Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i9-14900K vs Intel Core i5-13500T

Intel Core i9-14900K

► remove from comparison Intel i9-14900K

The Intel Core i9-14900K is a high-end processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, similar to the Intel Core i9-13900K last year. The base clock is 3.2 GHz and can reach up to 6 GHz under optimal conditions. The total of 32 threads are still divided into 8 P and 16 E cores. The 8 performance cores (P-cores) also offer hyperthreading, which means that a total of 32 threads can be processed simultaneously in conjunction with the 16 energy-efficient E-cores. As before, the K models continue to offer a freely selectable multiplier, which simplifies overclocking. The Intel Core i9-14900K uses the same CPU socket (LGA 1700) as the Intel Core i9-13900K. This means you don't necessarily need a new motherboard, as the 600 series chipsets support the new processors after a BIOS update. There is also still the option of using DDR4 for the RAM.

Performance

Compared to the Intel Core i9-13900K, the Core i9-14900K still offers 8 P-cores, which are relieved by 16 additional E-cores for demanding applications and thus ensure very high multi-thread performance. In comparison, however, the Intel Core i9-14900K can only gain a slight lead. The e-cores primarily take care of background applications. The hybrid architecture relies on the Intel Thread Director, which is responsible for the correct allocation of tasks. Meanwhile, the IPC could only be increased slightly. As an innovation with the Intel Core i9-14900K, the manufacturer is increasingly relying on AI, which is also used for overclocking. With one click in the Intel Extreme Utility, the tool checks the entire system and makes the necessary settings.

Graphics unit

Like the Intel Core i9-13900K, the Intel Core i9-14900K offers an integrated graphics unit. The Intel Iris Xe architecture continues to serve as the basis. In terms of performance, however, nothing has changed with the Intel UHD Graphics 770.

Power consumption

The Intel Core i9-14900K is specified with a TDP of 125 watts, which corresponds to the PL1 value. In Boost mode, the processor's performance can increase to up to 253 watts (PL2). However, this requires very good cooling. Compared to the Intel Core i9-13900K, the specified power consumption does not increase if the limits are adhered to. The situation is different if the limits are deactivated. As this value depends on the overall system, we cannot make an exact statement on this.

Intel Core i5-13500T

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core i5-13500T ist ein schneller und sehr sparsamer Desktop-Prozessor auf Basis der Raptor-Lake-Architektur, die bereits im Oktober 2022 vorgestellt wurde. Der Prozessor bietet einen Basistakt von 2,5 GHz und erreicht bis zu 4,6 GHz im Turbo. Die hybride CPU-Architektur, welche mit Alder-Lake eingeführt wurde, kommt auch den Raptor-Lake-Prozessoren zugute. Der Namenszusatz T steht hierbei für ein besonders sparsames CPU-Modell und mit einer TDP von nur 35 Watt (PL1 = 35 Watt) sind diese Prozessoren für kleine, kompakte Systeme bestens geeignet.

Performance

Die geringe Leistungsaufnahme sorgt schlussendlich für eine etwas geringere Leistung im Vergleich zum Intel Core i5-13500. Je nachdem, wie das PL2 (92 Watt) definiert ist, kann es bei der Multi-Core-Leistung spürbare Unterschiede geben. Im Vergleich zum Intel Core i5-12500T ist der Intel Core i5-13500T aufgrund der höheren Anzahl an physischen Rencheneinheiten überlegen.

Grafikeinheit

Wie auch der Intel Core i5-12500T bietet der Intel Core i5-13500T eine integrierte Grafikeinheit. Als Basis dient weiterhin die Intel Iris Xe-Architektur. Rein leistungstechnisch hat sich bei der neuen Intel UHD Graphics 770 aber nicht viel verändert. Die iGPU des Intel Core i5-13500T taktet zudem 100 MHz höher, was aber keinen spürbaren Unterschied im Alltag ergibt.

Leistungsaufnahme

Die TDP des Intel Core i5-13500T beläuft sich auf 35 Watt, mit der Option, diese im Turbo auf bis zu 92 Watt zu erhöhen. Gegenüber dem Intel Core i5-12500T (PL2 = 74 Watt) steigt der maximal mögliche Energiebedarf etwas an.

ModelIntel Core i9-14900KIntel Core i5-13500T
SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-RIntel Raptor Lake-S
CodenameRaptor LakeRaptor Lake
Series: Raptor Lake-S Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-14900K « 3.2 - 6 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-14700K compare2.5 - 5.6 GHz20 / 28 cores33 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14600K compare3.5 - 5.3 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900K compare3 - 5.8 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700K compare3.4 - 5.4 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600K compare3.5 - 5.1 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500 compare2.5 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500T « 2.5 - 4.6 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Clock3200 - 6000 MHz2500 - 4600 MHz
L2 Cache32 MB11.5 MB
L3 Cache36 MB24 MB
Cores / Threads24 / 32
8 x 6.0 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
16 x 4.4 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
14 / 20
6 x 4.6 GHz Intel Golden Cove P-Core
8 x 3.2 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
TDP125 Watt35 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm
Die Size257 mm2215 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketLGA 1700LGA 1700
FeaturesIntel UHD Graphics 770, DDR5 5600 MT/s, DDR4 3200 MT/sIntel UHD Graphics 770, DDR5 4800 MT/s, DDR4 3200 MT/s
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1650 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1550 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$589 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.com
TDP Turbo PL292 Watt

