Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i9-13900H vs Intel Core i7-12650H vs Intel Core i9-12900HK

Intel Core i9-13900H

► remove from comparison Intel i9-13900H

The Intel Core i9-13900H is a high-end mobile CPU for laptops based on the Raptor Lake-H series (Alder Lake architecture). It was announced in early 2023 and offers 6 performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) and 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores support Hyper-Threading leading to 20 supported threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock rate ranges from 2.6 to 5.4 GHz (single core turbo, all-core 4.9 GHz) on the performance cluster and 1.9 to 4.1 GHz on the efficiency cluster. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare with the Core i7-6920HQ). All cores can use up to 24 MB L3 cache. Compared to the similar Core i9-13900HK, the 13900H supports no open multiplicator for overclocking, but on the other hand the full set of vPro management features.

Performance

The average 13900H in our database is in the same league as the Core i5-13500HX, Core i7-13705H, Core i9-12900HK, Core i9-13905H and also the Ryzen 9 7940HS, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 115 W, the Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014 is among the fastest laptops built around the 13900H that we know of. It can be about 50% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Features

The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to DDR5-5200 (up from 4800 MHz for the 12th gen). The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficient cores for the best performance. For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC, and AV1 decode in hardware. The CPU now supports PCIe 5.0 x8 for a GPU and two PCIe 4.0 x4 for SSDs.

The integrated graphics card is based on the Xe-architecture and offers 96 EUs (Execution Units) .

The CPU is rated at 45 W base power (115 W PL2) but most laptops will use a PL1 of around 60 Watt. The SoC is manufactured in a 10nm process at Intel, which is known as Intel 7 (improved over the 12th Gen).

Intel Core i7-12650H

► remove from comparison Intel i7-12650H

The Intel Core i7-12650H is a high-end mobile CPU for laptops based on the Alder Lake architecture. It was announced in early 2022 and offers 6 performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) and 4 of the 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores support Hyper-Threading leading to 16 supported threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock rate ranges from 2.3 to 4.7 GHz on the performance cluster and 1.7 to 3.5 GHz on the efficient cluster. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 24 MB L3 cache. Compared to the 12700H, the 12650H offers only 4 instead of 8 E-cores, a slower iGPU and no vPro features (for remote management).

Performance

The average 12650H in our database is in the same league as the Core i9-11950H, Ryzen 5 7640HS, Ryzen 9 5900HS, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a very good result, as of early 2023.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 80 W, the TUF Dash F15 FX517ZR is among the fastest laptops built around the 12650H that we know of. It can be more than 25% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Features

The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200, and LPDDR4x-4267. The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficient cores for the best performance. For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC, and AV1 decode in hardware. The CPU only supports PCIe 4.0 (x8 for a GPU and two x4 for SSDs).

The integrated graphics card is based on the Xe-architecture and offers 64 of the 96 EUs (Execution Units) operating at up to 1.4 GHz.

Power consumption

This Core i7 has a "minimum assured" power consumption of 35 W, with 45 W being its Base power consumption. The processor's maximum Intel-recommended Turbo power consumption sits at 115 W. It would take at least two fans to cool such a beast.

Last but not the least, Intel Core i7-12650H is built with Intel's fourth-generation 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for OK, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i9-12900HK

► remove from comparison Intel i9-12900HK

The Intel Core i9-12900HK is a high-end mobile CPU for laptops based on the Alder Lake architecture. It was announced in early 2022 and offers 6 performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) and 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores support Hyper-Threading leading to 20 supported threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock rate ranges from 2.5 to 5 GHz on the performance cluster and 1.8 to 3.8 GHz on the efficiency cluster. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare with the Core i7-6920HQ). All cores can use up to 24 MB L3 cache. As a K-variant, the CPU offers an open multiplicator and therefore the possibility to overclock the CPU cores. Compared to the similar i9-12900H, the 12900HK only offers the "Essentials" features of vPro.

Performance

The average 12900HK in our database is in the same as the Core i9-13900H, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. It's also almost as fast as the Ryzen 7 7745HX and the Core i5-13500HX. This is a super-fast processor, as of mid 2023; it will have no issues running any app or any game for at least two more years.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 134 W, the Alienware x17 R2 P48E is among the fastest laptops built around the 12900HK that we know of. It can be more than 40% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Features

The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200, and LPDDR4x-4267. The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficient cores for the best performance. For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC, and AV1 decode in hardware. The CPU only supports PCIe 4.0 (x8 for a GPU and two x4 for SSDs).

