Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-14700HX vs Intel Core Ultra 5 125H

Intel Core i7-14700HX

► remove from comparison Intel i7-14700HX

The Intel Core i7-14700HX is a high-end CPU based on the new Raptor Lake architecture for large and heavy notebooks. The CPU was introduced at the beginning of 2024 as part of the Raptor Lake HX refresh. The i7-14700HX is similar to the Core i7-13850HX with slightly higher clocked CPU cores.

The total of 28 threads are divided into P-cores and E-cores, which we already know from Alder Lake. The 13700HX offers 8 performance cores (P-cores) with hyperthreading and 12 efficiency cores (E-cores) without hyperthreading. A total of 28 threads are therefore supported. The P-cores clock at up to 5.5 GHz (single core) and the E-cores up to 3.9 GHz. The integrated memory controller supports a maximum of DDR5 with 5600 MHz.

Compared to Alder Lake, the new Raptor Lake architecture offers improved P-cores (Raptor Cove architecture with more cache), more E-cores (same Gracemont architecture) and higher clock rates thanks to the improved Intel 7 process. Furthermore, Intel now supports faster DDR5 main memory (up to 5600 MHz) in the top models.

The 13700HX is manufactured in the older 10nm FinFET process at Intel (Intel 7 process) and is specified with 55 watts base power and 157 watts turbo power.

Intel Core Ultra 5 125H

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 5 125H

The Intel Core Ultra 5 125H is a mid-range Meteor Lake family chip that debuted in December 2023. This 1st Gen Core Ultra processor has come to replace 13th generation Core chips; it has 14 cores (4 + 8 + 2) and 18 threads at its disposal. Its Performance cores, of which there are 4, are HT-enabled and run at up to 4.5 GHz while its Efficient cores, of which there are 10 (8 main cores plus 2 extra ones found in the Low Power Island), run at up to 3.6 GHz. The 7-core Arc GPU, just out of the oven, serves as the integrated graphics adapter - this runs at up to 2.20 GHz - and there is a bevy of other brand-new technologies on offer as well, including the integrated AI Boost NPU with two Gen 3 engines for hardware AI workload acceleration.

Architecture and Features

With Meteor Lake, Intel intends to deliver higher CPU performance, higher GPU performance and at the same time, longer battery life than what Raptor Lake chips were capable of. The company also wants a large piece of the AI cake and is working with Microsoft and other partners to make that happen. As a result, Windows Defender is now AI-enabled, meaning it can use the Intel NPU to take some of the load off the main CPU cores. We also get this new Intel Device Discovery technology that is designed to give us a better hardware-based remote laptop management than ever before; and, to make things even better, Intel now offers a dedicated Arc Pro graphics driver for workstations.

This generation of Intel Core processors features Redwood architecture P-cores and Crestwood architecture E-cores. Both come with slight architectural improvements over Raptor Cove and Gracemont respectively for slightly higher performance-per-clock figures; the interesting thing is that of the 10 E-cores, two are actually a separate cluster located on what Intel calls a "Low Power Island". Essentially, the latter is an SoC within an SoC that can stay active while most other parts of the chip are temporarily switched off to save power. The low-power E-cores run at up to 2.5 GHz. Intel hopes this approach will let it deliver unprecedentedly low power consumption figures when under low load, boosting battery life of laptops and tablets powered by Meteor Lake.

To build its Meteor Lake processors, Intel uses the Foveros technology (stacking several chips on top of each other). This is a cost-cutting measure more than anything else, as manufacturing several small dies on several different processes is so much cheaper than making a huge single die and hoping that there are no defects in it that will require disabling some parts of it.

Elsewhere, the Core Ultra 5 125H comes with 18 MB of L3 cache which is a significant reduction compared to the 24 MB that the 155H, the 165H and the 185H have. The processor has a very healthy number of PCIe 5 and PCIe 4 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 15.7 GB/s; it supports RAM running at up to 7467 MHz (DDR5-5600, LPDDR5-7467, LPDDR5x-7467, to be specific - which is about as good as what 8040 series Ryzen chips have). Naturally, the 125H features built-in Thunderbolt 4 support and Intel CNVi Wi-Fi support. It is also worth mentioning that Intel chose to keep native SATA III support that AMD had removed from its Ryzen processors quite a while ago.

The 125H is compatible with 64-bit Windows 10, 64-bit Windows 11 and with many Linux distros.

Performance

While we have no way of knowing what the 125H will be like, as of December 2023, it's safe to expect the chip to be slightly slower than the Ryzen 7 7735HS (Zen 3 Plus, 8 cores, 16 threads, up to 4.75 GHz), as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Either way, real-world performance of the chip may vary significantly depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of the system is.

