Intel Core i9-13900K vs Intel Core i5-11400F
Intel Core i9-13900K ► remove from comparison
The Intel Core i9-13900K is a fast high-end desktop processor of the Raptor Lake series. It includes a hybrid architecture for the CPU cores with combined 24 cores and 32 threads. Eight fast Raptor Cove performance cores (P-cores) with HyperThreading and a clock speed of 3 - 5.8 GHz and sixteen Gracemont efficiency cores without HyperThreading and a clock speed of 2.2 - 4.3 GHz.
Thanks to the faster P-cores and more E-cores, the i9-13900K is significantly faster than the old i9-12900K (especially in multi-threaded workloads). Compared to the Raphael AMD Ryzen 9 7950X (Zen 4) , the 13900K offers a slightly higher multi-thread-performance and a slightly lower single core performance. In games, the Intel CPU is currently the clear winner (at the time of announcement of the 7950X).
The 13900K is rated at 125 Watt TDP base power (PL1) and 253 Watt Turbo Power (PL2) and therefore slightly higher than the old i9-12900K .
Intel Core i5-11400F ► remove from comparison
The Intel Core i5-11400F is a fast six-core desktop processor based on the new Rocket Lake architecture, which was introduced in March 2021. The processor clocks with a base clock of 2.6 GHz and reaches an all-core boost of 4.2 GHz under load. In single-thread applications, the Intel Core i5-11400F even reaches up to 4.4 GHz. Intel also gives the Rocket Lake processors the Hyperthreading feature, which allows the i5-11400F to process up to 12 threads simultaneously. As known, the Intel Core i5-11400F is manufactured in the 14 nm process. Nevertheless, many changes have been made with the Rocket Lake architecture, which is also reflected in the performance compared to the Comet Lake. The Intel Core i5-11400F is a non-K CPU, which means that there is no freely selectable multiplier. Thus, the scope for overclocking is relatively small.
Compared to the Intel Core i5-10400F, the Core i5-11400F offers a significantly better IPC. This can be seen clearly in the single-core benchmarks. But the multi-core performance also benefits from the better IPC compared to Comet-Lake. A performance increase of up to 20 percent can be expected. The Core i5 has to do without the TVB (Thermal Velocity Boost). However, 4.2 GHz is still possible when all cores are loaded. Due to the very high single-thread performance, the Intel Core i5-11400F is best suited for video games.
The processors marked with "F" in the nomenclature don't offer an integrated graphics unit. All other non-F processors can fall back on the Intel UHD Graphics 750 and also allow operation without a dedicated graphics card.
The TDP turns out relatively low with 65 watts. This is the PL1 value. For Turbo, the Intel Core i5-11400F offers a higher TDP of up to 154 watts with PL2. However, this may only be applied for a maximum of 28 seconds (dew). A good air cooler should be able to handle the resulting waste heat, so no AiO is necessary for this processor.
Model Intel Core i9-13900K Intel Core i5-11400F Series Intel Raptor Lake-S Intel Rocket Lake Codename Raptor Lake Rocket Lake Series: Rocket Lake Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-13900K « 3 - 5.8 GHz 24 / 32 36 MB L3 Intel Core i7-13700K 3.4 - 5.4 GHz 16 / 24 30 MB L3 Intel Core i5-13600K 3.5 - 5.1 GHz 14 / 20 24 MB L3 Intel Core i5-13500 2.5 - 4.8 GHz 14 / 20 24 MB L3 Intel Core i5-13500T 2.5 - 4.6 GHz 14 / 20 24 MB L3
Clock 3000 - 5800 MHz 2600 - 4400 MHz L2 Cache 32 MB 3 MB L3 Cache 36 MB 12 MB Cores / Threads 24 / 32 8 x 5.8 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core 16 x 4.3 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core 6 / 12 TDP 125 Watt 65 Watt Technology 10 nm 14 nm Die Size 257 mm2 276 mm2 max. Temp. 100 °C 100 °C Socket LGA 1700 LGA1200 Features Intel UHD Graphics 770, DDR5 5600 MT/s, DDR4 3200 MT/s DDR4-3200 RAM, PCIe 4, 8 GT/s bus, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA iGPU Intel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1650 MHz)Architecture x86 x86 $589 U.S. $157 U.S. Announced Manufacturer www.intel.com ark.intel.com L1 Cache 480 KB
Benchmarks Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-13900K
59.3 pt (82%)
...
