Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i9-10880H vs Intel Core i5-1335U

Intel Core i9-10880H

► remove from comparison Intel i9-10880H

The Intel Core i9-10880H is a high-end processor for laptops with eight cores based on the Comet Lake architecture (CML-H, 4th generation of Skylake). The processor clocks at between 2.3 and probably around 4.9 GHz and can execute up to sixteen threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. The processor is still manufactured in the old 14nm (14nm++) process. Compared to the predecessor, the Core i9-9880H, the 10880H probably offers only increased clock rates.

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

Performance

The performance of the Core i9-10880H should be only slightly higher than the old Core i9-9880H. Thanks to the 8 cores and high Turbo speeds, even demanding applications should run very good on the CPU. However, long term performance is always depending on the laptop cooling system and system configuration. At the time of announcement, the i9-10880H is the second fastest Comet Lake-H CPU behind the Core i9-10980HK.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a similar performance as the UHD630 in the Core i7-9880H. As a  low-end solution it will only run current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 45 watts and therefore the i9 is only suited for big laptops with good cooling solutions. Using cTDP-down, the CPU can also be configured to 35 Watt resulting in a reduced performance.

According to our information, the Core i9-10880H was not released but split up into the Core i7-10875H and Core i9-10885H.

Beware, the CPU was not yet released at the time of writing and the information is based on leaks and early information.

Intel Core i5-1335U

► remove from comparison Intel i5-1335U

The Intel Core i5-1335U is a mid-range mobile CPU for thin and light laptops based on the Alder Lake architecture (Raptor Lake-U / RPL-U series). It was announced in early 2023 and offers 2  performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) and 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores support Hyper-Threading leading to 12 supported threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock rate ranges from 1.3 to 4.6 GHz on the performance cluster and 0.9 to 3.4 GHz on the efficient cluster. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 12 MB L3 cache. The CPU supports only "Essentials" vPro management features. Compared to the P-series (28W) or H-series (45W), the 15W TDP may limit the sustained performance.

Performance

Thanks to the similar clock speed, the Core i5-1335U is very similar to the older Core i7-1250U (+100 MHz P-Cores base clock rate). The faster i7 like the i7-1365U models offer only higher clock rates (and a faster iGPU).

Architecture

The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to LPDDR5-6400. The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficient cores for the best performance. For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC, and AV1 decode in hardware. The CPU still only supports PCIe 4.0 x8 for a GPU and two PCIe 4.0 x4 for SSDs.

The integrated graphics card is based on the Xe-architecture and offers 80 of the 96 EUs (Execution Units) operating at up to 1.25 GHz.

Power consumption

This Core i5 CPU is rated at a TDP of 15W (base power, PL1) and a maximum turbo power of 55W (PL2). The RPL-U processors are built in a further improved Intel 7 process (10nm SuperFin) that allows higher clock rates.

ModelIntel Core i9-10880HIntel Core i5-1335U
SeriesIntel Comet LakeIntel Raptor Lake-U
CodenameComet Lake-HRaptor Lake-U
Series: Raptor Lake-U Raptor Lake-U
Intel Core i9-10980HK compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10885M compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10885H compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10880H « 2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10875H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10870H compare2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10850H compare2.7 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10855M compare2.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10750H compare2.6 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10500H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400H compare2.6 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10300H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10200H compare2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1365U compare1.3 - 5.2 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1355U compare1.2 - 5 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1345U compare1.2 - 4.7 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1335U « 0.9 - 4.6 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1334U compare0.9 - 4.6 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1315U compare0.9 - 4.5 GHz6 / 8 cores10 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1305U compare1.2 - 4.5 GHz5 / 6 cores10 MB L3
Intel Processor U300 compare0.9 - 4.4 GHz5 / 6 cores8 MB L3
Clock2300 - 5100 MHz900 - 4600 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB928 KB
L2 Cache2 MB9.5 MB
L3 Cache16 MB12 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 1610 / 12
TDP45 Watt15 Watt
Technology14 nm10 nm
SocketFCBGA1440BGA1700
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIThread Director
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs ( - 1250 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
max. Temp.100 °C
Manufacturerwww.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-1335U
37.7 pt (52%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 6957     avg: 8383     median: 8889.5 (8%)     max: 9438 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1532     avg: 1669     median: 1684.5 (72%)     max: 1733 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 593     avg: 636     median: 643 (71%)     max: 663 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 2602     avg: 3257     median: 3343 (8%)     max: 3849 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1109     avg: 1411     median: 1464 (9%)     max: 1547 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 222     avg: 236.5     median: 238 (72%)     max: 248 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
18.9 Points (25%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3 Points (74%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
9351 Points (56%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
40266 Points (29%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
62930 Points (44%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
13680 Points (17%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
508 s (6%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
8 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
5178 Points (8%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 25012     avg: 33576     median: 34186 (20%)     max: 38513 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4872     avg: 5202     median: 5171 (62%)     max: 5545 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
81.8 fps (29%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
257 fps (59%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 6.55     avg: 9     median: 9.2 (16%)     max: 10.7 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.9 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.7 GB/s (29%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
9.5 GB/s (25%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 646     avg: 807     median: 804 (10%)     max: 1100 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 340     avg: 460.4     median: 409 (3%)     max: 786 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4892     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (11%)     max: 0.524 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
12286 Points (26%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.4 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
16.3 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
423.1 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 8341     avg: 12167     median: 12727 (34%)     max: 15080 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 6734     avg: 10580     median: 11760 (30%)     max: 12730 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 9926     avg: 16238     median: 17566 (31%)     max: 19968 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 4040     avg: 5523     median: 5589 (24%)     max: 6757 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 2236     avg: 2295     median: 2260 (61%)     max: 2379 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 6604     avg: 8168     median: 8597 (34%)     max: 9282 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1506     avg: 1639     median: 1669 (70%)     max: 1700 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5459     avg: 7429     median: 7856 (14%)     max: 8618 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1637     avg: 1642     median: 1641.5 (7%)     max: 1646 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 7984     avg: 8225     median: 8225 (26%)     max: 8466 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
7007 Points (70%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
30532 Points (34%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 545     avg: 671     median: 558 (1%)     max: 1914 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
64.5 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 71882     avg: 81575     median: 84497 (74%)     max: 85424 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 195.6     avg: 227.5     median: 231 (66%)     max: 238 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 212     avg: 255.3     median: 260 (54%)     max: 270 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1339     avg: 1442     median: 1450 (56%)     max: 1599 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 26.2     avg: 36.7     median: 36 (6%)     max: 56.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 29.6     avg: 44     median: 41.7 (8%)     max: 62.8 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 3.03     avg: 6.6     median: 5.9 (4%)     max: 12.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 4.5     avg: 6.3     median: 6 (7%)     max: 9.71 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 24.3     avg: 41.6     median: 43.1 (32%)     max: 57.5 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-1335U → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 01. 22:30:24

#0 checking url part for id 11871 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14916 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719865824 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 11871 +0.001s ... 0.007s

#7 got single benchmarks 11871 +0.003s ... 0.01s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14916 +0.005s ... 0.015s

#9 got single benchmarks 14916 +0.021s ... 0.036s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.036s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.034s ... 0.07s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.072s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)