Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-12700F vs Intel Core i5-13600HX

Intel Core i7-12700F

► remove from comparison Intel i7-12700F

The Intel Core i7-12700F is a high end CPU for desktops based on the Alder Lake architecture. It was first announced in November 2021 and offers 8 performance cores and 4 efficiency cores. The performance cores (P-cores) support HyperThreading, leading to 20 threads that can be processed at once. The performance cores can clock with up to 4.9 GHz (Turbo Boost Max 3.0, 2.1 base), the efficiency cores can clock with up to 3.6 GHz (1.6 GHz base). All cores can use 25 MB Smart Cache. The integrated memory controller supports up to 128 GB DDR5 with 4800 MT/s (dual channel).

The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficiency cores for the best performance.

For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost. Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC and AV1 decode in hardware.

The F-series desktop models don't offer an integrated graphics card.

The CPU is rated at 65 W base power and 180 Watt maximum Turbo power. It is manufactured in 10nm, called Intel 7, process at Intel.

Intel Core i5-13600HX

► remove from comparison Intel i5-13600HX

The Intel Core i5-13600HX is a fast mid-range mobile processor of the Raptor Lake series. Is was announced in early 2023 and integrates 6 fast Raptor Cove performance cores (P-cores) with HyperThreading and 8 Gracemont efficiency cores without HyperThreading. The P-Cores clock between 2.6 GHz (base) up to 4.8 GHz (single core boost, all-core 4.5 GHz). The smaller E-Cores clock between 1.9 and 3.6 GHz. All cores can access the combined 24 MB L3 cache. The CPU supports vPro (Enterprise) management features.

Compared to Alder Lake, Raptor Lake offers improved P-Cores (Raptor Cove micro-architecture) with bigger caches and more E-Cores (same Gracemont micro-architecture). Furthermore, the chip supports faster DDR5 memory (up to 5600 MHz for the 13980HX, but only 4800 MHz for the i5).

Performance

While we have not tested a single system built around the 13600HX as of August 2023, we have plenty of performance data for the i7-13650HX, a chip with almost the same specs (six P-cores mated to eight E-cores, with the latter running at the same clock speeds as what the 13600HX has and the former running at up to 100 MHz faster which is a very small difference). Based on that, we expect the 13600HX to be just a few percentage points behind the i7-13700HX and the i9-12950HX, meaning it's a very, very fast CPU, as of mid 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is, and how high the CPU power limits are.

Power consumption

The chip's "minimum assured" power consumption sits at 45 W. Its peak Turbo power consumption is not supposed to go over 157 W and its Intel-recommended Base power consumption is 55 W. Most laptop makers will probably go for a noticeably higher value to get better performance.

The i5-13600HX is built with Intel's 4th generation 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for average, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i7-12700FIntel Core i5-13600HX
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-SIntel Raptor Lake-HX
CodenameAlder LakeRaptor Lake-HX
Series: Raptor Lake-HX Raptor Lake-HX
Intel Core i9-12900K compare3.2 - 5.2 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900 compare2.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 24 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700K compare2.7 - 5 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700F « 3.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700 compare3.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12600K compare2.8 - 4.9 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13980HX compare1.6 - 5.6 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13950HX compare1.6 - 5.5 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900HX compare1.6 - 5.4 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13850HX compare1.5 - 5.3 GHz20 / 28 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700HX compare1.5 - 5 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13650HX compare1.9 - 4.9 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600HX « 1.9 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500HX compare1.8 - 4.7 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13450HX compare1.8 - 4.6 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Clock3300 - 4900 MHz1900 - 4800 MHz
L1 Cache1 MB
L2 Cache12 MB
L3 Cache25 MB24 MB
Cores / Threads12 / 2014 / 20
TDP65 Watt55 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm
Die Size215 mm2257 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketLGA 1700BGA1964
Architecturex86x86
$386 U.S.
Announced
FeaturesDDR4-3200/DDR5-4800 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, GNA, vPro Enterp., MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Hyper-Threading, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 770 ( - 1500 MHz)
Manufacturerark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-12700F
44.5 pt (62%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
15291 Points (14%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1898 Points (81%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
726 Points (81%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
5786 Points (14%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2610 Points (16%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
271 Points (82%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
33.5 Points (44%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.3 Points (82%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
9146 Points (55%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
56067 Points (41%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
93400 Points (65%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
15176 Points (18%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
128.3 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
8695 Points (14%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
61218 MIPS (35%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
6145 MIPS (73%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
118.6 fps (41%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
296.5 fps (68%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
17.7 fps (31%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.5 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.8 GB/s (48%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
3.3 GB/s (9%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
212 Seconds (1%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.4 sec (9%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
15823 Points (34%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.4 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
16.5 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
386.3 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
66554 Points (58%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
23748 Points (64%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
81273 Points (66%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
77233 Points (63%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
79448 Points (67%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
17840 Points (45%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
31106 Points (55%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
11521 Points (49%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
2920 Points (79%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
15910 Points (63%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1590 Points (67%)
min: 1885     avg: 1913     median: 1912.5 (81%)     max: 1940 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
10126 Points (18%)
min: 14280     avg: 15135     median: 15135 (27%)     max: 15990 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1557 Points (7%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
10249 Points (32%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
6698 Points (67%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
39852 Points (44%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
522 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
94804 Points (83%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
271 Points (78%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
281 Points (59%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1841 Points (71%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
114.6 Watt (20%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
127.6 Watt (23%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
29.7 Watt (20%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
20.5 Points per Watt (15%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-12700F → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-13600HX → 135% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 30. 09:49:28

#0 checking url part for id 14604 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14675 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719733768 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.006s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14604 +0.005s ... 0.011s

#7 got single benchmarks 14604 +0.005s ... 0.016s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14675 +0.001s ... 0.017s

#9 got single benchmarks 14675 +0.003s ... 0.02s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.02s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.03s ... 0.05s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.052s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)