Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-1265U vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100

Intel Core i7-1265U

► remove from comparison Intel i7-1265U

The Intel Core i7-1265U is a high-end mobile CPU for thin and light laptops based on the Alder Lake architecture. It was announced in early 2022 and offers 2  performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) and 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores support Hyper-Threading leading to 12 supported threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock rate ranges from 1.8 to 4.8 GHz on the performance cluster and 1.3 to 3.6 GHz on the efficient cluster. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 12 MB L3 cache. The 1265U offers "Enterprise" vPro management features. Compared to the P-series (28W) or H-series (45W), the 15W TDP may limit the sustained performance.

Performance

Thanks to the 10 cores, the multi-threaded performance should be clearly faster than the older quad-core Tiger Lake CPUs with 15 Watt (like the Intel Core i7-1160G7). The sustained performance will be limited by the TDP setting and thermals and therefore only short term loads. Thanks to the architectural improvements of the big Golden Cove cores, the single thread performance should be better than similar clocked Tiger Lake CPUs.

Features

The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200, and LPDDR4x-4267. The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficient cores for the best performance. For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC, and AV1 decode in hardware. The CPU only supports PCIe 4.0 (x8 for a GPU and two x4 for SSDs).

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offers all 96 EUs (Execution Units) operating at up to 1.25 GHz.

The CPU is rated at 15 W base power (TDP, PL1) and 55 W max. Turbo power (PL2) and the whole SoC is manufactured on a 10nm process at Intel, which is known as Intel 7.

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100

The Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 is a pretty fast ARM architecture processor (SoC) for use in Windows laptops. The X1E-78-100 is the least powerful member of the Snapdragon X Elite processor series, as of May 2024; as such, it has 12 Oryon CPU cores (3 clusters of equally powerful cores; 12 threads) running at no more than 3.4 GHz. Other key features include the 3.8 TFLOPS Adreno X1-85 iGPU, the 45 TOPS Hexagon NPU and an impressively fast LPDDR5x-8448 memory controller.

The top dog, known as the Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100, is thought to be based on the same die with the same NPU but with higher GPU clock speeds, higher CPU clock speeds and possibly higher power targets as well.

Architecture and Features

Qualcomm Oryon cores are in part based on Nuvia IP; they most likely make use of the ARM v8.7 microarchitecture. Much like modern AMD and Intel processors, the Snapdragon chip is compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt 4 but it remains to be seen if the X Elite is compatible with GeForce or Radeon discrete graphics cards.

The SoC is said to have 12 PCIe 4 and 4 PCIe 3 lanes for connecting various kinds of devices. NVMe SSDs are supported with a throughput of up to 7.9 GB/s; furthermore, most laptops built around the chip are expected to have 16 GB of LPDDR5X-8448 RAM. There is also a 45 TOPS NPU for accelerating AI workloads.

Performance

Our first benchmarks (featuring a 35 W X Elite X1E-78-100) revealed very decent CPU performance figures that see the X Elite going head-to-head with the AMD Ryzen 7 7840U. It's also not much faster or slower than the Apple M3 chip with 10 GPU cores. While not groundbreaking, this should be good enough for the user to be able to run any applications in 2024 and 2025.

Like any other Windows on ARM platform, the Snapdragon X chip works best with applications and games compiled specifically for ARM processors. If making use of the built-in x86 to ARM emulation mode, a performance penalty of about 20% is to be expected.

Graphics

The integrated 3.8 TFLOPS Adreno X1-85 GPU is DirectX 12-enabled but not DirectX 12 Ultimate-enabled, despite featuring VRS and ray tracing support. The 3.8 TFLOPS of performance that it supposedly delivers pale in comparison to the slowest current-generation professional Nvidia Ada graphics card for laptops, the RTX 500 Ada, that's good for up to 9.2 TFLOPS.

Its gaming performance is rather underwhelming according to our in-house testing results. While slightly faster than the aging Iris Xe (96 EUs), the Adreno fails to outgun the Radeon 780M meaning there is little point in comparing it with full-fat discrete graphics cards. Baldur's Gate 3, a triple-A title released in 2023, is pretty much unplayable at 1080p / Low. GTA V, a game that saw the light of day in 2015, is playable at 1080p / High.

