Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i9-14900K vs Intel Core i7-13700K vs Intel Core i9-13900K

Intel Core i9-14900K

► remove from comparison Intel i9-14900K

The Intel Core i9-14900K is a high-end processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, similar to the Intel Core i9-13900K last year. The base clock is 3.2 GHz and can reach up to 6 GHz under optimal conditions. The total of 32 threads are still divided into 8 P and 16 E cores. The 8 performance cores (P-cores) also offer hyperthreading, which means that a total of 32 threads can be processed simultaneously in conjunction with the 16 energy-efficient E-cores. As before, the K models continue to offer a freely selectable multiplier, which simplifies overclocking. The Intel Core i9-14900K uses the same CPU socket (LGA 1700) as the Intel Core i9-13900K. This means you don't necessarily need a new motherboard, as the 600 series chipsets support the new processors after a BIOS update. There is also still the option of using DDR4 for the RAM.

Performance

Compared to the Intel Core i9-13900K, the Core i9-14900K still offers 8 P-cores, which are relieved by 16 additional E-cores for demanding applications and thus ensure very high multi-thread performance. In comparison, however, the Intel Core i9-14900K can only gain a slight lead. The e-cores primarily take care of background applications. The hybrid architecture relies on the Intel Thread Director, which is responsible for the correct allocation of tasks. Meanwhile, the IPC could only be increased slightly. As an innovation with the Intel Core i9-14900K, the manufacturer is increasingly relying on AI, which is also used for overclocking. With one click in the Intel Extreme Utility, the tool checks the entire system and makes the necessary settings.

Graphics unit

Like the Intel Core i9-13900K, the Intel Core i9-14900K offers an integrated graphics unit. The Intel Iris Xe architecture continues to serve as the basis. In terms of performance, however, nothing has changed with the Intel UHD Graphics 770.

Power consumption

The Intel Core i9-14900K is specified with a TDP of 125 watts, which corresponds to the PL1 value. In Boost mode, the processor's performance can increase to up to 253 watts (PL2). However, this requires very good cooling. Compared to the Intel Core i9-13900K, the specified power consumption does not increase if the limits are adhered to. The situation is different if the limits are deactivated. As this value depends on the overall system, we cannot make an exact statement on this.

Intel Core i7-13700K

► remove from comparison Intel i7-13700K

The Intel Core i7-13700K is a high-end CPU based on the current Raptor Lake architecture, which was introduced in September 2022. The base clock is 3.4 GHz and can reach up to 5.4 GHz under optimal conditions. The total of 16 cores are divided into 8 P-cores and 8 E-cores, which we already know from the Alder Lake architecture. Compared to the Intel Core i7-12700K, however, the number of E-cores has been doubled, meaning that the Intel Core i7-13700K now offers 24 threads. As usual, the K models continue to offer a freely selectable multiplier, which simplifies overclocking. In addition, all new Raptor Lake processors can be operated on the existing Socket 1700 motherboards.

Performance

Compared to the Intel Core i7-12700K, the Core i7-13700K still offers 8 P-cores, but these are to be relieved by 8 additional E-cores for demanding applications. The E-cores primarily take care of background applications. The hybrid architecture relies on the Intel Thread Director, which is responsible for the correct allocation of tasks. Compared to Alder Lake, the number of e-cores has been doubled, which significantly improves multi-thread performance in combination with a further increase in IPC. If all requirements are met, Intel Turbo Boost 3.0 can increase the clock rate of the P-cores to up to 5.4 GHz. The E-cores can also be overclocked and reach a maximum of 3.4 GHz.

Graphics

Like the Intel Core i7-12700K, the Intel Core i7-13700K offers an integrated graphics unit (iGPU). The Intel Iris Xe architecture continues to serve as the basis. In terms of performance, however, not much has changed with the new Intel UHD Graphics 770.

Power Consumption

The Intel Core i7-13700K is specified with a TDP of 125 watts, which corresponds to the PL1 value. In Boost mode, the processor's performance can increase to up to 253 watts (PL2). However, this requires good cooling. If all restrictions are deactivated in the BIOS, the PL2 value is not restricted by a Tau value.

