Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-9400F vs Intel Core i9-13905H vs Intel Core i9-9900K

Intel Core i5-9400F

► remove from comparison Intel i5-9400F

The Intel Core i5-9400F is a six-core desktop processor based on the Coffee Lake architecture introduced in October 2018 along with the flagship Intel Core i9-9900K. The processor clocks at 2.9-4.1 GHz and can process up to 6 threads simultaneously. The Intel Core i5-9400F is manufactured in the improved 14-nm process (14nm++).

Performance

Compared to the Intel Core i5-8400, the performance could only be increased slightly. Performance increases of up to 10 percent can be expected. Both processors (old and new) still do not offer hyperthreading. The performance increase therefore only adds up to small architecture improvements and a slightly higher basic and turbo clock rate. This CPU is suitable for everyday office use, which does not require large coolers due to the low waste heat. But games are also among the application areas, because in games the Intel Core i5-9400F clearly beats the Intel Core i3-9100F. Here the six cores are paying off in the meantime. 

Graphics unit

The Intel Core i5-9400F is a processor without integrated graphics unit. If you value an iGPU, you should take a closer look at the Intel Core i5-9400, as it offers the entry level Intel UHD Graphics 630.

Power consumption

Intel puts the Thermal Design Power (TDP) at 65 watts. This means there is no need for large cooling systems, which also allows installation in very compact housings.

Intel Core i9-13905H

► remove from comparison Intel i9-13905H

The Intel Core i9-13905H is a high-end mobile CPU for laptops based on the Raptor Lake-H series (Alder Lake architecture). It was announced in early 2023 and offers 6 performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) and 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores support Hyper-Threading leading to 20 supported threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock rate ranges from 2.6 to 5.4 GHz (single core turbo, all-core 4.9 GHz) on the performance cluster and 1.9 to 4.1 GHz on the efficiency cluster. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare with the Core i7-6920HQ). All cores can use up to 24 MB L3 cache. Similar to the i9-13900H but without vPro support and the 13905H uses a different package and socket.

Performance

Thanks to the high core count and high clock speed, the Core i9-13905H is (together with the 13900HK) the fastest 45W CPU for laptops and only bested by Raptor Lake-HX based models with more cores and improved P-cores (e.g., the i9-13980HX). Still, the CPU is very well suited for all demanding use cases like gaming, content creation, and scientific calculations.

Features

The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to DDR5-5200 (up from 4800 MHz for the 12th gen). The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficient cores for the best performance. For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC, and AV1 decode in hardware. The CPU now supports PCIe 5.0 x8 for a GPU and two PCIe 4.0 x4 for SSDs.

The integrated graphics card is based on the Xe-architecture and offers 96 EUs (Execution Units) .

The CPU is rated at 45 W base power (115 W PL2) but most laptops will use a PL1 of around 60 Watt. The SoC is manufactured in a 10nm process at Intel, which is known as Intel 7 (improved over the 12th Gen).

Intel Core i9-9900K

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i9-9900K is a high end desktop processor based on the Coffee Lake architecture. At the time of announcement in late 2018, the 9900K is the fastest Coffee Lake CPU and offers an open multiplicator for easy overclocking. The CPU integrates 8 cores (16 threads) clocked at 3.6 - 5 GHz and it needs a new Z390 based mainboard.

Thanks to the two additional cores, the performance in multi-threaded applications is up to 25 % faster than the older Core i7-8700K. The single thread performance is only slightly faster due to the higher clock speeds. As a high end desktop CPU, the i9-9900K is suited even for very demanding applications and perfect for 3D gaming.

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 graphics card is clocked at up to 1.2 GHz and offers no advantage compared to previous generations. As it is a very low end GPU, only some low demanding games like Hearthstone can be played with it (see GPU page for benchmarks).

Intel specifies the TDP at 95 Watt, so if the CPU is used in laptops a big and chunky cooling system is needed to avoid throttling and lower clock speeds under sustained loads. When overclocking the CPU, the power consumption can easily rise up to 200 Watt and higher.