Graphics

The 7-core Arc GPU running at up to 2.20 GHz is set to overshadow the Radeon 760M; just like the 8-core Arc GPU, this graphics adapter is set to be miles ahead of the aging Xe-series integrated GPUs. As long as one chooses to take Intel's word for it, that is.

A proper DX12 Ultimate graphics adapter, the Arc is no stranger to ray tracing and other modern technologies including AI frame generation (XeSS). It will let you connect up to four SUHD 4320p monitors and it will both HW-encode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs including AVC, HEVC and AV1 in a fast and efficient manner.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is. The latter is really important; Intel stresses that for the Arc to deliver the best results possible, multi-channel RAM configuration is a must.

Power consumption

The Base power consumption, in the case of the 125H, is 28 W while its maximum Turbo power consumption is supposed to be within 115 W. A powerful cooling solution is a must for any system powered by this chip.

This Core Ultra 5 series processor is comprised of five small chips ("tiles") that are connected using Intel's Foveros technology. The tile containing main CPU cores is produced on the fairly modern 7 nm Intel process marketed as Intel 4 while most other tiles (the iGPU, the I/O die, ...) are built with TSMC's N5 and N6 processes. The base tile is built with the old Intel 22FFL process.

ModelIntel Core i7-14700HXIntel Core Ultra 5 125H
SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-HXIntel Meteor Lake-H
CodenameRaptor Lake-HX RefreshMeteor Lake-H
Series: Meteor Lake-H Meteor Lake-H
Intel Core i9-14900HX compare1.6 - 5.8 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-14700HX « 3.9 - 5.5 GHz20 / 28 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i7-14650HX compare1.6 - 5.2 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14500HX compare1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14450HX compare1.8 - 4.8 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H compare3.8 - 5 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H compare3.8 - 4.8 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H compare3.6 - 4.6 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H « 3.6 - 4.5 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Clock3900 - 5500 MHz3600 - 4500 MHz
L2 Cache24 MB
L3 Cache30 MB18 MB
Cores / Threads20 / 28
8 x 5.5 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
12 x 3.9 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
14 / 18
4 x 4.5 GHz Intel Redwood Cove P-Core
8 x 3.6 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
2 x 2.5 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
TDP55 Watt28 Watt
TDP Turbo PL2157 Watt
Technology10 nm7 nm
Die Size257 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C110 °C
SocketBGA1964BGA2049
FeaturesDDR4-3200/DDR5-5600 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, GNA, vPro Enter., MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR5-5600/LPDDR5-7467/LPDDR5x-7467 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, AI Boost, vPro Essen., MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNI, FMA3, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 770 ( - 1600 MHz)Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU ( - 2200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-14700HX
51.4 pt (71%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 100.6     avg: 113.1     median: 113.1 (79%)     max: 125.5 Points
100 Points (69%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 1003     avg: 1181     median: 1180.5 (22%)     max: 1358 Points
min: 331     avg: 447.5     median: 447.5 (8%)     max: 564 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 23207     avg: 25028     median: 24595 (23%)     max: 28122 Points
min: 9194     avg: 10593     median: 9965 (9%)     max: 12620 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1702     avg: 1962     median: 2103 (89%)     max: 2144 Points
min: 1549     avg: 1638     median: 1655 (70%)     max: 1710 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 651     avg: 751     median: 803 (89%)     max: 821 Points
min: 633     avg: 648     median: 655 (73%)     max: 655 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 8361     avg: 9299     median: 9244 (23%)     max: 10498 Points
min: 3673     avg: 4137     median: 3870 (9%)     max: 4869 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 3455     avg: 3801     median: 3812 (24%)     max: 4137 Points
min: 1700     avg: 1848     median: 1702 (11%)     max: 2143 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 238     avg: 276     median: 294 (89%)     max: 304 Points
min: 236     avg: 243     median: 246 (74%)     max: 247 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
10.4 Points (14%)
min: 21.9     avg: 24.2     median: 24.2 (31%)     max: 26.4 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.6 Points (90%)
min: 2.9     avg: 2.9     median: 2.9 (73%)     max: 2.98 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
11767 Points (71%)
min: 9266     avg: 9335     median: 9334.5 (56%)     max: 9403 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
68172 Points (49%)
min: 45559     avg: 48467     median: 48466.5 (35%)     max: 51374 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
409.9 s (5%)
296.9 s (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
2.7 s (1%)
9.5 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
10202 Points (16%)
min: 6103     avg: 9592     median: 9591.5 (15%)     max: 13080 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 84799     avg: 96226     median: 98097 (56%)     max: 104730 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5641     avg: 6466     median: 6890 (82%)     max: 7041 MIPS
min: 4663     avg: 4950     median: 5082 (61%)     max: 5106 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
177.1 fps (62%)
129.6 fps (45%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