Intel Core i9-13900K

► remove from comparison Intel i9-13900K

The Intel Core i9-13900K is a fast high-end desktop processor of the Raptor Lake series. It includes a hybrid architecture for the CPU cores with combined 24 cores and 32 threads. Eight fast Raptor Cove performance cores (P-cores) with HyperThreading and a clock speed of 3 - 5.8 GHz and sixteen Gracemont efficiency cores without HyperThreading and a clock speed of 2.2 - 4.3 GHz.

Thanks to the faster P-cores and more E-cores, the i9-13900K is significantly faster than the old i9-12900K (especially in multi-threaded workloads). Compared to the Raphael AMD Ryzen 9 7950X (Zen 4), the 13900K offers a slightly higher multi-thread-performance and a slightly lower single core performance. In games, the Intel CPU is currently the clear winner (at the time of announcement of the 7950X).

The 13900K is rated at 125 Watt TDP base power (PL1) and 253 Watt Turbo Power (PL2) and therefore slightly higher than the old i9-12900K.

ModelIntel Core i9-14900KIntel Core i7-13700KIntel Core i9-13900K
SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-RIntel Raptor Lake-SIntel Raptor Lake-S
CodenameRaptor LakeRaptor LakeRaptor Lake
Series: Raptor Lake-S Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-14900K « 3.2 - 6 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-14700K2.5 - 5.6 GHz20 / 28 cores33 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14600K3.5 - 5.3 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900K3 - 5.8 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700K « 3.4 - 5.4 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600K3.5 - 5.1 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-135002.5 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500T2.5 - 4.6 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900K « 3 - 5.8 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700K3.4 - 5.4 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600K3.5 - 5.1 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-135002.5 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500T2.5 - 4.6 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Clock3200 - 6000 MHz3400 - 5400 MHz3000 - 5800 MHz
L2 Cache32 MB24 MB32 MB
L3 Cache36 MB30 MB36 MB
Cores / Threads24 / 32
8 x 6.0 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
16 x 4.4 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
16 / 24
8 x 5.4 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
8 x 3.4 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
24 / 32
8 x 5.8 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
16 x 4.3 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
TDP125 Watt125 Watt125 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm10 nm
Die Size257 mm2257 mm2257 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C100 °C
SocketLGA 1700LGA 1700LGA 1700
FeaturesIntel UHD Graphics 770, DDR5 5600 MT/s, DDR4 3200 MT/sIntel UHD Graphics 770, DDR5 5600 MT/s, DDR4 3200 MT/sIntel UHD Graphics 770, DDR5 5600 MT/s, DDR4 3200 MT/s
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1650 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1600 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1650 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
$589 U.S.$409 U.S.$589 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.intel.dewww.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-14900K
61.7 pt (86%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-13700K
54.1 pt (75%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-13900K
59.3 pt (82%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 134     avg: 136.5     median: 137 (95%)     max: 138 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 2112     avg: 2189     median: 2146.5 (40%)     max: 2352 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
41193 Points (38%)
min: 30737     avg: 30745     median: 30745 (29%)     max: 30753 Points
min: 32592     avg: 37310     median: 38271.5 (36%)     max: 40103 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
2351 Points (100%)
min: 2114     avg: 2116     median: 2116 (90%)     max: 2118 Points
min: 2203     avg: 2238     median: 2238.5 (95%)     max: 2272 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
900 Points (100%)
min: 808     avg: 812     median: 811.5 (90%)     max: 815 Points
min: 828     avg: 849     median: 849.5 (94%)     max: 870 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
15466 Points (38%)
min: 11685     avg: 11714     median: 11713.5 (29%)     max: 11742 Points
min: 13415     avg: 14459     median: 14620.5 (36%)     max: 15181 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
6282 Points (40%)
min: 4438     avg: 4508     median: 4507.5 (28%)     max: 4577 Points
min: 5321     avg: 5798     median: 5805.5 (37%)     max: 6191 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
332 Points (100%)
303 Points (91%)
min: 299     avg: 314.1     median: 318 (96%)     max: 328 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
