Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i9-13900H vs Intel Core i5-1155G7

Intel Core i9-13900H

► remove from comparison Intel i9-13900H

The Intel Core i9-13900H is a high-end mobile CPU for laptops based on the Raptor Lake-H series (Alder Lake architecture). It was announced in early 2023 and offers 6 performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) and 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores support Hyper-Threading leading to 20 supported threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock rate ranges from 2.6 to 5.4 GHz (single core turbo, all-core 4.9 GHz) on the performance cluster and 1.9 to 4.1 GHz on the efficiency cluster. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare with the Core i7-6920HQ). All cores can use up to 24 MB L3 cache. Compared to the similar Core i9-13900HK, the 13900H supports no open multiplicator for overclocking, but on the other hand the full set of vPro management features.

Performance

The average 13900H in our database is in the same league as the Core i5-13500HX, Core i7-13705H, Core i9-12900HK, Core i9-13905H and also the Ryzen 9 7940HS, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 115 W, the Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014 is among the fastest laptops built around the 13900H that we know of. It can be about 50% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Features

The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to DDR5-5200 (up from 4800 MHz for the 12th gen). The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficient cores for the best performance. For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC, and AV1 decode in hardware. The CPU now supports PCIe 5.0 x8 for a GPU and two PCIe 4.0 x4 for SSDs.

The integrated graphics card is based on the Xe-architecture and offers 96 EUs (Execution Units) .

The CPU is rated at 45 W base power (115 W PL2) but most laptops will use a PL1 of around 60 Watt. The SoC is manufactured in a 10nm process at Intel, which is known as Intel 7 (improved over the 12th Gen).

Intel Core i5-1155G7

► remove from comparison Intel i5-1155G7

The Intel Core i5-1155G7 is a power efficient quad-core SoC for laptops and Ultrabooks based on the Tiger Lake-U generation that was announced in mid 2021 as part of the refresh. It integrates four Willow Cove processor cores (8 threads thanks to HyperThreading). The base clock speed depends on the TDP settings and ranges from 1 GHz (12 Watt TDP) up to 2.5 GHz (28 Watt). Boost clock speed is 4.5 GHz.

Tiger Lake SoCs add PCIe 4 support (4 lanes), AI hardware acceleration, and the partial integration of Thunderbolt 4 / USB 4 and Wifi 6 in the chip.

Another novelty is the integrated Xe graphics adapter with 80 EUs based on the completely new Gen 12 architecture. It offers a significantly higher performance compared to the older Iris Plus G7 (Ice Lake).

Performance

The average 1155G7 in our database proves to be a very decent mid-range processor, as of mid 2022, trading blows with the Core i7-10810U and the Ryzen 5 4500U as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. While perhaps not the best option for power users, this Core i5 will make most consumers happy, providing for short load times and generally pain-free experience.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Power consumption

This Core i5 series chip has a default TDP, also known as the long-term power limit, of 12 W to 28 W, the expectation being that laptop makers will go for a higher value in exchange for higher performance. Either way, this is a tad too high to allow for passively cooled designs.

