Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-9400F vs Intel Pentium Silver N6000 vs Intel Core i9-9900KS

Intel Core i5-9400F

► remove from comparison Intel i5-9400F

The Intel Core i5-9400F is a six-core desktop processor based on the Coffee Lake architecture introduced in October 2018 along with the flagship Intel Core i9-9900K. The processor clocks at 2.9-4.1 GHz and can process up to 6 threads simultaneously. The Intel Core i5-9400F is manufactured in the improved 14-nm process (14nm++).

Performance

Compared to the Intel Core i5-8400, the performance could only be increased slightly. Performance increases of up to 10 percent can be expected. Both processors (old and new) still do not offer hyperthreading. The performance increase therefore only adds up to small architecture improvements and a slightly higher basic and turbo clock rate. This CPU is suitable for everyday office use, which does not require large coolers due to the low waste heat. But games are also among the application areas, because in games the Intel Core i5-9400F clearly beats the Intel Core i3-9100F. Here the six cores are paying off in the meantime. 

Graphics unit

The Intel Core i5-9400F is a processor without integrated graphics unit. If you value an iGPU, you should take a closer look at the Intel Core i5-9400, as it offers the entry level Intel UHD Graphics 630.

Power consumption

Intel puts the Thermal Design Power (TDP) at 65 watts. This means there is no need for large cooling systems, which also allows installation in very compact housings.

Intel Pentium Silver N6000

► remove from comparison Intel Pentium N6000

The Intel Pentium Silver N6000 is a quad-core SoC of the Jasper Lake series that is primarily intended for inexpensive notebooks and was announced in early 2021. The four Tremont CPU cores clock between 1.1 and 3.3 GHz (single core Burst) and offer no HyperThreading (SMT). The N6000 uses 1.5 MB L2 and 4 MB L3 cache. The chip is manufactured on the first-gen 10 nm Intel process, the same process as Ice Lake.

Architecture

The processor architecture is called Tremont and a complete redesign compared to the old Golmont Plus cores in the predecessor. According to Intel, the single thread performance of a core could be improved by 30% on average (10 - 80% in all tests of SPECint and SPECfp).

Features

In addition to the four CPU cores, the SoC integrates a 32 EU Intel UHD Graphics GPU clocked from 350 - 850 MHz and a dual-channel DDR4 / quad-channel LPDDR4x memory controller (up to 16 GB and 2933 MHz). The chip now also partly integrates Wi-Fi 6 (Gig+), 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes, 14 USB 2.0/ 3.2 ports and two SATA 6.0 ports. The package got bigger and measures 35 x 24 mm (compared to 25 x 24 mm for the N5030 e.g.). The SoC is directly soldered to the mainboard (BGA) and can't be easily replaced.

Performance

The average N6000 in our database proves to be an OK entry-level processor, as of late 2022, its multi-thread benchmark scores nearly matching those of the AMD Ryzen 3 3200U. Yes, the chip is a whole lot slower than the latest Ryzen 3 and Core i3 processors, but it will at least let you run your day-to-day apps without annoying slowdowns.

The Asus Vivobook 13 Slate is among the fastest systems built around the N6000 that we know of, thanks to the long-term CPU power limit of 10 W. It can be more than 20% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

Like nearly all other N-class Intel processors, the Pentium N6000 has a default TDP of 6 W (also known as the long-term power limit). This is low and thus good enough for passively cooled tablets, laptops, mini-PCs.

The SoC is built with Intel's 2nd generation 10 nm process (not 10 nm SuperFin or Intel 7) for low, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i9-9900KS

► remove from comparison Intel i9-9900KS

The Intel Core i9-9900KS is a high end desktop processor that includes 8 cores based on the Coffee Lake architecture. It is the fastest Coffee Lake CPU in 2019 and compared to the similar named i9-9900K, the KS offers an all core Turbo of 5 GHz. All cores can clock between 4 GHz and 5 GHz and thanks to Hyperthreading / SMT 16 threads can be executed in parallel. The CPU is still manufactured in the mature 14 nm process (14nm++). Thanks to the open multiplicator, the CPU is rather easy to overclock (if a Z390 based mainboard is used).

With good cooling, the i9-9900KS can be around 10% faster than the older Intel Core i9-9900K (thanks to the 5 GHz all core Turbo). Compare to the old Core i7-8700K, the 9900KS is even 45% faster. Especially for gaming, the 9900KS is currently the fastest option available. The fast Ryzen and Threadripper CPUs from AMD however offer a better multithreaded performance.

The integrated GPU is called Intel UHD Graphics 630 and clocks with up to 1.2 GHz. It is not suited for demanding 3D games and located in the low end.

The TDP is raised to 127 Watt for the additional performance, therefore a good CPU cooler is needed. When overclocking the CPU, more than 200 Watt can be reached unter load.

