Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-14700HX vs Intel Core Ultra 7 155H vs Intel Core i9-14900HX

Intel Core i7-14700HX

► remove from comparison Intel i7-14700HX

The Intel Core i7-14700HX is a high-end CPU based on the new Raptor Lake architecture for large and heavy notebooks. The CPU was introduced at the beginning of 2024 as part of the Raptor Lake HX refresh. The i7-14700HX is similar to the Core i7-13850HX with slightly higher clocked CPU cores.

The total of 28 threads are divided into P-cores and E-cores, which we already know from Alder Lake. The 13700HX offers 8 performance cores (P-cores) with hyperthreading and 12 efficiency cores (E-cores) without hyperthreading. A total of 28 threads are therefore supported. The P-cores clock at up to 5.5 GHz (single core) and the E-cores up to 3.9 GHz. The integrated memory controller supports a maximum of DDR5 with 5600 MHz.

Compared to Alder Lake, the new Raptor Lake architecture offers improved P-cores (Raptor Cove architecture with more cache), more E-cores (same Gracemont architecture) and higher clock rates thanks to the improved Intel 7 process. Furthermore, Intel now supports faster DDR5 main memory (up to 5600 MHz) in the top models.

The 13700HX is manufactured in the older 10nm FinFET process at Intel (Intel 7 process) and is specified with 55 watts base power and 157 watts turbo power.

Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 7 155H

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H is a high-end laptop processor of the Meteor Lake series that has 16 cores (6 + 8 + 2) and 22 threads at its disposal. This 1st Gen Core Ultra chip has come to replace 13th generation Core chips; its 16 cores are comprised of 6 HT-enabled Performance cores running at up to 4.8 GHz and 10 Efficient cores (8 main cores plus 2 extra ones found in the Low Power Island) running at up to 3.8 GHz.

The 8-core Arc GPU, just out of the oven, serves as the integrated graphics adapter - this runs at up to 2.30 GHz - and there is a bevy of other brand-new technologies on offer as well, including the integrated AI Boost NPU with two Gen 3 engines for hardware AI workload acceleration.

Architecture and Features

With Meteor Lake, Intel intends to deliver higher CPU performance, higher GPU performance and at the same time, longer battery life than what Raptor Lake chips were capable of. The company also wants a large piece of the AI cake and is working with Microsoft and other partners to make that happen. As a result, Windows Defender is now AI-enabled, meaning it can use the Intel NPU to take some of the load off the main CPU cores. We also get this new Intel Device Discovery technology that is designed to give us a better hardware-based remote laptop management than ever before; and, to make things even better, Intel now offers a dedicated Arc Pro graphics driver for workstations.

This generation of Intel Core processors features Redwood architecture P-cores and Crestwood architecture E-cores. Both come with slight architectural improvements over Raptor Cove and Gracemont respectively for slightly higher performance-per-clock figures; the interesting thing is that of the 10 E-cores, two are actually a separate cluster located on what Intel calls a "Low Power Island". Essentially, the latter is an SoC within an SoC that can stay active while most other parts of the chip are temporarily switched off to save power. The low-power E-cores run at up to 2.5 GHz. Intel hopes this approach will let it deliver unprecedentedly low power consumption figures when under low load, boosting battery life of laptops and tablets powered by Meteor Lake.

To build its Meteor Lake processors, Intel uses the Foveros technology (stacking several chips on top of each other). This is a cost-cutting measure more than anything else, as manufacturing several small dies on several different processes is so much cheaper than making a huge single die and hoping that there are no defects in it that will require disabling some parts of it.

Elsewhere, the Core Ultra 7 155H comes with 24 MB of L3 cache and a very healthy number of PCIe 5 and PCIe 4 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 15.7 GB/s. It supports RAM running at up to 7467 MHz (DDR5-5600, LPDDR5-7467, LPDDR5x-7467, to be specific - which is about as good as what 8040 series Ryzen chips have). Naturally, the chip features built-in Thunderbolt 4 support and Intel CNVi Wi-Fi support; fascinatingly enough, Intel chose to keep native SATA III support that AMD had removed from its Ryzen processors quite a while ago.