The i5-1155G7 is built with Intel's third-gen 10 nm process marketed as SuperFin for lower-than-average, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i9-13900HIntel Core i5-1155G7
SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-HIntel Tiger Lake
CodenameRaptor Lake-HTiger Lake-UP3
Series: Tiger Lake Tiger Lake-UP3
Intel Core i9-13900HK compare1.9 - 5.4 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13905H compare1.9 - 5.4 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900H « 1.9 - 5.4 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13800H compare1.8 - 5.2 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13705H compare1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700H compare1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13620H compare1.8 - 4.9 GHz10 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600H compare2.1 - 4.8 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13505H compare1.9 - 4.7 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500H compare1.9 - 4.7 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13420H compare1.5 - 4.6 GHz8 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1195G7 compare2.9 - 5 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1185G7 compare3 - 4.8 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1165G7 compare2.8 - 4.7 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1155G7 « 2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1145G7 compare2.6 - 4.4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1135G7 compare2.4 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1125G4 compare2 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1115G4 compare3 - 4.1 GHz2 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Clock1900 - 5400 MHz2500 - 4500 MHz
L1 Cache1.2 MB320 KB
L2 Cache11.5 MB5 MB
L3 Cache24 MB8 MB
Cores / Threads14 / 204 / 8
TDP45 Watt28 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketBGA1744BGA1449
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266/DDR5-5200/LPDDR5-6400/LPDDR5x-6400 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Dir., DL B., GNA, vPro Ent., RPE, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHADDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266 RAM, PCIe 4, 4 GT/s bus, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ( - 1500 MHz)Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (400 - 1350 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-13900H
46.3 pt (64%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-1155G7
33.9 pt (47%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 101     avg: 102.5     median: 102.5 (71%)     max: 104 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 703     avg: 761     median: 760.5 (14%)     max: 818 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 13015     avg: 16992     median: 17706 (16%)     max: 20385 Points
min: 5471     avg: 5625     median: 5612 (5%)     max: 5791 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1297     avg: 1894     median: 1966 (84%)     max: 2054 Points
min: 1362     avg: 1409     median: 1419 (60%)     max: 1446 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 428     avg: 723     median: 754 (84%)     max: 792 Points
min: 521     avg: 541     median: 550 (61%)     max: 551 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 4960     avg: 6599     median: 6864.5 (17%)     max: 7716 Points
min: 2123     avg: 2190     median: 2173 (5%)     max: 2273 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2061     avg: 2685     median: 2706 (17%)     max: 3100 Points
min: 858     avg: 892     median: 890 (6%)     max: 928 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 211     avg: 269.8     median: 280 (84%)     max: 297 Points
min: 210     avg: 210.7     median: 211 (64%)     max: 211 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 27.48     avg: 28.6     median: 28.6 (37%)     max: 29.65 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.98     avg: 3     median: 3 (74%)     max: 3 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 9550     avg: 9590     median: 9590 (58%)     max: 9630 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 53438     avg: 54921     median: 54920.5 (40%)     max: 56403 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 79014     avg: 79435     median: 79435 (55%)     max: 79856 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 13752     avg: 13786     median: 13786 (17%)     max: 13820 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 179.496     avg: 296.1     median: 296.1 (4%)     max: 412.775 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 3.141     avg: 3.3     median: 3.3 (1%)     max: 3.518 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 6800     avg: 8052     median: 8051.5 (13%)     max: 9303 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 45045     avg: 66867     median: 70217.5 (40%)     max: 79032 MIPS
min: 24862     avg: 25019     median: 24992 (14%)     max: 25203 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 3665     avg: 6064     median: 6277.5 (75%)     max: 6600 MIPS
min: 4603     avg: 4831     median: 4941 (59%)     max: 4949 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 113.95     avg: 126.3     median: 126.3 (44%)     max: 138.55 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 284     avg: 292.3     median: 292.3 (67%)     max: 300.5 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 14.1     avg: 18.7     median: 19 (33%)     max: 22.3 fps
min: 7.13     avg: 7.4     median: 7.5 (13%)     max: 7.55 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 1.2     avg: 1.3     median: 1.3 (0%)     max: 1.4 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 2.4     avg: 2.5     median: 2.5 (42%)     max: 2.5 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 13.2     avg: 14     median: 14 (36%)     max: 14.8 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 279     avg: 348.7     median: 336 (4%)     max: 467 Seconds
