Notebookcheck Logo

newitem vs Intel Core i7-12700F

Intel Core i7-12700F

Intel i7-12700F

The Intel Core i7-12700F is a high end CPU for desktops based on the Alder Lake architecture. It was first announced in November 2021 and offers 8 performance cores and 4 efficiency cores. The performance cores (P-cores) support HyperThreading, leading to 20 threads that can be processed at once. The performance cores can clock with up to 4.9 GHz (Turbo Boost Max 3.0, 2.1 base), the efficiency cores can clock with up to 3.6 GHz (1.6 GHz base). All cores can use 25 MB Smart Cache. The integrated memory controller supports up to 128 GB DDR5 with 4800 MT/s (dual channel).

The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficiency cores for the best performance.

For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost. Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC and AV1 decode in hardware.

The F-series desktop models don't offer an integrated graphics card.

The CPU is rated at 65 W base power and 180 Watt maximum Turbo power. It is manufactured in 10nm, called Intel 7, process at Intel.

ModelnewitemIntel Core i7-12700F
Series Intel Alder Lake-S
Series: Alder Lake-S Alder Lake
newitem «  cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W compare1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
UNISOC Tiger T310 compare1.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3288 compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple A6x compare1.4 GHzcores
Apple A6 compare1 GHzcores
Apple S5 compare2 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK3168 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz compare1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz compare0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR8670 compare0.08 GHzcores
ARM Cortex-M4 compare cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 compare cores
DK3.5+ST comparecores
unknown compare cores
Intel Core i9-12900K compare3.2 - 5.2 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900 compare2.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 24 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700K compare2.7 - 5 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700F « 3.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700 compare3.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12600K compare2.8 - 4.9 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
CodenameAlder Lake
Clock3300 - 4900 MHz
L1 Cache1 MB
L2 Cache12 MB
L3 Cache25 MB
Cores / Threads12 / 20
TDP65 Watt
Technology10 nm
Die Size215 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketLGA 1700
Architecturex86
$386 U.S.
Announced

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-12700F
44.5 pt (62%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
15291 Points (14%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1898 Points (81%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
726 Points (81%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
5786 Points (14%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2610 Points (16%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
271 Points (82%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
33.5 Points (44%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.3 Points (82%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
9146 Points (55%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
56067 Points (41%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
93400 Points (65%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
15176 Points (18%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
128.3 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
8695 Points (14%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
61218 MIPS (35%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
6145 MIPS (73%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
118.6 fps (41%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
296.5 fps (68%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
17.7 fps (31%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.5 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.8 GB/s (48%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
3.3 GB/s (9%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
212 Seconds (1%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.4 sec (9%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
15823 Points (34%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.4 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
16.5 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
386.3 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
66554 Points (58%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
23748 Points (64%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
81273 Points (66%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
77233 Points (63%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
79448 Points (67%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
17840 Points (45%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
31106 Points (55%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
11521 Points (49%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1590 Points (67%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
10126 Points (18%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1557 Points (7%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
10249 Points (32%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
6698 Points (67%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
39852 Points (44%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
522 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
94804 Points (83%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
271 Points (78%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
281 Points (59%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1841 Points (71%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
114.6 Watt (20%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
127.6 Watt (23%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
29.7 Watt (20%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
20.5 Points per Watt (15%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-12700F → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 04. 09:51:41

#0 checking url part for id 17594 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14604 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720079501 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.003s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 17594 +0.001s ... 0.004s

#7 got single benchmarks 17594 +0s ... 0.004s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14604 +0.004s ... 0.007s

#9 got single benchmarks 14604 +0.006s ... 0.013s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.013s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.027s ... 0.04s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.042s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)