Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-13600K vs Intel Core i5-11400F

Intel Core i5-13600K

► remove from comparison Intel i5-13600K

The Intel Core i5-13600K is a fast mid-range desktop processor of the Raptor Lake series. It includes a hybrid architecture for the CPU cores with combined 14 cores. Six fast Raptor Cove performance cores (P-cores) with HyperThreading and a clock speed of 3.5 - 5.1 GHz and eight Gracemont efficiency cores without HyperThreading and a clock speed of 2.6 - 3.9 GHz.

Thanks to the faster P-cores and more E-cores, the i5-13600K is significantly faster than the old i5-12600K (especially in multi-threaded workloads. 

The 13600K is rated at 125 Watt TDP base power (PL1) and 181 Watt Turbo Power (PL2) and therefore slightly higher than the old Core i5-12600K.

Intel Core i5-11400F

► remove from comparison Intel i5-11400F

The Intel Core i5-11400F is a fast six-core desktop processor based on the new Rocket Lake architecture, which was introduced in March 2021. The processor clocks with a base clock of 2.6 GHz and reaches an all-core boost of 4.2 GHz under load. In single-thread applications, the Intel Core i5-11400F even reaches up to 4.4 GHz. Intel also gives the Rocket Lake processors the Hyperthreading feature, which allows the i5-11400F to process up to 12 threads simultaneously. As known, the Intel Core i5-11400F is manufactured in the 14 nm process. Nevertheless, many changes have been made with the Rocket Lake architecture, which is also reflected in the performance compared to the Comet Lake. The Intel Core i5-11400F is a non-K CPU, which means that there is no freely selectable multiplier. Thus, the scope for overclocking is relatively small.

Performance

Compared to the Intel Core i5-10400F, the Core i5-11400F offers a significantly better IPC. This can be seen clearly in the single-core benchmarks. But the multi-core performance also benefits from the better IPC compared to Comet-Lake. A performance increase of up to 20 percent can be expected. The Core i5 has to do without the TVB (Thermal Velocity Boost). However, 4.2 GHz is still possible when all cores are loaded. Due to the very high single-thread performance, the Intel Core i5-11400F is best suited for video games.

Graphics

The processors marked with "F" in the nomenclature don't offer an integrated graphics unit. All other non-F processors can fall back on the Intel UHD Graphics 750 and also allow operation without a dedicated graphics card.

Power consumption

The TDP turns out relatively low with 65 watts. This is the PL1 value. For Turbo, the Intel Core i5-11400F offers a higher TDP of up to 154 watts with PL2. However, this may only be applied for a maximum of 28 seconds (dew). A good air cooler should be able to handle the resulting waste heat, so no AiO is necessary for this processor.

ModelIntel Core i5-13600KIntel Core i5-11400F
SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-SIntel Rocket Lake
CodenameRaptor LakeRocket Lake
Series: Rocket Lake Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-13900K compare3 - 5.8 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700K compare3.4 - 5.4 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600K « 3.5 - 5.1 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500 compare2.5 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500T compare2.5 - 4.6 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-11900K compare3.5 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-11700K compare3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-11700 compare2.5 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11600K compare3.9 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11400F « 2.6 - 4.4 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11400T compare1.3 - 3.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Clock3500 - 5100 MHz2600 - 4400 MHz
L2 Cache20 MB3 MB
L3 Cache24 MB12 MB
Cores / Threads14 / 20
6 x 5.1 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
8 x 3.9 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
6 / 12
TDP125 Watt65 Watt
Technology10 nm14 nm
Die Size257 mm2276 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketLGA 1700LGA1200
FeaturesIntel UHD Graphics 770, DDR5 5600 MT/s, DDR4 3200 MT/sDDR4-3200 RAM, PCIe 4, 8 GT/s bus, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1500 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$319 U.S.$157 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerwww.intel.comark.intel.com
L1 Cache480 KB

