Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-7600K vs Intel Core i9-14900K

Intel Core i5-7600K

► remove from comparison Intel i5-7600K

The Intel Core i5-7600K is a fast quad-core processor for desktops based on the Kaby Lake architecture and was announced in January 2017. It is the top model of the consumer Kaby-Lake-H Core i5 series at the time of the announcement. The i5 does not support HyperThreading (4 threads only) and runs from 3.8 (base speed) up to 4.2 GHz. As a K-model, the i5-7600K offers an open multiplicator for overclocking.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Skylake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. The manufacturer only reworked the Speed Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of voltages and clocks, and the improved 14nm process allows much higher frequencies combined with better efficiency than before.

Performance

The performance of the i5-7600K is about 10 percent above the predecessor Core i5-6600K, thanks to clock speed increases and long hold Turbo Boost clocks. Matching clock speed, there is no speed improvement from Skylake. The old top model Core i7-4790K however is still slightly faster.

More information with gaming benchmarks and power measurements can be found in our AMD Ryzen 7 versus Intel CPUs review (upcoming).

Graphics

The integrated Intel HD Graphics 630 has 24 Execution Units (similar to previous HD Graphics 530) running at 350 - 1150 MHz. The performance depends a lot on the memory configuration; it should be comparable to a dedicated Nvidia GeForce 920M in combination with fast DDR4-2133 dual-channel memory.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby Lake now supports hardware decoding for H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors, which were announced in January, should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in an improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors, which improves the efficiency slightly. Intel still specifies the TDP with 91 Watts, which is a lot more than the 45 Watts of the mobile Kaby-Lake-H CPUs.

Intel Core i9-14900K

► remove from comparison Intel i9-14900K

The Intel Core i9-14900K is a high-end processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, similar to the Intel Core i9-13900K last year. The base clock is 3.2 GHz and can reach up to 6 GHz under optimal conditions. The total of 32 threads are still divided into 8 P and 16 E cores. The 8 performance cores (P-cores) also offer hyperthreading, which means that a total of 32 threads can be processed simultaneously in conjunction with the 16 energy-efficient E-cores. As before, the K models continue to offer a freely selectable multiplier, which simplifies overclocking. The Intel Core i9-14900K uses the same CPU socket (LGA 1700) as the Intel Core i9-13900K. This means you don't necessarily need a new motherboard, as the 600 series chipsets support the new processors after a BIOS update. There is also still the option of using DDR4 for the RAM.

Performance

Compared to the Intel Core i9-13900K, the Core i9-14900K still offers 8 P-cores, which are relieved by 16 additional E-cores for demanding applications and thus ensure very high multi-thread performance. In comparison, however, the Intel Core i9-14900K can only gain a slight lead. The e-cores primarily take care of background applications. The hybrid architecture relies on the Intel Thread Director, which is responsible for the correct allocation of tasks. Meanwhile, the IPC could only be increased slightly. As an innovation with the Intel Core i9-14900K, the manufacturer is increasingly relying on AI, which is also used for overclocking. With one click in the Intel Extreme Utility, the tool checks the entire system and makes the necessary settings.

Graphics unit

Like the Intel Core i9-13900K, the Intel Core i9-14900K offers an integrated graphics unit. The Intel Iris Xe architecture continues to serve as the basis. In terms of performance, however, nothing has changed with the Intel UHD Graphics 770.

Power consumption

The Intel Core i9-14900K is specified with a TDP of 125 watts, which corresponds to the PL1 value. In Boost mode, the processor's performance can increase to up to 253 watts (PL2). However, this requires very good cooling. Compared to the Intel Core i9-13900K, the specified power consumption does not increase if the limits are adhered to. The situation is different if the limits are deactivated. As this value depends on the overall system, we cannot make an exact statement on this.