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-11400F
36.2 pt (50%)
...
Intel Core i5-11500B
...
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 32592 avg: 37310 median: 38271.5 (36%) max: 40103 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 95% 81%
10235 Points (10%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 26% 95% 81%
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 2203 avg: 2238 median: 2238.5 (95%) max: 2272 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 99% 97%
1339 Points (57%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 59% 99% 97%
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 828 avg: 849 median: 849.5 (94%) max: 870 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 97% 100% 99%
502 Points (56%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 97% 59% 100% 99%
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 13415 avg: 14459 median: 14620.5 (36%) max: 15181 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 96% 88%
3945 Points (10%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 26% 96% 88%
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 5321 avg: 5798 median: 5805.5 (37%) max: 6191 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 97% 100% 89%
1574 Points (10%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 97% 26% 100% 89%
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 299 avg: 314.1 median: 318 (96%) max: 328 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 95% 100% 99%
210 Points (63%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 95% 65% 100% 99%
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 62.2 avg: 67 median: 67.5 (88%) max: 70.78 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 95% 88%
17.7 Points (23%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 25% 95% 88%
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.8 avg: 3.9 median: 3.9 (96%) max: 3.93 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 99% 97%
2.2 Points (55%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 57% 99% 97%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 11661 avg: 11989 median: 12017.5 (73%) max: 12259 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 98% 97%
6210 Points (38%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 51% 98% 97%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 85342 avg: 88253 median: 87738 (64%) max: 92192 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 98% 100% 100%
44220 Points (32%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 98% 50% 100% 100%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 132000 avg: 134526 median: 133567 (93%) max: 138969 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 95% 96% 100%
57417 Points (40%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 95% 41% 96% 100%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 17418 avg: 17943 median: 17998.5 (22%) max: 18355 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 98% 97%
8876 Points (11%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 49% 98% 97%
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 79.738 avg: 84.6 median: 84.2 (1%) max: 90.13 s
CPU TDP ? TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 100% 100%
117.2 s (1%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 100% 100% 100%
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 1.818 avg: 2.1 median: 2 (0%) max: 2.305 s
CPU TDP ? TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 100% 100%
4.1 s (1%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 100% 100% 100%
min: 13210 avg: 14265 median: 14271 (23%) max: 15309 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 98% 89%
7147 Points (11%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 48% 98% 89%
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 127201 avg: 142777 median: 146984 (84%) max: 148053 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 100% 86%
41522 MIPS (24%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 28% 100% 86%
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 7176 avg: 7343 median: 7272 (87%) max: 7539 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 98% 100% 98%
5466 MIPS (65%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 98% 74% 100% 98%
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 247.5 avg: 261.5 median: 264.8 (92%) max: 269 fps
CPU TDP ? TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 100% 93%
91.5 fps (32%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 34% 100% 93%
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 412 avg: 419 median: 419.3 (97%) max: 425.5 fps
CPU TDP ? TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 97% 100% 98%
258 fps (60%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 97% 61% 100% 98%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 34.5 avg: 39.9 median: 40.7 (72%) max: 42.6 fps
CPU TDP ? TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 96% 81%
13.5 fps (24%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 32% 96% 81%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 2.6 avg: 2.9 median: 2.9 (0%) max: 3 GB/s
CPU TDP ? TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 97% 87%
0.8 GB/s (0%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 28% 97% 87%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 5.2 avg: 5.4 median: 5.4 (93%) max: 5.4 GB/s
CPU TDP ? TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 100% 96%
1.4 GB/s (24%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 26% 100% 96%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 20.5 avg: 23.3 median: 22.9 (60%) max: 27 GB/s
CPU TDP ? TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 85% 76%
8.7 GB/s (23%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 32% 85% 76%
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 136 avg: 145.2 median: 140.5 (2%) max: 174 Seconds
CPU TDP ? TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 100% 100%
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 80 avg: 85.7 median: 84 (1%) max: 101 Seconds
CPU TDP ? TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 100% 100%
290.2 Seconds (2%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 101% 100% 101% 101%
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.3468 avg: 0.4 median: 0.4 (8%) max: 0.3911 sec
CPU TDP ? TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 101% 101% 100%
0.6 sec (12%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 105% 100% 106% 105%
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 19989 avg: 20578 median: 20192 (43%) max: 21934 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 97% 96%
13359 Points (28%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 64% 97% 96%
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 5.655 avg: 5.7 median: 5.7 (1%) max: 5.86 s
CPU TDP ? TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 100% 100%