The integrated graphics card is based on the Xe-architecture and offers 96 EUs (Execution Units) operating at up to 1.45 GHz.

Power consumption

This Core i9 series chip has a "minimum assured" power consumption of 35 W, with 45 W being its Base power consumption. The maximum Intel-recommended Turbo power consumption sits at 115 W.

The i9-12900HK is manufactured on Intel's 4th generation 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for lower-than-average, as of mid-2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i9-13900HIntel Core i7-12650HIntel Core i9-12900HK
SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-HIntel Alder Lake-PIntel Alder Lake-P
CodenameRaptor Lake-HAlder Lake-HAlder Lake-H
Series: Alder Lake-P Alder Lake-H
Intel Core i9-13900HK1.9 - 5.4 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13905H1.9 - 5.4 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900H « 1.9 - 5.4 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13800H1.8 - 5.2 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13705H1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700H1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13620H1.8 - 4.9 GHz10 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600H2.1 - 4.8 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13505H1.9 - 4.7 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500H1.9 - 4.7 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13420H1.5 - 4.6 GHz8 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900HK1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900H1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12800H1.8 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12650H « 1.7 - 4.7 GHz10 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12600H2 - 4.5 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12500H1.8 - 4.5 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12450H1.5 - 4.4 GHz8 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900HK « 1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900H1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12800H1.8 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12650H1.7 - 4.7 GHz10 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12600H2 - 4.5 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12500H1.8 - 4.5 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12450H1.5 - 4.4 GHz8 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Clock1900 - 5400 MHz1700 - 4700 MHz1800 - 5000 MHz
L1 Cache1.2 MB864 KB1.2 MB
L2 Cache11.5 MB9.5 MB11.5 MB
L3 Cache24 MB24 MB24 MB
Cores / Threads14 / 2010 / 1614 / 20
TDP45 Watt45 Watt45 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm10 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C100 °C
SocketBGA1744BGA1744BGA1744
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266/DDR5-5200/LPDDR5-6400/LPDDR5x-6400 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Dir., DL B., GNA, vPro Ent., RPE, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHADDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 4, Thr. Dir., DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 4, Thr. Director, DL Boost, GNA, vPro Ess., MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
iGPUIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ( - 1500 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) ( - 1400 MHz)Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ( - 1450 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-13900H
46.3 pt (64%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-12650H
40.9 pt (57%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-12900HK
44.8 pt (62%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 101     avg: 102.5     median: 102.5 (71%)     max: 104 Points
min: 85     avg: 98     median: 99 (69%)     max: 107 Points
min: 105     avg: 109.5     median: 109.5 (76%)     max: 114 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 703     avg: 761     median: 760.5 (14%)     max: 818 Points
min: 294     avg: 515     median: 530 (10%)     max: 673 Points
min: 746     avg: 811     median: 811 (15%)     max: 876 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 13015     avg: 16992     median: 17706 (16%)     max: 20385 Points
min: 5362     avg: 11525     median: 12074 (11%)     max: 15537 Points
min: 13410     avg: 17662     median: 18373 (17%)     max: 19282 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1297     avg: 1894     median: 1966 (84%)     max: 2054 Points
min: 1428     avg: 1722     median: 1763 (75%)     max: 1808 Points
min: 1586     avg: 1797     median: 1901 (81%)     max: 1940 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 428     avg: 723     median: 754 (84%)     max: 792 Points
min: 552     avg: 664     median: 679 (75%)     max: 696 Points
