Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i9-10910 vs Intel Core i5-7Y57

Intel Core i9-10910

► remove from comparison Intel i9-10910

The Intel Core i9-10910 is a high-end processor for desktops with ten cores based on the Comet Lake architecture (CML-S, 4th generation of Skylake). The processor clocks at between 3.6 and 5.0 GHz (all 10 cores up to 4.6 GHz) and can execute up to twenty threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. The 5.0 GHz can be only achieved below 70°C core temperature (Thermal Velocity Boost of 100 MHz).

The processor is still manufactured in the old 14nm (14nm++) process. Compared to the predecessor, the Core i9-9900K, the 10900K offers increased clock speeds and two more cores.

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

Performance

Thanks to the high Turbo Boost, the CPU is the fastest gaming CPU available at the time of announcement. Using all cores, the i9 however is slower than the top Ryzen CPUs (like the Ryzen 9 3950X) which offer more cores.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a similar performance as the UHD630 in the Core i7-9900K. As a  low-end solution it will only run current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 125 Watts (PL1) but under full load up to 250 Watt are consumed (PL2). In default mode these 250 Watt and therefore high clock speeds can be maintained for up to 56 seconds, however, all boards offer the option to alter these settings.

Intel Core i5-7Y57

► remove from comparison Intel i5-7Y57

The Intel Core i5-7Y57 is a very efficient dual-core SoC for tablets and passively cooled notebooks based on the Kaby Lake architecture and was announced in the Q1/2017. It is a slightly faster version of the Core i5-7Y54 (1.2-3.2 GHz). The CPU consists of two processor cores clocked at 1.2-3.3 GHz (2-core Turbo 2.9 GHz). Thanks to Hyper Threading, the processor can execute up to four threads simultaneously. The chips also includes the Intel HD Graphics 615 GPU, a dual-channel memory controller (DDR3L/LPDDR3) as well as VP9 and H.265 video de- and encoder. It is still produced in a 14 nm process with FinFET transistors. 

Architecture

Intel basically used the familiar micro architecture from the Skylake generation, so the per-MHz performance is identical. Only the Speed-Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of the voltages and clocks was improved, and the matured 14 nm process now also enables much higher frequencies and better efficiency than before. 

Performance

Despite the changed designation, the Core i5-7Y57 is the successor to the Core m5-6Y57 (Skylake Y-series), so the chip does not reach the performance level of other Core i processors due to the lower TDP. Thanks to its high Turbo clock, the 7Y57 can sometimes keep up with the 15 Watt models for short peak load and single-thread scenarios, but the clocks will drop significantly under sustained workloads. The CPU is still suitable for many more demanding applications as well as multitasking. 

Graphics

The integrated Intel HD Graphics 615 GPU has 24 Execution Units (EUs) like the old HD Graphics 515 and runs with clocks between 300 and 950 MHz in combination with this processor. The performance heavily depends on the TDP limit as well as the memory configuration; with fast LPDDR3-1866 RAM in dual-channel mode, the GPU should sometimes be able to compete with the HD Graphics 520, but can also be much slower in other scenarios. Modern games from 2016 will, if at all, only run smoothly in the lowest settings.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby Lake now also supports hardware decoding for H.265/HEVC Main10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in an improved 14 nm process with FinFET transistors, so the power efficiency was once again improved significantly. The typical TDP for the Y-series is specified at 4.5 Watts, and can be adjusted in both directions depending on the usage scenario.

