Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-1370P vs AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS

Intel Core i7-1370P

► remove from comparison Intel i7-1370P

The Intel Core i7-1370P is the flagship Alder Lake-P CPU, which is to say, an expensive 28 W part meant for use in ultra-light (yet actively cooled) laptops. This CPU will probably be announced in early 2023 and it has 6 performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) mated to 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture) according to a leak on Geekbench. The P-cores are Hyper-Threading-enabled for whopping 20 threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock speeds can reach up to 5.2 GHz for the performance cluster (1.9 GHz base speed) and 1.4 GHz to 3.9 GHz for the efficiency cluster. The CPU is quite similar to the older Core i7-1280P but probably offers higher clock speeds.

Full vPro feature set is supported by this Core i7 ("Enterprise" tier, allowing for remote device management).

Architecture

The i7 is a continuation of Intel's efforts to use the ARM-developed big.LITTLE technology for its own benefit. A single "little" Alder Lake core is supposed to be just as fast as a Skylake core (as found in the venerable Core i7-6700HQ among other options) which is six years old at this point. All of a Core i7-1280P's CPU cores enjoy access to 24 MB of L3 cache. The integrated memory controller supports up to 64 GB of LPDDR5-5200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR4x-4267 or DDR4-3200 RAM. Just like the other 12th Gen Intel Core processors, Core i7-1280P comes with Thread Director which is a new functionality designed to help Windows 11 decide which cores to use for what workload for best performance and efficiency possible. Hardware acceleration of AI algorithms is supported via GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). PCI-Express 5.0 support has not found its way into Alder Lake P processors, so users will have to be content with PCI-Express 4.0 for the time being. The CPU still only supports PCIe 4.0 x8 for a GPU and two PCIe 4.0 x4 for SSDs.

Please note this is not a user-replaceable CPU. It gets soldered permanently on to the motherboard (BGA1744 socket interface).

Performance

Multi-thread performance is most comparable to AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS, Intel Core i9-11980HK. Which is impressive but comes with a catch; long-term performance sustainability will be rather poor unless the Power Limits are very high and the cooling solution is a truly capable one.

Graphics

The built-in graphics adapter in the form of the 96 EU Iris Xe running at up to 1.5 GHz has seen no change from what was built into the 11th Gen Tiger Lake-UP3 processors, like a i7-1165G7, which is hardly a downside as this iGPU is loaded with modern features such as AV1 video decoding capability and SUHD 4320p monitor support. 

Power Consumption

The i7's base power consumption (also known as the default TDP value or PL1) is 28 W, with 64 W being its maximum Intel-recommended Turbo power consumption (also known as the PL2). The "Minimum Assured" power consumption is fairly high at 20 watts. All in all, an active cooling solution is nearly a must.

Core i7-1370P is built with Intel's third-gen 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7.

AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS

► remove from comparison AMD R5 8640HS

The Ryzen 5 8640HS is a mid-range, Hawk Point family processor that was unveiled in Q4 2023. The 8640HS isn't actually a new chip; instead, it's a rebadged Ryzen 5 7640U, with slightly higher wattage of the 8640HS being the only meaningful difference between the two. The 8640HS has 6 SMT-enabled cores (12 threads) running at 3.5 GHz to 4.9 GHz. Those Zen 4 architecture cores are mated to the Radeon 760M integrated graphics adapter, and the Ryzen AI technology, now in its 2nd generation, is onboard as well to make apps like DaVinci Resolve and Adobe Photoshop more powerful than ever before.

Architecture & Features

Hawk Point chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips are. That's not to say there is no difference between the three. With Hawk Point, AMD is betting big on generative AI; these processors are set to deliver an up to 40% increase in generative AI performance over 7040 series APUs.

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers, is slated to deliver a double-digit IPC improvement over the former.

Elsewhere, the 8640HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and USB 4 support (therefore, Thunderbolt is supported as well). The chip is compatible with DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-7500 RAM which is still impressive as of late 2023.

A system powered by this Ryzen 5 will have access to twenty PCIe 4 lanes; this means a speedy enough NVMe SSD will be able to deliver speeds up to 7.8 GB/s.

Systems powered by this APU are expected to run 64-bit Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10, or Linux. Like most laptop chips, the 8640HS is neither overclockable nor user-replaceable. It gets soldered to the motherboard for good (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

It's safe to expect the APU to be at least 15% faster than the Zen 3 Plus-powered Ryzen 5 6600U (6 cores, 12 threads, up to 4.5 GHz), as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is.

