Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i9-11900KB vs Intel Core i3-7100H

Intel Core i9-11900KB

► remove from comparison Intel i9-11900KB

The Intel Core i9-11900KB is an Octa-Core-CPU that was used in the Intel Beast Canyon NUC. It is based on the Tiger-Lake-H45 series and was announced in the second quarter of 2021. The processor cores can clock from 3.3 to 5.3 GHz, all cores at once can reach up to 4.9 GHz. The CPU features 24 MB level 3 cache and DDR4-3200 memory. The integrated UHD graphics card is based on the Xe-architecture with 32 cores and clocks up to 1.45 GHz.

As with the slower Tiger Lake-H CPUs, the 11900KB has a partly integrated WiFi 6E and Thunderbolt 4 in the chip. Furthermore, the 11900KB supports 20 PCIe 4.0 lanes.

The TDP is rated at 65 Watt with 3.3. GHz base clock and can be configured to 55 Watt (cTDP-down).

Intel Core i3-7100H

► remove from comparison Intel i3-7100H

The Intel Core i3-7100H is a dual-core processor for notebooks based on the Kaby Lake architecture and was announced in January 2017. It is probably based on the quad-core die from the other H-series processor with two deactivated cores considering the TDP and the integrated HD Graphics 630. The two CPU cores run at 3GHZ without a Turbo, and the processor can execute up to four threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper Threading. It is also equipped with an Intel HD Graphics 630 GPU, a dual-channel memory controller (DDR4) as well as VP9 and H.265 video decoding as well as encoding. The chip is still manufactured in a 14nm process with FinFET transistors.

Architektur

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Skylake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. The manufacturer only reworked the Speed Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of voltages and clocks, and the improved 14nm process allows much higher frequencies combined with better efficiency than before.

Performance

Compared to the similarly branded, but much more efficient Core i3-7100U (2.4 GHz, 15-Watt TDP), the i3-7100H has much higher clocks and the performance is almost on par with theCore i5-7200U (2.5-3.1 GHz).

Graphics

The integrated Intel HD Graphics 630 has 24 Execution Units (similar to previous HD Graphics 530) running at 350 - 950 MHz in this case. The performance depends a lot on the memory configuration. Compared to HD 620 GPUs, the higher TDP could result in better sustained performance.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby Lake now supports hardware decoding for H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors, which were announced in January, should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in an improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors, which improves the efficiency even further. The TDP is pretty high for a dual-core processor at 35 Watts, so the CPU is not suited fpr thin and light notebooks (where the i3-7100U comes into play).

ModelIntel Core i9-11900KBIntel Core i3-7100H
SeriesIntel Tiger LakeIntel Kaby Lake
CodenameTiger Lake-HKaby Lake
Series: Kaby Lake Kaby Lake
Intel Core i9-11900KB « 3.3 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-11900H compare2.5 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-11950H compare2.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-11955M compare2.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-11850H compare2.5 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-11800H compare2.3 - 4.6 GHz8 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-11855M compare3.2 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11500B compare3.3 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11400H compare2.7 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11260H compare2.6 - 4.4 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700K compare4.2 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700 compare3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6 compare3.1 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7920HQ compare3.1 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700T compare2.9 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7600K compare3.8 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6 compare3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HQ compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HK compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7500 compare3.4 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7440HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7567U compare3.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7660U compare2.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7600U compare2.8 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300HQ compare2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7500T compare2.7 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7287U compare3.3 - 3.7 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7560U compare2.4 - 3.8 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7267U compare3.1 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7360U compare2.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7500U compare2.7 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300U compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7260U compare2.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7200U compare2.5 - 3.1 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100H « 3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7167U compare2.8 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7Y75 compare1.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y57 compare1.2 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y54 compare1.2 - 3.2 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100U compare2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y32 compare1 - 3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415U compare2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y30 compare1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965U compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7020U compare2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3867U compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3865U compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4425Y compare1.7 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y compare1.6 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4410Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Clock3300 - 5300 MHz3000 MHz
L1 Cache768 KB128 KB
L2 Cache10 MB512 KB
L3 Cache24 MB3 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 162 / 4
TDP65 Watt35 Watt
Technology10 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketBGA 1499BGA1356
FeaturesAVX512, Intel Xe Graphics 32 EUs, DDR4-3200Dual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) (350 - 1450 MHz)Intel HD Graphics 630 (300 - 950 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$539 U.S.$393 U.S.
Announced

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-11900KB
40.8 pt (57%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
11726 Points (11%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1621 Points (69%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
629 Points (70%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
4644 Points (11%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2027 Points (13%)
min: 325     avg: 327.5     median: 327.5 (2%)     max: 330 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
247 Points (74%)
130 Points (39%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
22.1 Points (29%)
3.6 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.8 Points (71%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
9538 Points (58%)
4870 Points (29%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
50665 Points (37%)
11172 Points (8%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
67183 Points (47%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
12508 Points (15%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
102.2 s (1%)
503 s (6%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.4 s (1%)
15.9 s (3%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
9584 Points (15%)
2713 Points (4%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
50152 MIPS (29%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5979 MIPS (71%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
106 fps (37%)
21.3 fps (7%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
272.5 fps (63%)
113.6 fps (26%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
14.4 fps (25%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.1 GB/s (0%)
0.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.7 GB/s (29%)
0.3 GB/s (5%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
11.6 GB/s (30%)
1.8 GB/s (5%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
262.7 Seconds (2%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.5 sec (12%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
14961 Points (32%)
4231 Points (9%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
6.7 s (1%)
12.6 s (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
14.4 s (1%)
28.5 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
343.2 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
66833 Points (59%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
17803 Points (48%)
4559 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
77901 Points (63%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
78146 Points (63%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
89952 Points (76%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
16497 Points (42%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
24327 Points (43%)
5154 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
10035 Points (42%)
2022 Points (9%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1656 Points (70%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
8924 Points (16%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1638 Points (7%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
8845 Points (28%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
6991 Points (70%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
36310 Points (40%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
602 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
269 Points (56%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1785 Points (68%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
112.9 Watt (19%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
123.9 Watt (23%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
16.4 Points per Watt (12%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-11900KB → 100% n=19

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-7100H → 41% n=19

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 05. 10:17:00

#0 checking url part for id 14024 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8418 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720167419 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14024 +0.005s ... 0.01s

#7 got single benchmarks 14024 +0.005s ... 0.015s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 8418 +0.001s ... 0.015s

#9 got single benchmarks 8418 +0.003s ... 0.019s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.019s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.03s ... 0.048s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.051s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)