min: 979     avg: 1011     median: 1011 (13%)     max: 1043 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 166     avg: 203     median: 193 (1%)     max: 268 Seconds
min: 536     avg: 547     median: 540 (4%)     max: 566 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4052     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.723 sec
min: 0.605     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (13%)     max: 0.616 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 13869     avg: 14799     median: 14893 (32%)     max: 15501 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 6.156     avg: 6.8     median: 6.8 (1%)     max: 7.445 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 13.784     avg: 15     median: 15 (1%)     max: 16.234 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 350.453     avg: 383.8     median: 383.8 (2%)     max: 417.103 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 55574     avg: 65893     median: 67507 (59%)     max: 75108 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 15540     avg: 21972     median: 22680.5 (61%)     max: 25420 Points
min: 11355     avg: 11710     median: 11849 (32%)     max: 11925 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 83732     avg: 95381     median: 93901 (76%)     max: 103874 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 85594     avg: 91514     median: 93285 (76%)     max: 93890 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 89952     avg: 94996     median: 96373 (81%)     max: 98040 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 12004     avg: 17896     median: 18588.5 (47%)     max: 22184 Points
min: 9401     avg: 9981     median: 10243 (26%)     max: 10298 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 17733     avg: 26770     median: 27939 (50%)     max: 32664 Points
min: 14439     avg: 14655     median: 14727 (26%)     max: 14798 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 7863     avg: 11616     median: 11827.5 (50%)     max: 13726 Points
min: 5082     avg: 5291     median: 5223 (22%)     max: 5569 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 2437     avg: 2658     median: 2653.5 (71%)     max: 2807 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 11118     avg: 12850     median: 12644 (50%)     max: 14404 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1140     avg: 1903     median: 1960 (83%)     max: 2043 Points
min: 1461     avg: 1471     median: 1473 (62%)     max: 1480 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 9094     avg: 12693     median: 13014 (23%)     max: 15410 Points
min: 5654     avg: 5747     median: 5761 (10%)     max: 5825 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1654     avg: 1819     median: 1847 (8%)     max: 1958 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11168     avg: 12512     median: 12681 (40%)     max: 14172 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 7253     avg: 8025     median: 8266 (83%)     max: 8498 Points
min: 6195     avg: 6306     median: 6305.5 (63%)     max: 6416 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 41851     avg: 47697     median: 46327 (51%)     max: 54848 Points
min: 21969     avg: 22182     median: 22182 (24%)     max: 22395 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 456     avg: 505     median: 478 (1%)     max: 828 ms
min: 669     avg: 690     median: 689 (1%)     max: 712 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 85435     avg: 97010     median: 100627 (88%)     max: 102947 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 133.5     avg: 275.6     median: 284 (82%)     max: 348 Points
min: 189.5     avg: 190.1     median: 190.1 (55%)     max: 190.6 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 171.4     avg: 303.2     median: 317 (66%)     max: 340 Points
min: 242     avg: 243.7     median: 244 (51%)     max: 245 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1104     avg: 1872     median: 1915 (73%)     max: 2146 Points
min: 1381     avg: 1388     median: 1388 (53%)     max: 1395 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 38.1     avg: 100.5     median: 102.4 (18%)     max: 154 Watt
min: 42.2     avg: 45.5     median: 44.9 (8%)     max: 49.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 66.1     avg: 125.6     median: 115.9 (21%)     max: 196.9 Watt
min: 50.7     avg: 55.7     median: 58.2 (11%)     max: 58.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 2.9     avg: 14     median: 15.6 (10%)     max: 28.1 Watt
min: 3.17     avg: 3.3     median: 3.3 (2%)     max: 3.48 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 4.85     avg: 13.3     median: 12.3 (14%)     max: 24 Watt
min: 5.5     avg: 5.8     median: 5.8 (6%)     max: 6.07 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 13.6     avg: 27.9     median: 21.8 (16%)     max: 97.6 Points per Watt
min: 14.7     avg: 16.1     median: 15.3 (11%)     max: 18.3 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-13900H → 100% n=24

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-1155G7 → 63% n=24

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 02. 17:01:13

#0 checking url part for id 14717 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13226 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719932472 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.008s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14717 +0.005s ... 0.013s

#7 got single benchmarks 14717 +0.041s ... 0.054s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 13226 +0.004s ... 0.059s

#9 got single benchmarks 13226 +0.011s ... 0.069s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.069s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.054s ... 0.123s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.126s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)