ModelIntel Core i9-10910Intel Core i5-7Y57
SeriesIntel Comet LakeIntel Kaby Lake
CodenameComet Lake-SKaby Lake
Series: Kaby Lake Kaby Lake
Intel Core i9-10850K compare3.6 - 5.2 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10910 « 3.6 - 5 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10320 compare3.8 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores7.9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10100 compare3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700K compare4.2 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700 compare3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6 compare3.1 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7920HQ compare3.1 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700T compare2.9 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7600K compare3.8 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6 compare3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HQ compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HK compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7500 compare3.4 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7440HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7567U compare3.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7660U compare2.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7600U compare2.8 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300HQ compare2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7500T compare2.7 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7287U compare3.3 - 3.7 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7560U compare2.4 - 3.8 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7267U compare3.1 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7360U compare2.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7500U compare2.7 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300U compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7260U compare2.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7200U compare2.5 - 3.1 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100H compare3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7167U compare2.8 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7Y75 compare1.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y57 « 1.2 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y54 compare1.2 - 3.2 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100U compare2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y32 compare1 - 3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415U compare2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y30 compare1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965U compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7020U compare2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3867U compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3865U compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4425Y compare1.7 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y compare1.6 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4410Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Clock3600 - 5000 MHz1200 - 3300 MHz
L1 Cache640 KB128 KB
L2 Cache2.5 MB512 KB
L3 Cache20 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads10 / 202 / 4
TDP125 Watt4.5 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketLGA 1200BGA
FeaturesTVB, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, Quick Sync, VirtualizationDual-Channel DDR3L-1600/LPDDR3-1866 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI, TXT
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630Intel HD Graphics 615 (300 - 950 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$488 U.S.$281 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-10910
38.8 pt (54%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
501 Points (56%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
5196 Points (13%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2302 Points (15%)
273 Points (2%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
215 Points (65%)
133 Points (40%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
25.6 Points (33%)
3 Points (4%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.4 Points (61%)
1.5 Points (38%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
8131 Points (49%)
5132 Points (31%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
57842 Points (42%)
9888 Points (7%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 i5-7Y57 +
12373 Points (9%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 i5-7Y57 +
6550 Points (8%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
243.5 s (1%)
1054 s (4%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
7.8 s (4%)
32.2 s (17%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
8613 Points (14%)
2105 Points (3%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
60747 MIPS (35%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5690 MIPS (68%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 i5-7Y57 +
17.2 fps (6%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 i5-7Y57 +
106.9 fps (25%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
16.8 fps (30%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 i5-7Y57 +
0.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 i5-7Y57 +
0.3 GB/s (5%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 i5-7Y57 +
1.8 GB/s (5%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
208 Seconds (1%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.5 sec (12%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 i5-7Y57 +
3698 Points (8%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.6 s (2%)
11.6 s (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
16.8 s (1%)
26.9 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
432.5 s (2%)
639 s (3%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
18348 Points (50%)
3579 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 i5-7Y57 +
35764 Points (29%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 i5-7Y57 +
34008 Points (28%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 i5-7Y57 +
min: 39302     avg: 39329     median: 39329 (33%)     max: 39356 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 i5-7Y57 +
2980 Points (8%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
25520 Points (46%)
4170 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
11771 Points (50%)
1448 Points (6%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1381 Points (58%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
10244 Points (18%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 i5-7Y57 +
4073 Points (41%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 i5-7Y57 +
7480 Points (8%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 i5-7Y57 +
6405 Points (11%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 i5-7Y57 +
3271 Points (64%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 i5-7Y57 +
6699 Points (10%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 i5-7Y57 +
3377 Points (51%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
737 ms (1%)
min: 1163     avg: 1176     median: 1176 (1%)     max: 1189 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 i5-7Y57 +
268.1 ms (3%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
55976 Points (49%)
min: 29367     avg: 30851     median: 30850.5 (27%)     max: 32334 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
236 Points (49%)
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
100%
1 i5-7Y57 +
180866 Points (62%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
100%
1 i5-7Y57 +
146457 Points (19%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
100%
1 i5-7Y57 +
6046 Points (32%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
100%
1 i5-7Y57 +
15296 Points (33%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
100%
1 i5-7Y57 +
10309 Points (67%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-10910 → 100% n=17

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-7Y57 → 55% n=17

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 04. 21:59:17

#0 checking url part for id 12832 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9230 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720123157 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 12832 +0.004s ... 0.01s

#7 got single benchmarks 12832 +0.004s ... 0.014s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 9230 +0.001s ... 0.015s

#9 got single benchmarks 9230 +0.004s ... 0.019s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.019s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.031s ... 0.05s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.053s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)