72.2 Points (94%)
53 Points (69%)
min: 62.2     avg: 67     median: 67.5 (88%)     max: 70.78 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
4 Points (100%)
3.7 Points (91%)
min: 3.8     avg: 3.9     median: 3.9 (96%)     max: 3.93 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
12643 Points (76%)
11278 Points (68%)
min: 11661     avg: 11989     median: 12017.5 (73%)     max: 12259 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
94801 Points (69%)
85748 Points (62%)
min: 85342     avg: 88253     median: 87738 (64%)     max: 92192 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
144156 Points (100%)
135499 Points (94%)
min: 132000     avg: 134526     median: 133567 (93%)     max: 138969 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
18511 Points (23%)
17002 Points (21%)
min: 17418     avg: 17943     median: 17998.5 (22%)     max: 18355 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
74.5 s (1%)
170.2 s (2%)
min: 79.738     avg: 84.6     median: 84.2 (1%)     max: 90.13 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
2.1 s (0%)
2.3 s (0%)
min: 1.818     avg: 2.1     median: 2 (0%)     max: 2.305 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
16108 Points (26%)
12835 Points (20%)
min: 13210     avg: 14265     median: 14271 (23%)     max: 15309 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 145144     avg: 146282     median: 145207 (83%)     max: 149570 MIPS
min: 110420     avg: 111390     median: 111390 (64%)     max: 112359 MIPS
min: 127201     avg: 142777     median: 146984 (84%)     max: 148053 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 7772     avg: 7893     median: 7932 (95%)     max: 7934 MIPS
min: 7061     avg: 7062     median: 7061.5 (84%)     max: 7062 MIPS
min: 7176     avg: 7343     median: 7272 (87%)     max: 7539 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 75.9     avg: 181.2     median: 181.2 (63%)     max: 286.5 fps
232 fps (81%)
min: 247.5     avg: 261.5     median: 264.8 (92%)     max: 269 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 257.5     avg: 345.5     median: 345.5 (80%)     max: 433.5 fps
406 fps (94%)
min: 412     avg: 419     median: 419.3 (97%)     max: 425.5 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 40.8     avg: 41.4     median: 41.1 (72%)     max: 42.8 fps
min: 33.7     avg: 33.9     median: 33.9 (59%)     max: 34 fps
min: 34.5     avg: 39.9     median: 40.7 (72%)     max: 42.6 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
2.8 GB/s (0%)
2.2 GB/s (0%)
min: 2.6     avg: 2.9     median: 2.9 (0%)     max: 3 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
5.8 GB/s (100%)
4 GB/s (69%)
min: 5.2     avg: 5.4     median: 5.4 (93%)     max: 5.4 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
26.7 GB/s (70%)
15.8 GB/s (41%)
min: 20.5     avg: 23.3     median: 22.9 (60%)     max: 27 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 135     avg: 143     median: 144.5 (2%)     max: 147 Seconds
min: 174     avg: 176.5     median: 176.5 (2%)     max: 179 Seconds
min: 136     avg: 145.2     median: 140.5 (2%)     max: 174 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 80     avg: 84.6     median: 85 (1%)     max: 87 Seconds
min: 106     avg: 108     median: 108 (1%)     max: 110 Seconds
min: 80     avg: 85.7     median: 84 (1%)     max: 101 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.3425     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (7%)     max: 0.3504 sec
min: 0.3855     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (8%)     max: 0.3899 sec
min: 0.3468     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (8%)     max: 0.3911 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 20532     avg: 22302     median: 22772.5 (48%)     max: 22928 Points
18153 Points (39%)
min: 19989     avg: 20578     median: 20192 (43%)     max: 21934 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
5.5 s (1%)
6.2 s (1%)
min: 5.655     avg: 5.7     median: 5.7 (1%)     max: 5.86 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
12 s (1%)
13.2 s (1%)
min: 12.287     avg: 12.6     median: 12.5 (1%)     max: 13.193 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
280.3 s (1%)
317.8 s (1%)
min: 289.628     avg: 296.6     median: 293.3 (1%)     max: 310.125 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 11403     avg: 96701     median: 112087 (98%)     max: 114209 Points
85363 Points (75%)
min: 86915     avg: 97290     median: 96473 (84%)     max: 112434 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 28587     avg: 31256     median: 31397 (85%)     max: 32853 Points
31214 Points (84%)
min: 29023     avg: 31289     median: 31187.5 (84%)     max: 33181 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 89084     avg: 105234     median: 106096 (86%)     max: 111347 Points
99898 Points (81%)
min: 79257     avg: 97847     median: 97246.5 (79%)     max: 111988 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 88682     avg: 105311     median: 105851 (86%)     max: 110989 Points
