Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i9-9980XE vs Intel Core i9-13900K vs Intel Core i5-13500

Intel Core i9-9980XE

► remove from comparison Intel i9-9980XE

The Intel Core i9-9980XE is a high end desktop / workstation processor based on the Sky Lake-X Refresh series. It integrates 18 processor cores based on the Sky Lake-X architecture that clock between 3 and 4.4 GHz (Turbo Boost 3.0). Thanks to HyperThreading the CPU can handle up to 36 threads at once. The individual cores are connected by a mesh instead of the ring bus in the consumer CPUs.

The performance in multi-threaded applications of the 18 core CPU is excellent, however in gaming and workloads with less threads, fast clocked consumer CPUs like the Core i9-9900K are faster.

The CPU is specified with a TDP of 165 Watt and therefore needs a big and capable cooling system.

Intel Core i9-13900K

► remove from comparison Intel i9-13900K

The Intel Core i9-13900K is a fast high-end desktop processor of the Raptor Lake series. It includes a hybrid architecture for the CPU cores with combined 24 cores and 32 threads. Eight fast Raptor Cove performance cores (P-cores) with HyperThreading and a clock speed of 3 - 5.8 GHz and sixteen Gracemont efficiency cores without HyperThreading and a clock speed of 2.2 - 4.3 GHz.

Thanks to the faster P-cores and more E-cores, the i9-13900K is significantly faster than the old i9-12900K (especially in multi-threaded workloads). Compared to the Raphael AMD Ryzen 9 7950X (Zen 4), the 13900K offers a slightly higher multi-thread-performance and a slightly lower single core performance. In games, the Intel CPU is currently the clear winner (at the time of announcement of the 7950X).

The 13900K is rated at 125 Watt TDP base power (PL1) and 253 Watt Turbo Power (PL2) and therefore slightly higher than the old i9-12900K.

Intel Core i5-13500

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core i5-13500 ist ein schneller und sparsamer Desktop-Prozessor auf Basis der Raptor-Lake-Architektur, die bereits im Oktober 2022 vorgestellt wurde. Der Prozessor bietet einen Basistakt von 2,5 GHz und erreicht bis zu 4,8 GHz im Turbo. Die mit Alder-Lake eingeführte hybride CPU-Architektur kommt auch bei den Raptor-Lake-Prozessoren zum Einsatz. Im Vergleich zum Intel Core i5-12500 bietet der Intel Core i5-13500 mehr Kerne, womit eine höhere Gesamtleistung erzielt werden kann. In Summe kann der Intel Core i5-13500 bis zu 20 Threads parallel verarbeiten. Die Performance-Kerne (P-Cores) bieten hierzu Hyperthreading, was den energieeffizienten Kernen (E-Cores) vorenthalten wird.

Performance

Aufgrund der höheren Anzahl an physikalischen Recheneinheiten bietet der Intel Core i5-13500 gegenüber dem Intel Core i5-12500 spürbar mehr Leistung. Beide Prozessoren verfügen über 6 P-Kerne, wenngleich nur der Intel Core i5-13500 zusätzlich mit 8 E-Kernen bestückt ist.

Grafikeinheit

Wie auch der Intel Core i5-12600K bietet der Intel Core i5-13500 eine integrierte Grafikeinheit. Als Basis dient weiterhin die Intel Iris Xe-Architektur. Rein leistungstechnisch hat sich bei der neuen Intel UHD Graphics 770 aber nicht viel verändert. 

Leistungsaufnahme

Die TDP des Intel Core i5-13500 beläuft sich auf 65 Watt, mit der Option, diese im Turbo auf bis zu 154 Watt zu erhöhen. Gegenüber dem Intel Core i5-12500 steigt der Energiebedarf etwas an.

ModelIntel Core i9-9980XEIntel Core i9-13900KIntel Core i5-13500
SeriesIntel Core i9 (Desktop)Intel Raptor Lake-S Raptor Lake-S
CodenameSky Lake-XRaptor LakeRaptor Lake
Clock3000 - 4400 MHz3000 - 5800 MHz2500 - 4800 MHz
L1 Cache1.1 MB
L2 Cache18 MB32 MB11.5 MB
L3 Cache24.8 MB36 MB24 MB
Cores / Threads18 / 3624 / 32
8 x 5.8 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
16 x 4.3 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
14 / 20
6 x 4.8 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
8 x 3.5 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
TDP165 Watt125 Watt65 Watt
Technology14 nm10 nm10 nm
max. Temp.84 °C100 °C100 °C
SocketFCLGA-2066 (LGA)LGA 1700LGA 1700
FeaturesQuad-Channel DDR4-2666 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX-NI, Quick Sync, Virtualization, vProIntel UHD Graphics 770, DDR5 5600 MT/s, DDR4 3200 MT/sIntel UHD Graphics 770, DDR5 4800 MT/s, DDR4 3200 MT/s
Architecturex86x86x86
$1979 U.S.$589 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.intel.comwww.intel.de
Series: Raptor Lake-S Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900K « 3 - 5.8 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700K3.4 - 5.4 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600K3.5 - 5.1 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-135002.5 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500T2.5 - 4.6 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900K3 - 5.8 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700K3.4 - 5.4 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600K3.5 - 5.1 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500 « 2.5 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500T2.5 - 4.6 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Die Size257 mm2215 mm2
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1650 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1550 MHz)
TDP Turbo PL2154 Watt