ModelIntel Core i5-7600KIntel Core i9-14900K
SeriesIntel Kaby LakeIntel Raptor Lake-R
CodenameKaby LakeRaptor Lake
Series: Raptor Lake-R Raptor Lake
Intel Core i7-7700K compare4.2 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700 compare3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6 compare3.1 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7920HQ compare3.1 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700T compare2.9 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7600K « 3.8 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6 compare3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HQ compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HK compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7500 compare3.4 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7440HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7567U compare3.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7660U compare2.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7600U compare2.8 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300HQ compare2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7500T compare2.7 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7287U compare3.3 - 3.7 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7560U compare2.4 - 3.8 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7267U compare3.1 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7360U compare2.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7500U compare2.7 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300U compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7260U compare2.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7200U compare2.5 - 3.1 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100H compare3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7167U compare2.8 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7Y75 compare1.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y57 compare1.2 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y54 compare1.2 - 3.2 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100U compare2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y32 compare1 - 3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415U compare2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y30 compare1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965U compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7020U compare2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3867U compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3865U compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4425Y compare1.7 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y compare1.6 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4410Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core i9-14900K « 3.2 - 6 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-14700K compare2.5 - 5.6 GHz20 / 28 cores33 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14600K compare3.5 - 5.3 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Clock3800 - 4200 MHz3200 - 6000 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB
L2 Cache1 MB32 MB
L3 Cache8 MB36 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 424 / 32
8 x 6.0 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
16 x 4.4 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
TDP91 Watt125 Watt
Technology14 nm10 nm
SocketFCLGA1151LGA 1700
FeaturesDDR3(L)-1600/DDR4-2400 Memory Controller, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX-NI, Quick Sync, Virtualization, vProIntel UHD Graphics 770, DDR5 5600 MT/s, DDR4 3200 MT/s
iGPUIntel HD Graphics 630 (350 - 1150 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1650 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$242 U.S.$589 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
Die Size257 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-14900K
61.7 pt (86%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 134     avg: 136.5     median: 137 (95%)     max: 138 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 2112     avg: 2189     median: 2146.5 (40%)     max: 2352 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
41193 Points (38%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
2351 Points (100%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
900 Points (100%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
15466 Points (38%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 660     avg: 674     median: 674 (4%)     max: 688 Points
6282 Points (40%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 168     avg: 179.5     median: 179.5 (54%)     max: 191 Points
332 Points (100%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 7.67     avg: 7.9     median: 7.9 (10%)     max: 8.07 Points
72.2 Points (94%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 1.98     avg: 2     median: 2 (50%)     max: 2.05 Points
4 Points (100%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 6730     avg: 6814     median: 6814 (41%)     max: 6898 Points
12643 Points (76%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 23585     avg: 24179     median: 24179 (18%)     max: 24773 Points
94801 Points (69%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
144156 Points (100%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
18511 Points (23%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 253.6     avg: 256.6     median: 256.6 (3%)     max: 259.5 s
74.5 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 8.3     avg: 8.5     median: 8.5 (2%)     max: 8.672 s
2.1 s (0%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
3570 Points (6%)
16108 Points (26%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 145144     avg: 146282     median: 145207 (83%)     max: 149570 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 7772     avg: 7893     median: 7932 (95%)     max: 7934 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
46.2 fps (16%)
min: 75.9     avg: 181.2     median: 181.2 (63%)     max: 286.5 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
223 fps (51%)
min: 257.5     avg: 345.5     median: 345.5 (80%)     max: 433.5 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 40.8     avg: 41.4     median: 41.1 (72%)     max: 42.8 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.303     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (0%)     max: 0.367 GB/s
2.8 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 0.534     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (10%)     max: 0.611 GB/s
5.8 GB/s (100%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 2.9     avg: 3.3     median: 3.3 (9%)     max: 3.7 GB/s
26.7 GB/s (70%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 135     avg: 143     median: 144.5 (2%)     max: 147 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 80     avg: 84.6     median: 85 (1%)     max: 87 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.3425     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (7%)     max: 0.3504 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
8532 Points (18%)
min: 20532     avg: 22302     median: 22772.5 (48%)     max: 22928 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 8.74     avg: 8.8     median: 8.8 (2%)     max: 8.891 s
5.5 s (1%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 19.9     avg: 20.1     median: 20.1 (1%)     max: 20.22 s
12 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 465     avg: 466.3     median: 466.3 (2%)     max: 467.5 s
280.3 s (1%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 11403     avg: 96701     median: 112087 (98%)     max: 114209 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
8381 Points (23%)
min: 28587     avg: 31256     median: 31397 (85%)     max: 32853 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
65821 Points (53%)
min: 89084     avg: 105234     median: 106096 (86%)     max: 111347 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
66315 Points (54%)
min: 88682     avg: 105311     median: 105851 (86%)     max: 110989 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
69090 Points (58%)
min: 90865     avg: 107009     median: 108898 (92%)     max: 110670 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
5972 Points (15%)
min: 27678     avg: 29391     median: 29524 (75%)     max: 30462 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 8839     avg: 9066     median: 9065.5 (16%)     max: 9292 Points
min: 48193     avg: 53897     median: 54404 (97%)     max: 56087 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
4152 Points (18%)
min: 19418     avg: 22177     median: 22451 (95%)     max: 23721 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 3108     avg: 3214     median: 3243 (87%)     max: 3294 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 20435     avg: 21326     median: 21397 (84%)     max: 21790 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2243     avg: 2347     median: 2369 (100%)     max: 2370 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 24552     avg: 25148     median: 25199 (45%)     max: 25867 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2177     avg: 2237     median: 2247 (10%)     max: 2280 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 23151     avg: 24582     median: 24467 (77%)     max: 25496 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 9620     avg: 9873     median: 9872.5 (99%)     max: 10009 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 82660     avg: 87853     median: 88108.5 (97%)     max: 91119 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
5225 Points (71%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
15030 Points (37%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
14426 Points (23%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
4455 Points (67%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
818 ms (1%)
min: 413     avg: 415     median: 414 (0%)     max: 418 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
56.9 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 332     avg: 334.7     median: 334 (96%)     max: 338 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 371     avg: 388.3     median: 386 (80%)     max: 410 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 2490     avg: 2566     median: 2584 (99%)     max: 2611 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
124 Watt (21%)
537 Watt (93%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
98 Watt (18%)
548 Watt (100%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 67.4     avg: 83.6     median: 77.9 (51%)     max: 151.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
7 Points per Watt (5%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-7600K → 100% n=26

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-14900K → 378% n=26

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 02. 16:17:49

#0 checking url part for id 8528 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 15092 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719929869 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 8528 +0s ... 0.005s

#7 got single benchmarks 8528 +0s ... 0.006s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 15092 +0.004s ... 0.009s

#9 got single benchmarks 15092 +0.032s ... 0.041s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.041s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.051s ... 0.091s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.094s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)