Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i9-10910 vs Intel Core i7-7700K

Intel Core i9-10910

► remove from comparison Intel i9-10910

The Intel Core i9-10910 is a high-end processor for desktops with ten cores based on the Comet Lake architecture (CML-S, 4th generation of Skylake). The processor clocks at between 3.6 and 5.0 GHz (all 10 cores up to 4.6 GHz) and can execute up to twenty threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. The 5.0 GHz can be only achieved below 70°C core temperature (Thermal Velocity Boost of 100 MHz).

The processor is still manufactured in the old 14nm (14nm++) process. Compared to the predecessor, the Core i9-9900K, the 10900K offers increased clock speeds and two more cores.

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

Performance

Thanks to the high Turbo Boost, the CPU is the fastest gaming CPU available at the time of announcement. Using all cores, the i9 however is slower than the top Ryzen CPUs (like the Ryzen 9 3950X) which offer more cores.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a similar performance as the UHD630 in the Core i7-9900K. As a  low-end solution it will only run current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 125 Watts (PL1) but under full load up to 250 Watt are consumed (PL2). In default mode these 250 Watt and therefore high clock speeds can be maintained for up to 56 seconds, however, all boards offer the option to alter these settings.

Intel Core i7-7700K

► remove from comparison Intel i7-7700K

The Intel Core i7-7700K is a fast quad-core processor for desktops based on the Kaby Lake architecture and was announced in January 2017. It is the top model of the consumer Kaby-Lake-H series at the time of the announcement. Besides four cores including Hyper-Threading (8 threads) support running at 4.2 - 4.5 GHz, the processor is also equipped with the HD Graphics 630 GPU as well as a dual-channel memory controller (DDR3L-1600/DDR4-2400). It is manufactured in a 14nm process with FinFET transistors.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Skylake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. The manufacturer only reworked the Speed Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of voltages and clocks, and the improved 14nm process allows much higher frequencies combined with better efficiency than before.

Performance

Thanks to the 200 (base) and 300 MHz (Boost) higher clock speed, respectively, the i7-7700K is a few percent faster than the old Skylake Core i7-6700K that offers the same per-MHz performance. Therefore, it is a very fast quad-core CPU that offers sufficient performance for all tasks.

Graphics

The integrated Intel HD Graphics 630 has 24 Execution Units (similar to previous HD Graphics 530) running at 350 - 1150 MHz. The performance depends a lot on the memory configuration; it should be comparable to a dedicated Nvidia GeForce 920M in combination with fast DDR4-2133 dual-channel memory.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby Lake now supports hardware decoding for H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors, which were announced in January, should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in an improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors, which improves the efficiency slightly. Intel still specifies the TDP with 91 Watts, which is a lot more than the 45 Watts of the mobile Kaby-Lake-H CPUs.

ModelIntel Core i9-10910Intel Core i7-7700K
SeriesIntel Comet LakeIntel Kaby Lake
CodenameComet Lake-SKaby Lake
Series: Kaby Lake Kaby Lake
Intel Core i9-10850K compare3.6 - 5.2 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10910 « 3.6 - 5 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10320 compare3.8 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores7.9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10100 compare3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700K « 4.2 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700 compare3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6 compare3.1 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7920HQ compare3.1 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700T compare2.9 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7600K compare3.8 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6 compare3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HQ compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HK compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7500 compare3.4 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7440HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7567U compare3.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7660U compare2.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7600U compare2.8 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300HQ compare2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7500T compare2.7 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7287U compare3.3 - 3.7 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7560U compare2.4 - 3.8 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7267U compare3.1 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7360U compare2.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7500U compare2.7 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300U compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7260U compare2.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7200U compare2.5 - 3.1 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100H compare3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7167U compare2.8 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7Y75 compare1.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y57 compare1.2 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y54 compare1.2 - 3.2 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100U compare2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y32 compare1 - 3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415U compare2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y30 compare1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965U compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7020U compare2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3867U compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3865U compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4425Y compare1.7 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y compare1.6 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4410Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Clock3600 - 5000 MHz4200 - 4500 MHz
L1 Cache640 KB256 KB
L2 Cache2.5 MB1 MB
L3 Cache20 MB8 MB
Cores / Threads10 / 204 / 8
TDP125 Watt91 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketLGA 1200FCLGA1151
FeaturesTVB, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, Quick Sync, VirtualizationDDR3(L)-1600/DDR4-2400 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX-NI, Quick Sync, Virtualization, vPro
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630Intel HD Graphics 630 (350 - 1150 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$488 U.S.$339 U.S.
Announced

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-10910
38.8 pt (54%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
501 Points (56%)
465 Points (52%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
5196 Points (13%)
2200 Points (5%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2302 Points (15%)
min: 897     avg: 940     median: 938.5 (6%)     max: 984 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
215 Points (65%)
min: 190     avg: 192.3     median: 192.5 (58%)     max: 194 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
25.6 Points (33%)
min: 9.78     avg: 10.4     median: 10.4 (13%)     max: 10.91 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.4 Points (61%)
min: 2.18     avg: 2.2     median: 2.2 (54%)     max: 2.2 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
8131 Points (49%)
min: 7222     avg: 7305     median: 7304.5 (44%)     max: 7387 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
57842 Points (42%)
min: 28189     avg: 28903     median: 28903 (21%)     max: 29617 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 169.8     avg: 173.1     median: 173.1 (2%)     max: 176.3 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 5.5     avg: 5.6     median: 5.6 (1%)     max: 5.615 s
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
243.5 s (1%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
7.8 s (4%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
8613 Points (14%)
5823 Points (9%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
60747 MIPS (35%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5690 MIPS (68%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
61.6 fps (22%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
230 fps (53%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
16.8 fps (30%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.54     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (0%)     max: 0.554 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 0.919     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (16%)     max: 0.939 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 5.4     avg: 5.5     median: 5.5 (14%)     max: 5.5 GB/s
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
208 Seconds (1%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.5 sec (12%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
10156 Points (22%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.6 s (2%)
min: 8.11     avg: 8.2     median: 8.2 (2%)     max: 8.22 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
16.8 s (1%)
min: 18.3     avg: 18.4     median: 18.4 (1%)     max: 18.41 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
432.5 s (2%)
440 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
18348 Points (50%)
min: 9975     avg: 11450     median: 11813 (32%)     max: 12026 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 64424     avg: 65351     median: 65408 (53%)     max: 66220 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
66177 Points (54%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
67714 Points (57%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 9230     avg: 9587     median: 9558 (24%)     max: 9974 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
25520 Points (46%)
min: 13137     avg: 13702     median: 13672.5 (24%)     max: 14325 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
11771 Points (50%)
min: 5276     avg: 5383     median: 5383 (23%)     max: 5490 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1381 Points (58%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
10244 Points (18%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
5480 Points (75%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
17800 Points (43%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
18800 Points (29%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
4700 Points (70%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
12169 Points (98%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
10472 Points (95%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
17576 Points (34%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
17183 Points (35%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
15476 Points (40%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
737 ms (1%)
769 ms (1%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
52 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
55976 Points (49%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
236 Points (49%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
145 Watt (25%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
127 Watt (23%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
7.8 Points per Watt (6%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-10910 → 100% n=16

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-7700K → 73% n=16

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 04. 22:40:21

#0 checking url part for id 12832 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8421 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720125621 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 12832 +0.004s ... 0.008s

#7 got single benchmarks 12832 +0.004s ... 0.013s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 8421 +0s ... 0.013s

#9 got single benchmarks 8421 +0.002s ... 0.015s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.015s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.023s ... 0.038s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.04s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)