min: 596     avg: 679     median: 685 (76%)     max: 739 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 4960     avg: 6599     median: 6864.5 (17%)     max: 7716 Points
min: 2106     avg: 4459     median: 4691 (11%)     max: 6009 Points
min: 5168     avg: 6742     median: 7040 (17%)     max: 7366 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2061     avg: 2685     median: 2706 (17%)     max: 3100 Points
min: 753     avg: 1770     median: 1851.5 (12%)     max: 2253 Points
min: 1975     avg: 2695     median: 2836 (18%)     max: 2944 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 211     avg: 269.8     median: 280 (84%)     max: 297 Points
min: 206     avg: 245.1     median: 250 (75%)     max: 261 Points
min: 226     avg: 258.1     median: 270 (81%)     max: 279 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 27.48     avg: 28.6     median: 28.6 (37%)     max: 29.65 Points
min: 9.35     avg: 17.9     median: 18.2 (24%)     max: 25.04 Points
min: 23.44     avg: 27.9     median: 27.3 (35%)     max: 33 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.98     avg: 3     median: 3 (74%)     max: 3 Points
min: 2.52     avg: 2.9     median: 3 (74%)     max: 3.15 Points
min: 2.69     avg: 3.1     median: 3.3 (81%)     max: 3.28 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 9550     avg: 9590     median: 9590 (58%)     max: 9630 Points
min: 7466     avg: 8300     median: 8301 (50%)     max: 8903 Points
min: 7710     avg: 8840     median: 9397 (57%)     max: 9412 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 53438     avg: 54921     median: 54920.5 (40%)     max: 56403 Points
min: 20693     avg: 35422     median: 34901.5 (25%)     max: 49328 Points
min: 48838     avg: 51988     median: 49924 (36%)     max: 57202 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 79014     avg: 79435     median: 79435 (55%)     max: 79856 Points
min: 29444     avg: 52500     median: 52008 (36%)     max: 68516 Points
min: 75223     avg: 75585     median: 75585 (52%)     max: 75947 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 13752     avg: 13786     median: 13786 (17%)     max: 13820 Points
min: 11960     avg: 13177     median: 13397 (16%)     max: 14533 Points
min: 12378     avg: 13841     median: 13840.5 (17%)     max: 15303 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 179.496     avg: 296.1     median: 296.1 (4%)     max: 412.775 s
min: 266.983     avg: 410.5     median: 426 (5%)     max: 483.853 s
min: 186.394     avg: 193.7     median: 193.7 (2%)     max: 201.062 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 3.141     avg: 3.3     median: 3.3 (1%)     max: 3.518 s
min: 3.705     avg: 6.5     median: 6.9 (1%)     max: 8.743 s
min: 3.375     avg: 3.4     median: 3.4 (1%)     max: 3.454 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 6800     avg: 8052     median: 8051.5 (13%)     max: 9303 Points
min: 6896     avg: 7773     median: 7731.5 (12%)     max: 9090 Points
min: 7387     avg: 8565     median: 8735 (14%)     max: 9573 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 45045     avg: 66867     median: 70217.5 (40%)     max: 79032 MIPS
min: 27053     avg: 46612     median: 47972 (28%)     max: 59034 MIPS
min: 55620     avg: 68839     median: 72836 (42%)     max: 75564 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 3665     avg: 6064     median: 6277.5 (75%)     max: 6600 MIPS
min: 5265     avg: 5635     median: 5702.5 (68%)     max: 6116 MIPS
min: 5257     avg: 5769     median: 5803 (69%)     max: 6186 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 113.95     avg: 126.3     median: 126.3 (44%)     max: 138.55 fps
min: 53.8     avg: 91.5     median: 88.9 (31%)     max: 127.5 fps
min: 113.7     avg: 132.8     median: 125.1 (44%)     max: 159.6 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 284     avg: 292.3     median: 292.3 (67%)     max: 300.5 fps
min: 197.2     avg: 255.4     median: 262.5 (61%)     max: 311.5 fps
min: 276     avg: 298     median: 300.4 (69%)     max: 317.5 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 14.1     avg: 18.7     median: 19 (33%)     max: 22.3 fps
min: 6.62     avg: 13.8     median: 14.3 (25%)     max: 17.4 fps
min: 15.7     avg: 19.4     median: 20.5 (36%)     max: 21.6 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 1.2     avg: 1.3     median: 1.3 (0%)     max: 1.4 GB/s
min: 0.674     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (0%)     max: 1.2 GB/s
min: 1.2     avg: 1.3     median: 1.3 (0%)     max: 1.5 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 2.4     avg: 2.5     median: 2.5 (42%)     max: 2.5 GB/s
min: 1.1     avg: 1.5     median: 1.5 (26%)     max: 2.1 GB/s
min: 2.2     avg: 2.4     median: 2.3 (40%)     max: 2.6 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 13.2     avg: 14     median: 14 (36%)     max: 14.8 GB/s
min: 6.7     avg: 9     median: 8.9 (23%)     max: 11.8 GB/s
