Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-11370H vs Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

Intel Core i7-11370H

► remove from comparison Intel i7-11370H

The Intel Core i7-11370H is a quad-core SoC designed for use in ultra-thin gaming laptops and mobile workstations. It is based on the Tiger Lake H35 generation and was announced early 2021. It integrates four Willow Cove processor cores (8 threads thanks to HyperThreading). The base clock speed depends on the TDP setting and can vary from 3 (28 W TDP) to 3.3 GHz (35 W). The boost of a single and two cores under load can reach up to 4.8 GHz. All four cores can reach up to 4.3 GHz. The 11370H can use the whole 12 MB level 3 cache.

The SoC also includes the improved Iris Xe iGPU with all 96 EUs active clocked at up to 1350 MHz.

Furthermore, Tiger Lake SoCs add PCIe 4 support (four lanes), AI hardware acceleration, and the partial integration of Thunderbolt 4/USB 4 and Wi-Fi 6 in the chip.

All articles on Tiger Lake can be found on our Tiger Lake architecture hub.

Performance

The average 11370H in our database matches the AMD Ryzen 5 4500U, a noticeably less power-hungry chip, in multi-thread performance. Disregard the Core i7 moniker; this is essentially a mid-range CPU and no match for the likes of the Core i7-11800H or the Ryzen 9 5900HS.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 25 W, the TUF Dash F15 FX516PR is among the fastest laptops powered by the 11370H that we know of. It can be around 30% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

The Core i7 has a default TDP of 28 W to 35 W, the expectation being that laptop makers will go for a higher value in exchange for higher performance. Either way, that's way too high to allow for passively cooled designs.

The i7-11370H is built with Intel's third-gen 10 nm process marketed as SuperFin for average, as of late 2022, energy efficiency.

Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 9 185H

The Intel Core Ultra 9 185H is the top-of-the-line Meteor Lake family chip that debuted in December 2023. This 1st Gen Core Ultra processor has come to replace 13th generation Core chips; it has 16 cores (6 + 8 + 2) and 22 threads at its disposal. Its Performance cores, of which there are 6, are SMT-enabled and run at up to 5.1 GHz while its Efficient cores, of which there are 10 (8 main cores plus 2 extra ones found in the Low Power Island) run at up to 3.8 GHz. The 8-core Arc GPU, just out of the oven, serves as the integrated graphics adapter - this runs at up to 2.35 GHz - and there is a bevy of other brand-new technologies on offer as well, such as the integrated AI Boost NPU with two Gen 3 engines for hardware AI workload acceleration.

Architecture and Features

With Meteor Lake, Intel intends to deliver higher CPU performance, higher GPU performance and at the same time, longer battery life than what Raptor Lake chips were capable of. The company also wants a large piece of the AI cake and is working with Microsoft and other partners to make that happen. As a result, Windows Defender is now AI-enabled, meaning it can use the Intel NPU to take some of the load off the main CPU cores. We also get this new Intel Device Discovery technology that is designed to give us a better hardware-based remote laptop management than ever before; and, to make things even better, Intel now offers a dedicated Arc Pro graphics driver for workstations.

This generation of Intel Core processors features Redwood architecture P-cores and Crestwood architecture E-cores. Both come with slight architectural improvements over Raptor Cove and Gracemont respectively for slightly higher performance-per-clock figures; the interesting thing is that of the 10 E-cores, two are actually a separate cluster located on what Intel calls a "Low Power Island". Essentially, the latter is an SoC within an SoC that can stay active while the rest of the chip is turned off to save power. The low-power E-cores run at up to 2.5 GHz. Intel hopes that this approach will let it deliver unprecedentedly low power consumption figures when under low load, boosting battery life of laptops and tablets powered by Meteor Lake.

To build its Meteor Lake processors, Intel uses the Foveros technology (stacking several chips on top of each other). This is a cost-cutting measure more than anything else, as manufacturing several small dies on several different processes is so much cheaper than making a huge single die and hoping that there are no defects in it that will require disabling some parts of it.

Elsewhere, the Core Ultra 9 185H comes with 24 MB of L3 cache and a very healthy number of PCIe 5 and PCIe 4 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 15.7 GB/s. vPro Enterprise and business-centric features such as the Remote Platform Erase are onboard as well. It supports RAM running at up to 7467 MHz (DDR5-5600, LPDDR5-7467, LPDDR5x-7467, to be specific - which is about as good as what 8040 series Ryzen chips have). Naturally, the chip also features built-in Thunderbolt 4 support and Intel CNVi Wi-Fi support; fascinatingly enough, Intel chose to keep native SATA III support that AMD had removed from its Ryzen processors quite a while ago.

The 185H is compatible with 64-bit Windows 10, 64-bit Windows 11 and with many Linux distros.