The 155H is compatible with 64-bit Windows 10, 64-bit Windows 11 and with many Linux distros.

Performance

If one chooses to trust the official performance data published by Intel, then the 155H is about as fast as the Ryzen 9 6900HX (Zen 3 Plus, 8 cores, 16 threads, up to 4.9 GHz), as far as multi-thread performance is concerned. This isn't a ground-breaking result but let's just wait for our in-house testing results instead of jumping to conclusions.

Either way, real-world performance of the chip may vary significantly depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of the system is.

Graphics

The 8-core Arc GPU running at up to 2.30 GHz is slated to be a proper alternative to the mighty Radeon 780M. The thing is almost as fast as the GTX 1650 (Laptop) and the RTX 2050 (Laptop) to represent some seriously solid performance gains over aging Xe-series integrated GPUs. If one chooses to take Intel's word for it, that is.

A proper DX12 Ultimate graphics adapter, the Arc is no stranger to ray tracing and other modern technologies including AI frame generation (XeSS). It will let you connect up to four SUHD 4320p monitors and it will both HW-encode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs including AVC, HEVC and AV1 in a fast and efficient manner.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is. The latter is really important; Intel stresses that for the Arc to deliver the best results possible, multi-channel RAM configuration is a must.

Power consumption

This mighty Core Ultra 7 series processor has a Base power consumption of 28 W, while its Turbo power consumption is not supposed to exceed 115 W. Its Base power consumption is supposed to be around 64 W, however, most laptop makers will probably go for a higher value to get higher clock speeds and thus better performance. Either way, a powerful cooling solution will be needed to sort out this chip's hot temper.

The 155H is comprised of five small chips ("tiles") that are connected using Intel's Foveros technology. The tile containing main CPU cores is produced on the fairly modern 7 nm Intel process marketed as Intel 4 while most other tiles (the iGPU, the I/O die, ...) are built with TSMC's N5 and N6 processes. The base tile is built with the old Intel 22FFL process.

Intel Core i9-14900HX

► remove from comparison Intel i9-14900HX

The Intel Core i9-14900HX is a high-end CPU based on the Raptor Lake architecture for large and heavy notebooks. The CPU was introduced at the beginning of 2024 and is a slightly higher clocked variant of the older Core i9-13980HX.

The total of 32 threads are divided into P-cores and E-cores, which we already know from Alder-Lake. Here, 8 performance cores (P-cores) with hyperthreading are used and 16 efficiency cores, so that a total of 32 threads can be processed simultaneously. The P-cores clock from 2.2 GHz (base clock) to 5.8 GHz (single-core turbo) and the E-cores from 1.6 GHz to 4.1 GHz.

Performance

Due to the slightly higher maximum clock rates, the single-core performance of the 14900HX in particular increases slightly compared to the 13980HX. Compared to AMD's top model, the Ryzen 9 7945HX or 7945HX3D the 14900HX comes in just behind (on average in our benchmarks). However, the performance depends on the benchmark and the cooling and is usually very comparable.

Graphics

Like the Intel Core i9-12900HX, the Intel Core i9-14900HX offers an integrated graphics unit. The Intel Iris XE architecture continues to serve as the basis. In terms of performance, however, not much has changed with the Intel UHD Graphics 770.

The 14900HX is manufactured on the improved 10nm FinFET process at Intel (Intel 7 process) and is specified with 55 watts of base power and 157 watts of turbo power.

