Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-7200U vs Intel Core i5-8259U

Intel Core i5-7200U

► remove from comparison Intel i5-7200U

The Intel Core i5-7200U is a dual-core processor of the Kaby Lake architecture. It offers two CPU cores clocked at 2.5 - 3.1 GHz and integrates HyperThreading to work with up to 4 threads at once. The architectural differences are rather small compared to the Skylake generation, therefore the performance per MHz is very similar. The SoC includes a dual channel DDR4 memory controller and Intel HD Graphics 620 graphics card (clocked at 300 - 1000 MHz). It is manufactured in an improved 14nm FinFET process at Intel. Compared to the old Skylake based Core i5-6200U, the i5-7200U offers a 300 MHz higher clock speed.

Intel Core i5-8259U

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i5-8259U is a quad-core SoC for notebooks based on the Coffee Lake architecture and was announced in April 2018. Compared to its predecessor Core i5-7267U, the CPU is now a quad-core with Hyperthreading support for the execution of up to 8 threads simultaneously. The base frequency is 2.3 GHz, but the Turbo goes all the way up to 3.8 GHz. It is also equipped with an Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 GPU with 128 MB eDRAM, a dual-channel memory controller (DDR4) as well as VP9 and H.265 video decoding as well as encoding. The chip is still manufactured in a 14nm process with FinFET transistors.

Compared to faster Core i5 and i7 models with eDRAM and 28 Watts, the i5-8259U only features 6 MB smart cache and the slowest clock of the Iris Plus GPU.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Kaby Lake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. The manufacturer only reworked the Speed Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of voltages and clocks, and the improved 14nm process allows much higher frequencies combined with better efficiency than before.

Performance

Considering the clocks of the Core i5-8259U, its performance should be between the 15W models Core i5-8350U and Core i7-8550U. The i5-8259U should still be faster than the i7-8550U in practice thanks to the increased TDP, especially during sustained workloads.

Graphics

The integrated Intel Iris Plus 655 Graphics is the GT3e model of the Kaby Lake GPU (Intel Gen. 9.5). It has 48 Execution Units running at 300-1050 MHz (slowest clock of the 655, the fastest is 1200 MHz in combination with the i7-8559U) and the performance is comparable to a GeForce 930M or 940MX thanks to fast eDRAM cache. However, there aren't any significant improvements compared to the old Iris Plus 650, so modern games can often not be played smoothly or only at the lowest or medium settings, respectively.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby lake now also supports H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors announced in January should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in an improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors, which improves the efficiency even further. Intel specifies the TDP with 28 Watts, which can be reduced to 23 Watts (cTDP Down) depending on the usage scenario. The TDP is pretty high compared to the common 15-Watt TDP for quad-core processors, but allows a better utilization of CPU and GPU Turbo.

