Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-8500Y vs Intel Core i7-8550U vs Intel Core i5-8210Y

Intel Core i7-8500Y

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i7-8500Y is a very efficient dual-core SoC for tablets and passively cooled notebooks based on the Amber Lake generation and will be announced around August 2018. It is the fastest Amber Lake-Y CPU at the time of announcement and consists of two processor cores clocked at 1.5 - 4.2 GHz. Thanks to Hyper Threading, the processor can execute up to four threads simultaneously. The chips also includes the Intel HD Graphics 615 GPU, a dual-channel memory controller (DDR3L/LPDDR3) as well as VP9 and H.265 video de- and encoder. Compared to the Kaby Lake-Y predecessors (e.g. Core i7-7Y75), Amber Lake uses the same architecture produced in the improved 14nm+ FinFET process (no 14nm++) but offers higher clock speeds at an increased TDP rating.

Architecture

Intel basically used the familiar micro architecture from the Skylake / Kaby Lake generation, so the per-MHz performance is identical.

Performance

The performance of the Y series is highly depending on the cooling solution of the laptop / tablet and the TDP settings for sustained load. Therefore, the differences between a Core m3 and a i7 may be rather slim, if the thermals are very limited. The high Turbo clock speeds in Amber Lake should however lead to a very good single thread performance for short bursts.

Graphics

The integrated Intel HD Graphics 615 GPU has 24 Execution Units (EUs) like the old HD Graphics 515 and runs with clocks between 300 and 950 MHz in combination with this processor. The performance heavily depends on the TDP limit as well as the memory configuration; with fast LPDDR3-1866 RAM in dual-channel mode, the GPU should sometimes be able to compete with the HD Graphics 520, but can also be much slower in other scenarios. Modern games from 2016 will, if at all, only run smoothly in the lowest settings.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby Lake and Amber Lake now also supports hardware decoding for H.265/HEVC Main10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in the second generation 14 nm+ process with FinFET transistors. The typical TDP for the Amber Lake Y-series is specified at 5 Watts (previous generations were 4.5 Watt), and can be adjusted in both directions depending on the usage scenario.

Intel Core i7-8550U

► remove from comparison Intel i5-8550U

The Intel Core i7-8550U is a power efficient quad-core SoC for notebooks and Ultrabooks based on the Kaby Lake Refresh generation and was announced in August 2017. Contrary to its direct predecessors Core i7-7500U and i5-7260U, respectively, which were still dual-cores, the i7-8550U is equipped with four cores but at a lower base frequency of 1.8 GHz. The Turbo Boost is not specified yet, but should be at least 3.7 - 4 GHz and therefore also offer good short term single core speeds. The GPU is now named Intel UHD Graphics 620 but otherwise identical to the Intel HD Graphics 620. The integrated memory controller supports DDR4-2400 / LPDDR3-2133 and dual channel memory.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Skylake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. The manufacturer only reworked the Speed Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of voltages and clocks, and the improved 14nm process allows much higher frequencies combined with better efficiency than before.

Performance

The performance of the i7-8550U depends on the cooling solution of the laptop and the defined TDP limits for short and long term performance. This leads to big differences in our benchmark scores ranging from the 15 Watt reference by Intel up to the 23% higher score of the Inspiron 17-7773 in the Cinebench R15 Multi benchmark. Especially when taxing the CPU for longer periods, these differences can be even higher.

In our usual benchmarks, the average i7-8550U is as fast as the 35 Watt rated Core i5-7440HQ. For single thread performance, the high Turbo Boost frequency helps achieving one of the highest scores for mobile CPUs.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Intel Gen 9.5) is untouched from the 8th Gen Kaby Lake chips. With fast dual-channel memory it can reach the performance of a dedicated GeForce 920M.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby lake now also supports H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors announced in January should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in an improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors (14nm+), the same as the 7th Gen Kaby Lake processors. Intel still specifies the TDP with 15 Watts, which is typical for ULV chips. Depending on the usage scenario, the TDP can vary between 7.5 (cTDP Down) and 25 Watts.

Intel Core i5-8210Y

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i5-8210Y is a very efficient dual-core SoC for (passively) cooled notebooks based on the Amber Lake generation and was announced on 30th October 2018 with the new MacBook Air. The CPU consists of two processor cores clocked at 1.6 - 3.6 GHz and a TDP of 7 Watt. Thanks to Hyper Threading, the processor can execute up to four threads simultaneously. The chips also includes the Intel HD Graphics 617 GPU, a dual-channel memory controller (DDR3L/LPDDR3) as well as VP9 and H.265 video de- and encoder. Compared to the Kaby Lake-Y predecessors (e.g. Core i7-7Y75), Amber Lake uses the same architecture produced in the improved 14nm+ FinFET process (no 14nm++) but offers higher clock speeds at an increased TDP rating. The Core i5-8200Y is very similar when configured to 7 Watt (cTDP up) and offers even higher Turbo clocks, but a slightly slower GPU (-100 MHz).

Architecture

Intel basically used the familiar micro architecture from the Skylake / Kaby Lake generation, so the per-MHz performance is identical.