ModelIntel Core i5-9400FIntel Core i9-13905HIntel Core i9-9900K
SeriesIntel Coffee LakeIntel Raptor Lake-HIntel Coffee Lake
CodenameCoffee Lake-RRaptor Lake-HCoffee Lake-R
Series: Coffee Lake Coffee Lake-R
Intel Core i9-9900KS4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900K3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9700K3.6 - 4.9 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-97003 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9600K3.7 - 4.6 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900T2.1 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400F « 2.9 - 4.1 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-9100F3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900HK1.9 - 5.4 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13905H « 1.9 - 5.4 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900H1.9 - 5.4 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13800H1.8 - 5.2 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13705H1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700H1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13620H1.8 - 4.9 GHz10 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600H2.1 - 4.8 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13505H1.9 - 4.7 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500H1.9 - 4.7 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13420H1.5 - 4.6 GHz8 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900KS4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900K « 3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9700K3.6 - 4.9 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-97003 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9600K3.7 - 4.6 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900T2.1 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400F2.9 - 4.1 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-9100F3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Clock2900 - 4100 MHz1900 - 5400 MHz3600 - 5000 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB1.2 MB512 KB
L2 Cache1.5 MB11.5 MB2 MB
L3 Cache9 MB24 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 614 / 208 / 16
TDP65 Watt45 Watt95 Watt
Technology14 nm, 10010 nm14++ nm
Die Size149 mm2178 mm2
SocketLGA 1151-2FCBGA1792FCLGA1151
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4-2666 Memory Controller, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX, Quick Sync, VirtualizationThread DirectorDual-Channel DDR4-2666 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX-NI, Quick Sync, Virtualization, vPro
Architecturex86x86x86
$182 U.S.$488 U.S.
Announced
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
iGPUIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ( - 1500 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.intel.de