ModelIntel Core i5-7200UIntel Core i5-8259U
SeriesIntel Kaby LakeIntel Coffee Lake
CodenameKaby LakeCoffee Lake-U
Series: Coffee Lake Coffee Lake-U
Intel Core i7-7700K compare4.2 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700 compare3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6 compare3.1 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7920HQ compare3.1 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700T compare2.9 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7600K compare3.8 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6 compare3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HQ compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HK compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7500 compare3.4 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7440HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7567U compare3.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7660U compare2.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7600U compare2.8 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300HQ compare2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7500T compare2.7 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7287U compare3.3 - 3.7 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7560U compare2.4 - 3.8 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7267U compare3.1 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7360U compare2.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7500U compare2.7 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300U compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7260U compare2.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7200U « 2.5 - 3.1 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100H compare3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7167U compare2.8 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7Y75 compare1.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y57 compare1.2 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y54 compare1.2 - 3.2 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100U compare2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y32 compare1 - 3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415U compare2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y30 compare1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965U compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7020U compare2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3867U compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3865U compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4425Y compare1.7 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y compare1.6 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4410Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8559U compare2.7 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8557U compare1.7 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8269U compare2.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8279U compare2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8259U « 2.3 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8257U compare1.4 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8109U compare3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Clock2500 - 3100 MHz2300 - 3800 MHz
L1 Cache128 KB256 KB
L2 Cache512 KB1 MB
L3 Cache3 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 44 / 8
TDP15 Watt28 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketBGA1356FCBGA1528
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI, Intel SSE4.1, Intel SSE 4.2
iGPUIntel HD Graphics 620 (300 - 1000 MHz)Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 (300 - 1050 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$281 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-8259U
27.6 pt (38%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 3592     avg: 3792     median: 3728 (3%)     max: 4025 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 959     avg: 976     median: 976.5 (42%)     max: 991 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 369     avg: 378     median: 381 (42%)     max: 386 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1385     avg: 1473     median: 1471 (4%)     max: 1567 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 268     avg: 324.5     median: 327 (2%)     max: 337 Points
min: 575     avg: 622     median: 615 (4%)     max: 687 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 88     avg: 126.3     median: 128 (39%)     max: 132 Points
min: 132     avg: 147.1     median: 148.7 (45%)     max: 154 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2.85     avg: 3.6     median: 3.7 (5%)     max: 3.7 Points
7.1 Points (9%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 1.2     avg: 1.4     median: 1.5 (36%)     max: 1.49 Points
1.7 Points (42%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 4787     avg: 4976     median: 4985.5 (30%)     max: 5022 Points
5706 Points (34%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 9213     avg: 11161     median: 11308 (8%)     max: 11955 Points
21869 Points (16%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 11910     avg: 13678     median: 13808 (10%)     max: 14554 Points
27377 Points (19%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 5663     avg: 6343     median: 6415.5 (8%)     max: 6524 Points
7397 Points (9%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 460.9     avg: 495     median: 491.2 (6%)     max: 537 s
248.6 s (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 14.66     avg: 15.6     median: 15.5 (3%)     max: 17.62 s
7.5 s (2%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
464.8 s (2%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
14.9 s (8%)
5348 Points (8%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 17799     avg: 20778     median: 19104.5 (11%)     max: 28824 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 3753     avg: 3949     median: 3975.5 (48%)     max: 4022 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 19     avg: 21.3     median: 21.6 (8%)     max: 22 fps
min: 38.5     avg: 39.5     median: 39.5 (14%)     max: 40.5 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 100     avg: 112.7     median: 113.1 (26%)     max: 117 fps
min: 162.3     avg: 165.1     median: 165.1 (38%)     max: 167.95 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 4.72     avg: 5.2     median: 5.4 (9%)     max: 5.49 fps
0.5 GB/s (0%)
0.8 GB/s (13%)
4.1 GB/s (11%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
1331 Seconds (17%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 688     avg: 730     median: 729.5 (5%)     max: 769 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.738     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (17%)     max: 0.818 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 3700     avg: 4299     median: 4347.5 (9%)     max: 4407 Points
7916 Points (17%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 12     avg: 12.3     median: 12.3 (3%)     max: 12.61 s
11.1 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 27.36     avg: 28.2     median: 28 (1%)     max: 29.69 s
24.3 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 610     avg: 645     median: 643.5 (3%)     max: 722 s
589 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 9939     avg: 11370     median: 11779 (10%)     max: 12049 Points
25093 Points (22%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 3242     avg: 4145     median: 4107 (11%)     max: 4695 Points
min: 7105     avg: 8348     median: 8528.5 (23%)     max: 9276 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 28394     avg: 37794     median: 37804 (31%)     max: 42974 Points
min: 47878     avg: 49579     median: 49578.5 (40%)     max: 51279 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 26941     avg: 36877     median: 37260 (30%)     max: 42166 Points
min: 47855     avg: 49509     median: 49509 (40%)     max: 51163 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 36369     avg: 41562     median: 42260 (36%)     max: 43942 Points
min: 17718     avg: 40451     median: 49722 (42%)     max: 53914 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 2622     avg: 3414     median: 3503 (9%)     max: 3684 Points
min: 5946     avg: 6904     median: 6670.5 (17%)     max: 7927 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 3866     avg: 4887     median: 4979 (9%)     max: 5252 Points
min: 8348     avg: 9726     median: 9743 (17%)     max: 11006 Points
min: 2752     avg: 3096     median: 3132 (13%)     max: 3346 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 948     avg: 961     median: 951 (40%)     max: 984 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3359     avg: 3602     median: 3607 (6%)     max: 3839 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 944     avg: 957     median: 948 (4%)     max: 979 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3335     avg: 3571     median: 3567 (11%)     max: 3811 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3648     avg: 3799     median: 3809 (38%)     max: 3958 Points
min: 4200     avg: 4265     median: 4211 (42%)     max: 4383 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 7066     avg: 7413     median: 7516 (8%)     max: 7767 Points
min: 13421     avg: 14122     median: 13961 (15%)     max: 14984 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3484     avg: 3661     median: 3630 (49%)     max: 3902 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6425     avg: 6947     median: 6806 (17%)     max: 7439 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6297     avg: 6584     median: 6480.5 (12%)     max: 6932 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 2812     avg: 2983     median: 2906 (57%)     max: 3209 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6695     avg: 6772     median: 6772 (11%)     max: 6849 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3037     avg: 3144     median: 3143.5 (47%)     max: 3250 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest 9 - PerformanceTest 9.0 CPU Mark
4907 Points (26%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1109     avg: 1211     median: 1196 (1%)     max: 1542 ms
min: 1010     avg: 1054     median: 1068 (1%)     max: 1095 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 77.7     avg: 124.3     median: 86.3 (1%)     max: 826 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 21890     avg: 29883     median: 30957 (27%)     max: 32838 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
140.3 Points (40%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 173.3     avg: 176.9     median: 176 (37%)     max: 182.4 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
954 Points (37%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
26.8 Watt (5%)
min: 36.1     avg: 42     median: 39.5 (7%)     max: 50.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
25.5 Watt (5%)
min: 37.6     avg: 44.2     median: 43.7 (8%)     max: 51.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
13.9 Watt (9%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
12.8 Points per Watt (10%)
min: 12.4     avg: 13.9     median: 13.9 (10%)     max: 15.3 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-7200U → 100% n=31

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-8259U → 159% n=31

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 03. 18:38:30

#0 checking url part for id 8152 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10068 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720024710 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.004s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 8152 +0s ... 0.004s

#7 got single benchmarks 8152 +0.016s ... 0.02s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 10068 +0.004s ... 0.024s

#9 got single benchmarks 10068 +0.013s ... 0.037s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.037s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.05s ... 0.087s

#12 return log +0.003s ... 0.09s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)