Intel Core i7-12700F vs Intel Core i9-13900HX
Intel Core i7-12700F ► remove from comparison
The Intel Core i7-12700F is a high end CPU for desktops based on the Alder Lake architecture. It was first announced in November 2021 and offers 8 performance cores and 4 efficiency cores. The performance cores (P-cores) support HyperThreading, leading to 20 threads that can be processed at once. The performance cores can clock with up to 4.9 GHz (Turbo Boost Max 3.0, 2.1 base), the efficiency cores can clock with up to 3.6 GHz (1.6 GHz base). All cores can use 25 MB Smart Cache. The integrated memory controller supports up to 128 GB DDR5 with 4800 MT/s (dual channel).
The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficiency cores for the best performance.
For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost. Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC and AV1 decode in hardware.
The F-series desktop models don't offer an integrated graphics card.
The CPU is rated at 65 W base power and 180 Watt maximum Turbo power. It is manufactured in 10nm, called Intel 7, process at Intel.
Intel Core i9-13900HX ► remove from comparison
The Intel Core i9-13900HX is a fast high-end mobile processor of the Raptor Lake series. Is was announced in early 2023 and looks like it is based on the desktop Core i9-13000K with combined 24 cores and 32 threads. Eight fast Raptor Cove performance cores (P-cores) with HyperThreading that clock between 2.2 GHz (base) and 5.4 GHz (single core boost, 4.9 GHz for all cores) and sixteen Gracemont efficiency cores without Hyper-Threading (1.6 - 3.9 GHz).
Compared to Alder Lake, Raptor Lake offers improved P-Cores (Raptor Cove micro-architecture) with bigger Caches and more E-Cores (same Gracemont micro-architecture). Furthermore, the chip supports faster DDR5 memory (up to 5600 MHz for the 13900HX).
Performance
The average 13900HX in our database is in the same league as the Core i9-13950HX and the Ryzen 9 7845HX , as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is really impressive, to say the least.
Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 99 W, the Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 is among the fastest laptops built around the 13900HX that we know of. It can be about 50% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.
The CPU is still produced in a further improved 10nm FinFET process (Intel 7) that allows the higher clock speeds. The power consumption is specified at 55W base power up to 157 Watt max. Turbo power.
Model Intel Core i7-12700F Intel Core i9-13900HX Series Intel Alder Lake-S Intel Raptor Lake-HX Codename Alder Lake Raptor Lake-HX Series: Raptor Lake-HX Raptor Lake-HX Clock 3300 - 4900 MHz 1600 - 5400 MHz L1 Cache 1 MB L2 Cache 12 MB 32 MB L3 Cache 25 MB 36 MB Cores / Threads 12 / 20 24 / 32 8 x 5.4 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core 16 x 3.9 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core TDP 65 Watt 55 Watt Technology 10 nm 10 nm Die Size 215 mm2 257 mm2 max. Temp. 100 °C 100 °C Socket LGA 1700 BGA1964 Architecture x86 x86 $386 U.S. Announced Features DDR4-3200/DDR5-5600 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Dir., DL B., GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA iGPU Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) ( - 1650 MHz)Manufacturer ark.intel.com
Benchmarks Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-12700F
44.5 pt (62%)
...
...
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-13900HX
53.1 pt (74%)
...
...
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
15291 Points (14%)
min: 24270 avg: 28225 median: 27844 (26%) max: 32623 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 99 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 130 W TDP 132 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W TDP 160 W 85% 87% 47% 82% 100% 84% 86% 94% 75% 81% 85% 93%
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1898 Points (81%)
min: 1867 avg: 2044 median: 2055 (87%) max: 2105 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 99 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 130 W TDP 132 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W TDP 160 W 98% 100% 90% 100% 100% 99% 94% 97% 89% 95% 97% 98%
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
726 Points (81%)
min: 722 avg: 784 median: 785.5 (87%) max: 810 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 99 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 130 W TDP 132 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W TDP 160 W 95% 100% 90% 100% 99% 99% 96% 97% 89% 95% 96% 98%
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
5786 Points (14%)
min: 9152 avg: 10766 median: 10548 (26%) max: 12541 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 99 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 130 W TDP 132 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W TDP 160 W 89% 87% 46% 82% 100% 82% 83% 92% 74% 79% 84% 92%
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2610 Points (16%)
min: 3913 avg: 4522 median: 4487 (28%) max: 4970 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 99 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 130 W TDP 132 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W TDP 160 W 98% 89% 53% 86% 100% 87% 86% 96% 79% 87% 89% 96%
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
271 Points (82%)
min: 247 avg: 291.7 median: 295 (89%) max: 304 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 99 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 130 W TDP 132 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W TDP 160 W 98% 99% 90% 100% 99% 99% 97% 98% 82% 93% 99% 97%
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
33.5 Points (44%)
min: 49.5 avg: 52.3 median: 52.3 (68%) max: 55.14 Points
CPU TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 130 W 61% 90% 100%
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.3 Points (82%)
min: 3.64 avg: 3.7 median: 3.7 (91%) max: 3.67 Points
CPU TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 130 W 89% 100% 99%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
9146 Points (55%)
min: 11618 avg: 11700 median: 11699.5 (71%) max: 11781 Points
