Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i9-10910 vs AMD E1-1200

Intel Core i9-10910

► remove from comparison Intel i9-10910

The Intel Core i9-10910 is a high-end processor for desktops with ten cores based on the Comet Lake architecture (CML-S, 4th generation of Skylake). The processor clocks at between 3.6 and 5.0 GHz (all 10 cores up to 4.6 GHz) and can execute up to twenty threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. The 5.0 GHz can be only achieved below 70°C core temperature (Thermal Velocity Boost of 100 MHz).

The processor is still manufactured in the old 14nm (14nm++) process. Compared to the predecessor, the Core i9-9900K, the 10900K offers increased clock speeds and two more cores.

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

Performance

Thanks to the high Turbo Boost, the CPU is the fastest gaming CPU available at the time of announcement. Using all cores, the i9 however is slower than the top Ryzen CPUs (like the Ryzen 9 3950X) which offer more cores.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a similar performance as the UHD630 in the Core i7-9900K. As a  low-end solution it will only run current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 125 Watts (PL1) but under full load up to 250 Watt are consumed (PL2). In default mode these 250 Watt and therefore high clock speeds can be maintained for up to 56 seconds, however, all boards offer the option to alter these settings.

AMD E1-1200

► remove from comparison

The AMD E1-1200 (codename Zacate, not to be confused with the Ryzen 3 1200 from 2017) is a dual-core processor for small notebooks and netbooks. It is produced on a 40 nm process and offers a relatively powerful integrated GPU and a single channel DDR3-1066 memory controller. Compared to the older E-300, which is based on the same chip, the E1-1200 offers a 100 MHz higher CPU clock rate.

The E1-1200 has two Bobcat cores running at 1.4 GHz (no Boost here) that can access 512 KB of L2 cache per core. In comparison to the Atom processors, the Bobcat architecture uses an "out-of-order" execution and is therefore faster at the same clock speed.

The integrated Radeon HD 7310 GPU offers 80 shaders and an UVD3 video decoder. Compared to the slow GMA 3150 in the Atom processors, an HD 7310 offers a lot more performance and is about as fast as the Nvidia ION graphics solution. The HD 7310's clock rate is 500 MHz to be very similar to the HD 6310 (488 - 500 MHz depending on the APU).

Performance

The average E1-1200 in our database is in the same league as the Celeron N2807 and the AMD E-300, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is an outrageously slow chip, as of mid 2022.

Power consumption

This E-series APU has a default TDP of 18 W, meaning an active cooling solution is pretty much a must.

The AMD E1-1200 is built with a 40 nm process for very, very, very low, as of 2022, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i9-10910AMD E1-1200
SeriesIntel Comet LakeAMD E-Series
CodenameComet Lake-SZacate
Series: E-Series Zacate
Intel Core i9-10850K compare3.6 - 5.2 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10910 « 3.6 - 5 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10320 compare3.8 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores7.9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10100 compare3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
AMD E2-2000 compare1.75 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-1800 compare1.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-450 compare1.65 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-350 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E1-1500 compare1.48 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E1-1200 « 1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-240 compare1.5 GHz1 / 1 cores
Clock3600 - 5000 MHz1400 MHz
L1 Cache640 KB128 KB
L2 Cache2.5 MB1 MB
L3 Cache20 MB
Cores / Threads10 / 202 / 2
TDP125 Watt18 Watt
Technology14 nm40 nm
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketLGA 1200FT1 (BGA413)
FeaturesTVB, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, Quick Sync, VirtualizationDDR3-1066 RAM (sin. chan.), PCIe 2 [?], MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630AMD Radeon HD 7310
Architecturex86x86
$488 U.S.
Announced
Die Size75 mm2
Manufacturerwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-10910
38.8 pt (54%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
501 Points (56%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
5196 Points (13%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2302 Points (15%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
215 Points (65%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
25.6 Points (33%)
min: 0.47     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (1%)     max: 0.54 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.4 Points (61%)
min: 0.27     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (7%)     max: 0.28 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
8131 Points (49%)
min: 888     avg: 906     median: 912 (6%)     max: 918 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
57842 Points (42%)
min: 1654     avg: 1709     median: 1682 (1%)     max: 1791 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 E1-1200 +
min: 1887     avg: 1909     median: 1913 (1%)     max: 1926 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 E1-1200 +
min: 984     avg: 1000     median: 1008 (1%)     max: 1008 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 E1-1200 +
min: 2347     avg: 2479     median: 2410 (28%)     max: 2679 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 E1-1200 +
min: 74     avg: 78.7     median: 76 (15%)     max: 86.2 s
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
243.5 s (1%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
7.8 s (4%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
8613 Points (14%)
min: 398     avg: 417.5     median: 417.5 (1%)     max: 437 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
60747 MIPS (35%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5690 MIPS (68%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
16.8 fps (30%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
208 Seconds (1%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.5 sec (12%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 E1-1200 +
min: 837     avg: 872     median: 873.5 (2%)     max: 905 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.6 s (2%)
min: 48.44     avg: 54.1     median: 57 (12%)     max: 57 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
16.8 s (1%)
min: 110.5     avg: 120.8     median: 124 (5%)     max: 128 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
432.5 s (2%)
min: 2718     avg: 2755     median: 2766 (12%)     max: 2780 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 E1-1200 +
8000 MIPS (4%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 E1-1200 +
6460 MFLOPS (5%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 E1-1200 +
min: 3.4     avg: 3.5     median: 3.6 (46%)     max: 3.6 Points
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 E1-1200 +
min: 1347     avg: 1594     median: 1645.5 (1%)     max: 1738 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
18348 Points (50%)
min: 598     avg: 602     median: 604 (2%)     max: 605 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 E1-1200 +
8205 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 E1-1200 +
596 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
25520 Points (46%)
748 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
11771 Points (50%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1381 Points (58%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
10244 Points (18%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 E1-1200 +
1437 Points (12%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 E1-1200 +
1179 Points (11%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 E1-1200 +
1597 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 E1-1200 +
1433 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 E1-1200 +
1440 Points (4%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
737 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
55976 Points (49%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
236 Points (49%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-10910 → 100% n=10

Average Benchmarks AMD E1-1200 → 31% n=10

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 04. 07:18:49

#0 checking url part for id 12832 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3146 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720070329 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 12832 +0.004s ... 0.01s

#7 got single benchmarks 12832 +0.004s ... 0.014s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 3146 +0.001s ... 0.015s

#9 got single benchmarks 3146 +0.006s ... 0.021s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.021s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.024s ... 0.044s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.047s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)