ModelIntel Core i7-14700HXIntel Core Ultra 7 155HIntel Core i9-14900HX
SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-HXIntel Meteor Lake-HIntel Raptor Lake-HX
CodenameRaptor Lake-HX RefreshMeteor Lake-HRaptor Lake-HX Refresh
Series: Raptor Lake-HX Raptor Lake-HX Refresh
Intel Core i9-14900HX1.6 - 5.8 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-14700HX « 3.9 - 5.5 GHz20 / 28 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i7-14650HX1.6 - 5.2 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14500HX1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14450HX1.8 - 4.8 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H3.8 - 5.1 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H3.8 - 5 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H « 3.8 - 4.8 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H3.6 - 4.6 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H3.6 - 4.5 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i9-14900HX « 1.6 - 5.8 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-14700HX3.9 - 5.5 GHz20 / 28 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i7-14650HX1.6 - 5.2 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14500HX1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14450HX1.8 - 4.8 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Clock3900 - 5500 MHz3800 - 4800 MHz1600 - 5800 MHz
L2 Cache24 MB32 MB
L3 Cache30 MB24 MB36 MB
Cores / Threads20 / 28
8 x 5.5 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
12 x 3.9 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
16 / 22
6 x 4.8 GHz Intel Redwood Cove P-Core
8 x 3.8 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
2 x 2.5 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
24 / 32
8 x 5.8 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
16 x 4.1 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
TDP55 Watt28 Watt55 Watt
TDP Turbo PL2157 Watt157 Watt
Technology10 nm7 nm10 nm
Die Size257 mm2257 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C110 °C100 °C
SocketBGA1964BGA2049BGA1964
FeaturesDDR4-3200/DDR5-5600 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, GNA, vPro Enter., MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR5-5600/LPDDR5-7467/LPDDR5x-7467 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, AI Boost, vPro Ess., MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNI, FMA3, SHADDR4-3200/DDR5-5600 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Dir., DL B., GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 770 ( - 1600 MHz)Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ( - 2250 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) ( - 1650 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-14700HX
51.4 pt (71%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ultra 7 155H
42 pt (58%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-14900HX
55.4 pt (77%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 100.6     avg: 113.1     median: 113.1 (79%)     max: 125.5 Points
min: 2.2     avg: 88.6     median: 102.5 (71%)     max: 107.2 Points
min: 120.1     avg: 128.1     median: 129.7 (90%)     max: 131.7 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 1003     avg: 1181     median: 1180.5 (22%)     max: 1358 Points
min: 6.94     avg: 718     median: 752 (14%)     max: 1024 Points
min: 1107     avg: 1634     median: 1718 (32%)     max: 2071 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 23207     avg: 25028     median: 24595 (23%)     max: 28122 Points
min: 9769     avg: 14809     median: 14712.5 (14%)     max: 19007 Points
min: 20702     avg: 29638     median: 30560 (28%)     max: 36249 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1702     avg: 1962     median: 2103 (89%)     max: 2144 Points
min: 1496     avg: 1722     median: 1745.5 (74%)     max: 1801 Points
min: 1720     avg: 2160     median: 2194 (93%)     max: 2235 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 651     avg: 751     median: 803 (89%)     max: 821 Points
min: 611     avg: 666     median: 670.5 (75%)     max: 693 Points
min: 657     avg: 827     median: 836.5 (93%)     max: 859 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 8361     avg: 9299     median: 9244 (23%)     max: 10498 Points
min: 3798     avg: 5736     median: 5645.5 (14%)     max: 7409 Points
min: 8427     avg: 11271     median: 11619 (28%)     max: 13832 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 3455     avg: 3801     median: 3812 (24%)     max: 4137 Points
min: 1932     avg: 2426     median: 2428.5 (15%)     max: 2857.55 Points
min: 3263     avg: 4503     median: 4611 (29%)     max: 5589 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 238     avg: 276     median: 294 (89%)     max: 304 Points
min: 99.6     avg: 248.4     median: 255 (77%)     max: 268 Points
min: 247     avg: 306.7     median: 311 (94%)     max: 320 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
10.4 Points (14%)
min: 29.98     avg: 31.7     median: 31.7 (41%)     max: 33.49 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.6 Points (90%)
