Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-7Y54 vs Intel Processor N200

Intel Core i5-7Y54

► remove from comparison Intel i5-7Y54

The Intel Core i5-7Y54 is a very efficient dual-core SoC for tablets and passively cooled notebooks based on the Kaby Lake architecture and was announced in the end of August 2016. The CPU consists of two processor cores clocked at 1.2-3.2 GHz (2-core Turbo not specified yet). Thanks to Hyper Threading, the processor can execute up to four threads simultaneously. The chips also includes the Intel HD Graphics 615 GPU, a dual-channel memory controller (DDR3L/LPDDR3) as well as VP9 and H.265 video de- and encoder. It is still produced in a 14 nm process with FinFET transistors. 

Architecture

Intel basically used the familiar micro architecture from the Skylake generation, so the per-MHz performance is identical. Only the Speed-Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of the voltages and clocks was improved, and the matured 14 nm process now also enables much higher frequencies and better efficiency than before. 

Performance

Despite the changed designation, the Core i5-7Y54 is the successor to the Core m5-6Y54 (Skylake Y-series), so the chip does not reach the performance level of other Core i processors due to the lower TDP. Thanks to its high Turbo clock, the 7Y54 can sometimes keep up with the 15 Watt models for short peak load and single-thread scenarios, but the clocks will drop significantly under sustained workloads. The CPU is still suitable for many more demanding applications as well as multitasking. 

Graphics

The integrated Intel HD Graphics 615 GPU has 24 Execution Units (EUs) like the old HD Graphics 515 and runs with clocks between 300 and 950 MHz in combination with this processor. The performance heavily depends on the TDP limit as well as the memory configuration; with fast LPDDR3-1866 RAM in dual-channel mode, the GPU should sometimes be able to compete with the HD Graphics 520, but can also be much slower in other scenarios. Modern games from 2016 will, if at all, only run smoothly in the lowest settings.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby Lake now also supports hardware decoding for H.265/HEVC Main10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in an improved 14 nm process with FinFET transistors, so the power efficiency was once again improved significantly. The typical TDP for the Y-series is specified at 4.5 Watts, and can be adjusted in both directions depending on the usage scenario.

Intel Processor N200

► remove from comparison Intel N200

The Intel Processor N200 is an entry-level mobile CPU for thin and light laptops from the Alder Lake-N series. It was announced in early 2023 and offers no performance cores and 4 of the 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The chip does not support HyperThreading and clocks with up to 3.7 GHz. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 6 MB L3-cache. 

Performance

The performance is clearly lower than the Core i3-N300 and N305 due to the reduced core count. Compared to older processors, the N200 should be similar to a Core i5-8250U (4 cores with HyperThreading, 3.4 GHz, 15W) when the power limit is not restricting performance.

Features

The Alder Lake-N chips only support single channel memory with up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 or LPDDR5-4800. The chip also supports Quick Sync and AV1 decoding (most likely same engine as in Alder Lake). Furthermore, Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.2 are partly integrated (but no Thunderbolt). External chips can be connected via PCIe Gen3 x9 (via the PCH).

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offersall 32 EUs (Execution Units) operating at only 450 - 750 MHz. Due to the single channel memory, low clock speeds and low shader count, the gaming performance of the iGPU is very limited.

Power consumption

The N200 has a base power consumption of only 6 W and is therefore suited for fanless cooling. The CPU is built with a further improved 10nm SuperFin process at Intel (called Intel 7).

