Notebookcheck Logo

Apple A10 Fusion vs Apple M2 vs Apple A10X Fusion

Apple A10 Fusion

► remove from comparison Apple A10 Fusion

The Apple A10 Fusion is a system on a chip (SoC) from Apple that is built into the iPhone 7 and iPhone 7 Plus. It integrates four 64 Bit cores that are divided in two clusters. Two high performance cores are clocked at up to 2.34 GHz and should be around 40% faster than the Apple A9 (according to Apple) and two low power cores (up to 1.1 GHz?). Up to now its unclear if all four cores can be used at once (that need only 1/5 th of the energy in some use cases). At the release of the iPhone 7 it looks like that IOS is only using two cores at a time and automatically switches between the two clusters. Therefore, apps are seeing only a dual core. The principle is similar to the first generation of ARMs big.LITTLE concept.

The integrated graphics card of the SoC will most likely stem from PowerVR (again) and perform 50% faster at 2/3 of the power consumption (according to Apple). 

All in all the chip includes 3.3 billion transistors, which is more than a current AMD Bristol Ridge (3.1) and Skylake Quad-Core (1.75)  X86 SoCs.

Sources: Apple Keynote, Ars Technica

Apple M2

► remove from comparison Apple M2

The Apple M2 is a System on a Chip (SoC) from Apple that is found in the late 2022 MacBook Air and, MacBook Pro 13. It offers 8 cores divided in four performance cores and four power-efficiency cores. The big cores offer 192 KB instruction cache, 128 KB data cache, and 16 MB shared L2 cache (up from 12 MB). The four efficiency cores are a lot smaller and offer only 128 KB instruction cache, 64 KB data cache, and 4 MB shared cache. The efficiency cores (E cluster) clock with  up to 2,4 GHz, the performance cores (P cluster) with up to 3,5 GHz and therefore higher than the M1 cores. The architecture should be similar to the A15 (iPhone 13) with Avalanche and Blizzard cores.

The chip features a unified memory architecture for the CPU and GPU cores and supports up to 24 GB LPDDR5-6400 for a bandwidth of up to 100GB/s.

According to Apple, the M2 offers a 18% higher CPU performance at the same power consumption level compared to the Apple M1. In our tests, the MacBook Pro 13 with active cooling was able to reach the 18% in Geekbench Multi. In other benchmarks we measured 12 to 15% gains compared to the M1. Therefore, the performance is now near the M1 Pro with 8 cores. The passively cooled MacBook Air may however suffer from throttling in longer load scenarios.

The integrated graphics card in the M2 offers 8 or 10 cores and a peak performance of 3.6 TFLOPs.

Furthermore, the SoC integrates a fast 16 core neural engine with a peak performance of 16 TOPS (for AI hardware acceleration), a secure enclave (e.g., for encryption), Thunderbolt / USB 4 controller, an ISP, and media de- and encoders.

The Apple M2 includes 20 billion transistors (up from the 16 billion of the M1) and is manufactured in the second generation 5nm process at TSMC (most likely N5P). The power consumption is rated at 20W what we also measured under CPU load.

Apple A10X Fusion

► remove from comparison

The Apple A10X Fusion is a system on a chip (SoC) from Apple that is built into the 2017 iPad Pro models. It integrates six 64 Bit cores that are divided in two clusters. Three high performance cores are clocked at up to 2.39 GHz. The three power saving cores are used for non demanding tasks. It looks like only one of both clusters is able to run at a time (therefore the apps see only three cores). The principle is similar to the first generation of ARMs big.LITTLE concept.

The performance of the SoC is positioned in the high and and clearly faster than all previous Apple SoCs. Even compared to Android high-end SoCs like the Snapdragon 835, the A10X takes the lead (e.g. in Geekbench or Antutu).

The integrated graphics card of the SoC will most likely stem from PowerVR (again) and features 12 cores instead of 6 in the A10 SoC.

According to TechInsights, the A10X is manufactured in the brand new 10 nm FinFet process at TSMC. Altough it offers more function blocks, the A10X is with measured 96.4 mm2 significantly smaller than the previous A9X (143.9 mm2).