365.2 fps (84%)
305.3 fps (70%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 22     avg: 25.3     median: 25.5 (45%)     max: 27.4 fps
min: 9.7     avg: 11.3     median: 10.6 (19%)     max: 13.7 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
2.2 GB/s (0%)
min: 0.83     avg: 418.9     median: 418.9 (50%)     max: 837 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
4.1 GB/s (71%)
min: 1.2     avg: 1.3     median: 1.3 (22%)     max: 1.4 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
19.3 GB/s (50%)
min: 8.9     avg: 9     median: 9 (23%)     max: 9 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 228     avg: 251     median: 240 (3%)     max: 312 Seconds
min: 523     avg: 620     median: 667 (8%)     max: 671 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 126     avg: 152     median: 140 (1%)     max: 184 Seconds
min: 285     avg: 335.3     median: 357 (3%)     max: 364 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.3821     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4896 sec
min: 0.503     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (11%)     max: 0.53 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
18104 Points (39%)
min: 12498     avg: 13225     median: 13225 (28%)     max: 13952 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
6 s (1%)
min: 7.4     avg: 7.5     median: 7.5 (2%)     max: 7.5 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
13.1 s (1%)
16.5 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
310.6 s (1%)
min: 400.5     avg: 403.6     median: 403.6 (2%)     max: 406.6 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 43778     avg: 54877     median: 54876.5 (48%)     max: 65975 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 23059     avg: 24395     median: 23642.5 (64%)     max: 27236 Points
min: 12766     avg: 14502     median: 13800 (37%)     max: 16940 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
72226 Points (59%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
22970 Points (58%)
14164 Points (36%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 33286     avg: 35827     median: 35140 (63%)     max: 40672 Points
min: 16291     avg: 18500     median: 17907 (32%)     max: 21301 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 16109     avg: 16665     median: 16262 (69%)     max: 18028 Points
min: 6216     avg: 7109     median: 6391 (27%)     max: 8721 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 2378     avg: 2724     median: 2884 (78%)     max: 2975 Points
min: 2258     avg: 2282     median: 2279 (61%)     max: 2310 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 14807     avg: 16432     median: 17292 (68%)     max: 17562 Points
min: 11192     avg: 11439     median: 11555 (46%)     max: 11571 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1700     avg: 1954     median: 2080 (88%)     max: 2133 Points
min: 1630     avg: 1671     median: 1684 (71%)     max: 1699 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 16732     avg: 18072     median: 18225 (33%)     max: 19597 Points
min: 9696     avg: 10260     median: 10309 (18%)     max: 10775 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1987 Points (9%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
17958 Points (57%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
8945 Points (89%)
6750 Points (67%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
67087 Points (74%)
38736 Points (43%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 447     avg: 485.3     median: 467 (1%)     max: 542 ms
min: 560     avg: 574     median: 575 (1%)     max: 588 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 89858     avg: 98657     median: 98656.5 (87%)     max: 107455 Points
min: 85765     avg: 86220     median: 86219.5 (76%)     max: 86674 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 251     avg: 277     median: 273 (78%)     max: 307 Points
min: 237     avg: 238.5     median: 238.5 (69%)     max: 240 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 276     avg: 300     median: 301 (63%)     max: 323 Points
min: 245     avg: 252.7     median: 250 (52%)     max: 263 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1923     avg: 2097     median: 2132 (82%)     max: 2235 Points
min: 1548     avg: 1591     median: 1590.5 (61%)     max: 1633 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 101.3     avg: 142.1     median: 150 (26%)     max: 175 Watt
min: 41.3     avg: 47.4     median: 46.9 (8%)     max: 53.9 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
243 Watt (44%)
min: 56.7     avg: 60.5     median: 60.5 (11%)     max: 64.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 22.6     avg: 25.1     median: 26 (17%)     max: 26.6 Watt
min: 4.31     avg: 5.3     median: 5.3 (3%)     max: 6.35 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 15.4     avg: 19.5     median: 16.4 (18%)     max: 26.8 Watt
min: 5.71     avg: 6.7     median: 6.7 (7%)     max: 7.68 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
17 Points per Watt (13%)
min: 26.5     avg: 28.3     median: 28.3 (21%)     max: 30 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-14700HX → 100% n=44

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 5 125H → 508% n=44

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 04. 01:17:24

#0 checking url part for id 17168 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 16911 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720048643 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 17168 +0.004s ... 0.008s

#7 got single benchmarks 17168 +0.009s ... 0.017s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 16911 +0s ... 0.017s

#9 got single benchmarks 16911 +0.001s ... 0.018s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.018s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.044s ... 0.062s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.064s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)