CPU TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 130 W 78% 100% 99%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
56067 Points (41%)
min: 76718 avg: 79300 median: 79299.5 (57%) max: 81881 Points
CPU TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 130 W 68% 94% 100%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
93400 Points (65%)
111582 Points (77%)
CPU TDP 65 W TDP 86 W 84% 100%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
15176 Points (18%)
17169 Points (21%)
CPU TDP 65 W TDP 86 W 88% 100%
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
128.3 s (2%)
215.7 s (3%)
CPU TDP 65 W TDP 86 W 101% 100%
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3 s (1%)
2.6 s (1%)
CPU TDP 65 W TDP 86 W 100% 100%
8695 Points (14%)
min: 12876 avg: 12916 median: 12916 (20%) max: 12956 Points
CPU TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 130 W 67% 99% 100%
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
61218 MIPS (35%)
min: 90675 avg: 111796 median: 114430 (66%) max: 127283 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 99 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 130 W TDP 132 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W TDP 160 W 92% 84% 48% 78% 100% 88% 91% 96% 71% 82% 89% 94%
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
6145 MIPS (73%)
min: 6340 avg: 6848 median: 6892.5 (82%) max: 7177 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 99 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 130 W TDP 132 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W TDP 160 W 98% 99% 88% 100% 100% 97% 94% 99% 90% 95% 98% 99%
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
118.6 fps (41%)
217.7 fps (76%)
CPU TDP 65 W TDP 130 W 54% 100%
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
296.5 fps (68%)
387.7 fps (89%)
CPU TDP 65 W TDP 130 W 76% 100%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
17.7 fps (31%)
min: 23.5 avg: 29.1 median: 29.4 (52%) max: 34.4 fps
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 99 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 130 W TDP 132 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W TDP 160 W 90% 81% 51% 73% 100% 84% 85% 93% 68% 78% 84% 91%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.5 GB/s (0%)
min: 2.1 avg: 2.3 median: 2.3 (0%) max: 2.4 GB/s
CPU TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 130 W 63% 88% 100%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.8 GB/s (48%)
min: 4.1 avg: 4.3 median: 4.3 (73%) max: 4.4 GB/s
CPU TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 130 W 64% 93% 100%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
3.3 GB/s (9%)
min: 15.2 avg: 17 median: 17 (44%) max: 18.8 GB/s
CPU TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 130 W 18% 81% 100%
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 175 avg: 210.7 median: 202 (3%) max: 275 Seconds
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 86 W TDP 99 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 130 W TDP 132 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W TDP 160 W 101% 100% 100% 101% 101% 101% 101% 100% 101% 101% 101%
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
212 Seconds (1%)
min: 101 avg: 117.9 median: 114 (1%) max: 153 Seconds
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 99 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 130 W TDP 132 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W TDP 160 W 101% 101% 100% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101% 100% 101% 101% 101%
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.4 sec (9%)
min: 0.375 avg: 0.4 median: 0.4 (9%) max: 0.4564 sec
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 99 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 130 W TDP 132 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W TDP 160 W 101% 102% 101% 101% 102% 101% 101% 101% 100% 101% 102% 102%
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
15823 Points (34%)
min: 16591 avg: 17802 median: 18036.5 (38%) max: 18235 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 130 W TDP 140 W TDP 160 W 99% 91% 87% 100% 97% 99% 100%
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.4 s (2%)
min: 6.2 avg: 6.2 median: 6.2 (1%) max: 6.215 s
CPU TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 130 W 100% 100% 100%
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
16.5 s (1%)
13.4 s (1%)
CPU TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 130 W 100% 100% 100%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
386.3 s (2%)
min: 315 avg: 315.1 median: 315.1 (1%) max: 315.265 s
CPU TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 130 W 100% 100% 100%
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
66554 Points (58%)
min: 74788 avg: 76276 median: 76275.5 (67%) max: 77763 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 130 W 96% 86% 100%
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
23748 Points (64%)
min: 19090 avg: 23115 median: 23699 (64%) max: 25681 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 99 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 130 W TDP 132 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W TDP 160 W 93% 98% 95% 88% 100% 100% 82% 97% 76% 84% 97% 96%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
81273 Points (66%)
min: 77043 avg: 86045 median: 83045 (67%) max: 101046 Points
CPU TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 130 W TDP 132 W TDP 135 W 80% 84% 100% 76% 80%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
77233 Points (63%)
82808 Points (67%)
CPU TDP 65 W TDP 86 W 93% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
79448 Points (67%)
85007 Points (72%)
CPU TDP 65 W TDP 86 W 93% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
17840 Points (45%)
min: 16532 avg: 21282 median: 21573 (55%) max: 23984 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 100 W TDP 130 W TDP 132 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W TDP 160 W 97% 86% 76% 85% 89% 100% 78% 86% 96% 97%
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
31106 Points (55%)
min: 28693 avg: 37016 median: 37598.5 (67%) max: 43004 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 99 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 130 W TDP 132 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W TDP 160 W 92% 89% 72% 83% 100% 81% 85% 84% 67% 81% 88% 91%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
