Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i9-10910 vs AMD E-350

Intel Core i9-10910

► remove from comparison Intel i9-10910

The Intel Core i9-10910 is a high-end processor for desktops with ten cores based on the Comet Lake architecture (CML-S, 4th generation of Skylake). The processor clocks at between 3.6 and 5.0 GHz (all 10 cores up to 4.6 GHz) and can execute up to twenty threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. The 5.0 GHz can be only achieved below 70°C core temperature (Thermal Velocity Boost of 100 MHz).

The processor is still manufactured in the old 14nm (14nm++) process. Compared to the predecessor, the Core i9-9900K, the 10900K offers increased clock speeds and two more cores.

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

Performance

Thanks to the high Turbo Boost, the CPU is the fastest gaming CPU available at the time of announcement. Using all cores, the i9 however is slower than the top Ryzen CPUs (like the Ryzen 9 3950X) which offer more cores.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a similar performance as the UHD630 in the Core i7-9900K. As a  low-end solution it will only run current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 125 Watts (PL1) but under full load up to 250 Watt are consumed (PL2). In default mode these 250 Watt and therefore high clock speeds can be maintained for up to 56 seconds, however, all boards offer the option to alter these settings.

AMD E-350

► remove from comparison

The AMD E-350 (codename Zacate) is a dual core processor for small notebooks and netbooks. It offers a relatively powerful integrated graphics card and a single channel DDR3-1066 memory controller.

Inside the E-350 two Bobcat cores can access 512KB level 2 cache per core. In comparison to the Atom processors, the Bobcat architecture uses an "out-of-order" execution and is therefore faster at the same clock speed.

Performance

The average E-350 in our database is in the same league as the V120, E-450, E1-2500 and also the Celeron SU2300, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned.

The ThinkPad X121e as well as the ThinkPad X120e are among the fastest systems built around the E-350 that we know of.

The integrated Radeon HD 6310 graphics adapter offers 80 shaders and an UVD3 video processor. Compared to the slow GMA 3150 in the Atom processors, the HD6310 offers a lot more performance and is about as fast as the Nvidia ION graphics solution.

The power consumption is rated with a TDP of 18 Watt by AMD. According to first reviews of Brazos prototypes the power consumption was between 11 to 29 Watt. This would be on a level of a (much more powerful) 11" MacBook Air using Windows 7.

ModelIntel Core i9-10910AMD E-350
SeriesIntel Comet LakeAMD E-Series
CodenameComet Lake-SZacate
Series: E-Series Zacate
Intel Core i9-10850K compare3.6 - 5.2 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10910 « 3.6 - 5 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10320 compare3.8 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores7.9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10100 compare3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
AMD E2-2000 compare1.75 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-1800 compare1.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-450 compare1.65 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-350 « 1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E1-1500 compare1.48 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E1-1200 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-240 compare1.5 GHz1 / 1 cores
Clock3600 - 5000 MHz1600 MHz
L1 Cache640 KB
L2 Cache2.5 MB2 MB
L3 Cache20 MB
Cores / Threads10 / 202 / 2
TDP125 Watt18 Watt
Technology14 nm40 nm
max. Temp.100 °C90 °C
SocketLGA 1200FT1 (BGA413)
FeaturesTVB, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, Quick Sync, VirtualizationDDR3-1066/DDR3L-1066 RAM, PCIe 2 [?], MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630AMD Radeon HD 6310
Architecturex86x86
$488 U.S.
Announced
Die Size75 mm2
Manufacturerwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-10910
38.8 pt (54%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
501 Points (56%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
5196 Points (13%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2302 Points (15%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
215 Points (65%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
25.6 Points (33%)
min: 0.59     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (1%)     max: 0.62 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.4 Points (61%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
8131 Points (49%)
min: 1029     avg: 1048     median: 1048.5 (6%)     max: 1064 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
57842 Points (42%)
min: 1887     avg: 1997     median: 2005 (1%)     max: 2080 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 E-350 +
min: 2034     avg: 2182     median: 2195.5 (2%)     max: 2250 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 E-350 +
min: 1122     avg: 1140     median: 1140 (1%)     max: 1158 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 E-350 +
min: 2054     avg: 2130     median: 2093 (25%)     max: 2257 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 E-350 +
min: 64     avg: 68.7     median: 68.8 (14%)     max: 72.1 s
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
243.5 s (1%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
7.8 s (4%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
8613 Points (14%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
60747 MIPS (35%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5690 MIPS (68%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
16.8 fps (30%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
208 Seconds (1%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.5 sec (12%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 E-350 +
min: 985     avg: 1016     median: 1021 (2%)     max: 1033 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.6 s (2%)
min: 49     avg: 51.2     median: 50 (11%)     max: 61 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
16.8 s (1%)
min: 109     avg: 111.6     median: 112 (5%)     max: 115 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
432.5 s (2%)
min: 2410     avg: 2466     median: 2460 (11%)     max: 2539 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 E-350 +
min: 9290     avg: 9647     median: 9790 (5%)     max: 9860 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 E-350 +
min: 7490     avg: 7520     median: 7530 (6%)     max: 7540 MFLOPS
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 E-350 +
min: 3.7     avg: 3.8     median: 3.8 (49%)     max: 3.8 Points
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 E-350 +
min: 1818     avg: 1933     median: 1982 (2%)     max: 1998 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
18348 Points (50%)
min: 605     avg: 638     median: 609 (2%)     max: 690 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
25520 Points (46%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
11771 Points (50%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1381 Points (58%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
10244 Points (18%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
737 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
55976 Points (49%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
236 Points (49%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-10910 → 100% n=7

Average Benchmarks AMD E-350 → 43% n=7

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 04. 07:31:40

#0 checking url part for id 12832 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 1509 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720071100 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 12832 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#7 got single benchmarks 12832 +0.004s ... 0.016s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 1509 +0.001s ... 0.016s

#9 got single benchmarks 1509 +0.016s ... 0.033s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.033s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.02s ... 0.053s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.055s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)