The Qualcomm iGPU will let you use up to 3 UHD 2160p monitors simultaneously. 2160p120 integrated displays are supported, as are the popular AV1, HEVC and AVC video codecs (both decoding and encoding). The hardware does not support the VVC codec; that feature remains a Lunar Lake exclusive for now.

Power consumption

The X1E-78-100 is set to be slightly less power-hungry than its more powerful brothers. Expect to see anything between 20 W and 45 W under long-term workloads depending on the system and on the performance profile chosen. That's exactly what Ryzen HS chips normally consume.

The SoC is built with a 4 nm TSMC process for decent, as of H1 2024, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i7-1265UQualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-MQualcomm Snapdragon X
CodenameAlder Lake-UOryon
Series: Snapdragon X Oryon
Intel Core i7-1265U « 1.3 - 4.8 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1255U compare1.2 - 4.7 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1245U compare1.2 - 4.4 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1235U compare0.9 - 4.4 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1260U compare0.8 - 4.7 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1250U compare0.8 - 4.7 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1240U compare0.8 - 4.4 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1230U compare0.7 - 4.4 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1215U compare0.9 - 4.4 GHz6 / 8 cores10 MB L3
Intel Pentium 8505 compare0.9 - 4.4 GHz5 / 6 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1210U compare0.7 - 4.4 GHz6 / 8 cores10 MB L3
Intel Pentium 8500 compare0.7 - 4.4 GHz5 / 6 cores8 MB L3
Intel Celeron 7305 compare0.9 - 1.1 GHz5 / 5 cores8 MB L3
Intel Celeron 7300 compare0.7 - 1 GHz5 / 5 cores8 MB L3
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 compare - 4.2 GHz12 / 12 cores Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 compare - 4 GHz12 / 12 cores Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 « - 3.4 GHz12 / 12 cores Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 compare - 3.4 GHz10 / 10 cores Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 compare8 / 8 cores Oryon
Clock1300 - 4800 MHz <=3400 MHz
L1 Cache928 KB
L2 Cache9.5 MB
L3 Cache12 MB
Cores / Threads10 / 1212 / 12
8 x 3.4 GHz
4 x 3.4 GHz Qualcomm Oryon
TDP15 Watt35 Watt
Technology10 nm4 nm
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketBGA1744
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 4, Thr. Dir., DL Boost, GNA, vPro, RPE, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ( - 1250 MHz)Qualcomm Snapdragon X Adreno X1-85 (3.8 TFLOPS)
Architecturex86ARM
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.qualcomm.com
TDP Turbo PL245 Watt