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-14900K
61.7 pt (86%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-13500T
40.3 pt (56%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 134     avg: 136.5     median: 137 (95%)     max: 138 Points
104 Points (72%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 2112     avg: 2189     median: 2146.5 (40%)     max: 2352 Points
577 Points (11%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
41193 Points (38%)
11028 Points (10%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
2351 Points (100%)
1754 Points (75%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
900 Points (100%)
669 Points (74%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
15466 Points (38%)
4246 Points (10%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
6282 Points (40%)
1945 Points (12%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
332 Points (100%)
247 Points (74%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
72.2 Points (94%)
21.3 Points (28%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
4 Points (100%)
3.1 Points (76%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
12643 Points (76%)
8693 Points (53%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
94801 Points (69%)
40528 Points (29%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
144156 Points (100%)
62808 Points (44%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
18511 Points (23%)
14147 Points (17%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
74.5 s (1%)
133.3 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
2.1 s (0%)
4.8 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
16108 Points (26%)
6683 Points (11%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 145144     avg: 146282     median: 145207 (83%)     max: 149570 MIPS
40034 MIPS (23%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 7772     avg: 7893     median: 7932 (95%)     max: 7934 MIPS
5840 MIPS (70%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 75.9     avg: 181.2     median: 181.2 (63%)     max: 286.5 fps
100.5 fps (35%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 257.5     avg: 345.5     median: 345.5 (80%)     max: 433.5 fps
259.5 fps (60%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 40.8     avg: 41.4     median: 41.1 (72%)     max: 42.8 fps
12.1 fps (21%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
2.8 GB/s (0%)
1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
5.8 GB/s (100%)
1.8 GB/s (31%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
26.7 GB/s (70%)
8.2 GB/s (21%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 135     avg: 143     median: 144.5 (2%)     max: 147 Seconds
533 Seconds (7%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 80     avg: 84.6     median: 85 (1%)     max: 87 Seconds
291 Seconds (2%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.3425     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (7%)     max: 0.3504 sec
0.5 sec (10%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 20532     avg: 22302     median: 22772.5 (48%)     max: 22928 Points
12818 Points (27%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
5.5 s (1%)
8 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
12 s (1%)
17.9 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
280.3 s (1%)
430.1 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 11403     avg: 96701     median: 112087 (98%)     max: 114209 Points
54029 Points (47%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 28587     avg: 31256     median: 31397 (85%)     max: 32853 Points
12162 Points (33%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 89084     avg: 105234     median: 106096 (86%)     max: 111347 Points
70975 Points (58%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 88682     avg: 105311     median: 105851 (86%)     max: 110989 Points
69547 Points (56%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 90865     avg: 107009     median: 108898 (92%)     max: 110670 Points
77848 Points (66%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 27678     avg: 29391     median: 29524 (75%)     max: 30462 Points
13665 Points (35%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 48193     avg: 53897     median: 54404 (97%)     max: 56087 Points
18673 Points (33%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 19418     avg: 22177     median: 22451 (95%)     max: 23721 Points
6210 Points (26%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 3108     avg: 3214     median: 3243 (87%)     max: 3294 Points
2393 Points (64%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 20435     avg: 21326     median: 21397 (84%)     max: 21790 Points
7327 Points (29%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2243     avg: 2347     median: 2369 (100%)     max: 2370 Points
1716 Points (72%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 24552     avg: 25148     median: 25199 (45%)     max: 25867 Points
7377 Points (13%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2177     avg: 2237     median: 2247 (10%)     max: 2280 Points
1685 Points (7%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 23151     avg: 24582     median: 24467 (77%)     max: 25496 Points
7316 Points (23%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 9620     avg: 9873     median: 9872.5 (99%)     max: 10009 Points
7069 Points (71%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 82660     avg: 87853     median: 88108.5 (97%)     max: 91119 Points
29164 Points (32%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 413     avg: 415     median: 414 (0%)     max: 418 ms
562 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 332     avg: 334.7     median: 334 (96%)     max: 338 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 371     avg: 388.3     median: 386 (80%)     max: 410 Points
254 Points (53%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 2490     avg: 2566     median: 2584 (99%)     max: 2611 Points
1324 Points (51%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
537 Watt (93%)
1220%
1 i5-13500T +
55.6 Watt (10%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
548 Watt (100%)
79.3 Watt (14%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 67.4     avg: 83.6     median: 77.9 (51%)     max: 151.2 Watt
8.6 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
21.9 Points per Watt (16%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-14900K → 100% n=51

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-13500T → 59% n=51

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 04. 19:03:23

#0 checking url part for id 15092 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 17902 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720112603 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 15092 +0.004s ... 0.008s

#7 got single benchmarks 15092 +0.032s ... 0.04s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 17902 +0.004s ... 0.044s

#9 got single benchmarks 17902 +0.004s ... 0.048s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.048s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.06s ... 0.108s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.11s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)