7.8 s (2%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 100% 100% 100%
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 12.287 avg: 12.6 median: 12.5 (1%) max: 13.193 s
CPU TDP ? TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 100% 100%
16.9 s (1%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 100% 100% 100%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 289.628 avg: 296.6 median: 293.3 (1%) max: 310.125 s
CPU TDP ? TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 100% 100%
703 s (3%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 102% 100% 102% 102%
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 86915 avg: 97290 median: 96473 (84%) max: 112434 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 86% 81%
57236 Points (50%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 53% 86% 81%
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 29023 avg: 31289 median: 31187.5 (84%) max: 33181 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 99% 92%
15367 Points (42%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 49% 99% 92%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 79257 avg: 97847 median: 97246.5 (79%) max: 111988 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 91% 96%
71688 Points (58%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 72% 91% 96%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 80320 avg: 96904 median: 97919.5 (79%) max: 102987 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 93% 99%
71496 Points (58%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 73% 93% 99%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 83056 avg: 98634 median: 97311 (82%) max: 105981 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 92% 93%
74053 Points (62%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 73% 92% 93%
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 26626 avg: 29034 median: 29044.5 (73%) max: 30955 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 98% 91%
13346 Points (34%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 46% 98% 91%
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 46013 avg: 51456 median: 51140 (91%) max: 54226 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 100% 89%
21144 Points (38%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 41% 100% 89%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 16236 avg: 20507 median: 20037 (84%) max: 22794 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 95% 77%
8468 Points (36%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 40% 95% 77%
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2106 avg: 2237 median: 2286 (96%) max: 2290 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 99% 92%
1575 Points (66%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 69% 99% 92%
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 22448 avg: 23743 median: 24033 (43%) max: 24157 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 100% 93%
7681 Points (14%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 32% 100% 93%
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2148 avg: 2191 median: 2197 (10%) max: 2246 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 99% 97%
1543 Points (7%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 70% 99% 97%
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 22024 avg: 23446 median: 23664 (75%) max: 24021 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 99% 92%
7679 Points (24%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 32% 99% 92%
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 9218 avg: 9542 median: 9598 (96%) max: 9683 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 100% 96%
6836 Points (68%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 71% 100% 96%
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 77347 avg: 84105 median: 85336 (94%) max: 86695 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 99% 89%
30191 Points (33%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 35% 99% 89%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 423 avg: 430.6 median: 432 (1%) max: 438 ms
CPU TDP ? TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 100% 100%
654 ms (1%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 100% 100% 100%
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 304 avg: 317.6 median: 316 (91%) max: 335 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 98% 100% 94%
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 338 avg: 364 median: 368 (77%) max: 382 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 97% 100% 90%
255 Points (53%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 97% 68% 100% 90%
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 2263 avg: 2497 median: 2580 (99%) max: 2589 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 98% 87%
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 228 avg: 354.3 median: 359 (62%) max: 471 Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 203% 323%
236 Watt (41%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 316% 203% 323%
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 349 avg: 392.5 median: 370.5 (68%) max: 480 Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 261% 293%
204 Watt (37%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 506% 261% 293%
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 41.8 avg: 91.7 median: 94.4 (62%) max: 138.2 Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 134% 214%
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 12.9 avg: 15 median: 15.2 (11%) max: 16.8 Points per Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 77% 100% 90%
7.7 Points per Watt (6%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 77% 46% 100% 90%
Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-13900K → 100% n=45 Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-11400F → 58% n=45
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
v1.28
log 03. 23:40:03
#0 checking url part for id 14625 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 13219 +0s ... 0s
#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720042803 +0s ... 0s
#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s
#4 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s
#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s
#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14625 +0.004s ... 0.009s
#7 got single benchmarks 14625 +0.021s ... 0.03s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 13219 +0.004s ... 0.033s
#9 got single benchmarks 13219 +0.004s ... 0.037s
#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.037s
#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.05s ... 0.087s
#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.09s
Please share our article, every link counts!
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)