min: 13     avg: 14.5     median: 14.1 (37%)     max: 16.3 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 279     avg: 348.7     median: 336 (4%)     max: 467 Seconds
min: 396     avg: 538     median: 479 (6%)     max: 1029 Seconds
413 Seconds (5%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 166     avg: 203     median: 193 (1%)     max: 268 Seconds
min: 222     avg: 299.8     median: 277 (2%)     max: 553 Seconds
min: 172.5     avg: 191.9     median: 181 (1%)     max: 234 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4052     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.723 sec
min: 0.4584     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.515 sec
min: 0.4155     avg: 0.5     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4997 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 13869     avg: 14799     median: 14893 (32%)     max: 15501 Points
min: 8344     avg: 12678     median: 12716 (27%)     max: 18599 Points
min: 13096     avg: 15289     median: 15597.5 (33%)     max: 16864 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 6.156     avg: 6.8     median: 6.8 (1%)     max: 7.445 s
min: 7.703     avg: 8     median: 7.9 (2%)     max: 8.891 s
min: 7.281     avg: 7.7     median: 7.3 (2%)     max: 8.438 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 13.784     avg: 15     median: 15 (1%)     max: 16.234 s
min: 17.392     avg: 18     median: 17.6 (1%)     max: 19.733 s
min: 16.1     avg: 17.2     median: 16.5 (1%)     max: 18.844 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 350.453     avg: 383.8     median: 383.8 (2%)     max: 417.103 s
min: 413.002     avg: 436.2     median: 433.5 (2%)     max: 463.857 s
min: 383.9     avg: 405.7     median: 397.4 (2%)     max: 435.936 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 55574     avg: 65893     median: 67507 (59%)     max: 75108 Points
min: 30717     avg: 53165     median: 53162 (47%)     max: 75129 Points
min: 59882     avg: 65775     median: 60056 (53%)     max: 77386 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 15540     avg: 21972     median: 22680.5 (61%)     max: 25420 Points
min: 9219     avg: 18466     median: 18363 (50%)     max: 22811 Points
min: 17378     avg: 22097     median: 22297.5 (60%)     max: 25556 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 83732     avg: 95381     median: 93901 (76%)     max: 103874 Points
min: 57680     avg: 80244     median: 83501.5 (68%)     max: 88686 Points
min: 66129     avg: 78262     median: 71995 (58%)     max: 96663 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 85594     avg: 91514     median: 93285 (76%)     max: 93890 Points
min: 57559     avg: 81506     median: 85075.5 (69%)     max: 89577 Points
min: 65657     avg: 78481     median: 72055 (58%)     max: 97730 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 89952     avg: 94996     median: 96373 (81%)     max: 98040 Points
min: 80654     avg: 88077     median: 87546.5 (74%)     max: 96373 Points
min: 75600     avg: 88980     median: 88770 (75%)     max: 102779 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 12004     avg: 17896     median: 18588.5 (47%)     max: 22184 Points
min: 8608     avg: 15722     median: 16486.5 (42%)     max: 19297 Points
min: 16214     avg: 18700     median: 18585 (47%)     max: 21231 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 17733     avg: 26770     median: 27939 (50%)     max: 32664 Points
min: 12668     avg: 22820     median: 22920 (41%)     max: 27558 Points
min: 23308     avg: 27794     median: 28300 (50%)     max: 31045 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 7863     avg: 11616     median: 11827.5 (50%)     max: 13726 Points
min: 4231     avg: 9365     median: 9953 (42%)     max: 11800 Points
min: 9449     avg: 12247     median: 12430.5 (52%)     max: 14252 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 2437     avg: 2658     median: 2653.5 (71%)     max: 2807 Points
min: 2131     avg: 2357     median: 2384 (64%)     max: 2481 Points
2611 Points (70%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 11118     avg: 12850     median: 12644 (50%)     max: 14404 Points
min: 7608     avg: 9408     median: 9656 (38%)     max: 11014 Points
10721 Points (42%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1140     avg: 1903     median: 1960 (83%)     max: 2043 Points
min: 1590     avg: 1743     median: 1758 (74%)     max: 1797 Points
min: 1596     avg: 1793     median: 1868 (79%)     max: 1918 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 9094     avg: 12693     median: 13014 (23%)     max: 15410 Points
min: 6478     avg: 9797     median: 9784 (18%)     max: 11284 Points
min: 10378     avg: 13176     median: 13682.5 (25%)     max: 14294 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1654     avg: 1819     median: 1847 (8%)     max: 1958 Points
min: 1486     avg: 1677     median: 1705 (7%)     max: 1766 Points