Performance

If one chooses to trust the official Intel performance data, then the 185H is not a whole lot faster than the Ryzen 9 6900HX (Zen 3 Plus, 8 cores, 16 threads, up to 4.9 GHz), as far as multi-thread performance is concerned. This isn't a ground-breaking result but let's just wait for our in-house testing results instead of jumping to conclusions.

Either way, real-world performance of the chip may vary significantly depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of the system is.

Graphics

The 8-core Arc GPU running at up to 2.35 GHz is slated to be a proper alternative to the mighty Radeon 780M. The thing is about as fast as the GTX 1650 (Laptop) and the RTX 2050 (Laptop) to represent some seriously solid performance gains over aging Xe-series integrated GPUs. If one chooses to take Intel's word for it, that is.

A proper DX12 Ultimate graphics adapter, the Arc is no stranger to ray tracing and other modern technologies including AI frame generation (XeSS). It will let you connect up to four SUHD 4320p monitors and it will both HW-encode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs including AVC, HEVC and AV1 in a fast and efficient manner.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is. The latter is really important; Intel stresses that for the Arc to deliver the best results possible, multi-channel RAM configuration is a must.

Power consumption

This mighty Core Ultra 9 series processor has a "base" power consumption of 45 W, while its Turbo power consumption is not supposed to exceed 115 W. A powerful cooling solution will be needed to sort out this chip's hot temper.

The 185H is comprised of five small chips ("tiles") that are connected using Intel's Foveros technology. The tile containing main CPU cores is produced on the modern 7 nm Intel process marketed as Intel 4 while most other tiles (the iGPU, the I/O die, ...) are built with TSMC's N5 and N6 processes. The base tile is built with the old Intel 22FFL process.

