Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-9400F vs Intel Celeron N5100 vs Intel Celeron N4505

Intel Core i5-9400F

► remove from comparison Intel i5-9400F

The Intel Core i5-9400F is a six-core desktop processor based on the Coffee Lake architecture introduced in October 2018 along with the flagship Intel Core i9-9900K. The processor clocks at 2.9-4.1 GHz and can process up to 6 threads simultaneously. The Intel Core i5-9400F is manufactured in the improved 14-nm process (14nm++).

Performance

Compared to the Intel Core i5-8400, the performance could only be increased slightly. Performance increases of up to 10 percent can be expected. Both processors (old and new) still do not offer hyperthreading. The performance increase therefore only adds up to small architecture improvements and a slightly higher basic and turbo clock rate. This CPU is suitable for everyday office use, which does not require large coolers due to the low waste heat. But games are also among the application areas, because in games the Intel Core i5-9400F clearly beats the Intel Core i3-9100F. Here the six cores are paying off in the meantime. 

Graphics unit

The Intel Core i5-9400F is a processor without integrated graphics unit. If you value an iGPU, you should take a closer look at the Intel Core i5-9400, as it offers the entry level Intel UHD Graphics 630.

Power consumption

Intel puts the Thermal Design Power (TDP) at 65 watts. This means there is no need for large cooling systems, which also allows installation in very compact housings.

Intel Celeron N5100

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N5100

The Intel Celeron N5100 is a quad-core SoC of the Jasper Lake series that is primarily intended for inexpensive notebooks and was announced in early 2021. The four Tremont CPU cores clock between 1.1 and 2.8 GHz (single core Burst) and offer no HyperThreading (SMT). The N5100 uses 1.5 MB L2 and 4 MB L3 cache. The chip is manufactured in 10nm at Intel (most likely in the same process as Ice Lake).

Architecture

The processor architecture is called Tremont and a complete redesign compared to the old Golmont Plus cores in the predecessor. According to Intel, the single thread performance of a core could be improved by 30% on average (10 - 80% in all tests of SPECint and SPECfp).

Features

In addition to the quad-core CPU block, the SoC integrates a 24 EU Intel UHD Graphics GPU clocked from 350 - 800 MHz and a LPDDR4(x) dual channel memory controller (up to 16 GB and 2933 MHz). The chip now also partly integrates Wi-Fi 6 (Gig+), 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes, 14 USB 2.0/ 3.2 ports and two SATA 6.0 ports. The package got bigger and measures 35 x 24 mm (compared to 25 x 24 mm for the N5030 e.g.). The SoC is directly soldered to the mainboard (BGA) and can't be easily replaced.

Performance

While we have not tested a single system powered by the N5100 as of August 2023, it's safe to expect the chip to be 10% to 20% slower than the N6000, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned. In other words, this is a fairly slow processor that is unlikely to make anybody happy.

Power Consumption

Like most other N-class Intel processors, this Celeron has a 6 W default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit). This is rather low; a small metal plate is all it takes to dissipate heat generated by such a CPU.

The Celeron N5100 is manufactured on Intel's first-generation or second-generation [no exact data available] 10 nm process for average, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Celeron N4505

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N4505

The Intel Celeron N4505 is a dual-core SoC of the Jasper Lake series that is primarily intended for inexpensive and small desktops and was announced in early 2021. The two Tremont CPU cores clock between 2 and 2.9 GHz (single core Burst) and offer no HyperThreading (SMT). The N4505 uses 1.5 MB L2 and 4 MB L3 cache. The chip is built with Intel's first-gen 10 nm process, just like Ice Lake family processors.

CPU Architecture

The processor architecture is called Tremont and a complete redesign compared to the old Golmont Plus cores in the predecessor. According to Intel, the single thread performance of a core could be improved by 30% on average (10 - 80% in all tests of SPECint and SPECfp).

