Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-12700F vs Intel Core i7-13700HX

Intel Core i7-12700F

► remove from comparison Intel i7-12700F

The Intel Core i7-12700F is a high end CPU for desktops based on the Alder Lake architecture. It was first announced in November 2021 and offers 8 performance cores and 4 efficiency cores. The performance cores (P-cores) support HyperThreading, leading to 20 threads that can be processed at once. The performance cores can clock with up to 4.9 GHz (Turbo Boost Max 3.0, 2.1 base), the efficiency cores can clock with up to 3.6 GHz (1.6 GHz base). All cores can use 25 MB Smart Cache. The integrated memory controller supports up to 128 GB DDR5 with 4800 MT/s (dual channel).

The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficiency cores for the best performance.

For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost. Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC and AV1 decode in hardware.

The F-series desktop models don't offer an integrated graphics card.

The CPU is rated at 65 W base power and 180 Watt maximum Turbo power. It is manufactured in 10nm, called Intel 7, process at Intel.

Intel Core i7-13700HX

► remove from comparison Intel i7-13700HX

The Intel Core i7-13700HX is a fast high-end mobile processor of the Raptor Lake series. Is was announced in early 2023 and is based on the desktop Core i7-13700K with combined 16 cores and 24 threads. Eight fast Raptor Cove performance cores (P-cores) with HyperThreading clocking between 2.1 - 5 GHz (4.5 GHz all core boost) and eight Gracemont efficiency cores without HyperThreading (1.5 - 3.7 GHz).

Compared to Alder Lake, Raptor Lake offers improved P-Cores (Raptor Cove micro-architecture) with bigger Caches and more E-Cores (same Gracemont micro-architecture). Furthermore, the chip supports faster DDR5 memory (up to 5600 MHz for the 13980HX, but only 4800 MHz for the i7).

Performance

The average 13700HX in our database is in the same league as the i7-13650HX, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned, and thus outguns the Ryzen 7 7745HX by a significant margin. This is a very fast chip, as of early 2023.

Thanks to its powerful cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 122 W, the Uniwill GM6PX7X is among the fastest laptops built around the 13700HX that we know of. It can be at least 10% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

The chip's "minimum assured" power consumption sits at 45 W. Its Turbo power consumption is not supposed to exceed 157 W; its Base power consumption is supposed to be around 55 W. Most laptop makers will probably go for a value much higher than 55 W to get better performance.