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-9980XE
41.1 pt (57%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-13900K
59.3 pt (82%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-13500
42.6 pt (59%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
107 Points (74%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
822 Points (15%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 32592     avg: 37310     median: 38271.5 (36%)     max: 40103 Points
14573 Points (14%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 2203     avg: 2238     median: 2238.5 (95%)     max: 2272 Points
1780 Points (76%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 460     avg: 461.5     median: 461.5 (51%)     max: 463 Points
min: 828     avg: 849     median: 849.5 (94%)     max: 870 Points
685 Points (76%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 8834     avg: 8857     median: 8857 (22%)     max: 8880 Points
min: 13415     avg: 14459     median: 14620.5 (36%)     max: 15181 Points
5633 Points (14%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 3722     avg: 3736     median: 3735.5 (24%)     max: 3749 Points
min: 5321     avg: 5798     median: 5805.5 (37%)     max: 6191 Points
2405 Points (15%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 197     avg: 197.5     median: 197.5 (59%)     max: 198 Points
min: 299     avg: 314.1     median: 318 (96%)     max: 328 Points
256 Points (77%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
38.6 Points (50%)
min: 62.2     avg: 67     median: 67.5 (88%)     max: 70.78 Points
28.4 Points (37%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.2 Points (55%)
min: 3.8     avg: 3.9     median: 3.9 (96%)     max: 3.93 Points
3.1 Points (77%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
7323 Points (44%)
min: 11661     avg: 11989     median: 12017.5 (73%)     max: 12259 Points
8875 Points (54%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
58001 Points (42%)
min: 85342     avg: 88253     median: 87738 (64%)     max: 92192 Points
49300 Points (36%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 132000     avg: 134526     median: 133567 (93%)     max: 138969 Points
79625 Points (55%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 17418     avg: 17943     median: 17998.5 (22%)     max: 18355 Points
14282 Points (17%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
46.5 s (1%)
min: 79.738     avg: 84.6     median: 84.2 (1%)     max: 90.13 s
100.7 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
2.7 s (1%)
min: 1.818     avg: 2.1     median: 2 (0%)     max: 2.305 s
4 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
6879 Points (11%)
min: 13210     avg: 14265     median: 14271 (23%)     max: 15309 Points
7704 Points (12%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 92936     avg: 93018     median: 93017.5 (53%)     max: 93099 MIPS
min: 127201     avg: 142777     median: 146984 (84%)     max: 148053 MIPS
55528 MIPS (32%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5109     avg: 5110     median: 5110 (61%)     max: 5111 MIPS
min: 7176     avg: 7343     median: 7272 (87%)     max: 7539 MIPS
5887 MIPS (70%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
156 fps (54%)
min: 247.5     avg: 261.5     median: 264.8 (92%)     max: 269 fps
134.6 fps (47%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
206.5 fps (48%)
min: 412     avg: 419     median: 419.3 (97%)     max: 425.5 fps
306 fps (71%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 26     avg: 26.1     median: 26.1 (46%)     max: 26.1 fps
min: 34.5     avg: 39.9     median: 40.7 (72%)     max: 42.6 fps
16.3 fps (29%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.9 GB/s (0%)
min: 2.6     avg: 2.9     median: 2.9 (0%)     max: 3 GB/s
1.3 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
3.2 GB/s (55%)
min: 5.2     avg: 5.4     median: 5.4 (93%)     max: 5.4 GB/s
2.3 GB/s (40%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
18.1 GB/s (47%)
min: 20.5     avg: 23.3     median: 22.9 (60%)     max: 27 GB/s
12 GB/s (31%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 136     avg: 145.2     median: 140.5 (2%)     max: 174 Seconds
399 Seconds (5%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 136     avg: 136.5     median: 136.5 (1%)     max: 137 Seconds
min: 80     avg: 85.7     median: 84 (1%)     max: 101 Seconds
223 Seconds (2%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.3468     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (8%)     max: 0.3911 sec
0.4 sec (10%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
13495 Points (29%)
min: 19989     avg: 20578     median: 20192 (43%)     max: 21934 Points
14875 Points (32%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.2 s (2%)
min: 5.655     avg: 5.7     median: 5.7 (1%)     max: 5.86 s
7.8 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
17.9 s (1%)
min: 12.287     avg: 12.6     median: 12.5 (1%)     max: 13.193 s
17.2 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
433 s (2%)
min: 289.628     avg: 296.6     median: 293.3 (1%)     max: 310.125 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 86915     avg: 97290     median: 96473 (84%)     max: 112434 Points
69725 Points (61%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
19237 Points (52%)
min: 29023     avg: 31289     median: 31187.5 (84%)     max: 33181 Points
18026 Points (49%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 79257     avg: 97847     median: 97246.5 (79%)     max: 111988 Points
84456 Points (69%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 80320     avg: 96904     median: 97919.5 (79%)     max: 102987 Points
