabooks (most likely) based on the Kaby Lake Refresh generation (and not Coffee Lake). It was announced in February 2018. Compared to its direct predecessor, the Core i3-7130U, the 8130U offers Turbo Boost for an increased single thread performance. The GPU is now named Intel UHD Graphics 620 but otherwise identical to the Intel HD Graphics 620. The integrated memory controller supports DDR4-2400 / LPDDR3-2133 and dual channel memory.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Skylake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. The manufacturer only reworked the Speed Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of voltages and clocks, and the improved 14nm process allows much higher frequencies combined with better efficiency than before.

Performance

Clocked at 2.2 to 3.4 GHz, the Core i3-8130U offers a much better single core performance than the Core i3-7130U (2.7 GHz, no Turbo). Therefore, the overall performance should be comparable to the older Core i5-7260U (also 2.2 - 3.4 GHz). The Core i5-8250U offers four processor cores and therefore offers a much better multi-threaded performance.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Intel Gen 9.5) is untouched from the 8th Gen Kaby Lake chips. In the Core i3-8130U it is rather low clocked with 1 GHz compared to the 1.1 GHz in Core i7 models. With fast dual-channel memory it can reach the performance of a dedicated GeForce 920M.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby lake now also supports H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors announced in January should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is most likely manufactured in an improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors (14nm+), the same as the 7th Gen Kaby Lake processors. Intel still specifies the TDP with 15 Watts, which is typical for ULV chips. According to Intel it can be configured to 10 Watt at 800 MHz (cTDP-down).

ModelAMD A9-9410Intel Core i3-8130U
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeIntel Kaby Lake Refresh
CodenameStoney RidgeKaby Lake Refresh
Series: Kaby Lake Refresh Kaby Lake Refresh
AMD A9-9425 compare3.1 - 3.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-9420e compare - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-9420 compare3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-9410 « 2.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9225 compare2.6 - 3.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9220 compare2.5 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9220C compare1.8 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9210 compare2.4 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-9120 compare2.2 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-9120C compare1.6 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-9010 compare2 - 2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-9000 compare1.8 - 2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9220e compare1.6 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core i7-8650U compare1.9 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8550U compare1.8 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8350U compare1.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8250U compare1.6 - 3.4 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8130U « 2.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4417U compare2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Clock2900 - 3500 MHz2200 - 3400 MHz
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 4
TDP10-25 Watt15 Watt
Transistors1200 Million
Technology28 nm14 nm
Die Size124.5 mm2
max. Temp.90 °C
SocketBGABGA1356
FeaturesSingle-Channel DDR4-2133, Virtualization,Dual-Channel DDR4/LPDDR3 Memory Controller, HyperThreading
iGPUAMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 800 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 620 (300 - 1000 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerproducts.amd.comark.intel.com
L1 Cache256 KB
L3 Cache4 MB

Benchmarks

Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
348 Points (39%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
774 Points (2%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
130 Points (1%)
min: 320     avg: 333.3     median: 338 (2%)     max: 342 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
63 Points (19%)
min: 138     avg: 139     median: 139 (42%)     max: 140 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1.6 Points (2%)
3.8 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
0.8 Points (20%)
1.6 Points (41%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
2694 Points (16%)
min: 5419     avg: 5448     median: 5447.5 (33%)     max: 5476 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
4619 Points (3%)
min: 12142     avg: 12157     median: 12157 (9%)     max: 12172 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
751 s (9%)
485.5 s (6%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
24 s (5%)
14.3 s (3%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
879 Points (1%)
2168 Points (3%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
10.1 fps (4%)
22.2 fps (8%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
53.5 fps (12%)
116.6 fps (27%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (0%)
0.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.2 GB/s (3%)
0.4 GB/s (6%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1 GB/s (3%)
2 GB/s (5%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
2455 Points (5%)
4720 Points (10%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
17.8 s (4%)
11.1 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
39.8 s (2%)
26.2 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
878 s (4%)
661 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 A9-9410 +
4764 Points (4%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
1470 Points (4%)
min: 4075     avg: 4183     median: 4126 (11%)     max: 4349 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 A9-9410 +
17953 Points (15%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 A9-9410 +
17279 Points (14%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
17768 Points (15%)
min: 47727     avg: 48886     median: 48885.5 (41%)     max: 50044 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
1318 Points (3%)
min: 3659     avg: 3800     median: 3797 (10%)     max: 3945 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
2054 Points (4%)
min: 5410     avg: 5509     median: 5508.5 (10%)     max: 5607 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
100%
1 A9-9410 +
732 Points (3%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3919     avg: 4001     median: 4000.5 (40%)     max: 4082 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 7470     avg: 7891     median: 7890.5 (9%)     max: 8311 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
2133 Points (29%)
min: 3796     avg: 4155     median: 4154.5 (57%)     max: 4513 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
3182 Points (8%)
min: 7123     avg: 8132     median: 8131.5 (20%)     max: 9140 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
3299 Points (6%)
min: 6935     avg: 7169     median: 7168.5 (13%)     max: 7402 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
2134 Points (42%)
min: 3107     avg: 3288     median: 3288 (64%)     max: 3469 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
3516 Points (6%)
7188 Points (11%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
2255 Points (34%)
3283 Points (49%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
3482 Points (28%)
6153 Points (50%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
3458 Points (31%)
6309 Points (57%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
4828 Points (9%)
7456 Points (15%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
4375 Points (9%)
7557 Points (15%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
4260 Points (11%)
7131 Points (19%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
2081 ms (2%)
min: 1084     avg: 1443     median: 1374.5 (2%)     max: 1937 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
147.7 ms (2%)
min: 91.3     avg: 187     median: 187 (2%)     max: 282.7 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
17423 Points (15%)
min: 25180     avg: 27861     median: 27142.5 (24%)     max: 31980 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
153 Points (32%)

Average Benchmarks AMD A9-9410 → 100% n=36

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-8130U → 189% n=36

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 29. 18:05:11

#0 checking url part for id 8181 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9518 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719677110 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 8181 +0s ... 0.007s

#7 got single benchmarks 8181 +0.001s ... 0.008s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 9518 +0.001s ... 0.009s

#9 got single benchmarks 9518 +0.012s ... 0.021s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.021s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.029s ... 0.05s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.052s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)