ModelApple A10 FusionApple M2Apple A10X Fusion
SeriesApple Apple A-SeriesApple Apple M2Apple Apple A-Series
CodenameAPL1021 Hurricane / ZephyrCyclone 4?
Clock2340 MHz2424 - 3480 MHz2390 MHz
Cores / Threads4 / 28 / 86 / 3
Transistors3300 Million20000 Million3300 Million
Technology16 nm5 nm10 nm
FeaturesARMv8 Instruction SetARMv8 Instruction SetARMv8 Instruction Set
iGPUApple A10 Fusion GPU / PowerVR (900 MHz)Apple M2 10-Core GPU ( - 1398 MHz)Apple A10X Fusion GPU / PowerVR
ArchitectureARMARMARM
Announced
Series: Apple M2
Apple M2 Max2.42 - 3.7 GHz12 / 12 cores48 MB L3
Apple M2 Pro2.42 - 3.5 GHz12 / 12 cores24 MB L3
Apple M2 Pro 10-Core2.42 - 3.7 GHz10 / 10 cores24 MB L3
Apple M2 « 2.42 - 3.48 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
L1 Cache2 MB
L2 Cache20 MB
L3 Cache8 MB
TDP20 Watt
Manufacturerwww.apple.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
100%
1 M2 +
121 Points (84%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
100%
1 M2 +
513 Points (10%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
100%
1 M2 +
min: 8517     avg: 8654     median: 8667 (8%)     max: 8772 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
100%
1 M2 +
min: 1580     avg: 1595     median: 1585 (67%)     max: 1638 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
100%
1 M2 +
min: 216     avg: 370.8     median: 381 (42%)     max: 446 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
100%
1 M2 +
min: 2231     avg: 2325     median: 2324 (6%)     max: 2416 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 M2 +
min: 1209.9     avg: 1222     median: 1215 (8%)     max: 1243 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 M2 +
min: 222     avg: 223.8     median: 223 (67%)     max: 229 Points
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
100%
1 M2 +
min: 540     avg: 620     median: 619.5 (8%)     max: 702 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
100%
1 M2 +
min: 549     avg: 614     median: 597 (4%)     max: 713 Seconds
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 9189     avg: 14249     median: 15479 (13%)     max: 15626 Points
min: 19534     avg: 19551     median: 19550.5 (16%)     max: 19567 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 1252     avg: 1437     median: 1434.5 (17%)     max: 1627 Points
min: 2036     avg: 2323     median: 2323 (27%)     max: 2610 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 1408     avg: 1525     median: 1518 (17%)     max: 1690 Points
min: 2145     avg: 2370     median: 2369.5 (27%)     max: 2594 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
100%
1 M2 +
min: 2587     avg: 2609     median: 2599 (70%)     max: 2650 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
100%
1 M2 +
min: 10034     avg: 10083     median: 10089 (40%)     max: 10120 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 766     avg: 773     median: 777 (33%)     max: 777 Points
247%
M2 +
min: 1887     avg: 1914     median: 1915.5 (81%)     max: 1953 Points
850 Points (36%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1361     avg: 1403     median: 1421 (3%)     max: 1426 Points
630%
M2 +
min: 8491     avg: 8812     median: 8956 (16%)     max: 8994 Points
2324 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 767     avg: 771     median: 771 (3%)     max: 775 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1426     avg: 1429     median: 1429 (5%)     max: 1432 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2672     avg: 3233     median: 3499 (35%)     max: 3527 Points
min: 3924     avg: 3929     median: 3928.5 (39%)     max: 3933 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4508     avg: 5461     median: 5922 (6%)     max: 5952 Points
min: 9293     avg: 9326     median: 9325.5 (10%)     max: 9358 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3476     avg: 3483     median: 3483 (47%)     max: 3490 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5585     avg: 5608     median: 5607.5 (14%)     max: 5630 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1026     avg: 1178     median: 1113 (1%)     max: 1531 ms
101%
M2 +
min: 440     avg: 450.1     median: 449.2 (1%)     max: 466.8 ms
min: 969     avg: 971     median: 971 (1%)     max: 973 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 19783     avg: 25316     median: 26053 (23%)     max: 27967 Points
287%
M2 +
min: 72484     avg: 75019     median: 74878 (66%)     max: 78736 Points
min: 30333     avg: 30761     median: 30760.5 (27%)     max: 31188 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
1 M2 +
min: 223     avg: 237.8     median: 235 (68%)     max: 256 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 79     avg: 95     median: 95 (20%)     max: 111 Points
396%
1 M2 +
min: 342     avg: 366.5     median: 376 (78%)     max: 387 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
min: 142532     avg: 153966     median: 153966 (52%)     max: 165399 Points
min: 217439     avg: 222713     median: 222713 (76%)     max: 227987 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
min: 6141     avg: 9979     median: 10439 (32%)     max: 12895 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
min: 32746     avg: 45782     median: 47936.5 (59%)     max: 54510 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
min: 45772     avg: 54850     median: 52519 (16%)     max: 68591 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
min: 50770     avg: 65083     median: 60084.5 (37%)     max: 89394 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
min: 160578     avg: 175694     median: 165802 (29%)     max: 210596 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
100%
1 M2 +
min: 1257990     avg: 1337360     median: 1337360 (81%)     max: 1416730 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
100%
1 M2 +
min: 294643     avg: 298254     median: 298254 (82%)     max: 301865 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
min: 49294     avg: 49329     median: 49329 (6%)     max: 49364 Points
min: 82816     avg: 82838     median: 82837.5 (11%)     max: 82859 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
359 Points (14%)
420%
1 M2 +
min: 1437     avg: 1515     median: 1507 (58%)     max: 1585 Points
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 M2 +
29 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 M2 +
min: 6.86     avg: 8.3     median: 8.4 (4%)     max: 9.71 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 M2 +
min: 2.03     avg: 2.6     median: 2.4 (2%)     max: 3.98 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 M2 +
min: 1.631     avg: 3.5     median: 3.6 (4%)     max: 5.32 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
100%
1 M2 +
42.4 Points per Watt (32%)

Average Benchmarks Apple A10 Fusion → 100% n=4

Average Benchmarks Apple M2 → 316% n=4

Average Benchmarks Apple A10X Fusion → 123% n=4

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 28. 07:03:04

#0 checking url part for id 8178 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14521 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 9162 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719550984 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 8178 +0.001s ... 0.008s

#8 got single benchmarks 8178 +0.005s ... 0.013s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14521 +0.001s ... 0.013s

#10 got single benchmarks 14521 +0.008s ... 0.021s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 9162 +0.001s ... 0.022s

#12 got single benchmarks 9162 +0.003s ... 0.025s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.025s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.025s ... 0.05s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.05s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)