Notebookcheck Logo

newitem vs Intel Core i7-12700

Intel Core i7-12700

Intel i7-12700

The Intel Core i7-12700F is a fast eight-core desktop processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, which was introduced in November 2021. The processor offers a base clock of 3.3 GHz and reaches up to 4.9 GHz in Turbo. In the same way, the Intel Core i7-12700K the Core i7-12700F is based on a hybrid architecture of 8P and 4E cores. The innovations of the Alder Lake-S processor compared to Rocket Lake, together with the smaller 10 nm manufacturing process, are clearly noticeable. The Intel Core i7-12700 does not offer a free multiplier, which means that overclocking is not possible.

Performance

Compared to the Intel Core i7-11700 , performance has been increased with a better IPC. The additional e-cores are also clearly noticeable in multi-threaded applications. Overall, this provides a noticeable performance boost, which also has an effect on all application areas. The 4 E-Cores provide the P-Cores with significantly more power. If all requirements are met, Intel Turbo Boost 3.0can increase the clock rate of the P-Cores to up to 4.9 GHz. The E-cores also offer a turbo and clock up to 3.6 GHz.

Graphics unit

The Intel Core i7-12700 is a processor with an integrated graphics unit. However, with the Intel UHD Graphics 770 there is only a simple iGPU which is only suitable for office use.

Power consumption

The TDP of the Intel Core i7-12700 is 65 watts, with the option to consume up to 180 watts in Turbo mode. If all restrictions are deactivated in the BIOS, the PL2 value can be achieved permanently. However, a high-quality and powerful cooling unit should be used for this.

ModelnewitemIntel Core i7-12700
Series Intel Alder Lake-S
Series: Alder Lake-S Alder Lake
newitem «  cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W compare1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
UNISOC Tiger T310 compare1.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3288 compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple A6x compare1.4 GHzcores
Apple A6 compare1 GHzcores
Apple S5 compare2 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK3168 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz compare1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz compare0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR8670 compare0.08 GHzcores
ARM Cortex-M4 compare cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 compare cores
DK3.5+ST comparecores
unknown compare cores
Intel Core i9-12900K compare3.2 - 5.2 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900 compare2.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 24 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700K compare2.7 - 5 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700F compare3.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700 « 3.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12600K compare2.8 - 4.9 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
CodenameAlder Lake
Clock3300 - 4900 MHz
L1 Cache1 MB
L2 Cache12 MB
L3 Cache25 MB
Cores / Threads12 / 20
TDP65 Watt
Technology10 nm
Die Size215 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketLGA 1700
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1500 MHz)
Architecturex86
$349 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerwww.intel.de

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-12700
47 pt (65%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
21751 Points (20%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1894 Points (81%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
731 Points (81%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
8338 Points (20%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
3151 Points (20%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
272 Points (82%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
36.9 Points (48%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.3 Points (82%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
9171 Points (55%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
60892 Points (44%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
103354 Points (72%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
15091 Points (18%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
272.8 s (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
2.9 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
9328 Points (15%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
78331 MIPS (45%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
6292 MIPS (75%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
172.4 fps (60%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
347 fps (80%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
25.5 fps (45%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.5 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.7 GB/s (47%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
14.5 GB/s (38%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
242 Seconds (3%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
151 Seconds (1%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.4 sec (9%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
15390 Points (33%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.5 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
16.8 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
400.4 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
72464 Points (63%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
27022 Points (73%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
86815 Points (71%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
86587 Points (70%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
96264 Points (81%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
23193 Points (59%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
34681 Points (62%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
16400 Points (69%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1924 Points (81%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
14961 Points (27%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1845 Points (8%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
14883 Points (47%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
8059 Points (81%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
52676 Points (58%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
508 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
268 Points (77%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
314 Points (65%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
2016 Points (77%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
327 Watt (56%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
284 Watt (52%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
82.7 Watt (55%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-12700 → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 04. 09:26:23

#0 checking url part for id 17594 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14995 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720077983 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.002s ... 0.002s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.002s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 17594 +0s ... 0.003s

#7 got single benchmarks 17594 +0s ... 0.003s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14995 +0.001s ... 0.004s

#9 got single benchmarks 14995 +0s ... 0.005s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.005s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.013s ... 0.018s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.02s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)