Performance

The performance of the Y series is highly depending on the cooling solution of the laptop / tablet and the TDP settings for sustained load. Therefore, the differences between a Core m3 and a i7 may be rather slim, if the thermals are very limited. The high Turbo clock speeds in Amber Lake should however lead to a very good single thread performance for short bursts.

Graphics

The integrated Intel HD Graphics 617 GPU has 24 Execution Units (EUs) like the old HD Graphics 515 and runs with clocks between 300 and 1050 MHz in combination with this processor. The performance heavily depends on the TDP limit as well as the memory configuration; with fast LPDDR3-1866 RAM in dual-channel mode, the GPU should sometimes be able to compete with the HD Graphics 520, but can also be much slower in other scenarios. Modern games from 2016 will, if at all, only run smoothly in the lowest settings.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby Lake and Amber Lake now also supports hardware decoding for H.265/HEVC Main10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in the 14 nm+ process with FinFET transistors. The typical TDP for the Amber Lake Y-series is specified at 5 Watts, but the i5-8210Y is specified at 7 Watt (for the MacBook Air).

ModelIntel Core i7-8500YIntel Core i7-8550UIntel Core i5-8210Y
SeriesIntel Amber LakeIntel Kaby Lake RefreshIntel Amber Lake
CodenameAmber Lake-YKaby Lake RefreshAmber Lake-Y
Series: Amber Lake Amber Lake-Y
Intel Core i5-10310Y1.1 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10210Y1 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8500Y « 1.5 - 4.2 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10110Y1 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8210Y1.6 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8200Y1.3 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10100Y1.3 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core m3-8100Y1.1 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 6500Y1.1 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8650U1.9 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8550U « 1.8 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8350U1.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8250U1.6 - 3.4 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8130U2.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4417U2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10310Y1.1 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10210Y1 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8500Y1.5 - 4.2 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10110Y1 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8210Y « 1.6 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8200Y1.3 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10100Y1.3 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core m3-8100Y1.1 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 6500Y1.1 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Clock1500 - 4200 MHz1800 - 4000 MHz1600 - 3600 MHz
L1 Cache128 KB256 KB128 KB
L2 Cache512 KB1 MB512 KB
L3 Cache4 MB8 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 44 / 82 / 4
TDP5 Watt15 Watt7 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketBGABGA1356BGA
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR3L-1600/LPDDR3-1866 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI, vPro, TXTDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIDual-Channel DDR3L-1600/LPDDR3-2133 Memory Controller (16 GB max), HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI, vPro, TXT
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 615 (300 - 1000 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 620 (300 - 1150 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 617 (300 - 1050 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
$409 U.S.$281 U.S.
Manufacturerark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-8500Y
24.6 pt (34%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-8550U
28.1 pt (39%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-8210Y
23.4 pt (32%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
2914 Points (3%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1021 Points (43%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 304     avg: 312     median: 312 (35%)     max: 320 Points
min: 383     avg: 388.5     median: 388.5 (43%)     max: 394 Points
312 Points (35%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 584     avg: 588     median: 587.5 (1%)     max: 591 Points
min: 1118     avg: 1128     median: 1128 (3%)     max: 1138 Points
601 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 245     avg: 252.3     median: 246.5 (2%)     max: 271 Points
min: 301     avg: 576     median: 553 (3%)     max: 761 Points
min: 254     avg: 269.5     median: 269.5 (2%)     max: 285 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 126     avg: 129.8     median: 130.5 (39%)     max: 132 Points
min: 108     avg: 159.5     median: 163 (49%)     max: 172 Points
min: 127     avg: 129.5     median: 129.5 (39%)     max: 132 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2.45     avg: 2.5     median: 2.5 (3%)     max: 2.53 Points
min: 4.38     avg: 6.3     median: 6.1 (8%)     max: 8.56 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 1.43     avg: 1.5     median: 1.5 (36%)     max: 1.47 Points
min: 1.43     avg: 1.8     median: 1.9 (47%)     max: 1.95 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 4898     avg: 5027     median: 5027 (30%)     max: 5156 Points
min: 4202     avg: 6333     median: 6423 (39%)     max: 8211 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 8493     avg: 8706     median: 8706 (6%)     max: 8919 Points
min: 11694     avg: 17867     median: 17321.5 (13%)     max: 24180 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 12279     avg: 23153     median: 22717 (16%)     max: 31667 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 6737     avg: 8065     median: 8370.5 (10%)     max: 8436 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
673 s (8%)
min: 257.5     avg: 352     median: 366.7 (4%)     max: 435 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
15.5 s (3%)
min: 7.047     avg: 9.8     median: 9.9 (2%)     max: 12.7 s
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
847 s (3%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
26.3 s (14%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
2483 Points (4%)
min: 3847     avg: 4487     median: 4374 (7%)     max: 5287 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 7982     avg: 10709     median: 10709 (6%)     max: 13436 MIPS
15613 MIPS (9%)