ModelIntel Core i5-9400FIntel Pentium Silver N6000Intel Core i9-9900KS
SeriesIntel Coffee LakeIntel Jasper LakeIntel Coffee Lake
CodenameCoffee Lake-RJasper LakeCoffee Lake-R
Series: Coffee Lake Coffee Lake-R
Intel Core i9-9900KS4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900K3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9700K3.6 - 4.9 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-97003 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9600K3.7 - 4.6 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900T2.1 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400F « 2.9 - 4.1 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-9100F3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N60052 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N6000 « 1.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N50952 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N51052 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N51001.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N45052 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N45001.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900KS « 4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900K3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9700K3.6 - 4.9 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-97003 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9600K3.7 - 4.6 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900T2.1 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400F2.9 - 4.1 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-9100F3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Clock2900 - 4100 MHz1100 - 3300 MHz4000 - 5000 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB512 KB
L2 Cache1.5 MB1.5 MB2 MB
L3 Cache9 MB4 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 64 / 48 / 16
TDP65 Watt6 Watt127 Watt
Technology14 nm, 10010 nm14 nm
Die Size149 mm2178 mm2
SocketLGA 1151-2BGA1338FCLGA1151
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4-2666 Memory Controller, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX, Quick Sync, VirtualizationDDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3 x 8, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADual-Channel DDR4-2666 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX-NI, Quick Sync, Virtualization, vPro
Architecturex86x86x86
$182 U.S.$513 U.S.
Announced
max. Temp.105 °C100 °C
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) (350 - 850 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.intel.de