Features

In addition to the dual-core CPU block, the SoC integrates a 16 EU Intel UHD Graphics GPU clocked from 450 - 750 MHz and a LPDDR4(x) dual channel memory controller (up to 16 GB and 2933 MHz). The chip now also partly integrates Wi-Fi 6 (Gig+), 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes, 14 USB 2.0/ 3.2 ports and two SATA 6.0 ports. The package got bigger and measures 35 x 24 mm (compared to 25 x 24 mm for the N5030 e.g.). The SoC is directly soldered to the mainboard (BGA) and can't be easily replaced.

Performance

The average N4505 in our database is just as fast as AMD's dual-core Athlon Silver 3050e and Intel's previous-gen Celeron N4100, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. In other words, the Celeron is good for basic day-to-day activities but not much more than that, as of mid 2022.

Power consumption

This Celeron series SoC has a default TDP, also known as the long-term Power Limit, of 10 W, which is low enough to allow for passively cooled designs.

The N4505 is manufactured on the first-gen or the second-gen (no exact data available) 10 nm Intel process making for average, as of late 2022, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i5-9400FIntel Celeron N5100Intel Celeron N4505
SeriesIntel Coffee LakeIntel Jasper LakeIntel Jasper Lake
CodenameCoffee Lake-RJasper LakeJasper Lake
Series: Jasper Lake Jasper Lake
Intel Core i9-9900KS4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900K3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9700K3.6 - 4.9 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-97003 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9600K3.7 - 4.6 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900T2.1 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400F « 2.9 - 4.1 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-9100F3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N60052 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N60001.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N50952 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N51052 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5100 « 1.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N45052 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N45001.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N60052 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N60001.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N50952 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N51052 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N51001.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4505 « 2 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N45001.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Clock2900 - 4100 MHz1100 - 2800 MHz2000 - 2900 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB
L2 Cache1.5 MB1.5 MB1.5 MB
L3 Cache9 MB4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 64 / 42 / 2
TDP65 Watt6 Watt10 Watt
Technology14 nm, 10010 nm10 nm
Die Size149 mm2
SocketLGA 1151-2BGA1338BGA1338
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4-2666 Memory Controller, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX, Quick Sync, VirtualizationDDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
Architecturex86x86x86
$182 U.S.
Announced
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) (350 - 800 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (450 - 750 MHz)
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-9400F
30.9 pt (43%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron N4505
19.9 pt (28%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 1114     avg: 1149     median: 1148.5 (1%)     max: 1183 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 592     avg: 604     median: 603.5 (26%)     max: 615 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
416 Points (46%)
min: 224     avg: 230     median: 230 (26%)     max: 236 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
2378 Points (6%)
min: 431     avg: 441.5     median: 441.5 (1%)     max: 452 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
984 Points (6%)
min: 191     avg: 197.5     median: 197.5 (1%)     max: 204 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
173 Points (52%)
min: 104     avg: 106     median: 106 (32%)     max: 108 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
11.3 Points (15%)
min: 2.46     avg: 2.5     median: 2.5 (3%)     max: 2.52 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2 Points (49%)
min: 1.27     avg: 1.3     median: 1.3 (32%)     max: 1.28 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
6490 Points (39%)
min: 3606     avg: 3622     median: 3621.5 (22%)     max: 3637 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
31523 Points (23%)
min: 6831     avg: 6861     median: 6860.5 (5%)     max: 6890 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
40065 Points (28%)
10063 Points (7%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
8182 Points (10%)
5294 Points (6%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
198.7 s (2%)
min: 1120.44     avg: 1132     median: 1131.7 (13%)     max: 1143 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
6.8 s (1%)
min: 35.481     avg: 35.8     median: 35.8 (7%)     max: 36.2 s
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
36.1 s (19%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
5794 Points (9%)
min: 1000     avg: 1062     median: 1061.5 (2%)     max: 1123 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
25639 MIPS (15%)
min: 5871     avg: 6004     median: 6003.5 (3%)     max: 6136 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4678 MIPS (56%)