83392 Points (68%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
51923 Points (44%)
min: 83056     avg: 98634     median: 97311 (82%)     max: 105981 Points
81778 Points (69%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
13429 Points (34%)
min: 26626     avg: 29034     median: 29044.5 (73%)     max: 30955 Points
17891 Points (45%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
27856 Points (50%)
min: 46013     avg: 51456     median: 51140 (91%)     max: 54226 Points
26263 Points (47%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
10963 Points (46%)
min: 16236     avg: 20507     median: 20037 (84%)     max: 22794 Points
9655 Points (41%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
2483 Points (67%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
10348 Points (41%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1200 Points (51%)
min: 2106     avg: 2237     median: 2286 (96%)     max: 2290 Points
1805 Points (76%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
15780 Points (28%)
min: 22448     avg: 23743     median: 24033 (43%)     max: 24157 Points
10322 Points (18%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1211     avg: 1218     median: 1217.5 (5%)     max: 1224 Points
min: 2148     avg: 2191     median: 2197 (10%)     max: 2246 Points
1749 Points (8%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 16286     avg: 16331     median: 16331 (51%)     max: 16376 Points
min: 22024     avg: 23446     median: 23664 (75%)     max: 24021 Points
10213 Points (32%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 5460     avg: 5493     median: 5492.5 (55%)     max: 5525 Points
min: 9218     avg: 9542     median: 9598 (96%)     max: 9683 Points
7379 Points (74%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 54730     avg: 55150     median: 55149.5 (61%)     max: 55569 Points
min: 77347     avg: 84105     median: 85336 (94%)     max: 86695 Points
39094 Points (43%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 80967     avg: 80967     median: 80967 (144%)     max: 56351 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
4875 Points (95%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
9164 Points (74%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
9377 Points (85%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
min: 58459     avg: 58459     median: 58459 (115%)     max: 51025 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
min: 58015     avg: 58015     median: 58015 (117%)     max: 49681 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
min: 43557     avg: 43557     median: 43557 (114%)     max: 38219 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 423     avg: 430.6     median: 432 (1%)     max: 438 ms
519 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 304     avg: 317.6     median: 316 (91%)     max: 335 Points
254 Points (73%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 338     avg: 364     median: 368 (77%)     max: 382 Points
266 Points (55%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 2263     avg: 2497     median: 2580 (99%)     max: 2589 Points
1549 Points (59%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
280 Watt (48%)
min: 228     avg: 354.3     median: 359 (62%)     max: 471 Watt
98.7 Watt (17%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
343 Watt (63%)
min: 349     avg: 392.5     median: 370.5 (68%)     max: 480 Watt
121 Watt (22%)
7.9 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
10.9 Points per Watt (8%)
min: 12.9     avg: 15     median: 15.2 (11%)     max: 16.8 Points per Watt
19.9 Points per Watt (15%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-9980XE → 100% n=33

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-13900K → 158% n=33

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-13500 → 99% n=33

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
Errors [Close]

#0 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 80967>56351 for benchmark 235, setting:683 +0s ... 0.118s

#1 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 58459>51025 for benchmark 136, setting:455 +0s ... 0.12s

#2 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 58015>49681 for benchmark 136, setting:454 +0s ... 0.121s

#3 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 43557>38219 for benchmark 136, setting:453 +0s ... 0.121s

log 30. 11:27:14

#0 checking url part for id 11498 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14625 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 17901 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719739634 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11498 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#8 got single benchmarks 11498 +0.005s ... 0.016s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14625 +0.004s ... 0.02s

#10 got single benchmarks 14625 +0.022s ... 0.042s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 17901 +0.004s ... 0.046s

#12 got single benchmarks 17901 +0.004s ... 0.05s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.05s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.052s ... 0.102s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.017s ... 0.118s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.119s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.119s

#18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.12s

#19 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.12s

#20 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.121s

#21 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.121s

#22 min, max, avg, median took s +0.012s ... 0.134s

#23 return log +0s ... 0.134s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)