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-1265U
37.8 pt (52%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100
34.5 pt (48%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 102.8     avg: 105.4     median: 105.4 (73%)     max: 108 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 768     avg: 935     median: 956 (18%)     max: 1132 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 4332     avg: 7486     median: 8225 (8%)     max: 9219 Points
min: 10856     avg: 10908     median: 10908 (10%)     max: 10960 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1144     avg: 1595     median: 1679.5 (71%)     max: 1820 Points
min: 1111     avg: 1121     median: 1120.5 (48%)     max: 1130 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 528     avg: 619     median: 642 (71%)     max: 701 Points
min: 416     avg: 418     median: 418 (46%)     max: 420 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1669     avg: 2884     median: 3214.5 (8%)     max: 3584 Points
min: 4033     avg: 4081     median: 4080.5 (10%)     max: 4128 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 706     avg: 1244     median: 1344.5 (8%)     max: 1572 Points
min: 1984     avg: 2080     median: 2079.5 (13%)     max: 2175 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 165.3     avg: 229.7     median: 240 (72%)     max: 260 Points
min: 208     avg: 209     median: 209 (63%)     max: 210 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
16.5 Points (21%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3 Points (74%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
8549 Points (52%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
38152 Points (28%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
60266 Points (42%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
13904 Points (17%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
217.4 s (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
5.2 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
5960 Points (9%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 20087     avg: 32344     median: 34399 (20%)     max: 38715 MIPS
min: 44935     avg: 45912     median: 45912 (26%)     max: 46889 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4614     avg: 5198     median: 5285.5 (63%)     max: 5617 MIPS
min: 4341     avg: 4476     median: 4476 (54%)     max: 4611 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
81 fps (28%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
265.5 fps (61%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 5.09     avg: 8.6     median: 9.2 (16%)     max: 10.6 fps
min: 6.65     avg: 7.1     median: 7.1 (12%)     max: 7.57 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.9 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.6 GB/s (28%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
9.7 GB/s (25%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 684     avg: 887     median: 834 (11%)     max: 1326 Seconds
min: 545     avg: 611     median: 610.5 (8%)     max: 676 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 364     avg: 465.9     median: 423.5 (3%)     max: 684 Seconds
min: 313     avg: 334.5     median: 334.5 (2%)     max: 356 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4666     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (11%)     max: 0.578 sec
min: 0.756     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (16%)     max: 0.77 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 7351     avg: 9434     median: 9433.5 (20%)     max: 11516 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
17.5 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
429.8 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 26635     avg: 35503     median: 35502.5 (31%)     max: 44370 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 7560     avg: 11888     median: 11716 (32%)     max: 16290 Points
min: 14374     avg: 14578     median: 14577.5 (39%)     max: 14781 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
63003 Points (51%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
63619 Points (52%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
67580 Points (57%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 5667     avg: 9450     median: 10255 (26%)     max: 12375 Points
8244 Points (21%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 8745     avg: 14302     median: 14659 (26%)     max: 18414 Points
min: 18547     avg: 18734     median: 18734 (33%)     max: 18921 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 3482     avg: 5221     median: 5352.5 (23%)     max: 6837 Points
min: 5015     avg: 5126     median: 5125.5 (22%)     max: 5236 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
2454 Points (66%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1429     avg: 1697     median: 1739.5 (73%)     max: 1806 Points
min: 1669     avg: 1737     median: 1737 (73%)     max: 1805 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5022     avg: 7709     median: 8127 (15%)     max: 8981 Points
min: 8618     avg: 9105     median: 9104.5 (16%)     max: 9591 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1489     avg: 1648     median: 1678 (7%)     max: 1700 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6992     avg: 8211     median: 8305.5 (26%)     max: 8917 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
7515 Points (75%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
33057 Points (36%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 542     avg: 572     median: 553 (1%)     max: 636 ms
min: 454.4     avg: 760     median: 759.7 (1%)     max: 1065 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 68050     avg: 75259     median: 73251 (64%)     max: 84477 Points
79579 Points (70%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 198.4     avg: 233.9     median: 242.5 (70%)     max: 250 Points
min: 114.2     avg: 199.6     median: 199.6 (57%)     max: 285 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 221     avg: 268.4     median: 279.5 (58%)     max: 288 Points
min: 134.1     avg: 276.6     median: 276.6 (58%)     max: 419 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1301     avg: 1540     median: 1593.5 (61%)     max: 1623 Points
min: 978     avg: 1003     median: 1002.5 (38%)     max: 1027 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 20.8     avg: 41.8     median: 42.8 (7%)     max: 63 Watt
44.7 Watt (8%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 25.2     avg: 48.6     median: 49.5 (9%)     max: 72.3 Watt
65.3 Watt (12%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 3.54     avg: 6.8     median: 6.5 (4%)     max: 12.7 Watt
min: 2.89     avg: 3.2     median: 3.2 (2%)     max: 3.46 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 3.67     avg: 5     median: 4.6 (5%)     max: 6.61 Watt
min: 4.89     avg: 5.5     median: 5.5 (6%)     max: 6.05 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 18.3     avg: 25.8     median: 26.1 (19%)     max: 30.4 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-1265U → 100% n=23

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 → 101% n=23

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 03. 23:56:31

#0 checking url part for id 14072 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 17587 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720043791 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.008s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14072 +0.005s ... 0.012s

#7 got single benchmarks 14072 +0.014s ... 0.027s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 17587 +0.004s ... 0.03s

#9 got single benchmarks 17587 +0.005s ... 0.036s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.036s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.042s ... 0.078s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.08s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)