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-9400F
30.9 pt (43%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Pentium N6000
21.9 pt (30%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-9900KS
38.4 pt (53%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 1610     avg: 1730     median: 1699 (2%)     max: 1911 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 653     avg: 669     median: 672.5 (29%)     max: 679 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
416 Points (46%)
min: 237     avg: 253.8     median: 255 (28%)     max: 268 Points
min: 509     avg: 512     median: 511.5 (57%)     max: 514 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
2378 Points (6%)
min: 595     avg: 657     median: 650.5 (2%)     max: 730 Points
min: 4463     avg: 4820     median: 4819.5 (12%)     max: 5176 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
984 Points (6%)
min: 266     avg: 292.5     median: 291 (2%)     max: 322 Points
min: 1962     avg: 2058     median: 2058 (13%)     max: 2154 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
173 Points (52%)
min: 109     avg: 114.3     median: 113.7 (34%)     max: 121 Points
min: 215     avg: 216     median: 216 (65%)     max: 217 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
11.3 Points (15%)
min: 3.47     avg: 3.6     median: 3.6 (5%)     max: 3.71 Points
min: 22.31     avg: 23.2     median: 23.1 (30%)     max: 23.98 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2 Points (49%)
min: 1.36     avg: 1.4     median: 1.4 (35%)     max: 1.46 Points
min: 2.43     avg: 2.4     median: 2.4 (61%)     max: 2.46 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
6490 Points (39%)
min: 4057     avg: 4132     median: 4131.5 (25%)     max: 4206 Points
min: 8143     avg: 8183     median: 8183 (49%)     max: 8223 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
31523 Points (23%)
min: 9343     avg: 9643     median: 9642.5 (7%)     max: 9942 Points
min: 50462     avg: 51779     median: 51778.5 (38%)     max: 53095 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
40065 Points (28%)
69169 Points (48%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
8182 Points (10%)
10759 Points (13%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
198.7 s (2%)
727 s (9%)
min: 82     avg: 87.9     median: 87.9 (1%)     max: 93.8 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
6.8 s (1%)
16.9 s (3%)
min: 3.232     avg: 3.6     median: 3.6 (1%)     max: 3.969 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
5794 Points (9%)
1330 Points (2%)
min: 8156     avg: 8353     median: 8353 (13%)     max: 8550 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
25639 MIPS (15%)
min: 8096     avg: 8953     median: 9212 (5%)     max: 9668 MIPS
min: 55064     avg: 55735     median: 55735 (32%)     max: 56406 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4678 MIPS (56%)
min: 2320     avg: 2934     median: 3305 (40%)     max: 3387 MIPS
min: 5674     avg: 5734     median: 5734 (69%)     max: 5794 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
64 fps (22%)
18.4 fps (6%)
min: 116     avg: 122.5     median: 122.5 (43%)     max: 129 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
234 fps (54%)
93.4 fps (22%)
min: 276.2     avg: 278.9     median: 278.9 (64%)     max: 281.5 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
9.1 fps (16%)
min: 1.55     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (3%)     max: 1.76 fps
min: 15.31     avg: 16.3     median: 16.3 (29%)     max: 17.2 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.5 GB/s (0%)
0.2 GB/s (0%)
1.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.9 GB/s (15%)
0.4 GB/s (7%)
2.1 GB/s (36%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
5.2 GB/s (14%)
2.8 GB/s (7%)
min: 12.1     avg: 12.2     median: 12.2 (32%)     max: 12.2 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
3786 Seconds (48%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
468.5 Seconds (3%)
min: 1738     avg: 2163     median: 1935 (14%)     max: 3157 Seconds
min: 205.1     avg: 224.6     median: 224.6 (2%)     max: 244 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.7 sec (14%)
min: 1.084     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (26%)     max: 1.278 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
3985 Points (8%)
min: 14825     avg: 14884     median: 14883.5 (32%)     max: 14942 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
9.3 s (2%)
17.5 s (4%)
min: 7.405     avg: 7.4     median: 7.4 (2%)     max: 7.436 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
20.8 s (1%)
min: 16.45     avg: 16.5     median: 16.5 (1%)     max: 16.59 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
499.8 s (2%)
895 s (4%)
min: 412.2     avg: 414.2     median: 414.2 (2%)     max: 416.1 s
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
11185 Points (30%)
min: 3134     avg: 3617     median: 3563 (10%)     max: 4155 Points
min: 18531     avg: 18914     median: 18694 (51%)     max: 19517 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
70546 Points (57%)
min: 30345     avg: 32921     median: 32921 (27%)     max: 35497 Points
min: 75473     avg: 75482     median: 75482 (61%)     max: 75491 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
70482 Points (57%)
min: 30120     avg: 32790     median: 32790 (27%)     max: 35460 Points
min: 75946     avg: 76061     median: 76060.5 (62%)     max: 76175 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
72413 Points (61%)
min: 38897     avg: 43994     median: 43993.5 (37%)     max: 49090 Points
min: 74085     avg: 75802     median: 75508 (64%)     max: 77813 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
8275 Points (21%)
min: 2524     avg: 2897     median: 2947 (7%)     max: 3220 Points
min: 19068     avg: 19770     median: 20049 (51%)     max: 20193 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
12616 Points (22%)
min: 3838     avg: 4315     median: 4063 (7%)     max: 5296 Points
min: 24327     avg: 25511     median: 26016 (46%)     max: 26191 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
5777 Points (24%)
min: 1161     avg: 1301     median: 1259.5 (5%)     max: 1523 Points
min: 11017     avg: 11358     median: 11375 (48%)     max: 11683 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1139 Points (48%)
min: 720     avg: 728     median: 727 (31%)     max: 736 Points
1372 Points (58%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
5715 Points (10%)
min: 1784     avg: 1912     median: 1915 (3%)     max: 2004 Points
9100 Points (16%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1132 Points (5%)
min: 723     avg: 725     median: 724.5 (3%)     max: 726 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
5698 Points (18%)
min: 1881     avg: 1912     median: 1911.5 (6%)     max: 1942 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
5347 Points (53%)
3188 Points (32%)
6308 Points (63%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
21830 Points (24%)
8341 Points (9%)
35586 Points (39%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
6313 Points (86%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
35932 Points (88%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
867 ms (1%)
min: 1388     avg: 1412     median: 1405 (2%)     max: 1451 ms
883 ms (1%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
293.2 ms (3%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 25840     avg: 32251     median: 34145.5 (30%)     max: 34874 Points
44538 Points (39%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
104.2 Points (30%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
211 Points (44%)
min: 138.4     avg: 143.8     median: 146 (30%)     max: 147 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 440     avg: 469     median: 469 (18%)     max: 498 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
131.6 Watt (23%)
min: 11.3     avg: 12     median: 12 (2%)     max: 12.6 Watt
259.6 Watt (45%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
122.5 Watt (22%)
min: 10.5     avg: 13.3     median: 12.9 (2%)     max: 16.4 Watt
min: 219.3     avg: 269.1     median: 292.7 (53%)     max: 295.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
3.1 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 3.37     avg: 5.4     median: 4.8 (5%)     max: 8.08 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
8 Points per Watt (6%)
min: 19.6     avg: 22.3     median: 20.6 (15%)     max: 26.7 Points per Watt
min: 7.29     avg: 8.1     median: 8.1 (6%)     max: 8.95 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-9400F → 100% n=34

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium Silver N6000 → 53% n=34

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-9900KS → 155% n=34

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 01. 20:34:19

#0 checking url part for id 12197 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13075 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11553 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719858859 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.009s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12197 +0.004s ... 0.013s

#8 got single benchmarks 12197 +0.005s ... 0.018s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 13075 +0.005s ... 0.023s

#10 got single benchmarks 13075 +0.01s ... 0.033s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11553 +0.004s ... 0.037s

#12 got single benchmarks 11553 +0.005s ... 0.042s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.042s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.082s ... 0.125s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.125s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)