11521 Points (49%)
min: 13288 avg: 15195 median: 14988 (63%) max: 18304 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 99 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 130 W TDP 132 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W TDP 160 W 87% 92% 65% 89% 100% 83% 83% 86% 75% 82% 84% 82%
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 2548 avg: 2720 median: 2720 (73%) max: 2892 Points
CPU TDP 55 W TDP 135 W 100% 88%
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 15031 avg: 16523 median: 16522.5 (65%) max: 18014 Points
CPU TDP 55 W TDP 135 W 100% 83%
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1590 Points (67%)
min: 1345 avg: 1988 median: 2036 (86%) max: 2093 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 99 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 130 W TDP 132 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W TDP 160 W 98% 99% 76% 99% 100% 99% 93% 97% 87% 84% 98% 98%
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
10126 Points (18%)
min: 17614 avg: 19809 median: 19982 (36%) max: 21075 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 99 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 130 W TDP 132 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W TDP 160 W 98% 98% 49% 92% 100% 94% 96% 100% 85% 90% 92% 99%
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1557 Points (7%)
min: 1804 avg: 1964 median: 1982 (9%) max: 2064 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 99 W TDP 110 W 96% 75% 96% 100% 87%
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
10249 Points (32%)
min: 18612 avg: 19451 median: 19027 (60%) max: 20594 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 99 W TDP 110 W 98% 50% 91% 100% 92%
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
6698 Points (67%)
min: 8706 avg: 8840 median: 8843 (88%) max: 8936 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 130 W 99% 75% 100% 99%
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
39852 Points (44%)
min: 66537 avg: 70316 median: 71143 (78%) max: 71700 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 130 W 100% 56% 93% 100%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
522 ms (1%)
min: 453 avg: 471.3 median: 463.5 (1%) max: 520 ms
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 99 W TDP 110 W TDP 130 W TDP 132 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W TDP 160 W 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
94804 Points (83%)
min: 95898 avg: 101964 median: 104390 (92%) max: 105526 Points
CPU TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W TDP 160 W 100% 90% 91% 99% 99%
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
271 Points (78%)
min: 243 avg: 288.7 median: 291 (84%) max: 304 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 99 W TDP 110 W TDP 130 W TDP 132 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W TDP 160 W 94% 100% 89% 98% 99% 95% 94% 92% 90% 94% 100%
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
281 Points (59%)
min: 266 avg: 322.6 median: 322 (67%) max: 358 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 99 W TDP 110 W TDP 130 W TDP 132 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W TDP 160 W 93% 94% 82% 98% 100% 92% 95% 94% 88% 94% 95%
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1841 Points (71%)
min: 1825 avg: 2064 median: 2113 (81%) max: 2295 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 99 W TDP 110 W TDP 132 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W TDP 160 W 91% 95% 84% 94% 100% 83% 89% 98% 84% 97%
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
114.6 Watt (20%)
min: 106.1 avg: 171.8 median: 175.4 (30%) max: 231 Watt
CPU TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 99 W TDP 110 W TDP 130 W TDP 132 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W TDP 160 W 112% 127% 115% 104% 100% 108% 121% 113% 112% 113%
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
127.6 Watt (23%)
min: 176 avg: 217.8 median: 223 (41%) max: 266 Watt
CPU TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 99 W TDP 110 W TDP 130 W TDP 132 W TDP 135 W TDP 160 W 113% 140% 118% 106% 114% 100% 124% 100% 108%
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
29.7 Watt (20%)
min: 13.9 avg: 23.8 median: 25 (17%) max: 31.5 Watt
CPU TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 99 W TDP 110 W TDP 130 W TDP 132 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W TDP 160 W 105% 102% 108% 115% 110% 106% 100% 104% 109% 105%
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 15 avg: 19.9 median: 19 (21%) max: 29 Watt
CPU TDP 55 W TDP 86 W TDP 99 W TDP 110 W TDP 130 W TDP 132 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W TDP 160 W 117% 112% 123% 113% 108% 100% 118% 121% 119%
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
20.5 Points per Watt (15%)
min: 19.5 avg: 20.7 median: 20.8 (15%) max: 21.8 Points per Watt
CPU TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 99 W TDP 110 W TDP 130 W 94% 94% 100% 96% 89%
Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-12700F → 100% n=48 Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-13900HX → 137% n=48
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
v1.28
log 30. 09:45:24
#0 checking url part for id 14604 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 14659 +0s ... 0s
#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719733524 +0s ... 0s
#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s
#4 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s
#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s
#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14604 +0.004s ... 0.008s
#7 got single benchmarks 14604 +0.004s ... 0.012s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14659 +0.004s ... 0.016s
#9 got single benchmarks 14659 +0.029s ... 0.045s
#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.045s
#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.067s ... 0.112s
#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.114s
Please share our article, every link counts!
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)