min: 3.07     avg: 3.1     median: 3.1 (77%)     max: 3.13 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
11767 Points (71%)
min: 9828     avg: 9874     median: 9873.5 (60%)     max: 9919 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
68172 Points (49%)
min: 56242     avg: 58357     median: 58357 (42%)     max: 60472 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 13726     avg: 54366     median: 54365.5 (38%)     max: 95005 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 13938     avg: 48020     median: 48020 (58%)     max: 82102 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
409.9 s (5%)
139.6 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
2.7 s (1%)
3.5 s (1%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
482 s (2%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
3.4 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
10202 Points (16%)
min: 7084     avg: 7404     median: 7403.5 (12%)     max: 7723 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 84799     avg: 96226     median: 98097 (56%)     max: 104730 MIPS
min: 42601     avg: 58514     median: 59879.5 (34%)     max: 70074 MIPS
min: 87555     avg: 115052     median: 119352 (69%)     max: 136645 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5641     avg: 6466     median: 6890 (82%)     max: 7041 MIPS
min: 5037     avg: 5343     median: 5398 (65%)     max: 5540 MIPS
min: 5452     avg: 7066     median: 7210.5 (86%)     max: 7508 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
177.1 fps (62%)
min: 128.04     avg: 141.1     median: 141.1 (49%)     max: 154.15 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
365.2 fps (84%)
min: 282.57     avg: 303.8     median: 303.8 (70%)     max: 325 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 22     avg: 25.3     median: 25.5 (45%)     max: 27.4 fps
min: 9.93     avg: 16.3     median: 16.3 (29%)     max: 21.2 fps
min: 22.7     avg: 30.2     median: 30.8 (54%)     max: 38.9 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
2.2 GB/s (0%)
min: 0.944     avg: 1     median: 1 (0%)     max: 1 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
4.1 GB/s (71%)
1.7 GB/s (29%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
19.3 GB/s (50%)
min: 10.2     avg: 10.4     median: 10.4 (27%)     max: 10.6 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 228     avg: 251     median: 240 (3%)     max: 312 Seconds
min: 296     avg: 423.2     median: 398 (5%)     max: 637 Seconds
min: 155     avg: 205.7     median: 195 (2%)     max: 298 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 126     avg: 152     median: 140 (1%)     max: 184 Seconds
min: 178     avg: 236.2     median: 226 (2%)     max: 349 Seconds
min: 91     avg: 116.4     median: 110.5 (1%)     max: 164 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.3821     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4896 sec
min: 0.4609     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.526 sec
min: 0.3609     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (8%)     max: 0.4859 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
18104 Points (39%)
13097 Points (28%)
min: 19451     avg: 20120     median: 20119.5 (43%)     max: 20788 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
6 s (1%)
min: 7.046     avg: 7.1     median: 7.1 (2%)     max: 7.168 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
13.1 s (1%)
min: 15.767     avg: 16     median: 15.9 (1%)     max: 16.125 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
310.6 s (1%)
min: 394.754     avg: 397.5     median: 397.5 (2%)     max: 400.292 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 62245     avg: 68433     median: 68432.5 (60%)     max: 74620 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 23059     avg: 24395     median: 23642.5 (64%)     max: 27236 Points
min: 6531     avg: 17980     median: 19912 (54%)     max: 23598 Points
min: 16205     avg: 23670     median: 24087 (65%)     max: 29134 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 53255     avg: 72535     median: 74001.5 (60%)     max: 85435 Points
92919 Points (76%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
66925 Points (54%)
94249 Points (76%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
94081 Points (79%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
22970 Points (58%)
min: 7073     avg: 15232     median: 16405 (42%)     max: 19549 Points
min: 16565     avg: 21097     median: 22021 (56%)     max: 24768 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 33286     avg: 35827     median: 35140 (63%)     max: 40672 Points
min: 5249     avg: 22143     median: 23177 (41%)     max: 28337 Points
min: 32683     avg: 39028     median: 38887 (69%)     max: 46710 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 16109     avg: 16665     median: 16262 (69%)     max: 18028 Points
min: 3922     avg: 8632     median: 9311.5 (39%)     max: 12145 Points
min: 13797     avg: 16800     median: 16908 (71%)     max: 18847 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 2378     avg: 2724     median: 2884 (78%)     max: 2975 Points