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-9400F
30.9 pt (43%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-13905H
42.9 pt (60%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-9900K
37.2 pt (52%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 17880     avg: 19384     median: 20034 (19%)     max: 20237 Points
12397 Points (12%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1652     avg: 1901     median: 2020 (86%)     max: 2030 Points
1280 Points (54%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
416 Points (46%)
min: 622     avg: 679     median: 639 (71%)     max: 775 Points
min: 495     avg: 502     median: 502 (56%)     max: 509 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
2378 Points (6%)
min: 6462     avg: 7028     median: 7152 (17%)     max: 7469 Points
min: 4816     avg: 4871     median: 4871 (12%)     max: 4926 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
984 Points (6%)
min: 2676     avg: 2821     median: 2857 (18%)     max: 2931 Points
min: 1623     avg: 1939     median: 1979 (12%)     max: 2040 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
173 Points (52%)
min: 235     avg: 255.3     median: 246 (74%)     max: 285 Points
min: 203     avg: 210.6     median: 212 (64%)     max: 218 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
11.3 Points (15%)
min: 17.37     avg: 20.7     median: 21.4 (28%)     max: 21.76 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2 Points (49%)
min: 2.33     avg: 2.4     median: 2.4 (59%)     max: 2.44 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
6490 Points (39%)
min: 7786     avg: 7924     median: 7933 (48%)     max: 8042 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
31523 Points (23%)
min: 36683     avg: 45846     median: 48778.5 (35%)     max: 49142 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
40065 Points (28%)
min: 63009     avg: 63708     median: 63976 (44%)     max: 64138 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
8182 Points (10%)
min: 10167     avg: 10218     median: 10192 (12%)     max: 10294 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
198.7 s (2%)
min: 85.6     avg: 91.9     median: 91.3 (1%)     max: 98.7 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
6.8 s (1%)
min: 3.276     avg: 4     median: 3.6 (1%)     max: 5.203 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
5794 Points (9%)
min: 7315     avg: 7775     median: 7633 (12%)     max: 8518 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
25639 MIPS (15%)
min: 68880     avg: 71701     median: 69892 (40%)     max: 76332 MIPS
min: 43248     avg: 48207     median: 48207 (28%)     max: 53166 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4678 MIPS (56%)
min: 4871     avg: 5487     median: 5520 (66%)     max: 6069 MIPS
min: 5311     avg: 5411     median: 5410.5 (65%)     max: 5510 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
64 fps (22%)
min: 90.9     avg: 110     median: 114.3 (40%)     max: 120.5 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
234 fps (54%)
min: 252.7     avg: 260.9     median: 260.5 (60%)     max: 270 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
9.1 fps (16%)
min: 20.5     avg: 21.5     median: 21.2 (37%)     max: 22.9 fps
min: 12.36     avg: 14.8     median: 15.8 (28%)     max: 16.3 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.5 GB/s (0%)
min: 0.8     avg: 1.1     median: 1.2 (0%)     max: 1.2 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.9 GB/s (15%)
min: 1.3     avg: 1.8     median: 1.9 (33%)     max: 2 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
5.2 GB/s (14%)
min: 7.8     avg: 10.4     median: 11.1 (29%)     max: 11.5 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 280     avg: 296     median: 302 (4%)     max: 306 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
468.5 Seconds (3%)
min: 163     avg: 171.3     median: 173 (1%)     max: 178 Seconds
min: 219.2     avg: 239.7     median: 223.8 (2%)     max: 276.1 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.7 sec (14%)
min: 0.4178     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4974 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 10312     avg: 13253     median: 14281.5 (30%)     max: 14409 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
9.3 s (2%)
min: 7.545     avg: 7.7     median: 7.7 (2%)     max: 7.823 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
20.8 s (1%)
min: 16.73     avg: 17     median: 16.9 (1%)     max: 17.25 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
499.8 s (2%)
min: 413.8     avg: 429.5     median: 432.2 (2%)     max: 440 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 58733     avg: 65154     median: 65153.5 (57%)     max: 71574 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
11185 Points (30%)
min: 22494     avg: 23911     median: 23894 (65%)     max: 25346 Points
min: 16598     avg: 17566     median: 17264 (47%)     max: 19169 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
70546 Points (57%)
min: 64697     avg: 67569     median: 67554.5 (55%)     max: 72059 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
70482 Points (57%)
min: 67420     avg: 68874     median: 67813 (55%)     max: 72450 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
72413 Points (61%)
min: 67259     avg: 68959     median: 68173.5 (57%)     max: 72229 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
8275 Points (21%)
21588 Points (55%)
min: 16435     avg: 17955     median: 17969 (45%)     max: 18694 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
12616 Points (22%)
min: 27625     avg: 29475     median: 29193 (52%)     max: 31606 Points
min: 21585     avg: 24141     median: 24497.5 (44%)     max: 25010 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
5777 Points (24%)
min: 12800     avg: 13567     median: 13653 (58%)     max: 14249 Points
min: 9413     avg: 10630     median: 10593 (45%)     max: 11298 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
2404 Points (65%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
14212 Points (56%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1139 Points (48%)
min: 1672     avg: 1774     median: 1685 (71%)     max: 1966 Points
1300 Points (55%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
5715 Points (10%)
min: 13661     avg: 14122     median: 13707 (25%)     max: 14999 Points
8845 Points (16%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1132 Points (5%)
1898 Points (8%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
5698 Points (18%)
14690 Points (46%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
5347 Points (53%)
min: 6014     avg: 6113     median: 6049 (60%)     max: 6339 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
21830 Points (24%)
min: 26616     avg: 31703     median: 32981 (36%)     max: 34233 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
867 ms (1%)
min: 465     avg: 522     median: 545 (1%)     max: 557 ms
min: 919     avg: 937     median: 924 (1%)     max: 968 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
71 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 38473     avg: 40081     median: 40081 (35%)     max: 41689 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 243     avg: 265.5     median: 265.5 (76%)     max: 288 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
211 Points (44%)
min: 267     avg: 301.5     median: 301.5 (63%)     max: 336 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1774     avg: 1884     median: 1883.5 (72%)     max: 1993 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
131.6 Watt (23%)
min: 139.4     avg: 140     median: 140 (24%)     max: 140.6 Watt
202 Watt (35%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
122.5 Watt (22%)
168.6 Watt (31%)
203.2 Watt (37%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 16     avg: 16.6     median: 16.6 (11%)     max: 17.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 11.7     avg: 15.8     median: 15.8 (17%)     max: 19.9 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
8 Points per Watt (6%)
16.9 Points per Watt (13%)
10 Points per Watt (7%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-9400F → 100% n=15

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-13905H → 203% n=15

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-9900K → 156% n=15

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 02. 08:49:43

#0 checking url part for id 12197 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14983 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 10442 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719902982 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12197 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#8 got single benchmarks 12197 +0.004s ... 0.014s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14983 +0.004s ... 0.018s

#10 got single benchmarks 14983 +0.007s ... 0.025s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 10442 +0.004s ... 0.029s

#12 got single benchmarks 10442 +0.018s ... 0.047s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.047s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.066s ... 0.113s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.113s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)