ModelIntel Core i5-7Y54Intel Processor N200
SeriesIntel Kaby LakeIntel Alder Lake-N
CodenameKaby LakeAlder Lake-N
Series: Alder Lake-N Alder Lake-N
Intel Core i7-7700K compare4.2 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700 compare3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6 compare3.1 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7920HQ compare3.1 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700T compare2.9 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7600K compare3.8 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6 compare3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HQ compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HK compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7500 compare3.4 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7440HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7567U compare3.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7660U compare2.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7600U compare2.8 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300HQ compare2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7500T compare2.7 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7287U compare3.3 - 3.7 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7560U compare2.4 - 3.8 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7267U compare3.1 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7360U compare2.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7500U compare2.7 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300U compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7260U compare2.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7200U compare2.5 - 3.1 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100H compare3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7167U compare2.8 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7Y75 compare1.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y57 compare1.2 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y54 « 1.2 - 3.2 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100U compare2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y32 compare1 - 3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415U compare2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y30 compare1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965U compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7020U compare2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3867U compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3865U compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4425Y compare1.7 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y compare1.6 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4410Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N305 compare1.8 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N300 compare - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N200 « 1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N97 compare - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N95 compare - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N100 compare1 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N50 compare1 - 3.4 GHz2 / 2 cores6 MB L3
Clock1200 - 3200 MHz1000 - 3700 MHz
L1 Cache128 KB
L2 Cache512 KB
L3 Cache4 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 44 / 4
4 x 3.7 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
TDP4.5 Watt6 Watt
Technology14 nm10 nm
max. Temp.100 °C105 °C
SocketBGA
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR3L-1600/LPDDR3-1866 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI, TXT
iGPUIntel HD Graphics 615 (300 - 950 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) (450 - 750 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$281 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - N200
21.5 pt (30%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
100%
1 N200 +
45 Points (31%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
100%
1 N200 +
91 Points (2%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
100%
1 N200 +
1406 Points (1%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
100%
1 N200 +
690 Points (29%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
100%
1 N200 +
265 Points (29%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
100%
1 N200 +
542 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 205     avg: 231.4     median: 234 (1%)     max: 262 Points
219 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 111     avg: 115.4     median: 115 (35%)     max: 124 Points
113 Points (34%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2.27     avg: 2.4     median: 2.4 (3%)     max: 2.57 Points
114%
N200 +
2.7 Points (4%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 1.27     avg: 1.3     median: 1.3 (32%)     max: 1.41 Points
105%
N200 +
1.4 Points (34%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 3830     avg: 4353     median: 4392 (27%)     max: 4838 Points
3937 Points (24%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 6854     avg: 7784     median: 7551 (5%)     max: 8946 Points
100%
N200 +
7549 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 8756     avg: 9646     median: 9681 (7%)     max: 10501 Points
114%
N200 +
11030 Points (8%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 5545     avg: 5813     median: 5646 (7%)     max: 6248 Points
106%
N200 +
5971 Points (7%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
761 s (9%)
875 s (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
16.8 s (3%)
26 s (5%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
100%
1 i5-7Y54 +
747 s (3%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
100%
1 i5-7Y54 +
22 s (12%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 1708     avg: 1881     median: 1881 (3%)     max: 2054 Points
112%
N200 +
2115 Points (3%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
100%
1 N200 +
7146 MIPS (4%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
100%
1 N200 +
3230 MIPS (39%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
13 fps (5%)
125%
N200 +
16.3 fps (6%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
73 fps (17%)
110%
N200 +
80 fps (18%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
100%
1 N200 +
1.5 fps (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (0%)
199%
N200 +
0.3 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.2 GB/s (4%)
247%
N200 +
0.6 GB/s (10%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.4 GB/s (4%)
229%
N200 +
3.2 GB/s (8%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
100%
1 N200 +
4297 Seconds (55%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
100%
1 N200 +
2150 Seconds (15%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
100%
1 N200 +
1.1 sec (25%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 2868     avg: 2905     median: 2904.5 (6%)     max: 2941 Points
134%
N200 +
3902 Points (8%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
12 s (3%)
18.8 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 26     avg: 27     median: 27 (1%)     max: 28 s
42.7 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 669     avg: 681     median: 681 (3%)     max: 693 s
1011 s (4%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 7827     avg: 7866     median: 7866 (7%)     max: 7905 Points
121%
N200 +
9491 Points (8%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 2751     avg: 3104     median: 3046 (8%)     max: 3575 Points
2765 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 23771     avg: 26824     median: 25440 (21%)     max: 31261 Points
109%
N200 +
27649 Points (22%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
25640 Points (21%)
112%
N200 +
28655 Points (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 25981     avg: 32030     median: 33418 (28%)     max: 36691 Points
104%
N200 +
34749 Points (29%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 2118     avg: 2380     median: 2325 (6%)     max: 2665 Points
122%
N200 +
2848 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 3088     avg: 3550     median: 3624 (6%)     max: 3864 Points
114%
N200 +
4135 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 1112     avg: 1233     median: 1232.5 (5%)     max: 1353 Points
102%
N200 +
1251 Points (5%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
100%
1 N200 +
956 Points (26%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
100%
1 N200 +
1660 Points (7%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N200 +
928 Points (39%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N200 +
1540 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N200 +
891 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N200 +
1518 Points (5%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
3745 Points (37%)
122%
N200 +
4552 Points (45%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
6921 Points (8%)
144%
N200 +
9989 Points (11%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 i5-7Y54 +
min: 3571     avg: 3652     median: 3652 (50%)     max: 3733 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 i5-7Y54 +
min: 5578     avg: 6103     median: 6102.5 (15%)     max: 6627 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 i5-7Y54 +
min: 5060     avg: 5619     median: 5619 (10%)     max: 6178 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 i5-7Y54 +
min: 2953     avg: 3057     median: 3056.5 (60%)     max: 3160 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 i5-7Y54 +
5293 Points (8%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 i5-7Y54 +
2953 Points (44%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1132     avg: 1232     median: 1255 (1%)     max: 1309 ms
100%
N200 +
1460 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 i5-7Y54 +
min: 25796     avg: 27945     median: 27627 (24%)     max: 30411 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
1 N200 +
171.3 Points (36%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 N200 +
614 Points (24%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N200 +
14.1 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N200 +
13.6 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N200 +
6.1 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
100%
1 N200 +
16.1 Points per Watt (12%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-7Y54 → 100% n=31

Average Benchmarks Intel Processor N200 → 120% n=31

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 04. 09:20:07

#0 checking url part for id 8162 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14930 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720077607 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.006s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 8162 +0s ... 0.006s

#7 got single benchmarks 8162 +0.001s ... 0.007s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14930 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#9 got single benchmarks 14930 +0.006s ... 0.018s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.018s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.037s ... 0.054s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.056s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)