7936 MIPS (5%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 3568     avg: 4368     median: 4367.5 (52%)     max: 5167 MIPS
4337 MIPS (52%)
3405 MIPS (41%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
14.1 fps (5%)
min: 32     avg: 35.3     median: 33.1 (12%)     max: 41 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
83.3 fps (19%)
min: 143.6     avg: 153.9     median: 147.9 (34%)     max: 178 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
2.1 fps (4%)
min: 3.77     avg: 4     median: 3.9 (7%)     max: 4.43 fps
2.3 fps (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.2 GB/s (0%)
min: 0.357     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (0%)     max: 0.469 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.4 GB/s (6%)
min: 0.583     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (13%)     max: 0.793 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
2.2 GB/s (6%)
min: 3.3     avg: 4.2     median: 4.3 (11%)     max: 4.6 GB/s
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 1772     avg: 1966     median: 1965.5 (14%)     max: 2159 Seconds
min: 841     avg: 897     median: 913 (6%)     max: 937 Seconds
1680 Seconds (12%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.7 sec (15%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 3015     avg: 3056     median: 3056 (7%)     max: 3097 Points
3544 Points (8%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
9.3 s (2%)
min: 9     avg: 10.5     median: 9.3 (2%)     max: 17.45 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
22.4 s (1%)
min: 20     avg: 23     median: 21.2 (1%)     max: 32.72 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
657 s (3%)
min: 510     avg: 575     median: 536 (2%)     max: 740 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
8123 Points (7%)
21623 Points (19%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 2942     avg: 3242     median: 3254.5 (9%)     max: 3516 Points
min: 3961     avg: 6653     median: 6649 (18%)     max: 9527 Points
min: 3311     avg: 3571     median: 3571 (10%)     max: 3831 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 25064     avg: 29890     median: 28391 (23%)     max: 36216 Points
min: 16314     avg: 42803     median: 44682 (36%)     max: 55226 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 26981     avg: 31559     median: 31558.5 (26%)     max: 36136 Points
min: 16312     avg: 37536     median: 36876 (30%)     max: 51937 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 35630     avg: 38017     median: 38016.5 (32%)     max: 40403 Points
min: 27917     avg: 50269     median: 52842 (45%)     max: 58213 Points
17419 Points (15%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 2260     avg: 2753     median: 2896 (7%)     max: 2959 Points
min: 3437     avg: 5739     median: 5695 (14%)     max: 7725 Points
2252 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 3308     avg: 3993     median: 4201 (7%)     max: 4261 Points
min: 3961     avg: 8228     median: 8306 (15%)     max: 11110 Points
min: 3028     avg: 3110     median: 3110 (6%)     max: 3192 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 1204     avg: 1292     median: 1240 (5%)     max: 1431 Points
min: 2463     avg: 2898     median: 2875 (12%)     max: 3865 Points
min: 1194     avg: 1205     median: 1204.5 (5%)     max: 1215 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
858 Points (4%)
1081 Points (5%)
660 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
1504 Points (5%)
3141 Points (10%)
1433 Points (5%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3910     avg: 4398     median: 4397.5 (44%)     max: 4885 Points
min: 4555     avg: 4858     median: 4900 (49%)     max: 4997 Points
4162 Points (42%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6223     avg: 7224     median: 7224 (8%)     max: 8225 Points
min: 10869     avg: 14247     median: 15117 (17%)     max: 16294 Points
7474 Points (8%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4439     avg: 4686     median: 4699 (64%)     max: 4858 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 10747     avg: 13316     median: 13251 (32%)     max: 15294 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
5614 Points (10%)
min: 8918     avg: 12315     median: 12327.5 (22%)     max: 14144 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
3245 Points (63%)
min: 2471     avg: 3671     median: 3770 (74%)     max: 4020 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11637     avg: 12834     median: 12833.5 (20%)     max: 14030 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3784     avg: 3949     median: 3948.5 (59%)     max: 4113 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1281     avg: 1499     median: 1446 (2%)     max: 1822 ms
min: 877     avg: 1087     median: 1107 (1%)     max: 2114 ms
min: 817     avg: 906     median: 906 (1%)     max: 995 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 63.2     avg: 80.3     median: 71.3 (1%)     max: 122.7 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 22283     avg: 24377     median: 24631.5 (22%)     max: 25962 Points
min: 17296     avg: 33448     median: 33496 (29%)     max: 42043 Points
min: 29470     avg: 33003     median: 33003 (29%)     max: 36536 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
182 Points (38%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 25.3     avg: 40.1     median: 33.7 (6%)     max: 61.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 28.2     avg: 38.1     median: 30.4 (6%)     max: 63.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 10.4     avg: 15.6     median: 17.3 (13%)     max: 17.5 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-8500Y → 100% n=20

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-8550U → 163% n=20

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-8210Y → 95% n=20

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 04. 17:02:03

#0 checking url part for id 10088 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9208 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 10886 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720105323 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 10088 +0.004s ... 0.01s

#8 got single benchmarks 10088 +0.008s ... 0.018s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 9208 +0.004s ... 0.022s

#10 got single benchmarks 9208 +0.072s ... 0.094s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 10886 +0.003s ... 0.097s

#12 got single benchmarks 10886 +0.004s ... 0.101s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.101s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.069s ... 0.171s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.171s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)