min: 1901     avg: 2381     median: 2412 (65%)     max: 2459 Points
min: 2419     avg: 2982     median: 3028.5 (82%)     max: 3129 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 14807     avg: 16432     median: 17292 (68%)     max: 17562 Points
min: 7732     avg: 12305     median: 12508 (49%)     max: 13656 Points
min: 15849     avg: 17715     median: 17918.5 (71%)     max: 19665 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1700     avg: 1954     median: 2080 (88%)     max: 2133 Points
min: 1462     avg: 1756     median: 1766 (75%)     max: 1824 Points
min: 1669     avg: 2095     median: 2128.5 (90%)     max: 2210 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 16732     avg: 18072     median: 18225 (33%)     max: 19597 Points
min: 10017     avg: 12023     median: 12218.5 (22%)     max: 13556 Points
min: 8618     avg: 19814     median: 20450 (37%)     max: 23194 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1987 Points (9%)
min: 1684     avg: 1712     median: 1708 (7%)     max: 1745 Points
min: 2090     avg: 2104     median: 2103.5 (9%)     max: 2117 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
17958 Points (57%)
min: 11684     avg: 12163     median: 12366 (39%)     max: 12438 Points
min: 19253     avg: 21215     median: 21214.5 (67%)     max: 23176 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
8945 Points (89%)
min: 6838     avg: 6883     median: 6882.5 (69%)     max: 6927 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
67087 Points (74%)
min: 43897     avg: 44574     median: 44573.5 (49%)     max: 45250 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 447     avg: 485.3     median: 467 (1%)     max: 542 ms
min: 416.4     avg: 537     median: 535 (1%)     max: 642 ms
min: 428     avg: 447.2     median: 443 (1%)     max: 535 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 89858     avg: 98657     median: 98656.5 (87%)     max: 107455 Points
min: 77142     avg: 87778     median: 89268 (78%)     max: 93476 Points
min: 106992     avg: 109933     median: 109745 (96%)     max: 113875 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 251     avg: 277     median: 273 (78%)     max: 307 Points
min: 236     avg: 253.7     median: 255.5 (73%)     max: 263 Points
min: 246     avg: 298.4     median: 302.5 (87%)     max: 316 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 276     avg: 300     median: 301 (63%)     max: 323 Points
min: 213     avg: 277.2     median: 278 (58%)     max: 299 Points
min: 279     avg: 327.5     median: 328.5 (68%)     max: 345 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1923     avg: 2097     median: 2132 (82%)     max: 2235 Points
min: 1366     avg: 1662     median: 1682.5 (64%)     max: 1903 Points
min: 1877     avg: 2157     median: 2183 (84%)     max: 2344 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 101.3     avg: 142.1     median: 150 (26%)     max: 175 Watt
min: 37.1     avg: 71.3     median: 65.9 (11%)     max: 168 Watt
min: 89.1     avg: 176.6     median: 180 (31%)     max: 318 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
243 Watt (44%)
min: 46.9     avg: 91     median: 87.9 (16%)     max: 160.1 Watt
min: 185     avg: 239.1     median: 240.4 (44%)     max: 301 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 22.6     avg: 25.1     median: 26 (17%)     max: 26.6 Watt
min: 3.12     avg: 6.6     median: 5.5 (4%)     max: 19.6 Watt
min: 14.8     avg: 23.8     median: 22.4 (15%)     max: 34.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 15.4     avg: 19.5     median: 16.4 (18%)     max: 26.8 Watt
min: 4.35     avg: 11     median: 7.5 (8%)     max: 90.3 Watt
min: 13.5     avg: 19.4     median: 18.1 (20%)     max: 35.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
17 Points per Watt (13%)
min: 17.7     avg: 31.8     median: 29.1 (22%)     max: 64.7 Points per Watt
min: 16     avg: 19.9     median: 20 (15%)     max: 24.1 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-14700HX → 100% n=30

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 7 155H → 79% n=30

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-14900HX → 110% n=30

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 01. 23:19:32

#0 checking url part for id 17168 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 16906 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 17163 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719868772 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.008s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 17168 +0.004s ... 0.012s

#8 got single benchmarks 17168 +0.009s ... 0.021s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 16906 +0.004s ... 0.025s

#10 got single benchmarks 16906 +0.012s ... 0.037s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 17163 +0.004s ... 0.041s

#12 got single benchmarks 17163 +0.032s ... 0.073s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.073s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.08s ... 0.153s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.153s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)