ModelIntel Core i7-11370HIntel Core Ultra 9 185H
SeriesIntel Tiger LakeIntel Meteor Lake-H
CodenameTiger Lake-H35Meteor Lake-H
Series: Meteor Lake-H Meteor Lake-H
Intel Core i7-11390H compare3.4 - 5 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-11375H compare3.3 - 5 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-11370H « 3.3 - 4.8 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11320H compare3.2 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11300H compare3.1 - 4.4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H « 3.8 - 5.1 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H compare3.8 - 5 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H compare3.8 - 4.8 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H compare3.6 - 4.6 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H compare3.6 - 4.5 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Clock3300 - 4800 MHz3800 - 5100 MHz
L1 Cache320 KB
L2 Cache5 MB
L3 Cache12 MB24 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 816 / 22
6 x 4.8 GHz Intel Redwood Cove P-Core
8 x 3.8 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
2 x 2.5 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
TDP35 Watt45 Watt
Technology10 nm7 nm
max. Temp.100 °C110 °C
SocketBGA1449BGA2049
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266 RAM, PCIe 4, 4 GT/s bus, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Hyper-Threading, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR5-5600/LPDDR5-7467/LPDDR5x-7467 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, AI Boost, vPro Enterprise, RPE, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNI, FMA3, SHA
iGPUIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (400 - 1350 MHz)Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ( - 2350 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$426 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-11370H
35.7 pt (50%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ultra 9 185H
44.2 pt (61%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 108     avg: 109     median: 109 (76%)     max: 110 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 828     avg: 948     median: 947.5 (18%)     max: 1067 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 3696     avg: 5563     median: 5712.5 (5%)     max: 6646 Points
min: 12688     avg: 17445     median: 18177 (17%)     max: 19851 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1081     avg: 1469     median: 1507 (64%)     max: 1556 Points
min: 1620     avg: 1803     median: 1810.5 (77%)     max: 1906 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 475     avg: 566     median: 589 (65%)     max: 601 Points
min: 622     avg: 694     median: 700.5 (78%)     max: 735 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1438     avg: 2146     median: 2199 (5%)     max: 2578 Points
min: 4843     avg: 6712     median: 7138.5 (17%)     max: 7651 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 606     avg: 946     median: 960 (6%)     max: 1086 Points
min: 1581.9     avg: 2669     median: 2777.5 (18%)     max: 3165 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 162.9     avg: 220.1     median: 229 (69%)     max: 233 Points
min: 238     avg: 262.8     median: 264.5 (80%)     max: 280 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
34 Points (44%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.3 Points (81%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
10300 Points (62%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
59935 Points (43%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
88902 Points (62%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
14374 Points (18%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 292.1     avg: 366.7     median: 366.7 (4%)     max: 441.275 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 3.254     avg: 5.7     median: 5.7 (1%)     max: 8.1 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 7940     avg: 12898     median: 12898 (20%)     max: 17856 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 18961     avg: 25340     median: 26791 (15%)     max: 28520 MIPS
min: 52522     avg: 67897     median: 69924 (40%)     max: 76331 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5074     avg: 5290     median: 5307 (63%)     max: 5550 MIPS
min: 4502     avg: 5381     median: 5524.5 (66%)     max: 5781 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
158.2 fps (55%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
335.5 fps (77%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 4.98     avg: 7.2     median: 7.7 (14%)     max: 8.82 fps
min: 14.1     avg: 19.5     median: 20.8 (37%)     max: 22.7 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.96     avg: 1     median: 1 (0%)     max: 1.1 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 1.4     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (28%)     max: 1.8 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 7.9     avg: 9.6     median: 9.6 (25%)     max: 11.3 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
783 Seconds (10%)
min: 285     avg: 357.4     median: 327.5 (4%)     max: 538 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 432     avg: 531     median: 491 (3%)     max: 762 Seconds
min: 163     avg: 201.3     median: 190 (1%)     max: 285 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.544     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (12%)     max: 0.596 sec
min: 0.4457     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.503 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
10019 Points (21%)
min: 9854     avg: 11420     median: 11420 (24%)     max: 12986 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 6.6     avg: 6.7     median: 6.7 (1%)     max: 6.751 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
14.9 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
304.4 s (1%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
80494 Points (70%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 9920     avg: 11762     median: 11719 (32%)     max: 13296 Points
min: 12693     avg: 20942     median: 21875 (59%)     max: 24629 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 30507     avg: 49576     median: 39856 (32%)     max: 70781 Points
min: 75240     avg: 75478     median: 75478 (61%)     max: 75716 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 39681     avg: 49084     median: 39698 (32%)     max: 67872 Points
min: 75340     avg: 75417     median: 75417 (61%)     max: 75494 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 47633     avg: 66145     median: 71560 (60%)     max: 73828 Points
min: 78677     avg: 84868     median: 84868 (71%)     max: 91059 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 8702     avg: 9617     median: 9727 (25%)     max: 10322 Points
min: 17876     avg: 18479     median: 18664 (47%)     max: 18896 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 9829     avg: 13876     median: 14499 (26%)     max: 15138 Points
min: 21106     avg: 27129     median: 27113 (48%)     max: 30623 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 3487     avg: 5096     median: 5465.5 (23%)     max: 5811 Points
min: 6307     avg: 10831     median: 11696 (49%)     max: 12209 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 2199     avg: 2459     median: 2499 (67%)     max: 2570 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 12825     avg: 13697     median: 13864 (55%)     max: 14160 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1376     avg: 1540     median: 1556.5 (66%)     max: 1607 Points
min: 1700     avg: 1825     median: 1847.5 (78%)     max: 1902 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3828     avg: 5258     median: 5388 (10%)     max: 6115 Points
min: 10441     avg: 13019     median: 13109 (23%)     max: 14230 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1380 Points (6%)
min: 1821     avg: 1826     median: 1825.5 (8%)     max: 1830 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
4911 Points (15%)
min: 13228     avg: 13600     median: 13600 (43%)     max: 13972 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
7602 Points (76%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
47960 Points (53%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 618     avg: 635     median: 629 (1%)     max: 657 ms
min: 494     avg: 524     median: 517 (1%)     max: 594 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 66039     avg: 68321     median: 68903 (61%)     max: 70020 Points
min: 90543     avg: 94193     median: 93980 (83%)     max: 98055 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
205 Points (59%)
min: 237     avg: 260.6     median: 267.3 (77%)     max: 269 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 248     avg: 259.5     median: 263 (55%)     max: 270 Points
min: 237     avg: 281.5     median: 292 (61%)     max: 295 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1233     avg: 1377     median: 1386 (53%)     max: 1502 Points
min: 1589     avg: 1757     median: 1736.5 (67%)     max: 1971 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 36.5     avg: 56.1     median: 59 (10%)     max: 69.4 Watt
min: 44.4     avg: 112.9     median: 125.7 (22%)     max: 176.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 43.1     avg: 61.6     median: 62.5 (11%)     max: 80.2 Watt
min: 88     avg: 138.3     median: 154.9 (28%)     max: 171.8 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
4.8 Watt (3%)
min: 5.87     avg: 11.2     median: 11.4 (8%)     max: 19.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 5.42     avg: 7.6     median: 7.6 (8%)     max: 9.84 Watt
min: 11.7     avg: 15.4     median: 13.1 (14%)     max: 28.8 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 13.3     avg: 16.8     median: 15.8 (12%)     max: 23.6 Points per Watt
min: 17.8     avg: 30.5     median: 24.3 (18%)     max: 67 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-11370H → 100% n=29

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 9 185H → 172% n=29

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 04. 17:57:58

#0 checking url part for id 13071 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 16921 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720108678 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 13071 +0.004s ... 0.009s

#7 got single benchmarks 13071 +0.016s ... 0.025s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 16921 +0.002s ... 0.027s

#9 got single benchmarks 16921 +0.002s ... 0.029s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.029s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.037s ... 0.066s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.068s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)