Graphics

The Radeon 760M has 8 CUs (512 shaders) running at up to 2,600 MHz. While not great for gaming (unless you are fine with resolutions such as 900p and low detail settings), the iGPU will let you use up to 4 monitors with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p. It also HW-decodes and HW-encodes the most widely used video codecs including AV1, HEVC, AVC without breaking a sweat.

Power consumption

The 8640HS has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 28 W that laptop makers are free to change to anything between 20 W and 30 W. Most companies will probably go for a higher value to get better performance. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for any system powered by the chip.

Last but not the least, the 8640HS is manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i7-1370PAMD Ryzen 5 8640HS
SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-PAMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c, Ryzen 8040)
CodenameRaptor Lake-PHawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
Series: Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c, Ryzen 8040) Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
Intel Core i7-1370P « 1.4 - 5.2 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1360P compare1.6 - 5 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1350P compare1.4 - 4.7 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1340P compare1.4 - 4.6 GHz12 / 16 cores12 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS « 3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Clock1400 - 5200 MHz3500 - 4900 MHz
L1 Cache1.2 MB384 KB
L2 Cache11.5 MB6 MB
L3 Cache24 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads14 / 20
6 x 5.2 GHz Intel Golden Cove P-Core
8 x 3.9 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
6 / 12
6 x 4.9 GHz AMD Zen 4
TDP28 Watt28 Watt
Technology10 nm4 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketFCBGA1744FP7/FP7r2/FP8
FeaturesThread DirectorDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3
iGPUIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ( - 1500 MHz)AMD Radeon 760M ( - 2600 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.amd.com
Die Size178 mm2

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-1370P
43.5 pt (60%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
90 Points (63%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
366 Points (7%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 12778     avg: 13559     median: 13159 (12%)     max: 14741 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1750     avg: 1887     median: 1915 (81%)     max: 1995 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 675     avg: 723     median: 729 (81%)     max: 764 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 5079     avg: 5293     median: 5148 (13%)     max: 5651 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2052     avg: 2316     median: 2404 (15%)     max: 2492 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 258     avg: 268.7     median: 264 (80%)     max: 284 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 48229     avg: 52228     median: 53407 (31%)     max: 55049 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6140     avg: 6334     median: 6176 (74%)     max: 6687 MIPS
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 9.65     avg: 13.2     median: 14.5 (25%)     max: 15.5 fps
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 444     avg: 563     median: 472 (6%)     max: 774 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 246     avg: 297.7     median: 258 (2%)     max: 389 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4244     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4649 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
10031 Points (21%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
46629 Points (41%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 13806     avg: 15963     median: 16281 (44%)     max: 17803 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
73456 Points (60%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 7878     avg: 11188     median: 10336 (26%)     max: 15350 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 12349     avg: 17027     median: 15761 (28%)     max: 22970 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 4929     avg: 6752     median: 6281 (26%)     max: 9045 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 2639     avg: 2642     median: 2641.5 (71%)     max: 2644 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 12497     avg: 12694     median: 12694 (50%)     max: 12891 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1655     avg: 1843     median: 1871.5 (79%)     max: 1974 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 10184     avg: 11028     median: 11048.5 (20%)     max: 11832 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1939 Points (8%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
11474 Points (36%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 479     avg: 484     median: 485 (1%)     max: 487 ms
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 270     avg: 277.5     median: 277.5 (80%)     max: 285 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 288     avg: 302     median: 296.5 (62%)     max: 327 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1728     avg: 1795     median: 1827 (70%)     max: 1830 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 36.7     avg: 53     median: 60.3 (10%)     max: 62.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
60.6 Watt (11%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 3.23     avg: 6.9     median: 5.9 (4%)     max: 12.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 8.39     avg: 9.8     median: 9.8 (11%)     max: 11.3 Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-1370P → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 04. 11:05:11

#0 checking url part for id 14657 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 16411 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720083911 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.009s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14657 +0.004s ... 0.013s

#7 got single benchmarks 14657 +0.007s ... 0.02s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 16411 +0.001s ... 0.02s

#9 got single benchmarks 16411 +0s ... 0.02s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.02s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.016s ... 0.037s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.039s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)