min: 1795     avg: 1834     median: 1848 (8%)     max: 1859 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11168     avg: 12512     median: 12681 (40%)     max: 14172 Points
min: 6287     avg: 9019     median: 9099 (29%)     max: 11153 Points
min: 10276     avg: 12524     median: 13538 (43%)     max: 13757 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 7253     avg: 8025     median: 8266 (83%)     max: 8498 Points
min: 6711     avg: 7411     median: 7483 (75%)     max: 7705 Points
min: 7925     avg: 7957     median: 7932 (79%)     max: 8015 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 41851     avg: 47697     median: 46327 (51%)     max: 54848 Points
min: 24621     avg: 34058     median: 34216 (38%)     max: 41477 Points
min: 39510     avg: 46971     median: 50218 (55%)     max: 51184 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 456     avg: 505     median: 478 (1%)     max: 828 ms
min: 519     avg: 552     median: 542 (1%)     max: 652 ms
min: 490     avg: 520     median: 499 (1%)     max: 582 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
86 ms (1%)
min: 102.4     avg: 107.1     median: 107.1 (1%)     max: 111.7 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 85435     avg: 97010     median: 100627 (88%)     max: 102947 Points
min: 85840     avg: 87864     median: 87864 (77%)     max: 89888 Points
94352 Points (83%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 133.5     avg: 275.6     median: 284 (82%)     max: 348 Points
min: 234     avg: 249.5     median: 250.5 (72%)     max: 268 Points
min: 249     avg: 259     median: 259 (74%)     max: 269 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 171.4     avg: 303.2     median: 317 (66%)     max: 340 Points
min: 265     avg: 291.3     median: 295.5 (62%)     max: 309 Points
min: 285     avg: 303.2     median: 300 (63%)     max: 331 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
43.3 MB/s (32%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
2539 MB/s (78%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
81.5 MB/s (100%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
3600 MB/s (100%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
20584 Points (95%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1104     avg: 1872     median: 1915 (73%)     max: 2146 Points
min: 1532     avg: 1694     median: 1715 (66%)     max: 1875 Points
min: 1727     avg: 1945     median: 1944.5 (74%)     max: 2138 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 38.1     avg: 100.5     median: 102.4 (18%)     max: 154 Watt
min: 45.2     avg: 81.3     median: 78.3 (14%)     max: 112.7 Watt
min: 82.3     avg: 117     median: 117.5 (20%)     max: 174.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 66.1     avg: 125.6     median: 115.9 (21%)     max: 196.9 Watt
min: 52.8     avg: 95.3     median: 91.4 (17%)     max: 147 Watt
min: 77.7     avg: 130.6     median: 138.5 (25%)     max: 166 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 2.9     avg: 14     median: 15.6 (10%)     max: 28.1 Watt
min: 5.22     avg: 20.2     median: 20.1 (13%)     max: 47.5 Watt
min: 13.2     avg: 38.1     median: 38.1 (25%)     max: 63 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 4.85     avg: 13.3     median: 12.3 (14%)     max: 24 Watt
min: 7.04     avg: 8.4     median: 8.4 (9%)     max: 9.8 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 13.6     avg: 27.9     median: 21.8 (16%)     max: 97.6 Points per Watt
min: 15.3     avg: 18.9     median: 16.7 (12%)     max: 24.2 Points per Watt
min: 17.2     avg: 20.7     median: 20.6 (15%)     max: 25.4 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-13900H → 100% n=53

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-12650H → 85% n=53

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-12900HK → 99% n=53

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 04. 04:59:24

#0 checking url part for id 14717 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14051 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14041 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720061964 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.01s ... 0.01s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.01s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14717 +0.004s ... 0.015s

#8 got single benchmarks 14717 +0.038s ... 0.053s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14051 +0.005s ... 0.058s

#10 got single benchmarks 14051 +0.025s ... 0.082s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 14041 +0.005s ... 0.087s

#12 got single benchmarks 14041 +0.016s ... 0.103s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.103s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.114s ... 0.217s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.217s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)