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-13600K
49.4 pt (69%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-11400F
36.2 pt (50%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 24174     avg: 24221     median: 24221 (22%)     max: 24268 Points
10235 Points (10%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1991     avg: 2001     median: 2000.5 (85%)     max: 2010 Points
1339 Points (57%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 766     avg: 771     median: 770.5 (86%)     max: 775 Points
502 Points (56%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 9217     avg: 9241     median: 9241 (23%)     max: 9265 Points
3945 Points (10%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 3641     avg: 3642     median: 3642 (23%)     max: 3643 Points
1574 Points (10%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 286     avg: 287.5     median: 287.5 (87%)     max: 289 Points
210 Points (63%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 42.2     avg: 42.3     median: 42.3 (55%)     max: 42.38 Points
17.7 Points (23%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.45     avg: 3.5     median: 3.5 (86%)     max: 3.48 Points
2.2 Points (55%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 10710     avg: 10755     median: 10754.5 (65%)     max: 10799 Points
6210 Points (38%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 67973     avg: 68880     median: 68879.5 (50%)     max: 69786 Points
44220 Points (32%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 110412     avg: 110969     median: 110969 (77%)     max: 111526 Points
57417 Points (40%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 16074     avg: 16155     median: 16154.5 (20%)     max: 16235 Points
8876 Points (11%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 172.189     avg: 174.9     median: 174.9 (2%)     max: 177.592 s
117.2 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 2.518     avg: 2.5     median: 2.5 (1%)     max: 2.527 s
4.1 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 10937     avg: 10967     median: 10967 (17%)     max: 10997 Points
7147 Points (11%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 89527     avg: 89587     median: 89587 (51%)     max: 89647 MIPS
41522 MIPS (24%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6253     avg: 6378     median: 6377.5 (76%)     max: 6502 MIPS
5466 MIPS (65%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 198.6     avg: 198.8     median: 198.8 (69%)     max: 199 fps
91.5 fps (32%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 387     avg: 387.5     median: 387.5 (89%)     max: 388 fps
258 fps (60%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 27.5     avg: 27.6     median: 27.6 (48%)     max: 27.6 fps
13.5 fps (24%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.7 GB/s (0%)
0.8 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 3.1     avg: 3.2     median: 3.2 (54%)     max: 3.2 GB/s
1.4 GB/s (24%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 18.8     avg: 19.1     median: 19.1 (50%)     max: 19.4 GB/s
8.7 GB/s (23%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 37     avg: 161.7     median: 224 (3%)     max: 224 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
135 Seconds (1%)
290.2 Seconds (2%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4048     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.405 sec
0.6 sec (12%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
17627 Points (38%)
13359 Points (28%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 6.471     avg: 6.5     median: 6.5 (1%)     max: 6.58 s
7.8 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 14.876     avg: 14.9     median: 14.9 (1%)     max: 14.993 s
16.9 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 328.929     avg: 331.4     median: 331.4 (1%)     max: 333.798 s
703 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
97718 Points (86%)
57236 Points (50%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 30358     avg: 30419     median: 30419 (82%)     max: 30480 Points
15367 Points (42%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 86734     avg: 86952     median: 86952 (71%)     max: 87170 Points
71688 Points (58%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 87784     avg: 87861     median: 87860.5 (71%)     max: 87937 Points
71496 Points (58%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 88547     avg: 89321     median: 89321 (75%)     max: 90095 Points
74053 Points (62%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 26359     avg: 26394     median: 26394 (67%)     max: 26429 Points
13346 Points (34%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 35386     avg: 35395     median: 35395 (63%)     max: 35404 Points
21144 Points (38%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 17079     avg: 17102     median: 17101.5 (72%)     max: 17124 Points
8468 Points (36%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1967     avg: 1973     median: 1973 (83%)     max: 1979 Points
1575 Points (66%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 16651     avg: 16671     median: 16670.5 (30%)     max: 16690 Points
7681 Points (14%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1931     avg: 1948     median: 1947.5 (8%)     max: 1964 Points
1543 Points (7%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 16497     avg: 16566     median: 16566 (52%)     max: 16635 Points
7679 Points (24%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 8618     avg: 8625     median: 8624.5 (86%)     max: 8631 Points
6836 Points (68%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 60407     avg: 61014     median: 61014 (67%)     max: 61621 Points
30191 Points (33%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 467     avg: 468     median: 468 (1%)     max: 469 ms
654 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
288 Points (83%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 329     avg: 331     median: 331 (69%)     max: 333 Points
255 Points (53%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 2237     avg: 2254     median: 2254 (86%)     max: 2271 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 278     avg: 313     median: 313 (54%)     max: 348 Watt
236 Watt (41%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 245     avg: 265.5     median: 265.5 (48%)     max: 286 Watt
204 Watt (37%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 69.3     avg: 73.3     median: 73.3 (48%)     max: 77.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 12.7     avg: 13.8     median: 13.8 (10%)     max: 14.9 Points per Watt
7.7 Points per Watt (6%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-13600K → 100% n=45

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-11400F → 67% n=45

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 03. 23:38:22

#0 checking url part for id 14626 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13219 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720042702 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14626 +0.004s ... 0.009s

#7 got single benchmarks 14626 +0.006s ... 0.015s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 13219 +0.003s ... 0.018s

#9 got single benchmarks 13219 +0.004s ... 0.022s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.022s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.046s ... 0.067s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.069s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)