min: 2971     avg: 3047     median: 3046.5 (36%)     max: 3122 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
64 fps (22%)
min: 13.5     avg: 13.7     median: 13.7 (5%)     max: 13.8 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
234 fps (54%)
72.3 fps (17%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
9.1 fps (16%)
min: 1.16     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (2%)     max: 1.22 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.5 GB/s (0%)
min: 0.099     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (0%)     max: 0.101 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.9 GB/s (15%)
min: 0.184     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (3%)     max: 0.192 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
5.2 GB/s (14%)
1.3 GB/s (3%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 5719     avg: 5742     median: 5741.5 (73%)     max: 5764 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
468.5 Seconds (3%)
min: 2845     avg: 2899     median: 2899 (20%)     max: 2953 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.7 sec (14%)
min: 1.162     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (26%)     max: 1.224 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 3165     avg: 3214     median: 3214 (7%)     max: 3263 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
9.3 s (2%)
min: 19.931     avg: 20.9     median: 20.9 (5%)     max: 21.9 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
20.8 s (1%)
min: 44.275     avg: 45.7     median: 45.7 (2%)     max: 47.2 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
499.8 s (2%)
min: 997     avg: 1003     median: 1003.5 (4%)     max: 1009.94 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
6156 Points (5%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
11185 Points (30%)
min: 2700     avg: 2720     median: 2719.5 (7%)     max: 2739 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
70546 Points (57%)
24182 Points (20%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
70482 Points (57%)
min: 24027     avg: 24121     median: 24121 (20%)     max: 24215 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
72413 Points (61%)
min: 25571     avg: 25808     median: 25808 (22%)     max: 26045 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
8275 Points (21%)
min: 2130     avg: 2131     median: 2130.5 (5%)     max: 2131 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
12616 Points (22%)
min: 2979     avg: 2993     median: 2992.5 (5%)     max: 3006 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
5777 Points (24%)
894 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1139 Points (48%)
631 Points (27%)
min: 647     avg: 654     median: 653.5 (28%)     max: 660 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
5715 Points (10%)
1788 Points (3%)
min: 1225     avg: 1232     median: 1232 (2%)     max: 1239 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1132 Points (5%)
min: 645     avg: 648     median: 648 (3%)     max: 651 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
5698 Points (18%)
min: 1205     avg: 1215     median: 1214.5 (4%)     max: 1224 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
5347 Points (53%)
min: 2942     avg: 2946     median: 2945.5 (29%)     max: 2949 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
21830 Points (24%)
min: 5078     avg: 5082     median: 5082 (6%)     max: 5086 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
867 ms (1%)
min: 1578     avg: 1688     median: 1688 (2%)     max: 1798 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
353.4 ms (4%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
24502 Points (22%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 79.3     avg: 80.3     median: 80.3 (23%)     max: 81.2 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
211 Points (44%)
min: 113.3     avg: 114.2     median: 114.2 (24%)     max: 115 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 442     avg: 444     median: 444 (17%)     max: 446 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
131.6 Watt (23%)
min: 18.3     avg: 19     median: 19 (3%)     max: 19.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
122.5 Watt (22%)
min: 15.4     avg: 16.5     median: 16.5 (3%)     max: 17.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
8 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
8 Points per Watt (6%)
13.2 Points per Watt (10%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-9400F → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N5100 → 43% n=2

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N4505 → 39% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 01. 20:34:32

#0 checking url part for id 12197 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13077 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 13113 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719858869 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12197 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#8 got single benchmarks 12197 +0.004s ... 0.015s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 13077 +0.001s ... 0.015s

#10 got single benchmarks 13077 +0.004s ... 0.02s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 13113 +0.004s ... 0.023s

#12 got single benchmarks 13113 +0.005s ... 0.028s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.028s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.046s ... 0.074s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.074s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)