99878 Points (81%)
min: 80320     avg: 96904     median: 97919.5 (79%)     max: 102987 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 90865     avg: 107009     median: 108898 (92%)     max: 110670 Points
103719 Points (87%)
min: 83056     avg: 98634     median: 97311 (82%)     max: 105981 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 27678     avg: 29391     median: 29524 (75%)     max: 30462 Points
28204 Points (71%)
min: 26626     avg: 29034     median: 29044.5 (73%)     max: 30955 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 48193     avg: 53897     median: 54404 (97%)     max: 56087 Points
45127 Points (80%)
min: 46013     avg: 51456     median: 51140 (91%)     max: 54226 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 19418     avg: 22177     median: 22451 (95%)     max: 23721 Points
18897 Points (80%)
min: 16236     avg: 20507     median: 20037 (84%)     max: 22794 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 3108     avg: 3214     median: 3243 (87%)     max: 3294 Points
2962 Points (80%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 20435     avg: 21326     median: 21397 (84%)     max: 21790 Points
19249 Points (76%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2243     avg: 2347     median: 2369 (100%)     max: 2370 Points
min: 2081     avg: 2110     median: 2110 (89%)     max: 2139 Points
min: 2106     avg: 2237     median: 2286 (96%)     max: 2290 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 24552     avg: 25148     median: 25199 (45%)     max: 25867 Points
min: 19719     avg: 20191     median: 20190.5 (36%)     max: 20662 Points
min: 22448     avg: 23743     median: 24033 (43%)     max: 24157 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2177     avg: 2237     median: 2247 (10%)     max: 2280 Points
2064 Points (9%)
min: 2148     avg: 2191     median: 2197 (10%)     max: 2246 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 23151     avg: 24582     median: 24467 (77%)     max: 25496 Points
19217 Points (61%)
min: 22024     avg: 23446     median: 23664 (75%)     max: 24021 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 9620     avg: 9873     median: 9872.5 (99%)     max: 10009 Points
8955 Points (89%)
min: 9218     avg: 9542     median: 9598 (96%)     max: 9683 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 82660     avg: 87853     median: 88108.5 (97%)     max: 91119 Points
69210 Points (76%)
min: 77347     avg: 84105     median: 85336 (94%)     max: 86695 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 413     avg: 415     median: 414 (0%)     max: 418 ms
min: 444     avg: 445.7     median: 444 (1%)     max: 449 ms
min: 423     avg: 430.6     median: 432 (1%)     max: 438 ms
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 332     avg: 334.7     median: 334 (96%)     max: 338 Points
301 Points (86%)
min: 304     avg: 317.6     median: 316 (91%)     max: 335 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 371     avg: 388.3     median: 386 (80%)     max: 410 Points
348 Points (73%)
min: 338     avg: 364     median: 368 (77%)     max: 382 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 2490     avg: 2566     median: 2584 (99%)     max: 2611 Points
2325 Points (89%)
min: 2263     avg: 2497     median: 2580 (99%)     max: 2589 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
537 Watt (93%)
357 Watt (62%)
min: 228     avg: 354.3     median: 359 (62%)     max: 471 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
548 Watt (100%)
357 Watt (65%)
min: 349     avg: 392.5     median: 370.5 (68%)     max: 480 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 67.4     avg: 83.6     median: 77.9 (51%)     max: 151.2 Watt
83.7 Watt (55%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 12.9     avg: 15     median: 15.2 (11%)     max: 16.8 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-14900K → 100% n=48

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-13700K → 89% n=48

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-13900K → 97% n=48

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 02. 16:35:18

#0 checking url part for id 15092 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14998 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14625 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719930918 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 15092 +0.004s ... 0.01s

#8 got single benchmarks 15092 +0.031s ... 0.042s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14998 +0.004s ... 0.045s

#10 got single benchmarks 14998 +0.005s ... 0.05s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 14625 +0.003s ... 0.053s

#12 got single benchmarks 14625 +0.021s ... 0.074s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.074s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.103s ... 0.177s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.177s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)