This Raptor Lake family processor is built with Intel's 4th generation 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for average, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i7-12700FIntel Core i7-13700HX
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-SIntel Raptor Lake-HX
CodenameAlder LakeRaptor Lake-HX
Series: Raptor Lake-HX Raptor Lake-HX
Intel Core i9-12900K compare3.2 - 5.2 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900 compare2.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 24 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700K compare2.7 - 5 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700F « 3.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700 compare3.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12600K compare2.8 - 4.9 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13980HX compare1.6 - 5.6 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13950HX compare1.6 - 5.5 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900HX compare1.6 - 5.4 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13850HX compare1.5 - 5.3 GHz20 / 28 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700HX « 1.5 - 5 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13650HX compare1.9 - 4.9 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600HX compare1.9 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500HX compare1.8 - 4.7 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13450HX compare1.8 - 4.6 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Clock3300 - 4900 MHz1500 - 5000 MHz
L1 Cache1 MB
L2 Cache12 MB24 MB
L3 Cache25 MB30 MB
Cores / Threads12 / 2016 / 24
8 x 5.0 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
8 x 3.7 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
TDP65 Watt55 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm
Die Size215 mm2257 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketLGA 1700BGA1964
Architecturex86x86
$386 U.S.
Announced
FeaturesDDR4-3200/DDR5-4800 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 770 ( - 1550 MHz)
Manufacturerark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-12700F
44.5 pt (62%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-13700HX
46.8 pt (65%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
112 Points (78%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
971 Points (18%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
15291 Points (14%)
min: 19987     avg: 21150     median: 20997.5 (19%)     max: 22598 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1898 Points (81%)
min: 1666     avg: 1842     median: 1882 (80%)     max: 1933 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
726 Points (81%)
min: 644     avg: 711     median: 724.5 (81%)     max: 740 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
5786 Points (14%)
min: 6889     avg: 7981     median: 7966 (19%)     max: 8610 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2610 Points (16%)
min: 3008     avg: 3288     median: 3324 (21%)     max: 3482 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
271 Points (82%)
min: 243     avg: 269     median: 272.5 (82%)     max: 279 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
33.5 Points (44%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.3 Points (82%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
9146 Points (55%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
56067 Points (41%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
93400 Points (65%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
15176 Points (18%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
128.3 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
8695 Points (14%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
61218 MIPS (35%)
min: 72220     avg: 79565     median: 78488 (45%)     max: 89294 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
6145 MIPS (73%)
min: 5552     avg: 6125     median: 6201.5 (74%)     max: 6409 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
118.6 fps (41%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
296.5 fps (68%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
17.7 fps (31%)
min: 19.7     avg: 22.6     median: 22.3 (39%)     max: 25.5 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.5 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.8 GB/s (48%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
3.3 GB/s (9%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 240     avg: 278.9     median: 270.5 (3%)     max: 345 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
212 Seconds (1%)
min: 138     avg: 161.4     median: 159 (1%)     max: 198 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.4 sec (9%)
min: 0.4274     avg: 0.5     median: 0.4 (10%)     max: 0.493 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
15823 Points (34%)
min: 15688     avg: 17169     median: 17038 (36%)     max: 18780 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.4 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
16.5 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
386.3 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
66554 Points (58%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
23748 Points (64%)
min: 21590     avg: 23818     median: 23995.5 (65%)     max: 25859 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
81273 Points (66%)
103646 Points (84%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
77233 Points (63%)
103932 Points (84%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
79448 Points (67%)
103341 Points (87%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
17840 Points (45%)
min: 17714     avg: 20672     median: 20745.5 (52%)     max: 22722 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
31106 Points (55%)
min: 30988     avg: 34044     median: 33720 (60%)     max: 36417 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
11521 Points (49%)
min: 12569     avg: 14765     median: 14971.5 (63%)     max: 16441 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 2541     avg: 2591     median: 2593 (70%)     max: 2638 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 11793     avg: 13739     median: 14402 (57%)     max: 15022 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1590 Points (67%)
min: 1666     avg: 1834     median: 1852.5 (78%)     max: 1899 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
10126 Points (18%)
min: 12389     avg: 14660     median: 14695 (26%)     max: 15850 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1557 Points (7%)
min: 1712     avg: 1786     median: 1788.5 (8%)     max: 1855 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
10249 Points (32%)
min: 13815     avg: 14802     median: 15008.5 (47%)     max: 15376 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
6698 Points (67%)
8059 Points (81%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
39852 Points (44%)
57031 Points (63%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
522 ms (1%)
min: 489     avg: 508     median: 503.5 (1%)     max: 538 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
94804 Points (83%)
min: 86875     avg: 92028     median: 92283 (81%)     max: 96670 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
271 Points (78%)
min: 247     avg: 267.4     median: 270.5 (78%)     max: 283 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
281 Points (59%)
min: 238     avg: 304.1     median: 316 (66%)     max: 336 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1841 Points (71%)
min: 1663     avg: 1875     median: 1831 (70%)     max: 2105 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
114.6 Watt (20%)
min: 100.4     avg: 157.7     median: 166.5 (29%)     max: 189.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
127.6 Watt (23%)
min: 166.3     avg: 187.3     median: 183.9 (34%)     max: 221 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
29.7 Watt (20%)
min: 12.9     avg: 22     median: 22.1 (15%)     max: 28.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 12.1     avg: 16.8     median: 15.2 (17%)     max: 25.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
20.5 Points per Watt (15%)
min: 16.9     avg: 18.3     median: 17.7 (13%)     max: 20.9 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-12700F → 100% n=30

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-13700HX → 117% n=30

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 04. 09:56:20

#0 checking url part for id 14604 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14661 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720079780 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14604 +0.002s ... 0.006s

#7 got single benchmarks 14604 +0s ... 0.006s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14661 +0.005s ... 0.011s

#9 got single benchmarks 14661 +0.017s ... 0.028s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.028s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.045s ... 0.073s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.075s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)